IR 05000302/1975009
| ML19317G391 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 07/25/1975 |
| From: | Cunningham A, Robert Lewis, Whitt K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19317G387 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-302-75-09, 50-302-75-9, NUDOCS 8003030801 | |
| Download: ML19317G391 (6) | |
Text
_
_
UNITE] STATES
-
JCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION ll eg I
230 PEACHTREE STREEY. N. W. SUITE St8 ATLANTA. GEO RGI A 30303
.
.
.;L IE Inspection Report No. 50-302/75-9
-
Lir.ensee:
Florida Power Corporation 3201 34th Street, South
,
P. O. Box 14042 St. Petersburg, Florida 33733
~
Facility Name: Crystal River 3
Docket No.:
50-302
'
License No.:
CPPR-51 Category: ~
B1
-
Location:
Crystal River, Florida Type of License:
B&W, PWR, 2452 Mwe Type of Inspection: Routine, Unannounced Dates of Inspection:
July 1-3, 1975 Dates of Previous Inspection:
June 17-20 and 24-26, 1975 Inspector-in-Charge:
A. L. Cunningham, Radiation Specialist Reactor Facilities Section Radio ogical and Environmental Protection Branch Principal Inspector:
4. h
/
) ~[b-2 K. W. Whitt, R'eactor spetor Date Facilities Section Facilit es Test and Startup Branch Reviewed by:
d, JS 2[
R. C. Lewis, Senior Reactor Inspector Date Facilities Section
-
Facilities Test and Startup Branch o JTio+
u
- 773 1916
.
8003030 h /
,--
-.
. _. _,, _
.
_.. _ __
- - _.
- - _ _ _ _ _ _
O
-
,
.
J i
IE Rpt. No. 50-302/75-9-2-b
.
SUl@fARY OF FINDINGS
.
I.
nforcement Matters
- 1.
A.
Violations
-
No violations were identified dur1ng the inspection.
-
,
B.' Infractions
,
.
No infractions were identified during t:.e inspection.
C.
Deficiencies
,
No deficiencies were i'dentified during the inspection.
II.
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Enforcement Matters
-
There are no previously identified enforcement matters requiring resolution.
III.
New Unresolved Items _
None
'
IV.
Status of Previously Reported Unresolved Items Not inspected.
V.
Unusual Occurrences None VI.
Other Significant Findings
_
None
<
VII.
Management Interviews A management interview was held on July 3,1975. The scope and findings of the inspection were discussed. The following licensee personnel attended:
e
.
'***M-
e %
T****r***'
- " *
- "'**ew
=e-
-*
... *
,e,
.,,.,
,,,
,
-
_
__
.
.
..
,
, _ _.
.,_-
_.., _ _ -..
--
-
__ _
__
_ _
_.
.
__ ___ _
__
__-__
-
..
.
. 3,
-
IE Rpt. No. 50-302/75-9-3-
.
J. Alberdi - Project Manager
,
G. P. Beatty - Plant Superintendent
,
E. E. Froats - Manager, Tite Surveillance J. C. Clapp - Manager, Site Quality Surveillance J. C. Hobbs, Jr. - Manager. Generation Testing'
-
,
D. W. Pedrick. - Compliance Engineer R. W. Slater -- Quality Engineer.
,
!
O.
D'. Perkins - Health Physics Supervisor i
P. McGee - Assistant Plant Superintendent
,
._-
g
9
h
.-
e
.
e i
N e *
I
..
.
,
I
',
e e'
s t
- ;.N.
.
.
.
l
. : ;.
.,.
..
-
., 7
....
.,,..,,
.. _,
_._
l -
-
_ _
,.-
_
_
, _..,.,,,.
_ _ _ _ -. _ _ _ - -.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -, - _, -. -__
-
.
~
--
.
(
IE Rpt. No. 50-302/75-09 I-l
.
DETAILS I
///MX Prepared.,by :
2//pse a6 C
,
A. L. Cunningham, ro'nmental
'Date'
' Scientist Reactor Facility Section
.
Radiological and Environmental
'
Protection Branch
'
Dates of Inspection: Ju y 1-3,1975 d
Reviewed by:
V
' ~--
I A. F. Gibson, Senior Health Physicist Date Reactor Facility Section
]
Radiological and. Environmental
)
'
Protection Branch
.
1.
Individuals Contacted-
-?.
g p,.w -
S. W. Slater - Quality Engineer J. Johnson - Environmental Scientist J. Jenkinsori - Supervisor of Operations R. Carr - Plant Chemist (Units 1 & 2)
J. Alberdi - Project Manager 2.
Obj ectives The objectives of the inspection were as follows:
(1) Evaluation of licensee's cor.tpliance with the environmental protection requirements and commitments during plant construction; (2) Assessment of preoperational baseline environmental program..
3.
Scope of Inspection The following items were included in the inspection:
(1) review of the environmental protection program; (2) review of the status of the preoperational environmental surveillance program; (3) review of the construction schedule; (4) discussion of the percolation ponding system; (5) review preparations for implementation of draf t Appendix B Technical Specifications and procedures.
.
,
s
. -.. _ -
..,
- -. _.
-.
,...,,
_
.
-
.
,,
.
-
IE Rpt. No. 50-302/75-09 I-2
.
!
4.
Preoperational Environmental Studies
I Preoperational biological surveillance and monitoring program results were summarized in the final report to the Interagency Research
'
Committee. The inspector reviewed the report which stressed those areas
.
'
where the existing environment and.the power plant interact.
Emphasis
>
,
was placed on baseline studies of. biological communities in the intake
and discharge canals and areas of the estuary under influence of the
,
plant. The inspector also reviewed and discussed with a licensee
,
representative supplementary reports including predicted thermal plume
,
,
studies for Units 1, 2 and 3.
Inspection revealed that the preoperational,
,
baseline studies were apparently completed. There wer=. no questions.
j concerning this inspection item.
!
5.
Environmental Protection Program
>
'
At the time of inspection, construction of Unit 3 was ap; aximately
,
95% complete. Review and discussion of the construction.3cnedule revealed that there were no additional constructf on activities which would adversely affect either the terrestrial or aquatic environments.
6.
Percolstion Ponding System The site percolation ponding system was inspected. The system consists
of two, one-million gallon capacity holding ponds and has been operational for one year.
The ponds are designed to accomodate chemical wastes generated from Units 1, 2 and 3, and the affluent from the site sewage treatment tilant A licensee representative stated that
.
cleaning and flushing of the condensate and feedwater systems of Unit 3 are scheduled for mid-September,1975. Wastes generated from this i
operation will be diverted to the ponding system. The licensee representative also stated that test wells which surround the ponds l
are monitored on a monthly basis to assure compliance with applicable
,
!
permits and water quality criteria. Fresh ground water in the arec should not be affected 4 the ponding system based on its location in j
relation to the direction of groundwater flow into the Gulf of Mexico.
'
There were no questions concerning this inspection item.
i
7.
Procedures l
Preparations for implementation of proposed Appendix B Technical
!
Specifications were reviewed. Inspection reverlod that detailed written l
l procedures, including applicable check-off lists and instructions, l
required for implementation of the proposed Technical Specifications t
had not been developed except for TS-2.3.1 (Total Residual Chlorine
.
i
,
- J
-.
,
.
.
- ..,
-
,.--.,q
,
y,..;
.y
-
. - _ -
,
-e
'. '
r*
y
,
..-.
..
-.
.... _,. ~.. _ _
_. _.. _, _.,, _ _.. _ _ -. _ _ - _ -, - -, _.,.. - - _
.
.
-
..
-
..
D
-
IE Rpt. No. 50-302/75-09 I-3
.
.
Monitoring).
.
The insppstor stressed the importance of procedures Appendix B Technical Specifications. prior to th loading date.
,
There were no further questions concerning the inspection item.
~
.
'
-
8.
Operational Environmental Protection Program
.
'
.
defined in the drsf t Technical Specifications was d licensee representative stated that on-stte thermal and chemical
.
A~
.
monitoring - draf t T.S.-2.0, would be implemented by operations.
Off-site biological and water quality monitoring would be managed a implemented by the corporate office environmental staff, however, this item has not been finalized. stated that use a also t
'
9.
Site Inspection
~
~"'
,.
,.. -..
The plant site, including the intake and discharge canal dikes were inspected.
,
Inspection revealed no apparent adverse effects from
,
construction activities.
was inspected and discussed with a licensee representativ ;
)
were no questions concerning this item.
There
.
9
em T
P V
'
.
,
'
e '
I
,
,,
- * * *
- ,*' K N**'."*
,
'
- * * * ***
. :'M 2
-- '
,,
_
_
_
__
_
,_. _