IR 05000250/1990002
| ML20012E254 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 03/15/1990 |
| From: | Mcguire D, Tillman A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20012E253 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-250-90-02, 50-250-90-2, 50-251-90-02, 50-251-90-2, NUDOCS 9004020123 | |
| Download: ML20012E254 (1) | |
Text
.
-
.
i.f ay
- SA.FEGU@p,j,NFORMATl0N-
'
k NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION -
_*g
. *-
o-REGloN H J
~ g a'
101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W., SUITE 2900 -
j
[
ATLANT A,0EoRQlA 30323
<
je :
w
- .. * '
.j
.
l
'j
Report Nos.:- 50-250/90-02 and 50-251/90-02
,
Licensee:
Florida Power and Light Company 9250 West Flagler Street y
Miami, FL" 33102
'
,
Docket Nos.: 50-250 and 50-251 License Nos.: DPR-31 and DPR-41 Facility Name:. Turkey Point 3 and 4
,
Inspection Condu ed January 29 - gbruary 2, 1990 Inspector:
, htMit ~.$Y S $~ b ' A..Tillm n, 'uM'ds' 16@edtoT 'Date'Si ned /[ N Approved by-e D.-R. McGuire, Chief /Date' Signed Safeguards Section Nuclear Materials Safety andl Safeguards Branch Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards SUMMARY '!' Scope: I > > \\, ., This routine, unannounced inspection was conducted in the areac of Management \\ ' l-Support, Security Program Plans.and Audits;-Protected and Vital Area Physical-I Security Barriers, Detection and Assessment. Aids;' Protected and Vital.-Area- ! Access-Control of Personnel, Packages and Vehiciss;- Alarm Stations-and L Communications; Testing, Maintenance and Compensatory Measures.
In additiu, the licensee's progress with regard to the security' program upgrade, and the ' circumstances of Safeguards Reportable Event No. 89-505, " Visitor Unescorted- + Within The Protected Area", and No.:89-508", Degraded Protected Area Barrier.
, Also.an allegation relating to the transportation of new fuel and the I @ licensee's Employee Concerns Program were reviewed, f Results: .In the areas inspected, violations or deviations were not identified.
Y
- Inspection.results indicated continuing improvement in the management and t
m' ' ' -operational effectiveness of the security force.
Improvement in the security . -force's ability to provide tactical response to contingencies as demonstrated by a video tape of a-response drill scenario involving a hostage event in the Unit'3 and 4 control room, was noteworthy and indicative of the emphasis and , effort' applied to upgrade response capability.
Considerable progress was also ' noted in the construction and installation of facilities and equipment associated with the security program upgrade.
~ 9004020123 900315 .ADOCK 05000250 k "~"*""*"~~~~ .hDR p PDC l "" SAFEGU ARDS INFORM ATION "n""~NSd3Cumentl$deC06tr0%d, ~, , - Oid3Wrf 3, I f . }}