Text

Aug/Sept 2004-301 Exam 50-261/2004-301 Administrative Documents
	ML050950509
Person / Time
Site:	Robinson
Issue date:	04/26/2004
From:	; Division of Nuclear Materials Safety II
To:	;
References
	50-261/04-301
	Download: ML050950509 (62)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:Administrative Documents ROBINSON AUG/SEPT 2004 EXAM NO. 05000261/2004-301 AUG. 27 - SEPT. 3, 2004 1. Exam Preparation Checklist ................ ES-201 -1 ,2. Exam Outline Quality Checklist ES-201-2 V 3. Exam Security Agreement ................. ES-201-3 4. Administrative Topics Outline (Final) ES-301-1 / 5. Control Room Systems and Facility Walk-through Test Outline (Final) ........................... ES-301-2 7% A6. Operating Test Quality Check Sheet P.k.t?... ES-301-3 A'. Simulator Scenario Quality Check Sheet P..t . ES-301-4

<8- Transient and Event Checklist . . . ......... ES-301-5 7
  ..P. ....... /

A. Competencies Checklist ES-301-6 A-O. Written Exam Quality Check Sheet ES-401-6 411. Written Exam Review Worksheet ......... ES-401-9> A-2. Written Exam Grading Quality Checklist ... ....... ES-403-1 7 13. Post-Exam Check Sheet ............... ES-501 -1 --ý IH *'c'ry Le-rrc-. Ltrn (o-//.-e.c

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201 -1 Facility: H. B. Robinson Date of Examination: 8/27 - 9/10/2004 Examinations Developed by: F / NRC (circle one) Target Chief Date* Task Description / Reference Examiner's Initials-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.l.a; C.2.a & b) rfa-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1 .d; C.2.e) rfa-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security &other requirements (C.2.c) rfa-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) exI

[-90] [5. Reference material due (C.1 .e; C.3.c)]   rfa-75 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due (C.1 .e &f; C.3.d)  rfa-70 7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided  rfa to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)
-45 8. Proposed examinations, supporting documentation, and   rfa reference materials due (C.1 .e, f, g & h; C.3.d)
-30 9. Preliminary license applications due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)  rfa-14 10. Final license applications due and assignment sheet prepared  rfa (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)
-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee  rfa review (C.2.h; C.3.f)
-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1 .j; C.2.f & h; C.3.g) rfa-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by   rfa NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
-7 14. Final applications reviewed; assignment sheet updated; waiver  rfa letters sent (C.2.g, ES-204)

administration guidelines reviewed with rfa-7 facility licensee andexam 15. Proctoring/written authorization granted to give written exams (if applicable) (C.3.k)

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions  rfa distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.

They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.

23 of 25 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Robinson Date of Examination: 8/30/2004 Initials Item Task Description a b* c# 1 a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401. JGA b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance JGA W with Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

R c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. JGA _ __ d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are JGA T T appropriate.

E N a. using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number JGA 2.

of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients.

S b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected JGA number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and M rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)*, and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and JGA £ quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described inAppendix D.

a. Verify that: JGA 3.

the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks, W no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination, T (3)* no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) and (4)/Ao more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensee's exam

 ?- banks.

b. Ve ify that: JGA (j) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, S4 - 6 (2-3 for SRO-U) of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure, (,) one in-plant task tests the applicant's response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5f/the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

c. erify that the required administrative topics are covered. JGA d>D6t!rmine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of JGA applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in JGA )/* r the appropriate exam section.

G b. Assess whether the 1OCFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. JGA E JGA priorities) are at least 2.5.

N c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific E d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. JGA R JGA A e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

L f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). JGA Pate Joseph G. Arsenault * 6 a. Author b. Facility Reviewer (*) >t

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) 4 9Ii t10 V d. NRC Supervisor6t ' )e7C NOTE: * Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c", chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Final Facility: Robinson Date of Examination: 8/30/2004 Initials Item Task Description a b* c# 1 a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model per ES-401. JGA b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance JGA . W with Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

R c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. JGA T d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are JGA T appropriate.

E N 2. a. using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number JGA . of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, and major transients.

S b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected JGA I number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and M rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity; ensure each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)*, and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and JGA quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3. a. Verify that: JGA (1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks,

/ (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination, 1 -

T (3)* no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) and (4) no more than 80% of any operating test is taken directly from the licensee's exam banks.

b. Verify that: JGA (1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-301, (2) one task is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition, (3) 4 - 6 (2-3 for SRO-U) of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path procedure, (4) one in-plant task tests the applicant's response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RCA.

c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered. JGA h d. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of JGA applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in JGA the appropriate exam section.

G b, Assess whether the 10CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. JGA E JGA are at least 2.5.

N c. Ensure that KJA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) E d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. JGA A e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. JGA L f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). JGA 7F rinte Nam I i ature Date a. Author Joseph G. Arsenault I, 6 b. Facility Reviewer ( , ej~ AlhMIba c, NRC Chief Examiner (,) 4 , '2//v ' d. NRC Supervisor r4 . Z. A ý9 7 NOTE: * Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c", chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

4814is"

[.

ES-201. iai Agreem, nj Fom*.rr*

           *ESe201-a
 . Pe-Examiution .

I acknowjledge that I have acquired Svodalafed linowledgo about lb. NRC ficanakhig dale of my sqttrulae. lagree that I will not knowinigly divulge arty exag* rti~ons schdikJW'Ii* to week(s) of uj a s orf r.. information about loe I r cAixo dimalop~to A r~mans wAGo htMd byitfiNRC ch emlenr I understandttafim no jtoI evaluateor op....ppica,*tcledule,I been I astoortzed CU

t--Ln*

administered these bieanslnyi examinations from this diab until lonbe completion of xexn lfn adrrvntislnikon, exc al In authorized by the NRC. Futhermore, I am aware of the procedures) and understhn physical scury mm.r nts (as doin&M p 4' riiled below and OW.l facility tenses's t vlation offli. coitious of he agreement may *1itrnssys aco, -agatvi,m orIh e acility icerses. I wli lmmedftoely repool to facility alflon of the ex(Jojlqtio andof an enforcement C' n, r Chi e- examiner my indi.* aions a t suggestions that-U examination security may have been comnpromised.

. - - 2. Post.Exarntnacn To [he bst of my knowledge, I did riot divulge to any unauthorized during fhe week(s) oI10Zý,.1* persornP av Mornmalion corr"rng fttNRC Hocsing From t dole that I enlered Into thspo.i.,ty agromant exenilnallons; adnlblislered Instrut, evaluate, or provide performance Feedback to until the ccmpbtiai of examinati administration, I did those app-icanb'l*n wegree.mert iithes6,ctensing not noted below and aulhorized by (he NRC- oxeminaliona,except as specifically DDRdTIIKIMAAAC .n n**r r.-. . ...... - i i, .: : PRINTED NAAAE U C I,

-IF L

cc n II

"C2i
.0CD

   ~' ~ * F- )

to 25

,n f of125    lna niL-h

H ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3-4 I', acknowledge that I have acquied spciaized knowledge about the NRC licensing *hktuuU sdjrd fifloe week4s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I wil not knowingly diulge any Infomateon about 4tt xaminnatonit. .aon& who have'bt been authorized by h*tNRC chief examner. I understand that I am not to instruct. evaluate, or rmmace dad .piq+apds ailemro carscheduled to be administered ftese licensing examinaidons from this date until completion of eainio an iontefo, e ~ w0ally no ted below and a (as dom* ,--1.*t efaclftyf licansee's authorized by the NRC. Fwthamore, am - wame of the physical sncurityineasqr a;M procedures) and understand thet viclaliown of the candifliom &ftiagreemn may ~1 tqclln ofth ax f and/or an enforcement CU 0 Y%¶$ acion against me or the rality licensee- I will inmediately repor to facility man e ' *er. chief examiner any indications or suggestons that

       ;C Lo T examuination security may have been compromised.   ...

IC m 2. Post-ExamInsidn To the best of my IKowledge. I did not divulge to any unaulbhodzd pars "aNRCftcensing examinations administered duqfthe week(s) oif"z*k. From the date that I(enered into this fletion of examinton administration, I did not Instruct, evalhate. or provide pefomrance feedback to those sppica*.. tnsing examinations, except as spedflca*ly noted below and authorzed by the NRC. " PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBLeJ'. ATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE A% let 3. ,I 4.

6, lb O7:.-* . POCK*. ."- Cu/l ir if t10. --

11.- 13. . 14.

NOTES:

25 of 25 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 IL

o. 4?A'JSO,%J I.. en-ni a1a. a---

       ~na~rnu, conuynwuusnrA zFern  E-2_01-3 1,.

1U, duelyuphe I gi alwIkwng vipmftm'n CI themtuq, Mh*v bensuo- e Iadcom~dg Out I isv. M~qtirs #sd6zd bmi4scp skil he NRC en4a w.

F-thebi NfllsA*)( oef 0) bMte41 M chuidasa. I tut us no Wondssa I l I)MW

     "san eviS. orW pmM srbimurd db~wiswici how i*
 .V O j Ntmdsudth s mkw l mnsti s unWit dumf o lnt eclo rW l l of"  n I~I~f tni'n wb eno l o ld 0;0 aiiciid by mnli~c. Fwlimmw., i - am. of 11 pIp  ialy nS.lii*  (us dsuigf&isay* tawen+.,

i pmmdudm) end undiermnd aitwanon s~t bt c~iliao WeGseasnpi may i~dfhnsqAn~n dim OR"ajhl P3IN

*flw actapl~limeora.iily tume. I ffirmfr       isrn wme*.ww 0,,      'qafllokfynu pm ! *._qnrttC chhielilurk any h bn. w sugIam tha uC*N llsw4i mcAtY ue beens hav cmprouud.

C-dm fww,(&Q - _. _Mjigol4lw .\.... ,* . Mqt M Sn". 0 wn(Of ftm dsbrulmaantIrllWohsctyamiol*nt mid11w Fin+iui- ii*Ua~~i//i Sswmmraem lIK Metal, usi*a.lts, Or Prov.deQplMIAfn Meibid OI ... w ..+.J,.M 4Md

       . -fqa Ut km
        -,m..u......,

urated b .le ida. ft. by NO, NWC... asuhp

          "epte *cd
     ..  * - - " ,

3) I-a to

'AO i -*

am

. ES-201    Examination Security Agreement    Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination , g I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing exatm ons s d-,he week(s) of as of the date of mysignature. I agreethat I will not knowingly divulge any information about teexamlinaho n who have been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct evaluate, or provie4e ormanc~  a","s applic scedle to be administered these licensing examinations from this date unfli completion of examrnlsbn administreuon, o authozed by theNRC. Furthermore, I      exce-callnoted below and aware of the physical security measuretramt reqwwnents (asdouiefacilitylicnsee's 4.F procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement a       may r0]ikr-cancellation of the examianons and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility manageii,'W a" lRc chief examiner any inications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

. * ,- fl..

_.*-- . if) 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowlejge Ildid not divulge to any unauthorized persor&-nSrtintoration concerziI during the week(s) of W`NRC licensing examinations administered d.ov From the date that I entered into thiss' t unt the completion of examination administration I did not instruct evaluate, or ptovide performance feedback to those appl io -iant*wer* adn1&ed theo licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. r '- PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE RESPONSIBILI*,*ý' SNATUR* *V DATE SIG DATE NOTE ,, 4. _ _" _ _-_ 2 7Y-OF: 6.*

*"41.  :*    i Q:
* 12. -t~

15. _____________________________ t NOTES:

  .. -25    of 25   NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 L

7S Robinson NRC Written Examination Agreement ES-201 Examination Securit Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Fro-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled tar the week(s) of 8127704 - 93A4 as of the date of my signature. I agree that Iwill not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been Co authorized by the NRC chief examiner. Iunderstand that Iam not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these flcensing examinations from this date unit completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and M Cu authorized by the NRC. Furthenmre, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented inthe faciity licensee's CC) a, procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations end/or an enforcement action against me orthe facility licensee. I wil immediately repert to facility management or the NRC ctdet examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Exam nation To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC flcensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 8/27/04 -93104 From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

.Jjg,,,1.CA  S&_otjft_.

-,rA0r VIyfAA"c 2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

It.

12.

13, 14.

15.

NOTES: 25 of 25 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

1Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1, Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly NRC licensing ex by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to divulge any information about exa m nsshe inatons week(s) of who have S as of the ee authorized administered these licensing examinations instruct, evaluate, or prbvi Performa from this date until completion of exami in d authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware i admin ionexc iapplica otedoheduled to be below and procedures) and understand that violation of the of the physical security measure ents (as docu facility licensee's conditions of this agreement may action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately ellation of the axe s and/or an enforcement report to facility manage examination security may have been compromised. LRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized person during the week(s) of . From the date that I entered into this on concaP instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applica a until the tion NRCoflicensing examination administration, examinations I did not administered owe th. , licensing examinations, except as specifically noted be'ow and authorized by the NRC. ,1A PRINTED NAME I/,* .r -- ,.ii,"* B L. . . .

  ,,L,-

I'.I, I PNSBILI t- _ 1NATURW - DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

8.

11, __ __t v L&L *~ 12.

13. - 14. r 15. - m NOTES: I-,-k t'4AJnQ~oA 25 of 25 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ItO Robinson INBC Written ExaminaLion Agreement ES-201 Examinaton Sewurity Agreement Form ES-201-3 I. PweElcanitfon I fcknowlecg thal I h[ave acquired specialized knowedge about the NRC licensing Aennallons scheduled for Ihe week(s) ofJZiizDQ as of Me daleaotmy signatrea. I agree thatI wll notk ngiyflvd'ulg any information about these examinations to any persontvo h eoW E atlhorzed by the NRC thief examiner. I undaestmnd tha I am not to insrucL evaluate. or provide performance Ieedback to those applcan schduled to be adminisred these licensing exam nations from this date until completion of examinalon aiatonex ptasspeciic and CD 'o aulhornzed by the NRC. Furlhermore I am aware of lhe phyakai security measures and e irement (as documenJed in the fcliy icensan m CU .... procedure) and understand that vlo latlon oa the onditions o this agreement may resuat in cancellation of te examinalions andkv anhMorcemeo action againt me or the taciftfctensee. I will mnmehdately redpor to lacility management or .he NRC cniesexaminer any idications or suggesmiona fhat examination securitymay havy been compromised.

kA 2. Post-Ei(arinatfon z To toe best of my knowledge, I dd not divulge to any ,tmauthorizsdpesonsanyInformation conceming the NRC licensing exaiwnamons admingsaed duing the week(s) of 8/27/04 - 9/Q'O4. From Tle date that I entered into this securityagreemenl until the completion of examination admniakalon, I did Ct nottlnsct, evaluale, or provide performance feedback to those appicants who were ackndmstered these icea*sing exarninatiors, except as specuically-cc noted below and authorized bythe NRC.

PMTN'ED NAME JOB TITLE/ RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (t) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

-- ozL 1.U t CA 7-A-i  c t*/ W_,0 c A p_

5.

,CC&*it

bdrl AMJ#P%01 MSI -M EL IJSMhJtALIDA. 11A9 ! 7is t.,0-raa, A-14 1istfe Dab.. 5 eil hmill-M

       "  _ _ _

C,,- 10,

2

--. C*

NOTES: 25 of25 NUREG-10=I, Draft Revision 9

Robinson NRC Written Examination Agreement ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examinationr I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC Iicenskig examinations scheduled for the week(s) of k2704 -a1104 as of the dale of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any informalion about these examinations to anypersona who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide perormance feedback to those app4licants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from ths date until completion of examination admirilstraton, ecept as specilically noted below and authorized by thle NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcemant action against me or the facity licenses. I will immediately report to facility managemen or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been comproeised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 8/27104 - 9/3/0I.rom the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these Iccensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE t RESPONSIBIUTY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE w 9ý-77- 0,f 4.

C I 6^01A 91tt **? -s,'o 12. li00ý An0MAI-4.It 1 Ialr Sfe~v -'eAIs 11. Ate - 11-.kft 7N.

13.

13. _ __ _ _14 14.- 15.

NOTES: 25 of 25 NUREG-1 021, Draft Revision 9

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement - TForm ES-201-3 1. Pe-Exsin*ation I acknowledge that Ihave acquired spedalized knowledge aboul the NRC licensing exarnirnotions schlddU fl*" lh week(s) of[ as of the r- date of my signatuic. I agree that I will riot knowingly divulge any information about Itk6 si'xamnatlqu" to A.4 ersons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to Instruct, evaluate, or provi4lhdormntd aqI. 46. applicanl.iicheduled lobe

, ;administered  these licenskng examinations from this date until completion of exanmintn addniistraflion, excilS4dsp;1? itca~ly.irioed below and 8aulhorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measiune*.* i reqfulireien{s (as docu e.0tbiid 4 i facilityanicensee's procedures) and understand that violabion of lhe conditions of this agreement may Aolt1* aneallztlon of the ext "lions andjor enforement action against me or the facility licensee. I wit Immediately report to facility mansage tor. '* NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Exainatllon To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge 10 any unauthorized person sdiy Information concerning I* NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of'*@ A . From the date that entered Into INs secklrity agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not Instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicanti who wereadmriistered li'ensing examlnatDone, except as specificaly noted below and authorized by the NRC . PRINTEO NAME JOB TITLEIRESPONSIBILITY' SlOA (1) DATE 5 TIRE (2) DAT TE 3 Ve C7 j --b -e _ a 4.

C cstiisaTk* 1~~2fi,4 - 0 BlZir, &./ F~ -a I' y 25 of 25 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

Examination Sec ementor ES2013 ES-201 ES..01 % a 1. Pre -Examination4 0 1 .44 knowledge about the NRC lcemiri extninetiofls sclqe$h weas of nod who have teen_ s f h been autho*ized I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowingly divulge any Information about tes'e-examInatll YP.omofs date of my signature. I agree that I will not k Pote applicants:Scheduledseand to be by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instru"t, evaluate, or provideperfornanfce.oedb&a*O adminirelton, docume n . eniylie exclfltEOICBIhted below ' administered these licensing xexa i ai n from i minatons from this date until physica completion of examination ,equ ents (as e ty rneasureig$. ,Iethedity licenseens physical set( o authorized by the NRC. Furthermore. I am aware of the andifr an enforcement the conditions of this agreement may *J rktt t moodC n of theexaminer procedures) and understand that violation of m _I, .RCchief examiner any indications or suggestions flin report to facility action against me or the fadlity licensee. I will immediatey .I.

examination security may have been compromised.

2.

noncs%4 'hbNRC lcensing examinations administered unfit the. ;cfiilation of examination administration, I did not To the best of my iknowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized pern ared thqs* licensing examinations. except as specifically during the week(s) of 0 __-. From the date that I entered into this instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicsat and authorized by the NRC. . noted below 3'. A Wý CIn JA'rI n rz I9 % DA IF N OTl 2. s'L _bj 3.

4, 6,. 7. frP, IIDD ' "-. ... __ _ c, 'r/d/l __" _

.'

ID. __ __ ,_i_ .

--

1 1. -- 14 .. . . '- . . ;

___-- 15, 0~ .0 NOTES: NUREG-1 021, Draft Revision 9 25 of 25 U.

C'] AJSOAJ K a-ES-201 Exmmnallon Security Agreeinent Form ES-a01-3 a acimourledgir out I have acquired aipecdat lndmwIedp aoslew tw NRC licensing exarplritone .didd14f t tho nik(Aa) fIi7 E!I 4.do ci my signaure. I tt I ill not divulge any Wmmabo lIe _untali H1fpuw,nIIeI s hog vt.t been gutihzaf by the NRC chief nhte. I understand tllI wamnt to inatli, evaluziow ptmuidp6"s haigp*ufl,_ edu~laIo be

 *dmillnl*ad ft.ese kar ina samndunlo Fr* thIS date Wi ctyo0hleon of eirhnlIn udrst*.i..a.i f% .ed below end no-lm  sshfled by the wIc. Fuflflrmum. I -maw= oth9N5Sselym tx Mre*mU(a mmft,   1. I IladpSenic esu C.,

pmcedure.) End unicrstalhu Cut ijlafian of the conduitso of N yg~sme nl may id uiaX tn n*ndloran urtocevent acton flalrtlme ori ladlily ~oem. ill Immadily report to falcly mrancge*f.qvh*it RC chlef enmkinery kfiilnesn oaauggeslion that aunvailman scaurity may have been c.*npmmniud .,.. . WI ft 2. PfrtEfl To the best olmy knowlee, I did not driulg to any unstafttod prnoanicdngiiorrnon toi nl fiNReunldnall admInisluted linrig inC durin 0 On week(s) of . From htidtW sVd Iordered WNoeit IFicly aguiomali uniOlciii..onWtf oi S@mUeafVOAl tsdhewdiSlon, ILid not Ibuvu, evaiueti, or provide porfluce icdback to t ose appicwn'wMo 1 itd ilk"ibzing uelawion, one.t as qperdky rnled belowabmdulomtad by fteRC. N" .

S

'4 S

Lp

,, 0,4 A
'C Ce
.44 a In mE L 2

g an PI p., I C 6,*

m flu "C U, I.... -,

'4   a. *,  .4.,
-I. 11~..*

N 0 'C-CIt LA.

OW

'I U.:

25 ol[S NUREG-i021, Draft Revasion 9 C CD-U S

(C S           51 Ii.           C
*5~

I

.I

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1 Pre-Examination 7 r AQI'41 9 I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations sdtdtitledtr the week(s) of / as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about theseexaminatioxto Ypehrsons who have no been authoized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provicl&rperformancei*lldbýa&Ithose applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, excepiFtaapficallyrnoted below and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measuresand requiriwhents (as documnented inthe facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may 1estin ctncellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility managemrnit-drtbeuNRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that been compromised. 7 -I :. examination security may have 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, Idid not divulge to any unauthorized personsoniinformation conciaah,"dbe NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of . 1 . From the date that I entered into this .sMcrity.egtrnmeht until the cmpletion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or rovide performance feedback to those applicantwho were admiir!*ed theis licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY: . SNATURE -... DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 3, ____ _____.... 2. - - --.... . 6.-N_ _ _ __ 10.

12. _____ _____ 14.

15.

NOTES: 25 of25 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

Robinson NRC Written Examination Agreement Form ES-201-3 ES-201 E-vominrtifn Security Agreement 1. Pre-Examination scheduled for the week(s) of 8/27/04 - 9/3104 I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations these examinations to any persons who have not been about as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to or provide authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, except as specifically noted below and administration, be administered these licensing examinations from this date urdil completion of examination and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action procedures) and understand that viotation of the conditions of this agreement may result NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did during the week(s) of 8/27/04- 9/3/04. From the date that I entered into this security administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were noted below and authorized by the NRC.

SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE/ RESPONSIBILITY 1 .JeA . CAnA Vo I wi'0- cgft-rg***"'4 j" v1: __ __ 2. * / 3.

4.

5.

6.

7. ____________ 8. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 9.

10.

1i.

12.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES: 25 of 25 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

N? NC- Lex- xSmi cAtinjSeui Agreemt," ES-201 Examination SecurityvAgreement Form ES-201-3 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing ex ns s he week(s) of 5/zl/Cvas of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about I exarr0 linatio ns who havy .t been' authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provi erform an db applica cheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of exami in admin *lion, exc oted below and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measure Lreauiu ents (as docu facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may cellation of the exa s and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility manage RC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination 4 To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized person ion conIc NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of . From the date that I entered into thisf kLu.ntilIthe pletion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applica howe III licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILIýr4 *NATU RI DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 1..3--- ---- _ -- -. -- /a445 0 SJALflWLClat 2.

3.

4. -- --------- ----- - --

       - --------- - -------------- ----

56. " ------ ----- - ------------- - --

    - ------------

7. ------ --------------------- ----- ----

       ------ ------------ - - -------

8.

9. ------ -------------- - -------- 10. ---- ------------------- ---- 11,

       ------ ----------------  ---

13.

14.

15. - FT------ ------ - --------------- ----- ----- --- ------------- ----- ---- NOTES: *

,ý4,,AIOA)  ,

25 of 25 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

 ~~Z~ 0 S~_7 S40Cxnnj

Robinson NRC Written Examination Agreement ES-201 Examinalion Security Agreement Form ES-201 -3 I. Pre-Exairnation I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about te NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 8K27/04 -9304 as of the dale of my signalure. I agree thai I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons wto have not been aulhorized bythe NRC chief examiner. Iunderstand that Iam not to insiucl, evaluate, or provide performance leedback to those applicants scheduled to

* be administered these licensing examinations from this dale until completion of examination administraion, except as specifically noted below and g 00 authorized by the NRC. Furhiemore. I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documenled in the lacily licensees procedures) and understand that violation ol the conditions of this agreemect may resull hi cancellation of the examinalions and/lo an enforcement action that Cn against me or the facilityllicensee. Iwill inomediately Fvpodto facility management or the NRC chiel examiner any indications or suggestions 5; examination seuei,ty may have been compromised.

6; 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge. Idid not divulge to any unauthouized persons any Information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered Z duringthe week(s) ofwzn1 -s/Xa. From the date that I entered into this securityagreenent until the completion of examination administration, I did examinations, except as specilicaily z; {.. not instruct, evaluale, or provide performance feedback to those appicants who were administered these licensing noted below and authorized bythe NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE/ RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATUIRE (t) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE S . V__-Af CP!e 6~~~ D1.- Aul 0 I--~ C A-ý 4. girt

          , a e i 1   _ axe_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5 _ 2U-

_ MNOTES 00)

 > 0250of25        NUREG-10211, Draft Revision 9 U'lu

Robinson NRC Written Examination Agreement Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 ES-201 1. Pre-Examination examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 8/27104 - 9/3/04 I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing about these examinations to any persons who have not been as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that Iam not to instruct, evaluate, administration, except as specifically noted below and be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination (as documented in the facility licensee's security measures and requirements authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination concerning the NRC licensing examinalions administered To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did during the week(s) of 8[27/04 - 913/04. From the date that I entered into this security were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who noted below and authorized by the NRC.

JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE PRINTED NAME 0ýOV ')1-1/0 ycdd C--7 -P 2.

4. Ccn Rber" 9.

10.

19.

1 13.

14.

15.

NOTES: 25 of 25 NU REG-1021. Draft Revision g

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Final Facility: Robinson Date of Examination: 8/30/2004 Examination Level: RO Operating Test Number: NRC Administrative Topic Describe activity to be performed.

(see Note) 2.1.2 (3.0) Knowledge of operator responsibility during all modes of plant Conduct of Operations operation JPM Al JPM: Monitor nuclear instrumentation during refueling operations (New JPM) 2.1.25 (2.8) Ability to obtain and interpret station reference materials such Conduct of Operations as graphs, monographs, and tables which contain performance data.

JPM A2 JPM: Perform a manual SDM calculation lAW FMP-012 (Modified JPM) Equipment Control 2.2.12 (3.0) Knowledge of surveillance procedures.

JPM A3 JPM: Given data collected over a period of time, determine RCS leak rate (Bank JPM; Last NRC Exam, modified data) Radiation Control 2.3.11 (2.7) Ability to control radiation releases JPM A4 JPM: Adjust a radiation monitor setpoint (New JPM) N/A Plan Emergency NOTE: All items (5 total are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when 5 are required.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

Administrative Topics Outline Narrative Summary Reactor Operator Al The applicant will be required to respond to a Source Range NI failure during Refueling Operations. The task will be to perform administrative actions such as ensuring that Core Alterations are halted and ensure that the audio count rate channel is selected to the operable Source Range Channel. This is a new JPM.

A2 The applicant will be required to perform a Shutdown Margin calculation for the plant in Mode 3 with a stuck control rod. This JPM is modified from the facility bank.

A3 The applicant will be required to determine RCS leakage for a given set of initial conditions and final conditions using a plant surveillance procedure. This JPM was performed on the 2002 NRC examination. Parameter values have been modified.

A4 The applicant will be required to simulate adjusting a radiation monitor setpoint using the radiation monitor drawer in the control room. This is a new JPM.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Final Facility: Robinson Date of Examination: 8/30/2004 Examination Level: SRO Operating Test Number: NRC Administrative Topic Describe activity to be performed.

(see Note) 2.1.2 (4.0) Knowledge of operator responsibility during all modes of plant Conduct of Operations operation JPM Al JPM: Monitor nuclear instrumentation during refueling operations (New JPM) 2.1.25 (3.1) Ability to obtain and interpret station reference materials such Conduct of Operations as graphs, monographs, and tables which contain performance data.

JPM A2 JPM: Perform a SDM calculation lAW FMP-012.

(Modified JPM) 2.2.6 (3.3) Knowledge of the process for making changes in procedures Equipment Control as described in the safety analysis report.

JPM A3 JPM: Review/approve a temporary change to a procedure lAW PRO-NGGC-0204.

(New JPM) Radiation Control 2.3.11 (3.2) Ability to control radiation releases JPM A4 JPM: Adjust a radiation monitor setpoint (New JPM) 2.4.44 (4.0) Knowledge of emergency plan protective action Emergency Plan recommendations.

JPM A5 JPM: Given a set of conditions, determine the Emergency Action Level (EAL) and make a Protective Action Recommendation (PAR) lAW the Emergency Plan.

(New JPM) NOTE: All items (5 total are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when 5 are required.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

Administrative Topics Outline Narrative Summary Senior Reactor Operator Al The applicant will be required to respond to a Source Range NI failure during Refueling Operations. The task will be to perform administrative actions such as ensuring that Core Alterations are halted and ensure that the audio count rate channel is selected to the operable Source Range Channel. This is a new JPM.

A2 The applicant will be required to perform a Shutdown Margin calculation for the plant in Mode 3 with a stuck control rod. This JPM is modified from the facility bank.

A3 The applicant will be required to review a temporary procedure change request for approval. Critical errors must be identified and corrected prior to approval, or non-approval stated based upon evaluation of information presented. This is a new JPM.

A4 The applicant will be required to simulate adjusting a radiation monitor setpoint using the radiation monitor drawer in the control room. This is a new JPM.

A5 The applicant will be required to determine the correct EAL for given plant conditions, and based on environmental conditions, perform a Protective Action Recommendation in accordance with the facility Emergency Plan. The facility audit examination contains EAL classification as the A5 task, but each classification is for a different proposed accident. This is a new JPM NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-301 ControI Room/-In Plant Systems -O-utineF-e-orm.S-01-2 Final Facility: Robinson Date of Examination: 8/30/2004 Exari Level: RO / SRO(I)/SRO(U) Operating Test No : NRC Cont'ol Room Systems (8 for RO, 7 for SRO-l, 2 or 3 for SRO-J) System / JPM Title El 001 Respond to a dropped rod in Mode 2 I Rod Control S2 006 Align SI for Cold Leg Recirculation 2 ECCS 83 EPE 009 Respond to a LOCA with the unit shutdown 3 SBLOCA S4 076 Restore SW Flow/Pressure in PATH- I 4S Service Water S5 005 Lineup RHR for SI Standby 4P RHR SB 022 Respond to Cooling Water leak in a Containment 5 Containment Cooler Cooling S7 062 Respond to loss of Vital Instrument bus 2

AC Distribution sa 008 RO ONLY S,D,EA 8 Component Respond to a loss of CCW to the RCP Motor Coolers Cooling Repeat From Last NRC Exam In-Plart Systems (3 for RO; 3 for SRO-], 3 or 2 for SRO-U) 010 Operate PZR PORV PCV-456 at the local control station D,E 3 P1 PZR Pressure Control 061 Align SW to supply the MDAFW Pump suction header P2 D.E 4S AFW 064 Restore AC Power to an EDG Control Panel P3 D,EA,R 6 EDG Repeat From Last NRC Exam-J

Type Codes:

I~~

 (D)irect from bank, (M)odified from bank, (N)ew, (A)lternate path, (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, (L)ow-Power, (R)CA NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-{,01 Control Room/In-Plant SystemsOutliine Form ES-301-2 Narrative Summary RO/SROI/SROU

$1 The applicants will be withdrawing control rods from criticality to the Point of Adding Heat. During the control rod withdrawal, a control rod will drop, requiring the applicant to execute an alternate path by determining that the reactor should be tripped per the AOP, and initiating the reactor trip This is a Bank JPM. The SRO Upgrade candidates will perform this task.

$2 The task is to perform a partial alignment of Cold Leg Recirculation after a LOCA. The candidate is required to energize and align components in accordance with EPP 9 The alternate success path for completion of this task is is to cross-connect CCW cooling for Cold Leg Recirculation due to CCW Pump failures. The SRO Upgrade candidates will perform this task S3 The applicants will respond to a loss of RCS Inventory with the unit shutdown by diagnosing pressurizer level decreasing and PRT level increasing. The applicants will raise Charging flow and isolate the leakage by isolating RHR suction piping. This is a new JPM S4 The applicants will be required to respond to a reactor trip in Path-1 They will be required to perform actions of the Path and execute an alternate path for Service Water system operation, using the Path-1 RNO column, by isolating cross-connect valves and initiating flow in the essential header This is a Bank JPM.

S* The applicants will be required to place the RHR system in normal standby mode for SI availability The task involves location and manipulation of switches for ECCS components. This is a Bank JPM S6 The applicants will be required to perform FRP-J 3 in response to Containment Flooding They will determine that the leak is in an HVH cooler and will isolate the leak in accordance with the FRP. This is a new JPM. The SRO Upgrade candidates will perform this task S" The applicants will be required to respond to a Loss of Instrument Bus 2 Action required is to take manual control of control systems and stabilize the plant This is a Bank JPM S8 The applicants will be required to respond to a Loss of CCW to the RCP motor coolers. They must diagnose an isolation valve failed closed, attempt to reopen, and execute an alternate path by tripping the reactor and tripping all RCPs when re-establishing CCW fails. This is a Bank JPM that was administered inthe 2002 NRC examination P' The applicants will be required to locate and operate the Pressurizer PORVs at the local control station. The task involves establishing alternate control, establishing communications, and operating the valves as directed locally. This is a Bank JPM P, The applicants will be required to establish an emergency suction source to the AFW pumps via Service Water The task is a series of valve manipulations. This is a Bank JPM The SRO Upgrade candidates will perform this task.

P3 The applicants will be required to restore control power to an EDG control panel. The task will require

,escution of an alternate path to start the diesel locally by re-aligning the AC control power to the engine con*'l' pappl This is a Bank JPM that was administered in the 2002 NRC examination. This JPM requires RCA entry IThe. SRO Upgrade candidates will perform this task NURE.G-1021, Draft Revision 9

Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 ES-301 8/30/04 Operating Test Number: NRC Facility: Robinson Date of Examination: Initials 1. GENERAL CRITERIA a b c# are consistent a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changessafety function JGA with sampling requirements (e.g. 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, distribution).

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered JGA - during this examination.

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s) (see Section JGA "'

        \t D1a).

Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is JGA d.

within acceptable limits.

JGA e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.

2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

- initial conditions
- initiating cues
- references and tools, including associated procedures
- reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee
- specific performance criteria that include:
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
- system response and other examiner cues
- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
- criteria for successful completion of the task
- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards JGA
- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable is within JGA b. Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examinationtest integrity.

acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise new or significantly modified. JGA c. At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are 3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA JGA a. The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Name I Signature Date 7/1/2004 a. Author Joseph G. Arsenault C c- Ae- - b. Facility Reviewer (*) c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) 4,,v 4J//* Va,11a / d. NRC Supervisor . ,, NOTE: The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

concurrence required.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c", chief examiner NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-301 operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Final Date of 8130/04 Operating Test Number: NRC Facility: Robinson Examination: Initials 1. GENERAL CRITERIA b c# a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline: changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g. 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function JGA distribution).

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered JGA . during this examination.

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s) (see Section JGA D.l1a).

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is JGA within acceptable limits.

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than- JGA competent applicants at the designated license level.

2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

- initial conditions
- initiating cues
- references and tools, including associated procedures
- reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation ifdeemed to be time critical by the facility licensee
- specific performance criteria that include:
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
- system response and other examiner cues
- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
- criteria for successful completion of the task
- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards
- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable   JGA b. Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within JGA acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.

c. At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified. JGA 3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA a. The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in JGA accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed qame / Sn,-natur Date a. Author Joseph G. Arsenault 8/19/2004 b. Facility Reviewer (5i 4,a C Aa, c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) /- ,A//j 2.-/009 0/'.qio d. NRC Supervisor f45. 47A C3 A)CF/j., NOTE: The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c', chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4

   /n no n0 L-Facility: Robinson  Date of Exam: 8/30/04 Scenario 1 /2 /3 Operating Test No.: NRC Numbers:

Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* c# may be out of JGA C 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. JGA 4 3. Each event description consists of

* the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated e the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
* the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
* the expected operator actions (by shift position)
* the event termination point (if applicable)

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario JGA % without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. r 5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. JGA 6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain JGA complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators N/A_ 1 have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given. _ _ 8. The simulator modeling is not altered. JGA 9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 1OCFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other JGA scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the JGA form along with the simulator scenarios).

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events JGA specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. JGA I -c-TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.5.d) Actual Attributes 1 2 3 1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 7 5 7 JGA 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 2 2 JGA 3. Abnormal events (2-4) 3 3 3 JGA 4. Major transients (1-2) 1 1 1 JGA 5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1 2 1 JGA 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 0 0 JGA 7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2 2 2 JGA NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Final Facility: Robinson Date of Exam: 8/30/04 Scenario 1/2/3/4 Operating Test No.i NRC Numbers: Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES 1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of JGA service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. JGA U 3. Each event description consists of JGA

* the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
* the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
* the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
* the expected operator actions (by shift position)
* the event termination point (if applicable)

4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario JGA without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. JGA 6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain JGA complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7. Iftime compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators N/A PVA, without undue time constraints. Cues are given.

have sufficient time to carry out expected activities 8 The simulator modeling is not altered. JGA U 9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance JGA scenarios.

deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other JGA 71^ scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D. 5 of ES-301.

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the JGA form along with the simulator scenarios).

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved inthe minimum number of transients and events JGAA _ with the simulator scenarios).

specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. JGA TKJ ___ TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION Actual Attributes D.5.d) Scenarios 1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 7 5 7 6 JGA 2 Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 2 2 2 JGA 3. Abnormal events (2-4) 3 3 3 3 JGA 4 Major transients (1-2) 1 1 2 2 JGA "-. 5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1 2 1 1 JGA 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 0 0 2 JGA 7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2 2 2 2 JGA NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5

  /) R P--r OPERATING TEST NO.: NRC

- Applicant Evolution Minimum Scenario Number - 4 Type Type Number 1 2 3 4 RO BOP RO BOP RO 1BOP1 RO IBOP Reactivity 1* "3 -- " 1- -- 1 1 Normal V 11 RO Instrument/ 4* , 2 2,3,4, 2 2,,,

7 4, 3,6,7 2,5,7 Component 7 2 Maor 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 Reactivity 1* 3 1 1 1 As RO Instrument/ 2* 1,2,5, 23,4, 2,3,7, 3,6,7 Component8 7 8 Maor6 5 5 5 SRO-I _ _ _ _ Reactivity _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Normal 1* 3 1 1 1 SRO Instrument / Cmoet1,2,5 2* 2,3,4 2,3,4,

2,3,6,

Component87 Major 1 6 5 5 5 Reactivity 0 Normal 1V 2* 3 1 1 2,3,4,

SRO-U Instrument/ 3 2,3,6,

1,2,5 2,3,4 Component Major 16 5 5 5 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. *Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author: NRC Reviewer: NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Final OPERATING TEST NO.: Robinson 2004-301 FINAL Applicant Evolution Type Minimum Scenario Number Type Number 1 2 3 4 (Spare) Reactivity 1" 4 1 1 1 Normal 1V RO Instrument/ 4* 1,5 3,4 2,3,7 3,6 Component Major 1 7 5 5,8 [ 5,7 Reactivity 1* Normal 1V 1 1 1 BOP Instrument /4 3,8 2,6 4 2,4 Component 3,8 2,6 4 2,4 Major 1 7 5 5,8 5,7 As RO Instrument) 2* 1,5 3,4 2,3,7 Component ,433,6 Major 1 7 5 5,8 5, SRO-I Reactivity 0 Normal 1V 4 1 1 1 SRO Instrument 2*1 2/ Component 1,3,5 2,3,4,6 2,3,4,7 2,3,4,6 Major 1 5 5,8 5,7 Reactivity 0 _ Normal 1" 4 1 1 1 SRO-U Clnsrument 2 1,3,5 2,3,4,6 2,3,4,7 2,3,4,6 Component 755,85, _______ Major 1 7 5 5,8 1 5.7 Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution type.

(2) Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. *Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

(3) Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included: only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirement.

Author: NRC Reviewer: NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 SRO RO BOP Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

/ Diagnose Interpretand56, 1,2,4, 2,3, 2,3,4, 2,3,4, 1,2,5, , 2,3 3,4,6 2,7,8 24,6 4,8 2,5,7 Events  45757, 7 8 3,767834627824,  48 257 7 8 6,7, Conditions 5,6,8 4,575,7,8 ComplyW ith and 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1-7 1,2,3, 1,3,4, 1,2,3, 1,3,4, 2,3,6, 1,2,4, 1,4,8 1,2, Use Procedures (1) 5,6,8 4,5,6 4,5,8 5,8 5,7 6,7,8 6,7 7,8 5,6 Operate Control NA NA NA NA 1,3,5, 1,3, 1,2,3, 1,3, 2,6, 1,2, 1,4,8 1,2, Boards (2)   8 4,7 7,8 6,7 7,8 4,6 5,7 Communicate and ALL ALL ALL ALL 1,2,3, 1,3,4, 1.2,3, 1,3,4, 2,3,6, 1,2, 1,4, 1,2,5, Interact   5,6,8 5,7 5,7,8 5,6,7 7,8 4,6 5,8 6,7 Demonstrate Supervisory Ability ALL ALL ALL ALL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA (3)

Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. 1,4 3,4 2,3 2,4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA (3) Notes: (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions: Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author: NRC Reviewer: NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 NRC Reviewer:

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Final SRO BOP RO SCENARIO SCENARIO Competencies SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret / Diagnose 1,3,4, 2,3, 2,3,4, 2,3,4, 1., 3,4,7 2 3,8,9 2,4,6 4,8 2,5,7 3,4,6 Events and 5,7,9 4,5,7 5,7,8 7 9 6,7,8 Conditions 1,4, 1,3,4, 1,2,3, 1,3,4, 3,4,7, 1,2,4, 1,2,4, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, Comply With and 1,3,4, 1-7 5,9 5,7 6,7,8 6,7 8,9 5,6 5,7 5,7,9 4,5,6 4,5,8 Use Procedures (1) 1,2,3, 1,3, 3,7, 1,2, 1,2,4 1,4, 1,3, Operate Control NA NA NA 8,9 4,8 1,4,8 5,7 NA 5,9 4,7 7,8 6,7 8,9 4,6 Boards (2) 1,4, 1,3,4, 1,2,3, 1,3,4, 3,4,7, 1,2, 1,4, 1,2,4, Communicate and ALL ALL ALL ALL 5,7,9 5,7 5,7,8 8,9 4,6 5,8 5,7 5,6,7 Interact Demonstrate NA NA NA NA ALL ALL ALL ALL NA NA NA NA Supervisory Ability (3) Comply With and 2,4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Use Tech. Specs. 1,6 3,4 2,3 (3) Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions: Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:R

NRC Reviewer: NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-6 Quality Checklist L) RA A 7 Facility: Robinson Date of Exam: 8/27/2004 Exam Level: RO/SRO Initial Item Description a b- c# 1. Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility JGA 2. a. NRC K/As referenced for all questions JGA b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available 3. SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401 JGA iTZ-' Z 4. Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams appears consistent with a systematic sampling process JGA J \t \

"'

5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as JGA indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate: the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or the examinations were developed independently; or XX the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain) 6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the rest modified); enter the actual 30/10 14/5 31/10 JGA RO / SRO-only question distribution(s) at right.

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions Memory C/A on the RO exam are written at the comprehension analysis level; the SRO exam 30/ 9 45/ 16 may exceed 60 percent ifthe randomly JGA selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO / SRO question distribution(s) at right _ __.

8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers JGA J), 9. Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously JGA v._ approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are JGA 4 . assigned; deviations are justified 10. Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines JGA The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the JGA total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet PrintedName /Signal 2 re - Date a. Author Joseph G. Arsenault-. 7/7/04 b. Facility Reviewer (*) L M1ILM14 Alit" ,c Z k -9-0,/. c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) C,Y/ i/- '. L - i d. NRC Regional Supervisor -. rf - . *dP-Note: The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1 021, Draft Revision 9

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-6 Quality Checklist Final Facility: Robinson Date of Exam: 8127/2004 Exam Level: RO/SRO Initial Item Description a b* C 1. Questions and answers technically accurate and applicable to facility JGA 2. a. NRC KJAs referenced for all questions JGA b. Facility learning objectives referenced as available-- 'l 3. SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401 JGA 4. Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams JGA appears consistent with a systematic sampling process Jv 5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as JGA indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate: the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed: or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or the examinations were developed independently; or XX the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain) 6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 Bank Modified New percent from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the rest modified); enter the actual 32/9 12/5 31/11 JGA RO / SRO-only question distribution(s) at right.

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions Memor C/A on the RO exam are written at the comprehension analysis level; the SRO exam 30/ 10 45/ 15 JGA may exceed 60 percent ifthe randomly JG' . selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO / SRO question distribution(s) at right 8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers JGA 9. Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously J JGA ' approved examination outline and is appropriate for the Tier to which they are

assigned; deviations are justified 10. Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guidelines JGA 11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the JGA total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet Printed Vlame /*Si nature1 Date Joseph G. Arsenault 819/04ý a. Author b. Facility Reviewer(k (v2cX*.L C_rA t , ,5".. c NRC Chief Examiner (#) ., f d. NRC Regional Supervisor rihJ . . E,,s t.,/fCJL. ** c / / Note: The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

      (      (

ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-9 Review Worksheet H.B. Robinson 2004-301 1 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD #

(C/M) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back-  Q= SRO U/E/S   Explanation Focus  Dist. Link units ward KJA Only Instructions (Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]

1. Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.

2. Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable).

3. Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:

* The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).

The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).

The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.

One or more distractors is not credible.

One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., ifthe applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).

4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:

* The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid K/A but, as written, is not operational in content).known from memory).

The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be

* The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).

The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements, 5. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved K/A and those that are designated SRO-onlv (K/A and license level mismatches are unacceptable).

6. Based on the reviewerls judgment, is the question as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory? 7. At a minimum, explain any 01Uf0 ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).

( ( 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other ,6 7.

Q# LOK LOD (CiM) (1-5) Stem Cues TiF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia # Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KIA JOnly RO/SRO Combined Question C 3 Y N E 0O1AK2.01 Generic All RO Questions: Need SRO importance S rating on all RO questions Placed SRO ratings on all RO questions(JGA 8/2/04) 08/10/04 RFA Approve 2 C 3 Y N S 002K5.09 No Comment (RFA 07/13/04) 3 C 3 X Y N -I 003A4.07 Question is NOT balanced. Either replace "B"distractor or re-write "C" and "D"to line up with "B."

S (RFA 07/13/04) Modified to reflect comment. Changed distractor'B'

     (JGA 812104)

08/10/04 RFA Approve M 2 X Y N Distractors "A"and states "All four "C" are NOT channels..." rod and itlet a specificbecause Give plausible the applicant figure out which channel or channels will be Affected.

(RFA 07/13/04) Changed to reflect comment above. Made open reference(JGA 8/2/04) 08110104 RFA Approve Changed again to eliminate direct lookup (JGA 8/18/04) 08/18/04 RFA Approve 5 C 3 Y N S 003K3.03 No Comment (RFA 07/13/04)

     (    (

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6 7.

0# LOK LOD CreI 1 1 (kC0M) (1-5) Stema Cues T!F Partial Job- Minutia #' Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dst. Link units ward K/A Only 6 M 2 Y N S 004K2.03 No Comment (RFA 07/13/04) 7 C 3 X Y N E 005A.204 Need to reference a procedure for distractor "C" to balance out the distractors.

(RFA 07/13/04) PRaced GP-007 reference in C (JGA 8/2/04) 08/10/04 RFA Approve 8M 2 Y N S 005AK3.02 No Comment (RFA 07/13/04) 9 C 3 Y N S 005K1.01 No Comment (RFA 07/13/04) 10 006A1.06 M 2 X Y N Distractors "C" and "D"are NOT plausible. Half of the heat removal is going away. SCM has to deminish.

Suggest giving them that SCM decreases and remove that statement from the distractors and add something else that is not so obvious.

(RFA 07/13/04) Changed to reflect comment above. (JGA 8/2/04) 08110104 RFA Approve Changed distractorsagain to balance distractorsand ensure plausibility (JGA 8/18/04) 08/18/04 RFA Approve

    (     (

Q# 1 LOK 2 LOD 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5 Other 6 7.

(C!M) (1-5) Stem Cues TF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #, Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 11 F= 006A2.12 C 2 X Y Y Based on the distractor analysis, it would be more S plausible to state in "C" and V' to "re-start... vs. "start... since starting is only performed following an SI flow reduction.

(RFA 07/13/04)

     'C' and 'D' are plausible because in this event the SI pumps have not been started yet. Item left as is per phone agreement (JGA 8 beG04)

08/10/04 RFA Approve Rebuild [Csag knowledge so tithe PORVs is not discharge to the PRT.

so obvious.

(RFA 07/13/04) Changed to reflect comment8/04) above (JGA 08110/04 RFA Approve Modified again to ensure D would be incorrectand replaced distractorC (JGA 8118104) 1~08118/04 RFA Approve 13 M 2 Y N S 007G2.1.20 No Comment (RFA 07/13/04) 14 -E 008A2.03 C 3 X Y N Given the initial conditions, RCP motor cooling IS ineffective. Therefore distractor "A" is NOT an incorrect S statement.

Re-write distractor "A."

(RFA 07/13/04) Modified to reflect comment. Rewrote distractor'A'

     (JGA 8/2/04)

08/10/04 RFA Approve Modified again for distractorplausibility(8/19/04 JGA) 08/19/04 RFA Approve

     (     (

1 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6, 7.

Q# LOK LOD Job- r -- 1 Explanation (CMý (1-5) Stem Cues TF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia # Back- Q= SROC U/E/S Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 15 M 2 Y N S 008AA2.23 No Comment (RFA 07/13/04) 16 C 3 Y N S 008K2.02 No Comment (RFA 07/13/04) 17 009EA1.17 C 2 X Y N E State containment pressure without a trend. The trend eludes to the fact that the rupture disc has blown.

Therefore, distractor "A"is NOT plausible. Restate the S last bullet "Containment pressure is currently reading 6 psig on auge."

(RFA 07/71/04) Modified to reflect comment above(JGA 8nmtP4) 0)8110/04 RFA Approve Modified stem and 1 distractorto avoid double jeopardy 1 1 with 007A4.d10 8118/04 (JGA 8t18/04) RFA Approve 1 1 1 1 i18 / 09EA2.04 C 3 X Y Y RCS is subcooled. Distractors "C" and "D"are NOT inand No voiding"C" RV can occur.

the "0D1.

oausible.distractors e-write (RFA 07/13/04) Question remains with editorialenhancements. Per telecon, described why "C'and are plausible for the conditions described in the stem (JGA 814104) 08/10/04 RFA Approve 19 C 3 Y N S 010A1.04 No Comment (RFA 07/13/04) 20 C 3 Y Y S 010G2.4.50 No Comment (RFA 07/13/04)

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. JobC ontent Flaws 5.Other 6, 7, Q# LOK LOD- -k -1 (elM) (1-5) Stem Cues TF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia # Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KJA Only__ 21 M 2 X Y N -E 011EK3.03 Remove "...but the DG output breakers..." from distractors "C" and "D". This statement "teaches" and is information that is not needed.

Modified to reflect comment above (JGA 8/2/04) 08/10/04 RFA Approve 22 C 3 Y Y 012G2.4.31 No Comment (RFA 07/13/04) Eliminated first part of each distractorfor consistency with Harrischanges. (JGA 812104) 23 012K3.02 C 3 X Y N The Removequestion is not

      "All rod bottom lightsas plausible arewritten.

illuminated" from the stem. If RTB "A"is open the rod bottom lights will be lit.

Modified to reflect comment above (JGA 812104) 08/10/04 IRFA Approve 24 013K3.03 C 3 X X Y N Containment phase "A" either will or will not actuate.

Either "B"or "C" has to be correct. Therefore distractors

     "A"and "D are moot.

Replace or re-write the question.

Question rewritten (JGA 8/2/04) 08/11/04 RFA Approve 25 E 014A1.04 C 3 X Y N The distractors are NOT balanced. Three distractors contain "no radial flux tilt." Change "D"to "a % radial flux tilt change was noted." Change "C" to rea-d the same thing.

(RFA 07/13/04) Modified to reflect comment above (JGA 8/2/04) 108/10/04 RFA Approve

    (     (

1. 2 3. Psychometric Flaws 4 Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6 7.

Q# LOK LOD -RO (C/M) (1-5) Ster Cues T'F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #! Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 26 M 2 Y N S 015A4.03 No Comment (RFA 07/13/04) 27 & O15AA1.22 C 3 X Y N Distractor "C": Consider "Seal Injection flow is too high."

S CAF seal injection flow does not seem plausible.

Low (RFA 07/13/04) Modified to reflect comment above (JGA 8/2/04) 08/10/04 RFA Approve 28 E 016A3.01 C 3 X Y N Remove "ifany" from the stem. None of the choices entertain this.

S (RFA 07/13/04) Modified to reflect comment (JGA 8/2/04) 08/10/04 RFA Approve 29 022A1.04 C 3 X Y N Psychometric flaw: If "C"was the correct answer, "D"would be also.

If "A"was the correct answer, "B' would be also.

Redesign the question.

(RFA 07/13/04) Modified to reflect comment above. (JGA 8/2/04) 08/10/04 RFA Approve 30 022A2.03 C 3 X Y Y S No Comment (RFA 07/13/04)

1 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q0 LOK LOD--

(CM) (1-5) Stem Cues TF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #! Back- Q= SRO U/E/S  Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KJA Only 31      024AA2.04 C 2  X  Y N I= Distractors "A"and "B": Change to "...equal to the flow rate..."

S flow rate...""C" and "D": Change to "...equal to charging Distractors Inconsistent fonts throughout.

(RFA 07/13/04) Modified to reflect comment. Changed font.

(JGA 8/2/4) 08/10/04 RFA Approve 32 025AA1.20 C 3 X Y N Distractorsfor"C" plausible a normal "red and and "D":breaker green lights on" is NOT indication.

Replace both distractors.

(RFA 07/13/04) Plausibleat Robinson for a breaker amptectortrip. No change as discussed per telecon. (JGA 8/2/04) 08/10/04 RFA Approve 33 026A1.01 C 3 X Y N E Psychometrically since "B" and "D" are both spray pump discharge valves, applicant will choose between the two.

Replace "D distractor.

S (RFA 07/14/04) Modified to reflect comment. (JGA 8/2/04) 08/10/04 RFA Approve Modified again to improve distractors (JGA 8/19/04) 08/19/04 RFA Approve 34 C 3 Y N S 026AA2.02 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) Changedcorrect answerto SFP HX tube (JGA 8/19/04) L RFA Approve 8/19/04

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6 7.

Q# LOK LOD unt ad --

(CM) (1-5) Stem Cues TF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #, Back- Q= SRO U/E/S  Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 35 C 3    Y N S 027AA2.10 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04)

36 C 3 Y Y S 027G2.4.49 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) 37 C 3 Y N S 028G2.1.23 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) 38 029EA1.09 C 3 X X Y N E Validate distractor "D": What is the evidence that auto rod insertion is malfunctioning? S (RFA 07/14/04) Updated explanation to describe that rods should be moving faster with a high temperature mismatch (JGA 8/2R04) Modified again to balance distractors (JGA 8/19/04) RFA Approve 08/19/04 39 C 3 Y Y E 029EA2.09 Provide reference to justify answer.

S (RFA 07/14/04) Reference provided. Also modified item (JGA 8/2/04) RFA: 08/10/04 Change "A" and "B" to "main" turbine Facility Agreed 08/10/04 RFA Approve 40 M 2 Y Y S 029G2.2.25 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04)

          (I 1 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5 Other 6   7, Q# LOK LOD (C/M) (1-5) Stem Cues TF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia # Back- Q= SRO U/E/S  Explanation Focus  Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 41        029K4.03 C 3      Y. N Add automatic valve closure to fully implement the KA.

Use choices "A"and "C" with valve closures (e.g. right S action right valve, wrong action right valve, right action wrong valve, wrong action wrong valve).

(RFA 07/14/04) Modified to reflect comment above (JGA 8/2/04) 08/10/04 RFA Approve 42 034A2.01 M 3 X Y Y "Should remain the same" is not plausible. Re- design distractors "B"and "D."

(RFA 07/14/04) Modified to reflect comment above. (JGA 8/2/04) 08/11104 RFA : Changed "should" to "will" in distractors "A" and "C". Approve Modified stem slightly (JGA 8/19/04) 08/19/04 RFA Approve 43 M 2 Y Y S 034G2.1.23 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) Modified to adjust distractorD for distractorplausibility (JGA 8/19/04) 08/19/04 RFA Approve I..... I___J......I____L.....L....J..- ___ l. 1________

1 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (C!M) (1-5) Stem Cues TF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #Q Back- 0= SRO U/EIS Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KJA Only 44 C 3 Q# Y N S 035K1.01 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) 45 036G2.4.6 C 3 X X N Y This question with GTH references an AOP NOT an EOP. Discuss or MEE.

GTH concurs Distractor "B"is NOT plausible. With cavity level dropping rapidly, moving the spent fuel assembly to the upender and then to the SFP is not plausible.

Replace distractor "B" (RFA 07/14/04) Modified distractor'B' to reflect comment. RFA allowed use of AOP since NO EOPs exist in relation to Fuel HandlingAccidents (JGA &82M04) 08/10/04 RFA Approve Modified again to enhance distractors(8/19/04) 08/19/04 RFA Approve 46 M 2 Y N E 038EA1.19 Provide reference to justify answer.

S (RFA 07/14/04) Reference provided (JGA 8/2/04) 08/11/04 RFA Approve 47 C 3 Y N S 039A1.06 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) 48 M 2 Y N S 039K1.09 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04)

1 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5 Other 6 7 Q# LOK LOD ] --- Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #* Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation (C/M) (1-5) Stem Cues T'F Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 49 C 2 X Y N E O40AA1.13 Change distractor "D"to "..... All MSIVs indicate RED" Need applicable reference attached (Main Steam SD) S (RFA 07/14/04) Modified to reflect comment above. Reference attached (JGA 8/2/04) 08/10/04 RFA Approve Modified again to enhance distractors (JGA 8/19/04) 08/19/04 RFA Approve 50 C 2 Y N S 041 K6.03 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) 51 M 2 X Y N E 045A3.05 Move "governor and" to the stem also.

S (RFA 07/14/04) Modified to reflect comment above (JGA 8/2/04) 08/10/04 RFA Approve 52 C 3 Y N -E 054AA2.08 Need applicable reference attached for verification (RFA 07/14/04) Reference provided (JGA 8/2/04) 08/11/04 RFA Approve Modified distractorsto increaseplausibility (8/19/04 JGA) 08/19/04 RFA Approve 53 C 4 Y N S 056AA2.56 Good question (RFA 07/14/04) 54 M 2 Y Y S 056G2.4.50 No Comment I(RFA 07/14/04)

        (I 6   7.

FlawsPartial 4. Job Content Flaws 5 Other 2.

1. (1-5)

(CiM) Stem3. Psychometric Cues TF Cred. Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/E/S  Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 55 C 3  X  Y N F 056K1.03 Psychometric flaw: Change "B" and "C" distractors to read "Only the Main Feedwater Pump will trip..."

S (RFA 07/1 4/04) Modified to reflect comment (JGA 872/04) 08/11/04 RFA: "B" and "C" emphasize sufficient and insufficient.

08/11/04 RFA Approve 56 M 2 X Y N E 057AA217 Add "ONLY" to "A,B, and C." Otherwise, if D" was correct, "A, B, and C" would be also.

S (RFA 07/14/04) Modified to reflect comment (JGA 872/04) 08/11/04 RFA Approve 57 M 2 Y N -4 058AK3.02 Place an "s" on "action" in the stem.

S (RFA 07/14/04) Modified to reflect comment (JGA 872/04) 08/11/04 RFA Approve 58 C 3 Y N S 059K3.04 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) 59 C 3 Y N S 061K6.02 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04)

1 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7, Q# LOK LODD --- LOD Stem cCu~es T/F Cred. Partrial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SFRO U/E/S Explanation (1-5) Se (C/M) (1-5) Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only IFocus 60 C 3 X Y N F 062AA1.07 Where is it assumed that excess letdown is in service? Change distractor "A"to state "isolate normal letdown S and pace excess letdown in service." This would be wrong (see AOP-14, step 10).

RFA 0/14/04) Modified to reflect comment (JGA 812/04) 08/11104 RFA Approve Clarifiedwording for consistency (8/19/04 JGA) 08/19/04 RFA Approve 81 C 3 Y Y S 062AA2.02 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) 62 M 3 Y N S 062K4.02 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) 63 M 3 Y N S 063K2.01 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) 64 C 3 Y N S 064A2.13 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) 65 C 3 X Y N E 065AK3.03 The question has low discriminatory value as written.

Chan e one distractor that does NOT require air, is S plaus~ile but is still wrong.

(RFA 07/14/04) Modified to reflect comment. Replaced "D" with

      'Pressurizer Safety Valves'(JGA 8/2/04)

08/11/04 RFA Approve

1 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD I -

('CM) (1-5) Stem Cues TT Cred. Partial Job- Minutia # Back- Q= SRO U/E/S  Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 66 M 3 X    Y N E 068AA1.02 CAF: Is there enough information in the stem to assume that the CR is evacuated?

S (RFA 07/14/04) Added clarificationto stem (JGA 812/04) 08/11/04 RFA Approve Minor mods to distractorsA and C (8/19/04 JGA) 08/19/04 RFA Approve 67 M 3 X Y N F 073A4.02 Wh are distractors "A"and "D"plausible? S (RFA 07/14/04) A'is plausible because some radiationmonitors are equipped with range switches, but not R-14C. 'D' is plausible because if R- 14 (PlantEffluent Monitors) were not operable, then dose assessments would be performed using diverse (ie, Containment) radiation readings.(JGA 8,2/04) 08/11/04 RFA Approve 68 C 3 Y N S 073K5.02 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) Minor stem modifications (8/19/04 JGA) 08/19/04 RFA Approve 69 C 3 Y N -E 076G2.1.33 This question is similar to question 30. They both deal S with entry modifying Consider into TS LCO 3.0.3. TS.

to another (RFA 07/14/04) Different systems. Not changed per telecon(JGA 8/2/04) 08/11/04 RFA Approve Modified distractorsfor RO level (8/19/04 JGA) 0 8119/04 RFA Approve

. 2 3. Psychometric Flaws 4, Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7, Q# LOK LODOD 1 5   Job- Minutia *# Back- Q= SRO U/E/S  Explanation (C!M) ( - ) Stem Cues T;F Cred. Partial Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 70 M 3  X  Y N -S 078A4.01 Psychometric flaw: Distractors "B"and "C"are too close.

S Change the second part of one of them (possibly the setpolnt).

(RFA 7/14/04) Modified to reflect comment. CapitalizedOPEN and CLOSE (JGA 8/2/04) 08/11104 RFA Approve 71 M 3 X Y N E 078K2.02 Change distractor "D"to: "480V Bus E-1 and E-2 are being powered by their respective EDG."

This way the answer is not given away.

(RFA 07/14/04) Modified to say '480v busses are energized(JGA 8/2/04) 08/11104 RFA Approve 72 086A2.01 C 3 N N The second part of the KA is NOT satisfied (use ro cedures to correct, control,...) odify question to include.

(RFA 07/14/04) Modified to reflect comment (JGA 8(2804) 08/11/04 RFA Approve 73 C 3 X Y N -E 103G2.1.2 Distractor "B" is not plausible.

Replace or justify its plausibility.

S (RFA 07/14/04) Plausibilityjustified per telecom and updated on explanation (JGA 812104) 08/111104 RFA Approve

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6 7 0# LOK LOD C (CMI (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #* Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 74 C 3 Y N E E02EK1.2 Need applicable reference attached for verification S (RFA 07/14/04) Reference provided (JGA 8/2/04) 08/11/04 RFA Approve 75 C 3 Y Y S* E03G2.4.31 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) MEE 08/11/04: KA being addressed (Similar to HR exam) 8/17/04 Resolved JGA. KA changed to 2.4.16 8/17/04 RFA Approve 76 C 3 Y Y S* E04G2.1.28 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) MEE 08/11/04: KA being addressed (Similar to HR exam) 8/17/04 Resolved JGA. Comment accepted by NRC 08/17/04 RFA Approve 77 E05EK3.4 M 2 X X Y N E- The distractors are inconsistent. The stem does NOT solicit a reason. Redo the stem to solicit a flow and a reason. Redo disatractors "B" and "D"to model "A"and S "C."

(RFA 07/14/04) Modified to reflect comment (JGA 812/04) 08111/04 RFA Approve

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5 Other 6.

LOK LOD (C/M) (1-5) Stern Cues IT/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia # Back- Q= SROI UE/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 78 E05G2.1.27 C 3 X N Y KA: This is not a "system purpose' question 3/4 of each distractor could be moved to the stem. The ouestion will read and flow better if moved.

(RFA 07/14/04) Modified to reflect comment. Discussedproposal on phone with RFA (JGA 8/2/04) 08/11/04 RFA Approve 79 E06EA2.1 C 3 X Y Y F Remove: "with 2 degrees of subcooling" from the 4 th bullet. Enough information is there to determine that.

Therefore, distractor "C" will become plausible.

S (RFA 07/14/04) Modified to reflect comment (JGA 812104) 08/11/04 RFA Approve 80 M 3 Y N S E06EK2.1 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) 81 C 3 Y N S E13EK3.1 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) 82 C 3 Y Y S E14EA2.1 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) 83 C 3 Y N E16EA2.1 E Question listed as SRO. Should be RO (RFA 07/14/04) S Changed to RO test item. Reflected on ES-401 outline.

4JGA 8/2/04) 08/11/04 RFA Approve

1 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6 7, Q# LOK LOD ----

(C!M) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #; Back- Q= SRO WEIS  Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 84      G2.1.1 M 2  X  Y N E Distractor "C" is symmetric with "A"but "D" is not symmetric with "B."

S RFA 07/14/04) Modified to reflect comment (JGA 8/2/04) 08/11/04 RFA Approve 85 C 3 Y Y S G2.1.11 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) Added > instead of > to distractors A'and 'B'

     (JGA 8/2/04)

08111/04 RFA Approve Modified stem wording (8119104 JGA) 108/19/04 RFA Approve 86 C 3 Y N G2.1.28 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) 87 G.. M 1 X X Y This question has no discriminatory value.

Selection "A"is too obvious.

Replace the question (RFA 07/14/04) Replaced with Bank Question, modified for suitability to exam (JGA 8/2/04) 08/11/04 RFA Approve 88 M 3 Y Y G2.2.12 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04) 89 M 3 Y N G2.2.13 No Comment (RFA 07/14/04)

1., 3. Psychometric Flaws 4, Job Content Flaws 5 Other 6 7.

2.

LOK LOD Explanation

{C/m) (1-5) Stem Cues TTF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- 0= [SRO UE/S Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 90      G2.2.14 M 2 X  X  Y N. "Must" combined with "may" statements can be ambiguous. Put in stem the "Must" statement and only use the second part of the distractors as distractors.

The second part of the answer "...an assessment of compensatory actions must be performed" is NOT clear from the reference. The reference states that items such as LCOs should NOT be tracked.

Why is distractor "A" not correct too? The nature of this question indicates SRO only.

(RFA 07/14/04) Replaced question with a modified bank item to eliminate the SRO nature of question (JGA 8/4/04) 08/11/04 RFA: KA does NOT match, Replace Question.

08/11/04 RFA Approve 91 M 1 G2.2.25 E This question is common knowledge and has very low discriminatory value.

(RFA 07/19/04) S SRO Validator had difficulty with this item. No change as agreed per telecom (JGA 8/2/04) 08/11104 RFA Approve 92 G2.2.28 M 2 X Y N If "B" was correct, "A"would be correct also. Stem needs to be written (... as a minimum...)

     (RFA 07/19/04)

Modified to reflect comment (JGA 8/2/04) 08/11/04 RFA Approve

1 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (C/M) (1-5) Stem Cues TF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #i Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward KJA Only 93 C 3 Y Y S G2.2.6 No Comment (RFA 07/19/04) Developed new question to replace because this was double jeopardy with SRO Admin Task A3) 08/11/04 RFA Approve 94 M 2 Y N S G2.3.1 No Comment (RFA 07/19/04) 95 M 3 Y N S G2.3.2 No Comment (RFA 07/19/04) 96 M 3 Y Y S G2.3.9 No Comment (RFA 07/19/04) 97 M 3 Y Y S G2.4.16 No Comment (RFA 07/19/04) 98 M 2 Y N S G2.4.26 No Comment (RFA 07/19/04) 99 G2.4.37 M 2 Y N* E The nature of this question appears to be SRO only. RO importance is 2.0 NOT 2.9. SRO importance is 3.5.

S Changed to SRO ONLY and updated ES-401 written exam outline. (Switched with E16EA2.1) (JGA 8/2/04) 08/11/04 RFA Approve

3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# 1 LOK 2.

LOD Explanation Ste Focus TF Ced. Link MintiSRO Dist. Partial Job- units ward KIA Only 100 G2.4.4 C 3 X Y N E Psychometric flaw: The distractors are NOT balanced.

Modify distractor "C' or add another reactor trip ractor.

Modified to reflect comment. Added reactortrip to "D" (JGA 8/2/04) 08/11/04 RFA Approve

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: H.B. Robinson Date of Exam: 08/27/04 Exam Level: RO Initials Item Description a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading TCK N/A RFA 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and N/A N/A N/A documented 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors TCK N/A RFA (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/- 2% overall and 70 +/- N/A N/A N/A 4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades N/A N/A N/A are justified 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training TCK N/A RFA deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name / Signature Date a. Grader Timothy C. Kolb _09/13/04_ b. Facility Reviewer(*) N/A N/A_ c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) Ronald F. Aiello - 09/13/04 d. NRC Supervisor (*) rjy*Gh. ý( 6, rCtAtrJ/2tsi q ( -1/0 (* The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: H.B. Robinson Date of Exam: 08/27/04 Exam Level: SRO Initials Item Description a b c 2. Clean answer sheets copied before grading TCK N/A RFA 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and N/A N/A N/A documented 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors TCK N/A RFA (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/- 2% overall and 70 +/- N/A N/A N/A 4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades N/A N/A N/A are justified 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training TCK N/A RFA deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name / Signature Date a. Grader Timothy C. Kolb - - 09/13/04 b. Facility Reviewer(*) _________N/A.- I/A _N/A-c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) Ronald F. Aiello 09/13/04 d. NRC Supervisor (*) ml. *.Et.st. /,ir* q/,, p4.y (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

F£-.*{31 Form ES-501 -1 ESR501 Post- Examination Check SheetFomE-li Task Description Date Complete 1. Facility written exam comments or graded exams received and 09/13/04 verified complete 2. Facility written exam comments reviewed and incorporated and NA NRC grading completed, if necessary 3. Operating tests graded by NRC examiners 09/15/04 4. NRC Chief examiner review of written exam and operating test rfa(tck) 09/15/04 grading completed rfa(dsm) 09/27/04 5. Responsible supervisor review completed 09/28/04 6. Management (licensing official) review completed 09/28/04 7. License and denial letters mailed / i zeto

/-

8. Facility notified of results 09/28/04 9. Examination report issued (refer to NRC MC 0612) / 0 - z 0': 10. Reference material returned after final resolution of any N/A appeals

C Progress Energy Serial: RNP-RA/04-0072 JUN 1 1 2004 Mr. Luis Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region II Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street S.W., Suite 23T85 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8931 H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-261/LICENSE NO. DPR-23 REACTOR AND SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR INITIAL EXAMINATION OUTLINES

Dear Mr. Reyes:

In response to NRC letter dated April 26, 2004, Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. (PEC), also known as Carolina Power and Light Company, H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant (HBRSEP), Unit No. 2, has submitted the requested examination outlines to your staff. The reactor and senior reactor operator initial examination outlines were mailed directly to Mr. Ron Aiello on June 2, 2004.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. C. T. Baucom.

Sincerely, Jan.ucas Manager - Support Services - Nuclear JFL/cac c: Document Control Desk NRC Resident Inspector, HBRSEP Mr. C. P. Patel, NRC, NRR Mr. M. E. Ernstes, NRC, Region II Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.

[HA..sc.rn Nuclear Plant 3h81 West Iritrance Hoad Hartsville SCK 29550 }}

IR 05000261/2004301

Text

Dear Mr. Reyes:

Navigation menu

v t e Inspection Report - Robinson - 2004301 (Operator Exams)
80 \| 81 \| 82 \| 83 \| 84 \| 85 \| 86 \| 87 \| 88 \| 89 \| 90 \| 91 \| 92 \| 93 \| 94 \| 95 \| 96 \| 97 \| 98 \| 99 00 \| 01 \| 02 \| 03 \| 04 \| 05 \| 06 \| 07 \| 08 \| 09 \| 10 \| 11 \| 12 \| 13 \| 14 \| 15 \| 16 \| 17 \| 18 \| 19 \| 20 \| 21 \| 22 \| 23 \| 24 \|
2004 Quarterly Integrated 1Q (0) 2Q (0) 3Q (0) 4Q (1) Assessments Mid Cycle End of Cycle 7(0) 8(0) 9(0) Security Operator Exams 301(0) Emergency Planning Other

IR 05000261/2004301

Text

Dear Mr. Reyes:

Navigation menu

Search