IR 05000269/1980026
| ML16161B200 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 07/30/1980 |
| From: | Jenkins G, Perrotti D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16161B199 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-269-80-26, 50-270-80-23, 50-287-80-20, NUDOCS 8008220043 | |
| Download: ML16161B200 (4) | |
Text
UNITED STATES S
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 JUL 8 1 1980 Report Nos. 50-269/80-26, 50-270/80-23 and 50-287/80-20 Licensee:
Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 Facility Name:
Oconee Units 1,2, and 3 Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270, 50-287 License Nos. DPR-38, DPR-47, DPR-55 Inspection at Oconee Site near Seneca, South Carolina Inspector:
_
_
_
_-__
_
_
_
D. J. Perr t Date igned Approved by:
(A72-G.. J er ns, Section Chief, FFMS Branch Date igned SUMMARY Inspection on July 9-10, 1980 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved eight inspector-hours on site in the areas of follow-up on IE Bulletins and follow-up on previously identified item Results Of the two areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie /
DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- J. E. Smith, Station Manager
- R. Knoerr, I&E Support Engineer
- T. C. Matthews, Licensing Technical Specialist
- J. N. Pope, Operations Superintendent
- R. J. Brackett, Senior QA Engineer
- C. T. Yongue, Station Health Physicist R. Gill, General Office Licensing Engineer D. Burton, General Office I&O Support Group Engineer R. Bond, Licensing Coordinator Other licensee employees included one technician and two office personne NRC Resident Inspector
- W.T. Orders
- Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on July 10, 1980 with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 abov.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspecte.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspectio.
Follow-up on Open Items Revision of Health Physics Procedure, HP/01/B/1006/0 The inspector verified, by review of the master file copy of Procedure HP/0/B/1006/05, that the matter concerning the compatibility of units of activity concentration, which was identified by the inspector during a previous inspection (Re IE Rp N /80-04-02, 50-270/80-03-02 and 50-287/80-03-02), has been resolve The inspector informed th licensee that this item is close Revision of Health Physics Procedure HP/0/B/1009/0 The inspector verified, by review of the master file copy of Procedure HP/0/B/1009/01, that the changes discussed during a previous inspection have been incorporated as change 3, namely, provisions for operation/
inventory check of emergency equipment in the administrative building conference room, and provisions for taking action on inventory devia tions. The procedure allows for a deviation to exist for more than 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />, provided an evaluation is made by the Station Health Physicis The inspector requested a working copy of the procedure from the HP department. Review of the working copy revealed that the last several changes to the procedure had been written in by hand, and that change 3 was erroneously identified as change This matter was discussed at the exit interview with the Station Health Physicist.; The inspector was informed that the procedure would be retyped within the next week to include all changes to date and that a copy would be furnished to the inspector. The licensee agreed to change the procedure so as to provide for correction of inventory deviations within a 72-hour perio The inspector informed the licensee that this matter (Ref.IE Rpt. N /80-04-01)
50-270/80-03-01 and 50-287/80-03-01)
would remain open pending the revision and retype of the procedure and would be reviewed during a subsequent inspectio.
Follow-up on IE Bulletin 79-18, Audibility Problems Encountered on Evacuation of Personnel from High-Noise Areas The inspector reviewed the licensee's responses to the bulletin, dated October 11 and December 27, 1979, and January 8, 1980, and discussed with licensee representatives the corrective actions taken and planne During the inspection the inspector was unable to get specific information as to what areas were identified during the initial survey of the evacuation announcement system and as to exactly what corrective action was taken to correct the problems in accessible and inaccessible areas, because of the unavailability of key personnel at the site and the corporate offic The inspector was informed that some work was performed on the existing system (add new speakers, rearrange speaker location, etc.)
However, review of Work Request 54218 failed to verify that speakers were installed or-rearranged in the identified problem area At the exit interview the inspector was informed by the licensee that the evacuation alarm could be heard in all areas of the plan The inspector was also informed that a new alarm system was to be installed under the supervision of the corporate Engineering Services Offic Subsequent to the inspection, on July 11, 1980, licensee representatives, from the site and the general office in Charlotte, North Carolina, informed the inspector, via telecon, that all areas of the existing plant announcement system had been surveyed and corrected by May 31, 1980, and that the proposed new alarm system was independent of bulletin requirement The new system was to provide for compatibility of alarms.at the Oconee and McGuire site The inspector was informed that, while portions of the modified system were
-3 tested by I&C individually, there has been no test of the entire syste In addition, a preventive maintenance program has been established to periodically inspect components of the system to identify if any unapproved adjustments have been made, particularly to the volume contro The inspector acknowledged the licensee's comments, and stated that this matter would remain open pending a review of the preventive maintenance program and test of the overall syste The inspector stated that this matter would be reviewed during a subsequent inspection.