IR 05000341/1981006
| ML20037D377 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 06/25/1981 |
| From: | Byron P, Konklin J, Little B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20037D375 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-341-81-06, 50-341-81-6, NUDOCS 8107100153 | |
| Download: ML20037D377 (3) | |
Text
-
.
..
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
Report No. 50-341/81-06 Docket No. 50 341 License No. GPR-87 Licensee: Detroit Edison Company 2000 Second Avenue Detroit, MI 48226 Facility: Enrico Fermi Nuclear Power Stati i, Unit 2 Inspection At:
Fermi Site, Monroe, MI Inspection Conducted: May 1-31, 1981 f(/
<rrr.i N !l -
oM Inspectors:
B. H. Little f.JT-4/
.,
m hh.!c arre7-IA-c
-
P. M. Byron (
.? s
.( /
.s Sci w Approved By:
J. E. Konklin, Ac Chief
[
!_
Reactor Projects Section 2A Inspection Summary Inspection on May 1-31, 1981 (Report No. 50-341/81-06)
Areas Inspected:
Routine resident inspector construction inspection con-sisting af Licensee action on previous inspection findings, IE Bulletin and Circular Followup, Licensee Event Followup, Independent Inspection effort and Plant tours. The inspection involved a total of 87 inspector-hours onsite by two NRC inspectors including 8 inspector-hours onsite during off shifts.
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
8107100153 810625 PDR ADOCK 05000341 G
.
- - -
- -
- -.
-
- - -
-
- -
-
- -
- -
-
.
- - -
_.
.
.
..
.
DETAILS
1.
Persons Contacted T. Alessi, Director Project QA
- W. Fahrner, Manager Fermi 2 Project E. Griffing, Plant Superintendent
,
J. Gessner, Assistant Project QA Director S. Noetzel, Assistant Project Manager D. Wells, Manager Quality Assurance
- Denotes those attending the exit interview.
2.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Open) Noncompliance (50-341/80-20-01) Improper cable pulling practices. The licensee has issued a supplemental response on item of noncompliance 80-20-01.
This response describes action by Detroit Edison with regard to additional NRC concerns on this matter. Follow-up and close out of this matter will be documented in a subsequent inspection report.
3.
IE Bulletin and Circular Followup
-
IE Bulletins issued during this period:
None IE Circulars issued during this period:
81-07, Control of Radioactive Contaminated Material.
The inspector verified that the above circular has been received and is undergoing licensee review.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
Licensee Event Followup Fisher Control Valves, Reported per 10 CFR 50.55(e)
a.
The licensee has issued an interim 10 CFR 50.55(e) report on this matter. The report describes liceusee action taken and planned.
Followup and close out of this matter will be documented in a subsequent inspection report.
b.
Thermal Growth Clearance for CRD Penetrations.
The licensee notified Region III of a potential reportable defi-ciency per 10 CFR 50.55(e). This matter concerns questionable-2-
.
..
.
..
'
clearance for thermal growth of the primary containment vessel with respect to the CRD penetrations in the Biological Shield.
Detroit Edison Engineering is investigating this matter. This matter is assigned open Item No. 341/81-06-01.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5.
Independent Inspection Effort
_
The inspectors met with Detroit Edison personnel at the Detroit and Troy offices to review the licensee's administrative controls for tracking IE Bulletins, Circulars and new issues.
Findings in this matter are as follows:
a.
The licensee has an adequate system for tracking activities resulting from IE Bulletins which require licensee action.
b.
The licensee's tracking system for new issues and IE Bulletins and Circulars issued for information, for which licensee evaluation determined the need for action, lacked feedback verification that the required action had been completed.
Item b above was discussed with licensee management. Changes are planned to provide a closed loop tracking system that would also include verification by Project Quality Assurance.
No items of nonr ompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Plant Tour The inspectors conducted tours of the RHR complex and the Reactor, Auxiliary, and Turbine Buildings. The inspectors observed work control and general housekeeping practices.
Control room activities were also observed including shift turnover and review of control room logs.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
Exit Interview The inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1)
at the conclusion of this inspection period. The inspectors summarized the scope of the inspection findings.
-3-