IR 05000250/1990026
| ML17348A614 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 10/16/1990 |
| From: | Ebneter S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Goldberg J FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9010300134 | |
| Download: ML17348A614 (40) | |
Text
OFFICIAL COPY OCT I 6 1990 Docket Nos. 50-250, 50-251 License Nos.
DPR-31, DPR-41 Florida Power and Light Company ATTN:
Mr. J.
H. Goldberg President - Nuclear Division P.O.
Box 14000 Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE REPORT NOS. 50-250/90-26 AND 50-251/90-26 This refers to the NRC's Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP)
Report for your Turkey Point Facility which was sent to you on September 25, 1990, our meeting of October 5, 1990, at which we discussed this report; and your written response, dated October 15, 1990, relative to this report.
Enclosed is our summary of the October 5, 1990, meeting and a
copy of the slides which we used during this meeting to present the results of the SALP.
Also enclosed is an errata to the Initial SALP Board Report and constitutes the Final SALP Report.
t'e have reviewed your written response and find that no changes to the SALP report are needed.
No reply to this letter is required; however, should you have any questions concerning these matters, I will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
/v/
Stewart D. Ebneter Regional Administrator
Enclosures:
October 5, 1990 Meeting Summary 2.
October 5, 1990 SALP Slides 3.
FPL Response to the SALP Report (Letter dated October 15, 1990)
4.
Errata Sheet
REGION II ORGANIZATION ADMINISTRATOR.
S. EBNETER DEPUTY J. MILHOAN TYA ~gn w
v CHIEF B. WILSON D!Y'SION OF
~ ~ ci'T~ >9 >9QECTS I
DIR.
L, REYES OEPUT Y E. MERSCHOFF
>
DIVISION OF REACTOR SAFET Y DIR.
A. GIBSON DEPUTY f %CANT)
I OIVISIOI OF RADIATION SAF E T y AND SAFEOUARCS DIR.
J. STOHR DEPUTY B. MALLETT
~
~
r DIVISION OF REACTOR PROJECTS ORG ANI2 ATI ON
3IQ~I.gF
~~ r JEST" DIR.
L. REYES DEPUTY E. ME RSCHOF F REACTOR PROJECTS BRANCH NO. 2 CHIEF M. SINKULE OJECTS SECTION NO. 2A PROJECTS SECTION NO. 28
- F P. FREDRICKSON CHIEF R. CRLENJAK fORTH ANNA SURRY ST. LUCIE CRYSTAL RI VER T( ~ Is( c I vO
NRR ORGANIZATION OFFICE OF iQ IJ C L E AR R E ', T REGULATI'IR.
THOMAS E. MURLEY ASSOC. OIRECTOR FOR PRO 'ECTS ASSOC. DIRECTOR FOR INSPECTION AND J. PARTLOW TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT DIVIS<OW OF AE4t TQA PRO~SOTS i'll DIV. OF ENGINEERING AND SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY S. VARGA, DIR. I/II G. LAINAS, ASST. DIR. II H. BERKOW, DIR. II-2 t
G. EDISON, PROJ. MGR.
TURKEY POINT DIV. OF OPERATIONAL EVENTS ASSESSMENT DIVISION OF REACTOR PROJECT III/IV/V DIV. OF REACTOR INSPECTION AND SAFEGUARDS DIVISION OF PROTECTION AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS AREAS FOR OPERATING REACTORS I
A.
PLANT OPERATIONS 3.
RADIOLOGICALCONTROLS
~
".
MAINTENANCE/SURVEILLANCE 3.
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SECURITY/SAFEGUARDS
/
ENGINEERING/TECHNICAL SUPPORT G.
SAFETY ASSESSMENT/QUALITY VERIFICATION
AREA PERFORMANCE CATEGORY
.
ENSEE MANAGEMENT ATTENTION AND OLVEMENT ARE READILY EVIDENT AND (CE EMPHASIS ON SUPERIOR PERFORMANCE NUCLEAR SAFETY OR SAFEGUARDS
, IVITIES, WITH THE RESULTING
)FORMANCE SUBSTANTIALLYEXCEEDING ADULATORY.REQUIREMENTS.
LICENSEE
<<OURCES ARE AMPLE AND EFFECTIVELY
=D SO THAT A HIGH LEVEL OF PLANT 3 PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE IS BEING
)IEVED. REDUCED NRC ATTENTION MAY AP P ROP RIAT AREA PERFORMANCE CATEGORY '2 LICENSEE MANAGEMENTATTENTION TO AND INVOLVEMENTIN THE PERFORMANCE OF NUCLEAR SAFETY OR SAFEGUARDS ACTIVITIES ARE GOOD.
THE LICENSEE HAS ATTAINED A LEVEL OF
'
PERFORMANCE A'BOVE THAT NEEDED TO MEET REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS.
LICENSEE RESOURCES ARE ADEQUATE AND REASONABLY ALLOCATED SO THAT GOOD PLANT AND PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE IS BEING ACHIEVED.
NRC ATTENTION MAY BE MAINTAINED AT NORMAL LEVEL V AREA PERFORMANCE CATEGORY 3
/
- ENSEE MANAGEMENT ATTENTION AND
/OLVEMENT IN THE'PERFORMANCE OF
'CLEAR SAFETY OR SAFEGUARDS TIVITIES ARE NOT SUFFICIENT.
E LICENSEE'S PERFORMANCE DOES
>T SIGNIFICANTLY EXC.EED THAT EDED TO MEET MINIMALREGULATORY QUIREMENTS.
LICENSEE RESOURCES PEAR TO BE STRAINED OR NOT FECTIVELY USED.
NRC ATTENTION
"OULD BE INCREASED ABOVE NORMAL VEL 'VALUATIONCRITERIA MANAGEMENTINVOLVEMENTIN ASSURING QUALITY 2.
APPROACH TO RESOLUTION OF TECHNICAL ISSUES FROM A SAFETY STANDPOINT 3.
ENFORCEMENT HISTORY 4.
REPORTING AND ANALYSIS OF REPORTABLE EVENTS 5.
STAFFING (INCLUDING MANAGEMENT)
6.
TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS AND QUALIFICATION
VIOLATION SUMMARY (CYCLE 9)
AUGUST 1, 1989 THROUGH JULY 31, 1990 I
II III IV V
TURKEY POINT
TURKEY POINT
0
0
0
14
0
REGION II AVE.
PER OPERATING UNIT fOR CYCLE 9
0
TURKEY P INT AUGUST l. 1989 JULY 31. 1990 (CYCLE 9)
COMP FAILURE 15%
OTHER 3%
PERSONNEL 65%
OTHER MAIN TENAN CE TEST/CALIB OP ERATIN G DESIGN/
CONSTR.
18%
TOTAL (34)
PERSONNEL (22)
Ji. L% L JLr M 4 LMJL 4 For Sixteen Region II Sites SALP CYCLES 8 AND 9 Number of Sites 12.
10-0-'PS RAD M/S EP SEC ENG/TS SA/QV Functional Areas
% CATEGORY
W CATEGORY 2 H CATEGORY 3
OPERATIONS CATEGORY 2 PERFORMANCE CONTINUED TO BE GOOD PLANT MANAGEMENTHAS TAKEN A CONSERVATIVE APPROACH TO PLANT OP E RATIONS STRENGTHS OPERATOR PERFORMANCE IN HANDLING PLANT TRANSIENTS WAS GOOD PROGRAM FOR LABELING PLANT COMPONENTS HAS BEEN EFFECTIVE USE OF NON-LICENSED OBSERVERS TO PERFORM INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF.
OP E RATIONS USE OF PLAN-OF-THE-DAYMEETINGS TO COORDINATE MAINTENANCEACTIVITIES SHIFT BRIEFINGS WERE THOROUGH AND P ROF ESSIONAL
OPERATIONS CON'T CATEGORY 2
CHALLENGES
- FEWER EVENTS THAN EXPERIENCED LAST SALP PERIOD, BUT SOME STILL OCCURRING PERSONNEL ERRORS RELAXATIONOF COMMAND AND CONTROL BLEMS CLEARANCE PRO R ECOMMENDATIONS LICENSEE TO ENSURE THAT ATTENTION TO DETAIL IS ENFORCED
'
e RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL CA: EGORY 2, TREND:
IMPROVING OVERALL IMPROVED P ERFORMANCE STRENGTHS LICENSEE RP AUDITS WERE THOROUGH, COMPREHENSIVE, CONTRIBUTING TO IMPROVEMENT EFFECTIVE ACTIONS RESULTED IN A REDUCTION IN CONTAMINATEDFLOOR SPACE REDUCTION IN PERSONNEL CONTAMINATIONEVENTS AND EXPOSURE AGGRESSIVE CHEMISTRY PROGRAM CHALLENGES SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE STORAGE AND PROCESSING CONTINUED IMPROVEMENT
MAINTENANCE/SURVEILLANCE C.-'.: EGQRY 2, TREND:
IMPROVING SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENTS NOTED IN ALL AREAS STRENGTHS IMPlEMENTED EFFECTIVE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO ADDRESS WEAKNESSES IDENTIFIED BY THE MTI CORPORATE MANAGEMENT.ALLOCATED SIGNIFICANT RESOURCES FOR PLANT IMPROVEMENTS AND SUPPORT OF PLANT MANAGEMENT TRACKING AND SCHEDULING OF SURVEILLANCES WAS EFFECTIVE LEAK RATE TESTING PROGRAMS AS THEY PERTAIN TO VALVE LEAKAGE TRENDING AND TESTING OF PRESSURE ISOLATION VALVES IMPROVEM.ENTS IN THE.MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT STAFFING, TURNOVER RATES AND OVERTIME REDUCTION
'
~
MAINTENANCE SURVEILLANCE (CON'T)
'TEGORY 2, TREND:
IMPROVING IMPROVEMENT IN THE MATERIAL CONDITION OF THE PLANT MANAGEMENTEFFECTIVE IN REDUCING PLANT WORK ORDER (PWO) BACKLOG IMPROVEMENT IN PREVENTIVE AND PREDICTIVE PROGRAMS MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVE IN REDUCING THE NUMBER OF CONTROL ROOM DEFICIENCY TAGS CHALLENGES FEWER MAINTENANCEREWORK PROBLEMS WERE OBSERVED THAN DURING LAST SALP, HOWEVER, REWORK PROBLEMS STILL EXIST DUE TO:
POOR DESIGN POOR WORKMANSHIP/MAINTENANCE PRACTICES POOR VENDOR SUPPLIED COMPONENTS AND SERVICES
MAINTENANCE SURVEILLANCE (CON'T)
- .CATEGORY 2, TREND:
IMPROVING CONTINUE IMPROVEMENTS TO REDUCE UNPLANNED REACTOR SHUTDOWNS DUE EQUIPMENT PROBLEMS (6 DURING THIS SALP PERIOD}
'CATEGORY 2 PERFORMANCE WAS CONSISTENT AND MANAGEMENTSUPPORT GOOD STRENGTHS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS COORDINATION AND SUPPORT WAS GOOD AS OBSERVED DURING ANNUAL EXERCISE CORPORATE AND SITE QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS WERE EFFECTIVE CHALLENGES TRAINING WAS GENERALLY EFFECTIVE, HOWEVER, THE TECHNICAL SUPPORT GROUP DEMONSTRATED LIMITED EFF ECTIVENESS DURING THE ANNUAL EXERCISE
SECURITY AND SAFEGUARDS Ch. Ei3ORY 2, TREND:
IMPROVING CONTINUING IMPROVEMENT IN PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE STRENGTHS CONTINUED IMPROVEMENT IN PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION
.MANAGEMENTAND SUPERVISORS
-
REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS (ONE)
IMPROVEMENT IN THE SECURITY TRAINING PROGRAM IMPROVED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY, BOTH WITHIN THE SECURITY ORGANIZATION AND IN COMMUNICATINGEVENTS WELL-ESTABLISHED FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM CHALLENGES COMPLETION OF FACILITY AND EQUIPMENT UPGRADES REDUCE THE CURRENT EXTENSIVE USE OF COMP E NSATORY MEASUR ES
GINEERINGlTECHNICAL SUPPORT CATEGORY 2 FFECTIVE CONSISTENT PERFORMANCE TRENGTHS EFFECTIVE ENGINEERING SUPPORT OVER THE EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM UPGRADE, APPENDIX R, AND REG.
GUIDE 1.97 BENEFICIAL SYSTEMATIC DESIGN INVESTIGATION P ROGRAM EFFECTIVE T.ECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR OUTAGES PRODUCTIVE SYSTEM ENGINEER PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS IN REQUAL TRAINING FOR LICENSED OPERATORS HALLENGES INCORPORATION OF DESIGN INFORMATION INTO PROCEDURES AND DRAWINGS DBO RECONSTITUTION AND VERIFICATION OVERVIEW OF CONTRACTED SERVICES ADDITIONALIMPROVEMENT IN SPARE PARTS PROCUREMENT
SAF ET Y ASSESSMENT/QUAL ITY VERIFICATION CATEGORY
OVERALL SUPERIOR PERFORMANCE IN SELF ASSESSMENTS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS STRENGTHS OVERALL POSITIVE PERSONNEL, PROGRAM, AND ATTITUDE CHANGES PREPARATION FOR EIGHT SPECIAL TEAM IN'SPECTIONS RESULTED IN NRC REQUIREMENTS BEING MET OR EXCEEDED IN SUBSEQUENT NRC INSPECTIONS IMPROVED SELF-IDENTIFICATION AND CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAMS RESULTED IN SELF-IDENTIFICATIONOF 14 NCV'S OVERALL IMPROVEMENT IN QUALITYOF LICENSING SUBMITTALS (STANDARD TS AND EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM)
EFFECTIVE EMPLOYEE CONCERNS PROGRAM CHALLENGES OVERVIEW OF CONTRACTED SERVICES