IR 05000321/1982014
| ML20053E158 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 05/14/1982 |
| From: | Brownlee V, Rogers R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20053E147 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-321-82-14, 50-366-82-14, NUDOCS 8206070657 | |
| Download: ML20053E158 (3) | |
Text
-
-
.
.
'o.
UNITED STATES P
't NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
$
E REGION 11
o 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 k
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 303s3 o
.....
Report Nos. 50-321/82-14 and 50-366/82-14 Licensee: Georgia Power Company P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, GA 30302 Facility Name: Hatch 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366 License Nos. DPR-57 and NPF-5 Inspection at Hatch site near Baxley, Georgia 0.
wY'h,c ;
C'//V/9 2 Inspectar:
-
.
m--
R, 7 Rogers
/ 9
&
04te Signed Approved by:
w 9M-C//V/62-y'/L. Brownlee, Sectlpri,0ffiefgIrivision of Ofte Signed Project and Resident Programs SUMilARY Inspection on !! arch 21 - April 20,1982 Areas Inspected This inspection involved 82 inspector-hours on site in the areas of Technical Specification compliance, housekeeping, operator performance, overall plant operations, quality assurance practices, station and corporate management practices, corrective and preventive maintenance activities, site security procedures, radiation control activities, and surveillance activities.
l Results Of the 10 area:, inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
i 8206070657 020514 PDR ADOCK 05000321 G
.
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- H. Nix, Plant lianager
- T. Greene, Assistant Plant lianager
- C. Jones, Assistant Plant !!anager S. Baxley, Superintendent of Operations R. Nix, Superintendent of !!aintenance C. Coggins, Superintendent of Engineering Services W. Rogers, Health Physicist
- C. Belflower, QA Site Supervisor Other licensee employees contacted included technicians, operators, mechanics, security force members, and office personnel.
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on !! arch 26 and April 19, 1982 with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findugs Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Plant Operations Review (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector periodically during the inspection interval reviewed shift logs and operations records, including data sheets, instrument traces, and records of equipment malfunctions.
This review included control room logs and auxiliary logs, operating orders, standing orders, jumper logs and equipment tagout records. The inspector routinely observed operator alertness and demeanor during plant tours.
During normal events, operator performance and response actions were observed and evaluated.
The inspector conducted random off-hours inspections during the reporting interval to assure that operations and security remained at an acceptable level.
Shift turnovers were observed to verify that they were conducted in accordance with approved licensee procedures.
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were ioentifie '
e
.
6..
Plant Tours (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector conducted plant tour periodically during the inspection interval to verify that monitoring equipment was recording as required, equipment was properly tagged, operations personnel were aware of plant conditions, and plant housekeeping efforts were adequate. The inspector also determined that appropriate radiation controls were properly established, critical clean areas were being controlled in accordance with procedures, excess equipment or material is stored properly and combustible material and debris wera disposed of expeditiously.
During tours the inspector looked for the existence of unusual fluid leaks, piping vibra-tions, pipe hanger and seismic restraint settings, various valve and breaker positions, equipment caution and danger tags, component positions, adequacy of fire fighting equipment, and instrument calibration dates.
Some tours were conducted on backshifts.
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
7.
Technical Specification Compliance (Units 1 and 2)
During this reporting interval, the inspector verified compliance with selected limiting conditions for operations (LC0's) and results of selected surveillance tests. These verifications were accomplished by direct observation of monitoring instrumentation, valve positions, switch positions, and review of completed logs and records. The licensee's compliance with selected LC0 action statements were reviewed on selected occurrences as they happened.
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
8.
Physical Protection (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector verified by observation and interviews during the reporting interval that measures taken to assure the physical protection of the l
facility net current requirements. Areas inspected included the organi-zation of the security force, the establishment and maintenance of gates, doors and isolation zones, in the proper condition, that access control and badging was proper, and procedures were followed.
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
-