IR 05000302/1975006
| ML19317G411 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 04/18/1975 |
| From: | Robert Lewis, Rob Parker, Whitt K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19317G405 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-302-75-06, 50-302-75-6, NUDOCS 8003030815 | |
| Download: ML19317G411 (9) | |
Text
.
/%
/().
)
,/,\\
UNITED STATES t,
)
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION il
.
230 PE ACHTREE STR EET. N. W. SUITE St 8 ATLANTA. GEO R GI A 30303
,
.
IE Inspection Report No. 50-302/75-6
,
Licensee:
Florida Power Corporation
-
3201 34th Street South Post Office Box 14042 St. Petersburg, Florida 33732
.
.-
Facility Name:
Crystal River 3 Docket No.:
50-302 License No.:
CPPR-51 Category:
B1
,
Location: Crystal River, Florida Type of License:
B&W, PWR, 2452 Mat, 855 Mwe si j
Type of Inspection: Routine, Announced Dates of Inspection: April 8-11, 1975 Dates of Previous Inspection: April 2-4,1975 (Construction)
March 25-28,1975 (Test)
Inspector-in-Charge:
R. C. Parker, Reactor Inspector Nuclear Engineering Section Facilities Test and Startup Branch Accompanying Inspectors:
F. Jape, Reactor Inspector Facilities Section Facilities Test and Startup Branch
%
C. E. Alderson, Reactor Inspector Nuclear Engineering Section Facilities Test and Startup Branch Other Accompanying Personnel: None l
l (
/
~
UTIO4 8003030
/b
- 76 198
._.
._
_
._
_
_. _...
._
-
.. _ _ _
.
,
3.
,
,
,
!
1-
-2-4't7-75 Principal Inspector:
(Lt tx _
%v K. W. Whitt, Reactor Inspector
- Date
. Facilities Section i
Facilities Test and Startup Branch i
Reviewed by:
8. d.
LWMO N
$
.
R. C. Lewis, Senior Reactor Inspector Date
,
Facilities Section
-
Facilities Test and Startup Branch
'
.
.
.
[
..
'
e
.
)
i
)
]
-
,
e i
i
.
O
^
.
-
-, _, _
_
.
,
..
-
.
-
--
, - -
_.
.
'
y
.-
- /v.
I (V IE Rpt. No. 50-302/75-6-3-
,
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
'
.
Enforcement Items-
'
.
None
'
I II.
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Enforcement Action Not' inspected. This was not within the scope of this inspection.
~
III. New Unresolved Items
~
,
"
75-6/1 Records Management ODetails, paragraph 3)
'
IV.
Status of Previously Reported Unresolved Items l
Not inspected. This was not within the scope of this inspection.
V.
Unusual Occurrences None VI.
Other Significant Findings
.
N ne o
i VII.
Management Interview
'
A management interview was held on April 11, 1975, to discuss the inspection findings.
The following personnel attended that meeting:
Florida Power Corporation (FPC)
J. Alberdi - Manager, Nuclear Operations M. Kleinman - Director Quality Programs E.' Froats - Manager, Site Surveillance G. Beatty, Jr. - Nuclear Plant Superintendent i
H. Bennett - Director, Generation Construction D. Pedrick, IV - Compliance Ergineer W. Shields - Manager, Qual'cy Procurement Surveillance and Testing J. Clapp - Manager, Quality Surveillance Audits J. Hobbs, Jr. - Manager, Generation Testing R. Slater - Quality Engineer R. Cosmer - Secretary i
l
,
[
,
-
-
~.
.
-
,.
.
. _, _..
..
...
.
.
-
.
_.
.
- ^
.
"
,*.
t IE Rpt. No. 50-302/75-6-4-
-
.
.
A.
The inspectors stated that the purpose of the inspection was to
'
review administrative controls and quality assurance for plant
activities that would occur during the test phase of plant life.
In addition, they stated that implementation of these administra-
-
tive controls was also reviewed.
'
B.
The unresolved item identified in Section III above was discussed.
'
C.
Other areas inspected and the associated findings were also dis-
~
cussed.
Specific findings are described in the report details.
"
,
h
. ~
i
!
I
.
.
E l
'
s
.
-.,,,.
.
. _.. -
-..
.. -
-
..
.
_
.
.....,
.-.
.._.w..
,. -
-\\
,,
[
'
(,/'
IE Rpt. No. 50-302/75-6-1-Details Prepared by:
d-l'I" 75
e
,
.
R. C. Parker, Reactor Inspector
'Date Nuclear Engineering Section Facilities-Tesfand Startup Branch C _f 'Q, (
i
.
.h.
W. \\ o
-
- s 2., ~
4 iT 'W
C. E. Alderson, Reactor Inspector Date
'
Nuclear Engineering Section Facili {es Test and Startup Branch 4 0,14 NA
-
~0 ~?
F. Mape, Reactor Ins 6 top Date
Facilities Section
Facilities Test and Startup Branch Dates of Inspection: Apri 8-11, 1975 Reviewed by:
<--.--
W. C. Seidle p Acting Senior Inspector Date Facilities Test and Startup Branch 1.
Individuals Contacted Florida Power Corporation (FPC)
J. Hobbs - Manager, Generation Testing E. Froats - Manager, Site Surveillance D. Pedrick, IV - Compliance Engineer W. Shields - Manager, Quality Procurement Surveillance and Testing J. Clapp - Manager, Quality Surveillance Audits R. Slater - Quality Engineer G. Walker - Manager, Field Testing A. Vogt - Testing S,erintendent (Instrumentation)
J. Kelly - Testing Superintendent (Mechanical)
J. Kowalchick - Test Supervisor
C. Pope - Administrative Manager W. Turner - Data Collection Supervisor R. Cunningham - Chief I&C Technician R. Cosmer - Secretary J. Rinne - Superintendent Testing Quality Control J. Poore - Test Supervisor T. Baker - Records Supervisor J. Barrett - Quality Engineer J. A. Jones (n)
A. Montrief - Receiving Inspdction and In-Storage Inspection V
.
-
_
_
_
.._
'
~
,
.
-
t
,
-
%
.
.IE Rpt. No. 50-302/75-6-2-
.
.
2.
Quality Assurance - Review and Audit
.
,.
-The Site Surveillance and the. Quality Surveillance and Audit Groups have the primary responsibilities for review and audit of quality related activities.
Training of QA personnel is the responsibility -
'
of the Procurement Surveillance and Training Group. The documented
,
policies and procedures which establish the responsibilities of
',
these groups and procedures which specify how these groups will.
-
function were reviewed. The purpose of the r. view was to determine conformance to commitments contained in Sections 1.7 and 13 of the'
'
FSAR. Training plans and schedules,'and reports of reviews and audits performed were reviewed to measure the effectiveness of
.
'
-
'
'
their programs.
Specific procedures reviewed include:
,.
Policy 1.1, Organizational. Structure and Functional Responsibilities
-
Policy 2.1, Quality Program Development and Implementation
-
-
Policy 10.1, Control of Inspection Activities
'
-
Policy 18.1, Quality Program Audits
'
-
QP 1.10, Quality Program Organization - Design and Construction
-
QP 15.10, Nonconformance Control
-
,
QP 18.11, FPC Quality Program Compliance. Audits - Design and Construction 1
-
-
QAP 9, Quality Program Implementation Audits f
-
QAP 10, Evaluation and Surveillance Activities QAP 12, Evaluation of Transition From Construction to Test
-
QAP 13, Evaluation of Tests
!
-
QAP 14, Evaluation of Test Results Documentation
-
)
Within those areas inspected, no discrepancies were identified.
}
3.
Test Program QA Records The Test Program Guide, Generation Testing Manual and various procedures were reviewed to determine that administrative controls for the accumula-tion and preservation of QA Records are consistent with the comnitments contained in Sections 1.7 and 13.2 of the FSAR.
Specific precedures
reviewed include:
j-QP-17.50, Construction Records Turnover and Control
-
QP-18.10, Quality Program Audits, Off-site Vendors
+
-
-
QP-18.11, FPC Quality Program Compliance Audits, Design and Construction QP-18.50, Quality: Audits for Operations
-
QAP-6, Control of Quality Program ocumentation
-
Implementation was verified by reviewing selected Generation Testing document packages, examination of temporary storage facilities and interviews with Document Control Personnel.
.
l n
,
L
.
.
..
.
.. -.
-.
-. -.-. --
-.-
.,
,
-
"%
>%
IE Rpt. No. 50-302/75-6-3-
%
-
,
.
One discrepancy was identified.
There~are no administrative controls-governing the access to, and accountability for, QA Records, in the Site Quality. Document file.
This is designated Unresolved Item 75-6/1.
4.
Test Organization
-
The test group's organizational structure, fanctional responsibilities and levels of authority for conducting the preoparational. test program
'.
'
were reviewed for conformance to commitments contained in.Section 13 of
'
the FSAR.
Qualifications of key personnel within the test organization
were also reviewed for conformance to Sections 12 and 13 of the FSAR.
Interviews were held with certain test personnel to determine their
-
.-
familiarity with established administrative controls.
The following
,
'
"
documents were reviewed:
.
Test Program Guide i
-
-
Policy 1.1, Organizational-Structure and Functional Responsibilities I
!
Within the areas inspected, no discrepancies were identified.
5.
Test Program Administration The Test Program Guide, Generation Testing Manual and various administrative procedures were reviewed to determine that the
.'
administrative controls are consistent with the commitments con-tained in Sections 1.7 and 13 of the FSAR relating to Test Program administration.
Specific procedures reviewed include:
QP-11.10, Preoperational Test Program Control
-
QP-15.10, Nonconformance Control
-
QP-16.10, Corrective Action
-
Q-33, Construction Release to FPC Test
-
.
Q-39, Procedure on Test Deficiency Reports
-
]
-
Q-40, Test Sequence Deviation Procedure
<
-
W-97, Rework Control Procedure Implementation of these administrative controls was verified by
,
reviewing selected system. turnover packages, test procedures in i
progress, test results.and test s :hedules and by direct observa-
"
i tion of equipment in the plant.
In-the areas inspected, no discrepancies were identified.
l
.
.
6.
Document control
Administrative controls in the Test Program Guide concerning the
'
'
g review, approval and issuance of test procedures, vendors manuals
.and drawings,.and revisions of these documents were reviewed to determine that they are' consistent with the commitments contained in Sections 1.7 and 13 of the FSAR.
Construction Procedure FPC W-ll,
" Control of Vendor Drawings, Instruction Manuals, Work Procedures,
. Specifications, System Descriptions and R.O.'s" was also reviewe,
-
,
-
_
.
,
f e
(s/
IE Rpt. No. 50-302/75-6-
-4-
.
d Implementation was verified by review of test procedures in progress
.
-and interviews with test personnel.
Revision numbers of drawings *
and manuals being used in the conduct of the tests were compared with the master index to determine that:the proper revisions were being used. lit was also determined that test procedures are being
-
'
updated, when necessary, due to drawing revisions.
I r.
In the areas inspected, no discrepancies were identified.
.
7.
Maintenance and Preventive Maintenance
'
Administrative controls for maintenance and preventive maintenance
'
activities during preoperational testing were reviewed to determine conformance to commitments contained in Sections 1.7, 12 and 13 of the FSAR.
Emplementation of the maintenance administrative controls was inspected by review'of completed maintenance document packages and interviews with certain responsible plant personnel.
The -
following documents were inspected:
-
W-24, Determining and Maintaining Equipment Insulation Levels of Permanent Plant Equipment W-40, Procedure for In-Storage Maintenance of Mechanical Equipment
-
W-97, Rework Control Procedure
-
AI 400, Plant Operating QA Manual Control Document
-
AI 600, Conduct of Maintenance
-
CP 111, Implementation of the Master Surveillance Program
-
CP 113, Procedure for Handling Discrepancies
-
,
Within those areas inspected, no discrepancies were identified.
J
{
8.
Equipmen. Protection and Cleculiness Procedures for equipment protection and cleanliness controls for work activities, conditions and environments that can affeer quality during preoperational testing were reviewed for conformance to guidance con-
,
tained in ANSI N45.2.3.
Requirements or commitments for cleanliness i
control are not addressed in the FSAR.
Available procedures only covered activities performed by the B&W i
Construction Company.
These procedures require establishment and control of clean zones for such items as the reactor vessel, steam generators'and accumulator tanks.
No discrepancies were identified
,
regarding.these procedures.
.'
'
.
.
..
.
.
.
-
...
,
S
..,
+
.
f
,,
IE Rpt.'No. 50-302/75-6-5-Equipment protection and cleanliness. control procedures for FPC activities such as clean system re-entry, establishing clean zones *
l and housekeeping had 'not been developed.
To date, the test group j
had not performed activities that would necessitate the availability
'
'
of these procedures.
FPC' stated that the cleanliness control proce-dures would be developed on an'as needed basis.
{
kI 9.
Training The training and indoctrination program for preoperational testing personnel was reviewed for conformance to guidance contained in
,
Requirements or conaitments for training and indoctri-
,
nation of preoperational testing personnel are not addressed in,the
FSAR.
Certain Preeperational Test Department memoranda were reviewed that demonstrated that training and indoctrination of test personnel is being performed.
Examples of, training being provided includes:
,
Nov. 27, 1974 - Administrativa Controls for Preoperational Testing
-
Dec. 3,1974 - Testing and Quality Programs
-
Feb. 14, 1975 - Release of Equipment from FPC Construction to
-
,
Generation Testing
\\
No discrepancies were identified in the training and indoctrination of the test group presently at the site. The need for training and indoctrination of replacement personnel in the test group was dis-cussed with the licensee.
FPC stated that replacement personnel would
.,
be given appropriate training and indoctrination, i
e
I L
.
.
--
__
_.
..
._
,
_