IR 05000302/1975002
| ML19319C727 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 02/18/1975 |
| From: | Robert Lewis, Troup G, Whitt K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19319C722 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-302-75-02, 50-302-75-2, NUDOCS 8003030844 | |
| Download: ML19319C727 (6) | |
Text
.
,
,
.
...
.
UNITED STATES
.J
.4UCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ^3
'
REGloN 11 W
230 PEACHTR EE STREET, N. W.
SulTE SIS ATLANTA. GEO RGI A 30303 Y
.
.
IE Inspection Report No. 50-302/75-2 Licensee:
Florida Power Corporation
,
3201 34th Street South Post Office Box 14042 St. Petersburg, Florida 33732
'l Facility Name: Crystal River 3
.
Dociet No.:
50-302 License No.:
CPPR-51 Category:
A3/B1
+
Location:
Crystal River, Florida Type of License: B&W, PWR, 2452 Mwt, 855 Mwe
,
Type of Inspection: Routine, Announced Dates of Inspection: January 27-31, 1975 O
Dates of Previous Inspection: January 14-17, 1975
,
Inspector-in-Charge:
G. L. Troup, Radiation Specialist Reactor Facility Section Radiological and Environmental Protection Branch Accompanying Inspector: None Other Accompanying Personnel: None Principal Inspector:
1(? st,d',
r*/9<*.
_.#U c. ~ b K. W. Whitt, Reactor (Inspector
//
Date Facilities Section 6"
,
'
Facilities Test and Startup Branch Reviewed by:
h-O o8[/(/'J4
~~
R.C.LewisySeniorReacporInspector
'Dat6 Facilities Section Facilities Test and Startup Branch
'
SDT TO: PDR MRg
&gosuT g %
KS5C tic '
- 2 (
Y A
~
z a
g
/
x
%es 6 f 8008030
.
y
-
.-
,
.
-
.
..
.. -.. - -
- .
--
-
.
_
}
IE Rpt. No. 50-302/75-2-2-j
\\~ J
.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
,
.
I.
Enforcement Items None
,
.
II.
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Enforcement Matters r-Not applicable.
.
III. New Unresolved Items
.
75-2/1 Audits of Radiological Environmental Monitoring Contractors
'
,
j Audits, inspections or reviews apparently have not been conducted of the activities of the radiological environmental monitoring contractors.
(Details I, paragraph 2)
.
75-2/2 Initial Calibration of Meteorology Facility Calibration procedures and records for the new meteorology facility are not in the possession of the licensee and have not been reviewed to assure that the calibration was adequate.
(
(Details I, paragraph 3)
75-2/3 Periodic Calibration of Meteorology Facility A program for the quarterly maintenance and calibration of
,
the meteorology facility has not been developed 11though the facility is. presently in operation.
(Details I, paragraph 4)
IV.
Status of Previously Reported Unresolved Items
.
Not applicable.
l V.
Design Changes
None VI.
Unusual Occurrences None VII. Other Significant Findings None v
.
-.y
-
_,., _ _ _
.y.
-_%m.,
,.
g._.,,,,--_..,-,
,,m..s.,...-
..
.
-.
. -..
.. -
.
. _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _
. _ _ _ _
_.. _.. _
-3'
.
.
IE Rpt. No. 50-302/75-2-3
-
'
.
.
,
VIII. Management Interview A management interview was conducted January 31, 1975, to discuss the findings of the inspection.
The following licensee personnel attended:
)
Florida Power Corporation (FPC)
'
H. L. Bennett - Director, Generation Construction
,
P. F. McKee - Assistant Nuclear Plant Superintendent R. W. Slater - Quality Engineer
,
J. R. Wright - Health Physics Supervisor D. W. Pedrick, IV - Compliance Engineer
'
H. B. Lucas, III - Compliance Auditor
,
J. C. Hicks - Quality Engineer
..
,
The new unresolved items in Section III were discussed.
(Details I, paragraphs 2-5)
.
}
,
.
'
,
,
e i
!
.
I
i
.
.
-
...
~
- - :..
.
.
.. -
. - -.
. -- -
--...
-.- -.-
..
.
-
,
_
..
.ma.
..
IE Rpt. No. 50-307/75-2
.I-l
,_s
.s DETAILS I Prepared by:
"7[
G. L. Tsou'p, Radiption Specialist Date Reactor Facility Section Radiological and
.ironmental Protection Br
-
Dates of Inspection:
anuary 27-31, 1975 Reviewed by:
%
2!#
,
A. F. Gibson, Senior Health Physicist Date
-
Reactor Facility Section Radiological and Environmental
-
Protection Branch
'
.
1.
Individuals Contacted
,
.
' Florida Pt ver Corporation (FPC)
a.
G. P. Beatty, Jr. - Nuclear Plant Superint'endent P. F. McKee - Assistant Nuclear Plant Superintendent D. W. Pedrick, IV - Compliance Engineer O'
' J. R. Wright - Health Physics Supervisor W. H. Cox - Assistant Chemistry and Radiation Protection Engineer i
G. R. Westafer - Technical Support Engineer
,
-
M. H. Kleinman - Director, Quality Programs Department E. E. Froats - Manager, Site Surveillance R. W. Slater - Quality Engineer E. C. Simpson - Licensing Engineer b.
Contractor Organizations State of Florida Department'of Health and Rehabilitative Services J. C. Eakins - Public Health Physicist
J. B. Dumas - Public Health Physicist
,
University of Florida Department of Environmental Engineering R. King - Laboratory Technician e
'
<
.
V
,
,
..--
.~. -
.-
_ _. _.. -
_
_
-..... _, _
......, _. ~. _.
..
. - - - -
-.. ~.
. -
.
.
-.
.
.
-.. _ _ _. _ _
.._---_.
- .
-
.
..
'
.
IE Rpt..No..-50-302/75-2
- I-2
\\
.
2. -Audits of Radiological Environmental Monitoring Contractors t
. a.
The radiological environmental monitoring. program is being
[
conducted by contract with the State of Florida Department of *
Health and Rehabilitative Services, Radiological and Occupational l
Health Section and the University of Florida Department of Environ -
mental Engineering.
The State of Florida has been conducting the
-
. program since 1969 while the University of Florida has been involved since 1971.
,
V
~
b.
The inspector asked what audits, inspections or reviews had i.
been conducted of the contractors' programs and operations to
,
E assure that the contractors are capable of performing the work
,
and maintaining control of their activities. A licensee management
i representative stated that no audits had been conducted by
,_
i
- Quality Assurance personnel as the preoperational environ-
!
mental. monitoring program was not considered to be a safety related, activity.
He further stated that-the operational environ-mental monitoring program would be under the operational quality
'
-
assurance program and that later this year a program will be
developed which identifies those activities in the operational l
environ-ental monitoring program which are considered to be safety
related and which implements the quality assurance program.
[
c.
A licensee representative stated he was not aware of any inspections r
or audits which had been made but that the matter would be reviewed I.
and, if no records were available, audits or-inspections would be j
initiated.
Licensee management concurred with this action.
i i
3.
Initial Calibration of Meteorology Facility k
.
a.
A new meteorology facility was installed on the site in December 1974, j
to conform to Regulatory Guide 1.23.
The instrumentation'was installed l
by Climet Instruments Company.
Data are being collected and sent to a
<
-
[
meteorology consultant for analysis to obtain one year of data prior to receipt of an operating license.
i
b.
The inspector asked a licensee representative if the instrumentation
had been. calibrated prior to1the start of data collection,as there
-were no calibration stickers on the instruments, and if the calibration j-records were in.the possession of the licensee.
After investigating
,
!
the matter, a licensee representative advised the inspector that the
'
'. initial calibration o' the instruments had bee-74rformed by Climet
-
. Instruments Company but that the calibration p.ocedures and records were not in the-possession of the licensee.
The representative further
-
[
stated that the calibration procedures and records would be requested
.
i, from C11 met Instruments Company. At the conclusion of the inspection, a
b I
\\s
+
4
..
.
,
7ED WE"'
$
- T'
d'?'{+TETPP
@e
- c w-
'u
'pe
r g -g mc w -qm--s
g oe=wy--
+
eT**NC**S't6-"+'t="es,+W-pgw Vn wn y pl. - p,g em esp y g-tm g-yr=p*bgr-yw w7t*'Wii--=qWefege"**-r--g-Wve
.
_
---
-.
--
'
O
_)
..
IE Rpt. No. 50-302/75-2 I-3 O
k_-
.
s licensee representative advised the inspector thht the calibration
,
procedures and records had been requested and were expected to be
,
received during the week of February 3, 1975. A licensea repre-sentative stated that when the records were received they would be
'
reviewed for adequacy and any additional action needed would be initiated.
Licensee management concurred with this action.
,
4.
Periodic-Calibration of Meteorology Facility
,
,
'
t a.
FSAR Section 2.3.3, Onsite Meteorological Measurements Program, describes the meteorology facility which was formerly installed
-
and states, ir. part, "FPC personnel.... perform routine maintenance
.
and calibration on a quarterly basis...." In response to a
.
question by the inspector, licensee representatives stated the new
-
meteorology facility would also be calibrated on a quarterly' basis.'
However, the licensee representatives stated that the program and
,
procedures for the quarterly maintenance and calibration had not been prepared pending receipt of the initial calibration procedures and results from Climet Instruments Company (see paragraph 3-above).
Once the material is received, a program will be developed by FPC in conjunction with the meteorology consultant.
Licensee management concurred with this action.
b.
At the present time, checks are being made of the facility for
,
(,,
operability three times a week and a weekly surveillance check is made in accordance with procedure SP-157, " Meteorological System Surveillance." Licensee representatives stated that these checks will continue on through operations.
c.
The inspector emphasized to licensee representatives tne need to develop the maintenance and calibration program in a timely manner so that no gaps develop in the callection of meteorology data and the commitment for one year of meteorology data is met.
Licensee
,
management acknowledged this comment.
L
\\
)
s_ -.
y y
.. _.,
.. _.
-
-,,
,,
,
.,.