IR 05000321/1982002
| ML20041C865 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 02/02/1982 |
| From: | Brownlee V, Rogers R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20041C853 | List: |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737 50-321-82-02, 50-321-82-2, 50-366-82-02, 50-366-82-2, NUDOCS 8203020618 | |
| Download: ML20041C865 (3) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:F . . RE:n .
UNITED STATES 1, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION $ E REGION 11 &[ 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 , +**** Report Nos. 50-321/82-02 and 50-366/82-02 Licensee: Georgia Power Company P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, GA 30302 Facility Name: Hatch 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366 License Nos. DPR-57 and NPF-5 Inspection at Hatch site near Baxley, Georgia Inspector: /N $ b ;;f-e, .2 /2/92-RFF. Reger N
9 Date Signed A[ [[9 7__ Approved by: z74( fttu V.L.[frownlee,SectionChief,Divisionof Date Signed Resident and Reactor Project Inspection SUttilARY Inspection on December 21, 1981 - January 20, 1982 Areas Inspected This inspection involved 68 inspector-hours on site in the areas of Technical Specification cr.pliance, housekeeping, operator performance, overall plant operations, quality assurance practices, station and corporate management practices, corrective and preventive maintenance activities, site security procedures, radiation control activities, surveillance activities, and TitI Task Action Items.
Resul ts Of the 11 areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
, 8203020618 820202 gDRADOCK 05000321 PDR i .-. . .-
. . DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees M. lianry, Plant fianager
- T. Greene, Assistant Plant flanager
- C. T. Jor.es, Assistant Plant flanager S. Baxley, Superintendent of Operations R. Nix, Superintendent of flaintenance C. Coggins, Superintendent of Engineering Services W. Rogers, Health Physicist
- C. Beiflower, QA Site Supervisor Other licensee employees contacted included technicians, operatcrs, mechanics, security force members, and office personnel.
- Attended exit interview
?. Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 20, 1982 with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspectec.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Plant Operations Review (Units 1 and 2) The inspector periodically during the inspection interval reviewed shift logs and operations records, including data shee's, instrument traces, and recur ds of equipment malfunctions.
This review ir.cluded control room logs and auxiliary logs, operating orders, standing orders, jumper logs and equipment tagout records. The inspector routinely observed operator alertness and demeanor during plant tours. During normal events, operator performance and response actions were obsc ved and evaluated.
The inspector conducted random off-hours inspections during the reporting intervai to assure that onerations and security remained at an acceptable level.
Shift turnovers were observed to verify that they were conducted in accordance with approved licensee procedures.
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
s
.. .
6.
Plant Tours (Units 1 and 2) The inspector conducted plant tours periodically during the inspection interval to verify mat monitoring equipment was recording as required, equipment was properly tagged, operations personnel were aware of plant conditions, and plant housekeeping efforts were adequate.
The inspector also determined that appropriate radiation controls were prc, erly established, critical clean areas were being controlled in accordance with procedures, excess equipment or material is stored properly and combustible mater!al and debris were disposed of expeditiously. During tours the inspector looked for the existence of unusual fluid leaks, piping vibra-tions, pipe hanger and seismic restraint settings, various valve and breaker oositions, equipment caution and da9ger tags, component positions, adequacy of fire fighting equipment, and instrument calibration datus.
Some tours were conducted on backshifts.
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
7.
Technical Specification Comr.11ance (Units 1 and 2) During this reporting interval, the inspector verified compliance with selected limiting conditions for operations (LCO's) and results of selected surveillance tests. These verifications were accomplished by direct observation of monitoring instrumentation, valve positions, switch positions, and review of completed logs and records. The licensee's compliance witn selected LC0 action statements were reviewed on selected occurrence as they happened.
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
8.
Physical Prote;tica (Units 1 and 2) The inspector verified by 3bservation and interviews during the reporting interval that measures taken to assure the physical protection of the facility met current requirements. Areas inspected included the organi-zation of the security force, the establishment and maintenance of gates, door and isolation zones, in the proper condition, that access control and badging was proper, and procedures were followed.
Within the os eas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
9.
URC Task Action Plant Requirements Review (NUREG 0737) (Units 1 and 2) The inspector has raviewed the licensee implementation of various require-ments associated with the NRC Task Action Plant (TAP) in response to the Three flile Island accident. Of fourteen items which were due for completion on 1/1/82, none were completed.
Exemption requests have been submitted to the NRC for these items. riost of the issues relate to hardware availablity.
Within the areas inspscted, no violations or deviations were identified. }}