IR 05000255/1986001

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
App to SALP Board Rept 50-255/86-01 for Nov 1984 - Oct 1985
ML20197E789
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/12/1986
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20197E776 List:
References
50-255-86-01, 50-255-86-1, NUDOCS 8605150317
Download: ML20197E789 (3)


Text

. .. . _ _ . ._ .. - -. .-. __ .

-

.

APPENDIX SALP 6 SALP BOARD REPORT

i

'

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

[ SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE

,

50-255/86001; Inspection Report N . .

.

Consumers Power Company Name of Licensee .

1 .

i Palisades Nuclear Generating Station Name of Facility

!

.

l November 1, 1984 to October 31, 1985 i Assessment Period i

!

, -

l

l

!

~

,

i 4 e t

i w

.

i , -

,

,

- _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . ___ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_

__

-

.

r l

l L. A. Reyes, Chief, Operations Branch E. R. Schweibinz, Chief, Technical Support Staff C. W. Hehl, Chief, Projects Section 2A r E. R. Swanson, Senior Resident Inspector C. D. Anderson, Resident Inspector W. E. Milbrot, Reactor Inspector N. R. Williamsen, Emergency Preparedness Analyst J. F. Suermann, Project Manager, Section 2A Michigan Public Service Commission R. Whale, Staff Engineer Regional Administrator's Conclusions Based on Consideration of Licensee's Comments By letter dated March 21, 1986, the licensee provided written comments on the SALP Report as requested by Region III; the letter indicated there were no errors in the report requiring correction. The staff has reviewed the licensee's comments ar.d has determined that they are responsive to the concerns identified in the SALP Report. As discussed with the licensee at the February 19, 1986 mee. ting, however, the formulation phase of the licensee's performance improvement programs has passed and an aggressive effort is needed to implement these programs such that they produce demonstrable and quantifiable results. Region III is particularly interested in seeing a marked improvement in the functional areas that were rated Category 3 or showed a declining trend in performance. The Region has been, and will continue in the future, applying additional resources to these areas and we intend to closely monitor the licensee's progress. Should the desired results not be evident by the end of the current SALP period, Region III intends to take additional actions to effect the necessary change .

E

_ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ - _ - - - - - - - -

Fa cili

~

n Febru i r Compan y o in Inspect r on 19, Powe mented on Februa yense e 's mers rd docu Consu licensee The lic Tne ing with SALP Boa h tne i Meet ns of the sed wit Illinois.a cceptaD was mma mp-os erent r y of Su an d co nclusio 1 we re discusin Glen Ellyn,fn toouDe d me nt attention nce i Tne n manace rma month nte0 a d nsee tr e perf oin prio r nce, The findingsN Region 50-255/8600III was preserthe office r lice of wa:

Repo t r

the nce fu ier i 1986,iatoat ry pe rforma that imp e mentat init iated of trainte lantrols; th shad not had a reas l

ce roqu indicated ffect ive n Com pa y 'r tne ive l ;e rio rect ive act ions r,

eve ing re e ap praisa noted asa P o w +, r NRC, how assu me rs r 3 rat andn ,ee' adrinistrat s

co r r tre was On neededmstothat Consua Catejo yprogr ms a rea r

a iite rat ing fo is ality the redre s , r r Drogra e receivec hat rmanco repa majo in the i

'ce.se nce, an d the cu fact he pe rfe t

"r a p ctio ,

mo roving prcte of last om a the -.J ei lla su rv rimar ily to t ra'se in the ~a nte in be nd fire nt nt te rma nce red to s a as se sme i ms

"o a ctisit ea fair to prub rtu' r ' ice due p suf f icie inq pe r+o w e's ce wa _ e ing a Deen licen nce - a s findings tak de clin to the 'ind ngs A re-ma i n' ' 3 e d rall 5t P ndiiwhich The pe rt due tno note loaical co ntroishe Boa r we exe d's e nsee inue a d that n

be ina he ove riod Inoa po 1tive radio ck nowl pdqed ted t

tattriLe t ppraisal oe o nt re sults of ' r orr . wo uld cs it ive areaslicen see a nce a nc h r

recove nce tre nds ce po The rforma rly i n t e i S ALP tC pe a

rforma would pro du their peexisted ea icitated t meimproving ms progr a that r than ant the nt impro ing r e riod veme ionce nce that rat confide rformance5AL P their petne next in ing r< et du r N nde at os n

Atte de nn"1 atte pe so wing The follo ns Drr Ant r (~;*'at'o V Nut Iva nce CPCo iu n i m >t Pri ,iCr nage r r Assura J Roynolas 'jice ral Ma r, Nuclea r b"ne sing r i 3nt W . B u ck r,a cutive Dir"cto ar t itenna n" Manaue r Nuc l e Mainte J . F . F ir{r ,inlito"*, PGnl:' inq a nd er Slade,f;"rry,AI i d 1 *

Directo W. Be _a l f' )s[ > l '

K Or c <c nr Ul dn+

RD Ee-h, n il r e> ct(,r , A ef*y, t

j . M . \(ri 5 d ' q: 1drdN r

r a nd Adm i n i s t r a t oi,trato i t i RC On hd U.S. N k " q : ,1 a i i r ,n a l Anmin dt1 k a(i i NRR 4"g P oI naqor kepp ier uty I .,1 D Ma

,

C2 s' .Du 01V I n ;"ct Brdnch B. Da O i 0 0 '~ t.n Ten. ley Ir riects A

!.

k. Hind ch, <

[r

>!

Wamoa imns I, n ri< sot I V j

N,

~ N

f .

PALISADES Facility A. Summary of Meeting with Consumers Power Company on February 19, 1986 The findings and conclusicas of the SALP Board documented in Inspection Report No. 50-255/86001 were discussed with the licensee on February 19, 1986, at the Region III office in Glen Ellyn, Illinois. The licensee's regulatory performance was presented and found to be acceptable. The NRC, however, indicated that further licensee management attention was needed to assure effective implementation of the performance improvement programs that Consumers Power Company had initiated in prior months. The licensee received a Category 3 rating in the areas of maintenance, surveillance, and quality programs and administrative controls; this was due primarily to the fact that the licensee's corrective actions had not been sufficient to raise the performance rating for the appraisal perio The declining performance in the emergency preparedness area was noted as being due to the licensee's performance in the last major exercise. On a positive note, the performance was considered to be improving in the areas of radiological controls, licensing activities and fire protectio The licensee acknowledged the Board's findings as a fair assessinent of their performance and attributed the overall SALP findings to problems that existed early in the SALP appraisal period and which were taking a longer than anticipated time to recover fro The licensee expressed confidence that the improving performance trends would continue and that their performance improvement programs would produce positive results during the next SALP rating perio A'ttendees The following personnel attended the meeting:

CPCo J. Reynolds, Executive Vice President F. W. Buckman, Vice President, Nuclear Operations J. E. .Firlit, Plant General Manager G. B.'Slade, Executive Director, Nuclear Assurance K. W. Berry, Director, Nuclear Licensing R. D. Orosz, Engineering and Maintenance Manager R. A. Fenech, Technical Engineer J. M. Storey, Director, Plant Publ.ic Affairs

'

U.S. NRC J. G. Keppler, Regional Administrator A. B. Davis, Deputy Regional Administrator J. A. Hind, Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards T. V. Wambach, Licensing Project Manager, NRR N. J. Chrissotimos, Chief, Projects Branch 2