IR 05000321/1982016
| ML20058C863 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 06/25/1982 |
| From: | Belisle G, Upright C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20058C850 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-321-82-16, 50-366-82-16, NUDOCS 8207260464 | |
| Download: ML20058C863 (7) | |
Text
' pu:
'o UNITED STATES
%s NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
REGION 11
o 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100
'
o ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
.....
l Report Nos. 50-321/82-12, 50-366/82-16 Licensee: Georgia Power Company P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, Georgia 30302 Facility Name:
Hatch 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-321, 50-366 License Nos. OPR-57, NPF-5 Inspection at Hatch site near Baxley, Georgia, and Corporate Offices in Atlanta, Georgia
/o / 6
+
Inspector:
(
r G. A. Belisle N
/Date/ Signed Approved by:
@ te '
h 27 L
C. M. Upright.'fectj5n Chief
/ Dat(Signed f
Engineering Jptpexion Branch Division of Engineering and Technical Programs SUMMARY Inspection on June 1-4 and 14,1982 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 27 inspector-hours on site and at the corporate offices in the areas of licensee action on previous enforcement matters and licensee action on previously identified inspection findings.
Results Of the two areas inspected, no viola!f ons or deviations were identified.
l 8207260464 820628 PDR ADOCK 05000321 G
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
..
___ ____________.
. _ _ _
.
.
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- C. Belflower, QA Site Supervisor
- T. Elton, Engineering Supervisor Regulatory Compliance
- P.
Fornel, Jr., Assistant QA Site Supervisor
- T. Green, Assistant Plant Manager
- F. Herrington, Senior Quality Control Specialist
- C. Jones, Assistant Plant Manager
- C. Miles, Jr., QA Field Supervisor
- D. Moore, Superintendent Nuclear Training
- H. Nix, Plant Manager D. Savage, Supervisor Nuclear Procurement Stancards
- E. Sorrell, Document Control Supervisor
- R. Tracy, Junior Engineer R. Walker, Quality Assurance Engineer Other licensee employees contacted included technicians, operators, mechanics, and office personnel.
NRC Resident Inspector
- R. Rogers
- P. Holmes-Ray
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on June 4, 1982 with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The licensee acknowl adged the inspection findings.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Matters (92702)
a.
(0 pen) Unresolved Item ( 30. 366/80-28-15):
Environmental Technical Specification 2.1.4.b.
Thi' item was discussed with cognizant NRC personnel and the item cannot be closed until the licensee submits a technical specification change ;o the NRC.
b.
The following tems from inspectico reports 50-321, 366/80-28 were reviewed with
!spect to licensee coriespondence dated Sept'mber 15 and September 23, 380.
(1)
(Closed) Deficiency (321, 366/80-28 i?):
Failure to Control Changes To Purchase Requisitions. The inspector reviewed HNP-803, Material and Services Procurement, hv1; ion 15; HNP-828, Requisition Review for Quality Requirement. Revision 5; and GEN 12250, Preparation and Handling of Nuclear Procurement Document,
- _ _ _ _ -
l
.
.
These procedures delineate how purchase requisitions are processed.
The inspector reviewed the documentation associated with six site generated purchase requisitions (E-10966, H-50321, H-01617, H-50321, G 14261, and C-16836) that were required to be changed by the Procurement Department at the corporate offices in Atlanta, Georgia, and verified that the previously mentioned procedures were being followed.
(2) (Closed) Deficiency (321, 366/80-28-11):
(a)
Failure to Establish Record Location Requirements.
The inspector reviewed HNP-820, Plant Records Management, Revision 13, which delineates the licensee's controls of plant records.
The inspection toured the block house and verified that quality related records are not being stored there.
(b) Failure to Maintain Shipping Damage Inspection Records. The inspector reviewed HNP-800, Materials Receiving, Revision 12.
This procedure provides a method for receipt and initial i n spec.ti on of materials procured for use on site.
The inspector toured the warehouse and verified that receipt inspections were being performed. The inspector reviewed the qualifications of 7 QA personnel and 13 warehouse personnel and verified that they met the requirements of ANSI N 45.2.6.
c.
(Closed) Unresolved (321, 366/81-20-03):
Failure to Meet NRC Grading Criteria on the Annual Requalification Examination.
The inspector presented the Training Supervisor with an NRC position statement relative to NRC grading criteria on annual requalification examina-tions.
The supervisor gave a tentative date of July 1, 1982, to incorporate these grading criteria into existing procedures.
d.
The following items from inspection reports 50-321, 366/81-20 were reviewed with respect to licensee correspondence dated October 8 and November 13, 1981.
(1) (Closed) Violation (321, 366/81-20-01):
(a) Fersonnel Serving In Licensed Capacity Af ter Removal From Licensed Duties The inspector reviewed the records of several plant personnel that had failed their annual requalification examination and verified that they were promptly removed from licensed duties until they were given upgraded training and passed their requalification examinations.
(b) Failure To Meet Requirements Of Approved Requalification program The inspector reviewed the RO and SRO examinations as well as the bank of questions used on examinations and verified that
__
__-___
r
..
.
the tests and depth of questions being asked for R0 and SR0.
examinations appears to be adequate.
(c) Failure To Make Annual Determination Of Licensed Personnel Weak Areas The inspector reviewed the results of several requalification examinations and the time taken to grade these examinations and verified that the examinations were 'being graded in a timely manner (usually within several weeks).
(2) (Closed) Violation (321, 366/81-20-02):
,
(a) Failure To Document Removal Or Reinstatement Of Licensed Privileges To Licensed Shif t Personnel i
The inspector reviewed the records of several personnel that
!
did not successfully pass their requalification examinations and verified that records existed for their removal from licensed duties.
Upon successful completion of the requal-j ification examination, records existed to verify their suc-cessful completion of the examination and reappointment to licensed duties.
j (b) Failure To Store QA Records In Qualified containers
The inspector reviewed the storage locations of licensee i
training records and verified that storage locations appeared to be adequate.
(c) Failure To Maintain' Adequate Records For Requalification
'
J Program Attendance
!
The inspector reviewed the records of eight SRCs and seven
'
R0s and verified that the records accurately reflected the training received.
,
i
e.
The following items from inspection reports 50-321, 366/81-27 were
reviewed with respect to licensee correspondence dated December 30, l
1981, and February 4,1982.
!
(1) (Closed) Violation (321, 366/81-27-01):
Failure To Evaluate Previous Inspections and Tests. The inspector reviewed HNP-807, Control of Test Shop Instrumentation, Revision 7, and verified that the necessary evaluations of equipment found out of calibration are procedurally controlled.
The inspector also i
reviewed evaluation results of eight pieces of M&TE that, when l
calibrated, were found out of tolerance. The following pieces of M&TE were selected for review: L51-G733, F871, T816, G944, G820, G703, G718, and G724.
I i
(2) (Closed) Violation (321, 366/81-27-02): Quality Review Of Plant I
Procedures. The inspector reviewed HNP-25, Quality Assurance
i
)
_ _ _. _ _..,_.
_, _.
.. _ _ _
,
_
_
..
.
.
. _ _ _ _ _
..
_
-
-
.
..
.
Review of _ Plant Procedures, Revision 4, and verified that administrative controls have been established for incorporation of QA comments into safety-related procedures.
Discussions with QA personnel identified that two QA personnel are assigned to review procedures on a rotating basis. Approximately 100 procedures are being reviewed each month.
QA has identified significant procedure deficiencies and these are being addressed by plant
,!
staff by revisions to these procedures.
4.
Unresolved Items
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Inspection Findings (92701)
a.
(Closed) Open Item (321, 366/80-28-27): Temperature Control Of Remote Warehouses. The inspector reviewed licensee documents dated August 25, 1980, (MS-80-4), September 3,1980, (MS-80-51) and January 4, 1982, (QC-82-1) and concluded that, after walkdowns and reclassifications of items by the licensee, proper storage of items in warehouses 2 and 3 is being maintained.
'
b.
(Closed) Inspector F-llowup Item (321, 366/80-28-32):
Followup Housekeeping Inspections. The inspector conducted a tour of U1 and U2
,
i auxiliary and diesel generator buildings.
Housekeeping controls appeared adequate. The inspector reviewed HNP-556, Plant Housekeeping, Revision 6, and also reviewed approximately 30 HNP-556 data sheets for various plant areas and verified that housekeeping inspections were being performed as required.
c.
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (321, 366/80-28-34): Review Of Vendor Performance.
The licensee receives vendor surveys from Southern Company Services and maintains a feedback network from the plant-QA organization on receipt inspection problem that are potentially vendor
,
related.
,
d.
(Closed)
Inspector Followup Item (321, 36t/80-28-35):
Use of Non-Qualified Vendor.
The licensee maintains a detailed Qualified Suppliers List and QA reviews the safety-related purchase requests to insure that only those identified on the list are used,
,
i e.
(Closed) Open Item (321, 366/81-17-01):
Establishment Of Laboratory Quality Assurance Program. The inspector reviewed HNP-7004, Chloride i
Determination (Hach Turbidimetric Method for 50 to 200 ppb). Revision 7; i
HNP-7650, Quality Assurance Program for Environmsntal Test Specs,
'
Revision 1; HNP-7651, Analytical Quality Control fo-Chemical Analysis, Revision 3; HNP-7652, Quality Control Chemi stry Sample Program, Revision 1, and verified that the licensee has established a laboratory quality assurance program. The inspector reviewed t1e analytical data curves for a Perkin Elmer 200 and Beckman DU2 anab sis instruments.
These instruments are used to measure boron and chloride concentraticas
!
respectively.
i i
-.
__
,
_
-
__
,
.-.
..
-
..
_
..
.
,
5 f.
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (321, 366/81-17-02): SRB Member Audit i
Schedules.
The inspector reviewed correspondence dated January 26,
'
1982, from E. F. Cobb to C. E. Belflower verifying that SRB members submitted their schedules of planned audits for 1982. These schedules were submitted by January 15, 1982.
g.
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (321, 366/81-17-03):
SRB Member Qualifications. The inspector reviewed correspondence dated October 1,
!
1981, from H. P. Walker to C. E. Belflower verifying that all SRB members have resumes and these resumes include specific technical disciplines for SRB members.
h.
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (321, 366/81-20-04): Failure To Teach
Industrial Safety In General Employee Training. The inspector reviewed
HNP-203, General Employee Training, Revision 7.
Section 4 of this procedure states that training in industrial safety is accomplished as
.
specified in HNP-505. HNP-505 was deleted March 31, 1981. Discussions i
with the Training Supervisor and Safety Supervisor identified that the i
plant conducts monthly safety meetings and attendance record are kept of personnel attending these lectures.
The Safety Supervisor also stated that GET is conducted for all new employees as delineated in HNP-19, Orientation of New Employees, Revision 12. The licensee agreed
to delete the erroneous reference to HNP-505 in the controlling
!
procedure HNP-203.
i 1.
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (321, 366/81-20-05):
Weaknesses In
!
Presentation Of Training Material During General Employee Training.
!
The inspector reviewed training lesson plans for Emergency and Disaster
'
Procedures and Radiation Safety Orientation. The inspector interviewed three training instructors as to their presentation of ALARA concepts, l.
dose limits imposed by the licensee for workers, radiation exposure as it pertains to 5(N-18), and the interaction of all these. During the interviews the inspector was able to verify that material as presented was not overemphasized as to particular quiz questions, 5(N-18) was not addressed as a " banking system", and slides used for definitions of radiation area and high radiation area accurately reflect 10 CFR 20.202 requirements.
j.
(Closed)
Inspector Followup Item (321, 366/81-27-03):
Record Keeping / Review Practices. QA item 79-pC-1/37 was completed and closed February 12, 1982. During the review of multiple sets of records for closing many of the items discussed in this report, the inspector verified that the data sheets were free of write overs, pencil entries, and missing data. Additionally, the QA department conducted an audit of surveillance and calibration records and found them acceptable. The QC department is developing a program to be implemented during June to perform random sampling of plant records to assure that acceptable recordkeeping practices are maintained.
k.
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (321, 366/81-27-04):
Action On l
Disapproval Of Temporary Procedures.
The inspector reviewed HNP-9, Procedure Writing Use and Control, Revision 19, and verified that administrative controls were added to Section U to assure that an
,
i
-_,_,r_
..,.., _ __....., _,
. _,. _
_
,___._y
. _,, _ _, _,,
_,, _.
_ _ _.
. _ _- __ - _
..
.
evaluation is performed on temporary procedures changes initiated and later cancelled by the PRB and that system configurations are reverified if a temporary procedure change modified that system.
,
l
!
. _.