IR 05000277/1980022
| ML19343A098 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 07/17/1980 |
| From: | Brunner E, Cowgill C, Mccabe E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19343A097 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-277-80-22, 50-278-80-16, NUDOCS 8009160229 | |
| Download: ML19343A098 (7) | |
Text
I l
' ' '
-
0FFICE OF' INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Region I Report Nos. 50-277/80-22 50-278/80-16 Docket Nos. 50-277 50-278 License Nos. DPR-44 Category C
DPR-56 Priori ty
--
Licensee:
Philadelphia Electric Company (PECo)
2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 Facility Name:
Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3
,
Meeting at:
PEco Corporate Office, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Meeting conducted:
June 19, 1980 NRC Personnel:
P.f.A kk.,b&
7 Il1l86 C. J. Cowgill, Resident Reactor date signed Inspector, Region I f e A %, b.. k.
> In le.
E. G. Greenman, Chief, Nuclear date signed Support Section No. 2, RO&NS Branch f GA. A.L.a,b zl87 lia E. C. McCabe, Jr., Chief, Reactor date signed Projects Section No. 2, RO&NS Branch D. Verelli, Project Manager, Office date signed of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, USNRC h/P o Approved by:
'E./ y. Brunner, Chief, Reactor date signed Operations and Nuclear Supp3rt Branch Meeting Summary:
Inspection on June 19,1980 (Reports 50-277/80-22 and 50-278/80-16)
Scope:
Special, announced management meeting to discuss the results of an appraisal board convened to evaluate the peformance of the facility from May 1979 to May 1980.
Areas addressed to include:
Plant Operations, Refueling Operations, Radiation Protection, Radwaste Operations, Transportation, Maintenance, Security and Safeauards, Surveillance and Pre-op Testing, Design Change and Modifications, Emergency Planning, Environmental, Training, Management Controls, Fire Protection, QA/QC, Committee Activities / Audits, Reporting, Procurement.
8 0 0 916 0 2..
.
Results: A sunnary of the licensee performance evaluation was presented.
Areas
- of concern were discussed with corporate management.
No new enforcement actions were identified; a number of areas where improvements appear achievable were identified.
i
+
I
4 t
j
.
<
,,.
.. -,.
. _._-
.
. -.,,
.
.
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Licensee Attendees Mr. M. J. Cooney, Nuclear Superintendent, Generation Division, Nuclear, Electric Production Mr. S. L. Daltreff, Vice President, Electric Production Mr. R. S. Fleishchman, Assistant Peach Bottom Station Superintendent Mr. J. W. Gallagher, Manager, Electric Production Mr. J. S. Kemper Vice President, Engineering and Research
Mr. R. H. Logue, Engineer in charge, Nuclear and Environment Section Mr. R. H. Moore, Superintendent, Quality Assurance Mr. A. H. Sellers, Chief, F.lectrical Engineer Mr. W. T. Ullrich, Peach Bottom Station Superintendent Mr. W. C. Whitfield, General Superintendent Maintenance Division, Electric Production 2.
NRC Attendees Mr. B. H. Grier, Director, USNRC Region I Mr. E. J. Brunner, Chief, Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch, Region I Mr. E. C. McCabe, Jr., Chief, Reactor Projects Section No. 2, RO&hS Branch, RI Mr. E. G. Greenman, Chief, Nuclear Support Section No. 2, R0&NS Branch, RI Mr. D. M. Verrelli, Project Manager, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, USNRC Mr. C. J. Cowgill, Resident Reactor Inspector USNRC, Region I (
3.
Areas Discussed a.
A brief summary of the SALP Program was presented to include the basic for the evaluation and its purpose.
b.
The results of NRC's evaluation of the licensee's performance were discussed.
Peach Bottom's performance to date is considered acceptable although three areas will require an increased inspection f:equency.
c.
Items of concern were discussed with corporate management to include those areas where the NRC considers additional licensee management attention may be warranted.
,
,
ENCLOSURE 2
.
.
PEACH BOTTOM UNITS 2 & 3 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PLAN JUNE 16,1980
REGION I
LICENSEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (OPERATIONS)
.
Facility:
Peach Bottom 2 and 3 Licensee:
Philadelphia Electric Company Unit Identificatian:
Docket No.
License No./Date of Issuance.
UNIT No.
,
50-277 DPR 44/ August 8,1978
50-278 DPR 56/ July 2, 1974
Reactor Information:
Unit 2 Unit 3
.
NSSS General Electric General Electric MWt 3293 3293 Appraisal Period: May 1979 to May 1980 Appraisal Completion Date:
June 16,1980 Review loard Members:
B. H. Grier, Director, Region I J. M. Allan, Deputy Director, Region I
.
D. Vere 111, Licensing Project Manager, NRR E. J. Brunner, Chief,. Reactor Operations and
-'
Nuclear Support Branch, Region I E. C. McCabe, Jr., Chief, Reactor Projects Section 2, Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch, Region I E. G. Greenman, Chief, Nuclear Support Section 2, Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch, Region I C. J. Cowgill, Peach Bottom Resident Inspector, Region I
'
P. J. Knapp, Chief, Radiation Support Section, Region I J. W. De>1in, Chief, Security Section, Region I G. H. Smith, Chief, Fuel Facilities & Materials Safety Branch, Region I
.
O'
-
.
-
,
.
A.
Number' and Nature of Noncompliance Items Noncompliance category:
Unit 2 Unit 3
'Both Violations
0
Infractions
29
Deficiencies
3
B. - Number and Nature of' Licensee Event Reports
"
Type of Events:
Unit 2 Unit 3 Both Personnel Error
3
Design / Man./Const./ Install.
11
External Cause.
1
.
Defective Procedure
2
Component Failure
18
Other
3
Licensee Event f.eport Reviewed (Report Nos.)
Unit 2 Report No. 7901803L (May 11,1979) to 8000901P (May 2,1980)
Unit 3 Report No. 7901301P (June 14, 1979) to 8000801P (March 9, 1980)
C.
Escalated Enforcement Actions Civil Penalties None Orders None Immediate Action Letters None D.
Management Conferences Held During Past Twelve Months None E.
Justification of Evaluations of Functional Areas Categorized as Requiring an Increase in Inspection Frequency / Scope (See evaluation sheets)
.
L,
- '
.
.
.
_.
.
.
MAINTENANCE Increased inspection frequency is warranted in this ares due to the high
'
number of LERS associated with maintenance and the high rate of seal failures (5 on the recirculation pumps alone). Additionally, NRC observations on site which f:Hicated that improved first level superv/sor observation
would improve maintenance activities.
'
SECURITY AND SAFEGUARDS i
Increased inspection frequency is warranted in this area because of the attitude of Philadelphia Electric Company management toward security as shown.in the structure of the security plan. The board.also concluded that improved general employee training would improve the area.
QA/QC
.
,
. Increased inspection frequency is warranted in this area due to the large
'
number of outstanding inspection items in this area.
.
.
Y
.
e i
.__
.
..
.
PEACH BOTTOM UNITS 2 & 3 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION June 16,1980 Inspection Frequency and/or Scope FONCTIONALAREA Increase No Change Decrease 1.
Plant Operations x
2.
Refueling Operations x
3.
Radiation Protection NA*
4.
Radwaste Operations NA*
5.
Transportation x
6.
Maintenance x
7.
Security and Safeguards x
8.
Surveillance and Pre-op Testing x
9.
Design Change and Modifications x
10.
Emergency Planning x
11.
Environmental x
12.
Training x
.
13.
Management Controls x
14.
Fire Protection x
15.
QA/QC x
-
,,
16.
(,ommittee Activities / Audits x
17.
Reporting x
18.
Procurement x
'
- Not being. inspected under routine inspection program; health physics appraisal approach being used.
,
Regional Director Date