IR 05000321/1982012
| ML20053A863 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 04/08/1982 |
| From: | Rogers R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20053A840 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-321-82-12, 50-366-82-12, NUDOCS 8205270367 | |
| Download: ML20053A863 (4) | |
Text
.
.
g?
%
o UNITED STATES r
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION U
S E
REGION 11 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100
'4 g
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
Report Nos. 50-321/82-12 and 50-366/82-12 Licensee: Georgia Power Company P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, GA 30302 Facility Name:
Hatch 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366 License Nos. DPR-57 and NPF-5 Inspection at Hatch site near Baxley, Georgia Inspector:
N cvin-n--o 9/f/92-e RpF. Rogers y [/
p Dd te ' Signed Approved by:
b, d+ b f f 2.
V'.
L. Brownlee, Section Chief, Division of Oste'5igned Project and Resident Programs SUMilARY Inspection on flarch 2-20, 1982 Areas Inspected This inspection involved 85 inspector-hours on site in the areas of Technical Specification compliance, housekeeping, operator performance, overall plant operations, quality assurance practices, station and corporate management practices, corrective and preventive maintenance activities, site security procedures, radiation control activities, surveillance activities, and followup of previous identified items.
Results Of the eleven areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified in ten areas, one violation was found in one area (Failure to properly control safety-related valves - paragraph 6).
l 8205270 3b7
..
-
.
_
_
-
.
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- T. Greene, Assistant Plant flanager
- C. T. Jones, Assistant Plant flanager S. Baxley, Superintendent of Operations R. flix, Superintendent of liaintenance C. Coggins, Superintendent of Engineering Services 11. Rogers, Health Physicist
- C. Belflower, QA Site Supervisor Other licensee employees contacted included technicains, operators, mechanics, security force members, and office personnel.
- Attended exit interviews 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on flarch 5,12 and 19, 1982, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings a.
Violations (Closed) (366/81-03-02) Failure to promptly retrieve plant records.
The corrective action detailed in the licensee's April 3,1981 response has been completed. This item is closed.
(Closed) (366/81-14-01 and 02) Isolation of High Drywell Pressure Swi tches.
The corrective action described in the licensee's response dated August 26, 1981 has been implemented.
This item is closed.
(Closed) (321, 366/81-34-01) Failure to properly control special nuclear material.
The additional controls described in the licensee's response dated flarch 2,1982 have been implemented.
This item is closed.
(Closed) (321, 366/81-34-02) Failure to provide an adequate procedure for Residual Heat Removal (RHR) surveillance. Plant procedures HilP-1/2-3160 have been suitably revised as described in the licensee's fiarch 2,1982 response.
This iten is closed.
(Closed) (321, 366/81-34-03) Failure to report in accordance with Technical Specification requirements. The licensee's response to this item dated !! arch 2,1982 has been implemented. This item is close.
.-
.
.
.
b.
Unresolved Item (Closed) (321/79-06-01) Noise level in control room from emergency exhaust fan.
The inspector listened to the running fan and noted that the noise level has been adequately reduced. This item is closed.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Plant Operations Reiiew (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector periodically during the inspection interval reviewed shift logs and operations records, including data sheets, instrument traces, and records of equipment malfunctions.
This review included control room logs and auxiliary logs, operating orders, standing orders, jumper logs and equipment tagout records.
The inspector routinely observed operator alertness and demeanor during plant tours.
During normal events, operator performance and response actions were observed and evaluated. The inspector conducted random off-hours inspection during the reporting interval to assure that operations and security remained at an acceptable level.
Shift I
turnovers were observed to verify that they were conducted in accordance with approved licensee procedures.
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
6.
Plant Tours (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector conducted plant tours periodically during the insoection interval to verify that monitoring equipment was recording as required, equipment was properly tagged, operations personnel were aware of plant
conJitions, and plant housekeeping efforts were adequate.
The inspector also determined that appropriate radiation controls were properly
'
established, critical clean areas were being controlled in accordance with procedures, excess equipment or material is stored properly and combustible material and debris were disposed of expeditiously.
During tours the inspector looked for the existence of unusual fluid leaks, piping vibra-tions, pipe hanger and seismic restraint settings, various valve and breaker positions, equipment caution and danger tags, component positions, adequacy of fire fighting equipment, and instrument calibration dates.
Some tours were conducted on backshifts.
During an inspection of the intake structure on Ibrch 11, 1982, the inspector noted that the inlet valve on the cooling water line to "A"
-
Residual Heat Removal Service Water Pump was not locked open as required.
Plant procedure HNP-1-1117 requires that the valve be locked open and verified by two people. The inspector requested that the licensee verify that the valve was open immediately and it was open.
The failure to maintain this valve in its required conditions is a violation
<
(321/82-12-01).
i
.
.
. -.
,
.
_
,-
.
. _
,.
..
.
.
7.
Technical Specification Compliance (Units 1 and 2)
During this reportin1 interval, the inspector verified compliance with selected limiting
.nditions for operatons (LC0's) and results of selected surveillance tests. These verifications were accomplished by direct observation of monitoring instrumentation, valve positions, switch positions, and review of completed logs and records. The licensee's compliance with selected LCO action statements were reviewed on selected occurrence as they happened.
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
8.
Physical Protection (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector verified by observation and interviews during the reporting interval that measures taken to assure the physical protection of the facility met current requirements. Areas inspected included the organi-zation of the security force, the establishment and maintenance or gates, door and isolation zones in the proper condition, that access control and badging was proper, and procedures were followed.
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
i
i (