IR 05000333/1986002
| ML20141N578 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | FitzPatrick  |
| Issue date: | 02/20/1986 |
| From: | Dunlap J, Keimig R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20141N575 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-333-86-02, 50-333-86-2, NUDOCS 8603170167 | |
| Download: ML20141N578 (6) | |
Text
r
.
.
- .& '
.
..
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0lWISSION
REGION I
Report No. 50-333/86-02 Docket No. 50-333 License No. D]2-59 Power Authcrity of the State of New York Licensee:
10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Facility Name:
Inspection At:
Scribs, New York Inspection Conducted: January 13-16, 1986 April 29 - May 3, 1985 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection:
Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspection Type of Inspection:
2'W -8 ep Inspector:
Jac( M. Dunia Phy a
ecurity Inspector date
- $1r 2-&*
A Approved by:
rd'R. Keinig epnief, Safeguards date R
ection,huclead/4aterials & Safeguards Branch Unannounced. Physical Security Inspection on January 13 -
Inspection Summary:
50-333/86-02)
1_6, 1986 (Report No.
Security Plan and Implementing Procedures; Management Areas Inspected:
Effectiveness; Security Organization; Access Control (P The inspection involved 26 hours3.009259e-4 days <br />0.00722 hours <br />4.298942e-5 weeks <br />9.893e-6 months <br /> onsite by one NRC region-Communications.
based inspector.
The licensee was in compliance with NRC requirements in the areas Results:
examined.
060317016786M333 PDR ADOCK O PDR
-
. -. - -. -. ~
---.-------.- - -. --.
. _ -. _ _. -.. - -. - - -.
_, _.
'
~
! * h..
~-
4
.,
j
>
-
,
g,
'
'y t
_
,
,>
>
,
.
,
.
.#
y
..l'
nq
DETAILS
...u,
,
,
-
1 1.-
Key Persons Contacted-0 Converse, Resident Manager..
.
>
,
~ W. Fernandez, Superintendent of Power
,.
E. Sackman, Manager of. Security
'
iT. Teifke, Superintendent of Security-
- J. Haley, Security Supervisor.
,
?A.;'Luptak,6NRC Resident Inspector
'
-
'
s The inspector also 'interviewe'.other plant. employees and members of the
%
d proprietary security force.;
'
'2.-
MC'30703 Exit Interview
,
<
- At the conclusion of the inspection on January 16, 1986, the inspector met with the licensee representatives listed in Paragraph 1 to review the
'
purpose and scope.of the inspection and to present the inspection
. findings.
'
,
No written material was provided to the licensee by the inspector at:
.t anytime during the inspection.
..
3.
MC 92701 - Status of Inspector Follow-up-and Unresolved Items (Closed)InspectorFollow-upItem(50-333/85-11-01):
a.
- '
,
THIS IW"W ?" PNiTAlHS SMm!r?DS
"
INFDEPT 2" ' C B lFli FC1 PU:LIC.
,
L DISCLOS32E,!Ii3 inTEi;TiDilALLY LEFT BLANK.
'
,
' (0 pen)'InspectorFollow-upItem(50-333/84-23-01):
b.
-
>
$
gg visntasa.s'.29!!.!*!mmuc LUTDu,Ng,
W I
.
b
.
_
-
1;*
,
+
k-.
L THIS Pf'M'""3 MtiT7tN3 S:1FEGUUD3 IfG0 W T~' * ~ " m)irg;lPU3UC D!SCLOSTli,6 iiuMENT10NALLY LEFT BLANK.
These modifications, as explained by the licensee, should resolve this matter and will be reviewed upon their completion. The licen::ee plans to submit a security plan change under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(p) to address these modifications and-has implemented appro-
-
'priate compensatory measures.
c.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (50-333/85-11-03): Designated Licensee Vehicle (DLV) List not in compliance.with the intent of 10 CFR 73.55(c)(4). The Division of Safeguards, NMSS, confirmed Region I's understanding of 10 CFR 73.55(c)(4), which differed from the
'
licensee's implemented policy regarding designated licensee vehicles
~(DLV). This information was furnished to the licensee in a telephone call on December 6,1985, by the inspector. The licensee took immed-iate corrective action by revising their DLV list. During this'
inspection, the inspector reviewed a licensee memorandum, dated December 6, 1985 (JSEC-85-188), from the Security Supervisor to the Superintendent of Security which advised that the DLV List had been revised and that all non-New York Power Authority vehicles had been deleted. A review of the DLV list by the inspector and a check of vehicles in the PA confirmed that the licensee's action was effective.
THIS PAFO" I'MU!MWFEBUMD5
!!iF0'"" r
- ' :DT I" PUBLIC DISCLOUi,il.;.aIERT!GliALLY LEFT BLANK.
Because the licensee had taken these supplemental precautions and prompt corrective action when the matter was clarified, this matter is considered resolved.
d.
(0 pen) Unresolved Item (.,0-333/85-11-02):
,
THIS pt
-
l';[I'dPU:UC,,,,, M SVEcuygg INFDU:>5.
,,
DISCLGSum e
>
LEFT BU;yi ** *EIGiDNhlLY t
. -
-
-
-
-
.
-
'f
..
This item will be reviewed upon completion of the change which the
,
licensee comitted to make as soon as possible after winter weather
'
conditions allow.' The licensee will submit a security plan change under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(p)'and has implemented appropriate ' compensatory measures in the interim.
l4.
MC 81018 Security Plan and Implementing Procedures The' James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Station Modified Amended Security Plan (MASP), dated May 16, 1977, with Revision 7, dated August 29, 1984, and implementing procedures were reviewed by the inspector for any changes made since the last physical security inspection. No plans-changes were identified; however, Revision 8 is presently being drafted.
Implementing procedure 5.1.8, Access Control Reactor Drywell, had been revised to incorporate a change unrelated to physical security.
5.
MC 81020 - Management Effectiveness Licensee management appeared to be effectively carrying out its responsibilities with regard to the security program. The inspector observed that the security force displayed a high degree of professional-ism in carrying out their duties and when responding to the inspector's questions. Some program improvements have been made and others are planned.
Improvements consisted of a complete overhaul of the security computer system and an upgrade from paper tape to a disc drive, replace-ment of one-half of the handguns, a new security vehicle, and, an-increase of.6 guards. Planned improvements, over the next three years, include replacenent of the remaining handguns, construction of a new security building, procurement of a new security computer, relocation of the central and secondary alarm stations, and realignmer.t of portions of the protected area fence.
6.
MC 81038 - Records and Reports The inspector reviewed records of foot patrols, key control, designated licensee vehicles, tests of security equipment and the Summary Action Logs. No discrepancies were noted. A review of the two security event reports submitted to the NRC in 1985 revealed them to be factual, timely, and complete.
7.
MC 81052 - Physical Barriers (Protected Areas)
The inspector observed fifty percent of the physical barrier surrounding the protected area and determined that the licensee was maintaining it in accordance with the physical security plan. Deep snow pre /ented the inspector from observing the entire fence in all areas, ho ever, that which could be seen was adequate and appropriate for its intended function.
,
_
x
<
q
_
-
-
P
-
8.
MC 81054'- Physical Barriers (Vital-Areas)
- The, inspector observed that the licensee maintained.the physical barriers i[,
surrounding the vital areas -(VA) in conformance with the physical
,
b
'5-security plan.
I
!'
9.
MC 81066 - Assessment Aids l-L The' inspector observed that the assessment aids utilized by the licensee =
b
~ conformed to security ~ plan requirements and were' adequate and appropriate
'
a
. for their intended funct'
n.
L THIS h UGRAP:! CONTAINS SAFEGUARDS
[
INF0 HUN'0" r>n ISImi FOR PU3LIC DISCLOSTE,li U MTEf;T;0NALLY-10. 'MC 81070 - Access Co r (
sonnel)
!
,
L The inspector determined through. direct observations, interviews, and n
review of records that the licensee controlled personnel access to the
'
'
protected and vital areas in accordance with the security plan. Search.
~;
,
!
equipment was adequate and appropriate for its intended purpose.
L
[
.-11.. MC 81072 - Access Control (Packages)'
'
![
Ob'servatiions by the %spector of the licensee controlling the entry of L
packages'and materials to the protected area, disclosed that the
"
!
procedures followed were in' conformance with the physical security i,'
plan.
Search equipment u' sed was adequate and appropriate for its intended function.
,
[
[
12. MC 81074 - Access Control (Vehicles)
'
I L
L ~.
It was observed by the inspector that the licensee was controlling the
. access of vehicles into the protected areas in accordance with the physical security plan.
<
13. MC 81078 - Detection Aids (Protected Areas)
i
,
t The inspector requested penetration tests of approximately fifty percent F
i of the perimeter intrusion detection system zones. All of the zones i
tested detected the intrusions in accordance with the physical security L
' plan.
V
,
-
14. MC 81080 - Detection Aids (Vital Areas)
%
The intrusion detection system detected inspector requested penetration tests of all vital areas in accordance with the physical security plan.
All of.the VA door card readers were included in the test.
-
>-
!
l L
,
.
'
-
-
_
,
t'- i 3
-
..-
.J.
.9 f.s
>
Fi,
'
i-
'15. 'MC 81084 - Alarm Stations-
.
,
,
..
'The inspector confirmed.through observations ~in the central alarm station-
,.
'(CAS) and'the secondary alarm station (SAS) that they were in conformance with the physical security plan and were adequate and appropriate for-their intended functions. CAS and SAS' operators demonstrated adequate skill and-knowledge in the performance of their duties in response to the
- inspector's inquiries.
'
-16.1 MC 81088.- Consnunications Internal and external communication _ links' established by' the licensee-conformed-to. security plan reouirements' and were adequate and appropriate for their ' intended. function as confirmed by the inspector through observations of communication tests.
'
,
I t
t J
i 1%
-
O
,
.