IR 05000309/1989014
| ML20246F870 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Maine Yankee |
| Issue date: | 08/21/1989 |
| From: | Anderson C, Roy Mathew NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20246F862 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-309-89-14, NUDOCS 8908310156 | |
| Download: ML20246F870 (7) | |
Text
,
_,.-__- -.
. _ - - -
-_
- -
.
__.
.
-
-- -
A-j o
,
L.
.
.
j;
-
p
U.S.' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'
.
REGION I-
..
.
-
- Report No. :50-309/89-14
' Docket No. 50-309'
License No. DPR-36
'
Priority -
Category-C
-
--
Licensee: Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company-83 Edison Drive Augusta, Maine 04336-
'
Facility Name: ' Maine Yankee Inspection:At: Wiscasset; Maine Inspection Conducted: July 24 - 28,'1989
~
' Inspector:
-'9e4 k W Ell 7/f 7
'
.
R. K. Mithew, eactor Engineer.
date O
Approved by:
U 8 f/ P9 C. J. Anderson, Chief, Plant Systems Section date
,
' Inspection' Summary:
Inspection on July 24-28, 1989 (Report No. 50,-32/89-14)
Areas Inspected: Routine unannounced inspection of the Fire Protection / Prevention Program including: program admiaistiation and organization; administrative control of comous?, Wies: administrative e entrol
'taf ignition sources; other administrative controls; equipment maintenance,
inspection and tests; fire brigade trnning; periodic inspectior.s ar.d gusif ty 1j assurance audits; and facility tours.
.
. fnults: Of the areas inspected, no violations were iGentified.
e908310156 890822 PDR ADOCK 05000309
,
o PDC
'
,
_ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ -. _ _ _ _ _. _ _. _ _ _.. _ _ _
-
]
- _ _ _ _
- _ _ _ - - - _ -
-
.
l Details 1.0 Persons Contacted 1.11 Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company (MYAPCO)
,
- E. T. Boulette, Vice President, Operations / Plant Manager
- *S. Brown, Fire Protection Coordinator
- J. Brinkler,. Department Head, Technical Support.
l
- S. T. Leclerc, QP Section Head
- S. E. Nichols, Licensing Supervisor 1.2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission'(NRC)
- R. Freudenberger, Resident' Inspector
'*J. R. Johnson, Chief, Project Branch 3
- Denotes those present at the exit meeting.
E 2.0 Fire Protection / Prevention Program (64704)
The-inspector reviewed several documents in the following areas of the program to verify that the licensee had. developed and implemented adequate procedures consistent with the Fire Hazard Analysis (FHA), Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), and Technical Specifications (TS). The documents reviewed, the scope of review, and the inspection findings for each area of the program are described in the following sections.
2.1 Program Administration and Controls fest I,qnition Sources and Combustible Materials The inspectee reviewed the pracedures in Attachment i 'v.
verify that the Fire Protection Program, as described in tne ?SAR and other licensing documer.ts, is prrperly inplemerted.
The scope of the review was to escerte.in that:
Personnel vere desigrated for implementing the program at the
vite; Qualifications were delineated for personnel designated to
implement the program; Special authorization for the use of combustible, flammable or
explosive hazardous material in safety-related areas; Prohibition on the storage of combustible, flammable or
explosive hazardous material in safety-related areas;
_ _ _ - _ _ - - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
__ -- -
---
-.
-_. _ _ _
L<
.:,
a,
,
,
.
-
'
3'
The removal of all wastes, debris, rags, oil. spills or other
combustible materials resulting from the work activity or at.
the end of.each work shift, whichever,is sooner; Periodic inspection for accumulation of combustibles;.
-*-
Transient combustibles to be restricted and controlled in
safety-related areas; Housekeeping to.be properly maintained in areas containing
safety related equipment and components;
. Requirements for.special authorization (work permit) for
. activities involving welding, cutting, grinding, open flame or other. ignition sources' and that they are properly -safeguarded in areas containing. safety-related equipment and components; Prohibition on smoking in safety-related areas, except where
" smoking permitted" areas'had been specifically designated by plant management; Work' authorization, construction permit or similar arrangement
is provided for review and approval cf modification, construction and maintenance activities which could adversely affect the safety of.the facility:
Fire brigade organization and qualifications of brigade members
are del $neated; J
Fir:e reperting ir.;tructions for general plant pertonnel are
<
. developed;
~
!
Periodic audits are to be conducted on the enties fire l
protectiori program; and Fire protection / prevention program is included in the
licensee's QA Program.
The review of these documents and the inspection of the areas described did not identify any unacceptable conditions.
2.2 Equipment Maintenance, Inspection and Test The inspector reviewed several surveillance and testing procedures to determine whether the licensee had developed adequate procedures
!
which established maintenance, inspection, and testing requirements for the plant fire protection equipment.
In addition, the inspector reviewed test records for the carbon dioxide (c 2) systems installed in cable vault, protected cable tray area, unprotected cable tray a __-
_ _ _ _ _ -
_ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ -
_
_
_.
-..
- -.
j
-
,
4 area, conta'inment' motor control center and containment electrical penetration to verify that each system is capable of performing its
required function.
No unacceptable conditions were identified.
'
2.3 Fire Brigade Training
]
2.3.1 Procedure Review i
The inspector reviewed the Fire Brigade Training Program
{
to verify that this program includes:
q l
a.
~ Requirements for announced and unannounced drills; j
b.
Requirements for fire brigade training and retraining at prescribed frequer.cies; c.
Requirements fo* at least one drill per year to be performed on backshift for each brigade, d.
Requirements for maintenance training records e.
Requirements for minimum of 2 drills for each brigade member per year.
14o unacceptable conditions were identified.
2.3.2 Records Review i
The 'uspector reviewed training records of fin brigaos members fer 1989 to verify that tney had attended the required quarttriy training, participated
',n a quarterly drill, and yearly hands-on training on fire extinguishing practice.
The inspector observed an announced fire drill to evaluate the brigade's response actions, brigade leader's tactics,
'
planning, decisive instructions and communication skills.
The inspector also observed the folicw-up critique of the drill with all fire brigade members.
No unacceptable conditions were identified.
2.4 Periodic Inspections and Quality Assurance Audits The inspector reviewed QA audits MY-89-10, MY-88-10 and internal audits of the Fire Protection Program.
The scope of the review was to ascertain that the audits are conducted in accordance with the technical specifications and, that audit findings are being resolved
- _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ - _ -
- _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _.
.-..
,
~
.-
i
.
l l
in a timely and satisfactory manner.
Some of the problem areas i
identified during the previous NRC inspections and QA audits were:
1.
Inoperable fire doors and failure to list all fire doors in the procedure.
2.
Inoperable emergency lights.
]
3.
Technical Specification related fire protection valves were not cycled due to insufficient procedures.
4.
Snoke detectors exceeded the six months testing schedule.
5.
3 Fire brigade members missed their minimum requirement of 2 drills for calendar year 1988.
6.
Not all fire barriers were included in the Fire Protection Program.
The inspector noticed that inadequate staffing is the chief weakness in the fire protection program.
The fire protection coordinator had other responsibilities besides that of maintaining the fire program.
Licensee management decided that increased attertion to Fire Protec-tion requirements was warranted, based on the discrepancies identi-
)
fied. Management deciced to assign a full-time Fire Prorection
'
Coordinator and two Fire Protection Assist,nts te bandle the rire Protection problems. The licensee had taken pr3 mot corrective
,
actions to correct all the identified discrepancies. At this time, j
the licensee has a tracking system to perform all surveillance tests,
-
and to develop schedules for trackirg fire brigade training and drills. All the deficient procedures were reviewed and updated.
Fire Protectirn deficiency report items vere given a high priority.
l Licensee oersonnel statea chat all of the Fire Protection Procedures
'
will be reviewed and updated by April 1990.
I The inspector noted that in a previous NRC inspection report (86-12),
the licensee agreed to investigate the possibility of adding an odor or scenting agent to the c system for personnel protection. During
this inspection, the licensee stated that they are planning to make this modification during the next refueling outage.
No unacceptable conditions were identified.
l 3.0 Facility Tour The inspector examined fire protection water systems, including fire pumps, fire water piping and distribution systems, post indicator valves, l
hydrants and contents of hose houses.
The inspector toured accessible vital and non vital plant areas and examined fire detection and alarm l
l
_ _ _ _ _ _
_
_
_ _.
.
.
-_
-
.
.
.
--4
- ,
e
6 systems ~, automatic and manual fixed suppression. systems, interior hose stations, fire barrier penetration seals, and fire doors. The inspector observed general plant housekeeping conditions and randomly checked tags of portable extinguishers for evidence of periodic inspections.
No deterioration of equipment was noted..The inspection tags attached to extinguishers indicated that monthly inspections were performed.
I No unacceptable conditions were identified.
4.0 Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee management representatives (see Section 1.0 for-attendees) at the conclusion of the inspection on July 28,.1989.
The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection at that time. The inspector also confirmed with the licensee that the report will not contain any proprietary information. The licensee agreed that the inspection report may be placed in the Public Document Room without
. prior licensee. review for proprietary information.
At no time during this inspection was written material provided to the licensee by the inspector.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _
i
____-__ - _ -
Q ?jf;+
.
.
.g-ATTACHMENT I Fire Program
.
Proceoures Reviewed Procedure No.13.19.1, Revision 7
-
Carbon dioxide. system te' sting.
Procedure No~. 3'19.3,_
Revision,11
'
. Smoke detector testing-
-
.
Procedure No. 19.1, Revision 8 Fire emergency
. _.
-
Procedure No.;19.'7, Revision 4.
. Welding,. cutting, and ignition.
-
>
source safety; procedure Procedure No. 19.6,=
. Revision 7'
Fire training
-
. Procedure No. 19.28, '
Control of transient flammable Revision 3
-
'
and' combustible solids, liquids and gases.
Procedure No. 19.2, Revision 9 Fire equipment. inspection
-
' Procedure No. 3.19.5, Revision 4
' Fire cump capacity test.
-
' Procedure Not 19.12,-
Revision 6 Fire cours
-
Procedure:No. 19.29, Revisior, 7 '
Fire dcor access and repair
-
guidelines Y
Prccedure No. 3.39.2.1, Revision 2 Yearly fire main system functional
-
test and flush
.Pecteduts R6. 3.19.6.1, Revision 4 Fire system isolation valve
-
testing Procedure No. 3.19.11, Revision 5 Fire barrier penetration seeling
-
Procedure No. 19.4,-
Revision 10 Remote battery pack emergency
-
lighting system
.
Corrective action procedures QA Procedure No. 0-16-1, Revision 3
-
QA Procedure No. 0-16-3, Revision 2
-
Discrepancy reporting procedure
Technical Specifications, Section 5, Administrative controls Fire Protection Plan, Revision 9 l-
_ _ _ _ _
- _ _ - -_ _--...---__ _-
- - _
_