IR 05000250/1990023
| ML17348A460 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 07/16/1990 |
| From: | Harris J, Hunt M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17348A456 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-250-90-23, 50-251-90-23, NUDOCS 9007260185 | |
| Download: ML17348A460 (14) | |
Text
~8 Rfgy, fp
~4
Op 0O C
Cy
+w*w+
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTASTREET, N.W.
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30323 Report Nos.:
50-250/90-23 and 50-251/90-23 Licensee:
Florida Power and Light Company 9250 West Flagler Street Miami, FL 33102 Docket Nos.:
50-250 and 50-251 Facility Name:
Turkey Point 3 and
Inspection Conducted:
June 25-29, 1990 Inspector:
/
arr s
Approved by:
unt, tsng se Plant Systems Section Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety License Nos.:
DPR-31 and DPR-41 ate igned ate gne SUMMARY Scope:
This routine, unannounced inspection was conducted in the areas of fire protection.
Results:
The inspector identified the following strengths in implementation of the fire protection program.
The licensee management appears to be committed to the successful implementation of the fire protection program.
The licensee has effectively implemented a
program of controlling the movement of transient combustibles in and out of the plant which ensure unsafe hazards will not be present.
This is evident based on the very good housekeeping in the plant.
Staffing of the fire protection group is very good.
The group appears knowledgeable of the fire protection issues and has adequate manpower to implement the licensee's program.
No deviations or violations were identified in the areas inspected.
$ 0(.)72/0 i85 9007 1 8 PDR ADOCK I35000250
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- W. Bladow, Quality Manager
- J. Brien, Quality Control Superintendent
- K. Harris, Site Vice President
- K. Hayes, Maintenance Superintendent
- V. Kaminskas, Operations Superintendent
- L. Pearce, Plant Manager
- D. Powell, Licensing Superintendent
- G. Smith, Service Manager
- G. Traczyk, Fire Protection Supervisor NRC Resident Inspectors
- R. Butcher, Senior Resident Inspector
- G. Schnebli, Resident Inspector
- Attended exit interview 2.
Fire Protection Prevention Program (64704)
a.
Fire Prevention/Administrative Control Procedures The inspector reviewed the following Fire Prevention/Administrative
,Procedures Procedure No.
0-ADM-016 QI2-PTN-4 AP-0190.67 AP-0190. 72 0-ADM-0163 0-ADM-016.4 0-ADM-205 Title Fire Protection Program Housekeeping Welding, Cutting, Grinding, and Open Flame Work Safety Procedure Receipt Inspection, Identification and Control of Safety-Related and Quality Parts, Materials and Components Fire Protection Impairments Fire Watch Program Administrative Control of Valves Locks and Switches
0-ADM-503 Control and Use of Temporary System Alterations 0-ADM-016. 2 QP 2.12 EP-20107 Fire Brigade Program FPL QA Program Applicability for Fire Protection Systems Fire/Explosion Emergencies Based on this review, it appears that the above procedures meet the NRC guidelines of the document entitled,
"Nuclear Plant Fire Protection Functional Responsibilities, Administrative Controls, and Quality Assurance,"
dated June 1977, and
CFR 50 Appendix R - Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities.
b.
Fire Protection Surveillance Procedures The inspector reviewed the following Fire Protection System Surveillance Procedures:
Procedures No.
Title O-OSP-016.1 Electric Driven Fire Pump Annual Surveillance Test O-OSP-016.2 Diesel Driven Fire Pump Annual Surveillance Test 0-OSP-016. 23 O-OSP-016.26 0-OSP-200.
Diesel Driven Fire Pump Operability Test Electric Driven Fire Pump Operability Test Schedule of Plans, Checks and Surveillance O-SME-091.1 Fire and Smoke Detection System Semi-Annual Test 0-PME-091. 1 3-SME-091. 2 4-SME-091. 2 Outside Containment Smoke Detector Sensitivity Check and Calibration Inside Containment and Electrical Penetration Rooms Fire Detector System Semi-Annual Test Inside Containment and Electrical Penetration Rooms Fire Detectors System Semi-Annual Test
0-
MP-15537. 2 Fire Protection Equipment - Annual Maintenance MP-15537. 4 MP-15537. 5 Annual Fire Hose Hydro Test Fire Protection Equipment Surveillance Monthly and Semi-Annual The above surveillance procedures were reviewed to determine if the various test outlines and inspection instructions adequately implement the surveillance requirements of Units
and 4 fire protection specifications.
In addition, these procedures were reviewed to determine if the inspection and test instructions followed general industry fire protection practices, NRC fire protection program guidelines and the guidelines of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) fire codes.
Based on this review, it appears that the above procedures are satisfactory.
Fire Protection System Surveillance Inspections and Tests The inspector reviewed the following surveillance inspection and test records for dates indicated:
0-OSP-16. 23 0-OSP-016. 2 0-OSP-016. 26 O-OSP-016.1 MP-15537. 2 MP-15537. 5 Diesel Driven Fire Pump Operability Test
-
Weekly.
Reviewed Tests for January 1990 through June 1990.
Diesel Driven Fire Pump Annual Surveillance'est.
Reviewed Tests for May 17 - 23, 1990.
Electric Driven Fire Pump Operability Test.
Monthly for the following dates:
January 1990, February 1990, March 1990, April 1990, May 1990 and June 1990.
Electric Driven Fire Pump Annual Surveillance.
Reviewed test performed June 6-8, 1990.,
Fire Protection Equipment Annual Maintenance Inspection.
Reviewed Test Performed January 22-24,.1990.
Fire Protection Equipment Surveillance Performed Monthly.
Reviewed Tests Performed January 1990, February 1990, March 1990, April 1990 and May 199 MP-15537.5 0-SME-091. 1 3-SME-091. 2 Fire Extinguishers Semi-Annual Surveillance.
Reviewed Tests Performed January 22 - February 7, 1990.
Fire and Smoke Detection Systems Semi-Annual Test.
Reviewed Tests Performed October 3, 1989-November 9, 1989.
Inside Containment and Electrical Penetration Rooms Fire Detector Systems Semi-Annual Test.
Reviewed Tests Conducted November 22, 1989 and May 6, 1990.
0-PME-091. 1 Outside
.Containment Smoke Detector Sensitivity Check and Calibration.
'Reviewed Test Conducted August 14-26, 1989.
3-PME-091'. 2 4-PME-091. 2 Inside Containment and Electrical Penetration Rooms Smoke Detector Sensitivity Check and Calibration.
Reviewed Calibration Conducted April 13-May 6, 1990.
Inside Containment and Electrical Penetration Rooms Smoke Detector Sensitivity Check and Calibration.
Reviewed Calibration Conducted March 25, 1990.
The surveillance test record data and testing frequency associated with the above fire protection surveillance test/inspections were found to be satisfactory with regard to meeting the requirements of the plants Fire Protection Technical Specifications.
Fire Protection Audit'he inspector examined the most recent audit report of the Turkey Point Fire Protection Program.
This audit was guality Assurance Audit gAO-PTN-90-012, Triennial Fire Protection and Loss Prevention Audit Conducted March 20, 1990 - April 24, 1990.
The following findings were identified:
Finding
The effects of Fire Protection are not reflected in the Fire Protection Checklists for PC/MS87-264, 87-265 and 87-26 Finding
Fire Hain three Hydraulic Gradient Flow Test Inconsistencies.
Concern I Pressure Gauges on Several Sprinkler Systems are off scale or broken.
The inspector reviewed the following corrective actions on these findings:
Finding I Finding
Revision of PC/HS to accurately reflect that impact on the fire protections systems were appropriate.
Revision of procedure O-OSP-016.29 to provide flow'paths such that the degradation in all sections of the fire main piping can be determined.
Concern
The pressure gages on the sprinkler systems were repaired or replaced.
Based on this review, it appears that proper corrective actions were taken on these findings.
Fire Brigade (1)
The fire brigade is composed of thirteen brigade leaders, twenty two fire brigade operator s, twenty three heal th physics
- personnel and fifteen chemistry personnel.
The inspector reviewed the on duty shifts for the period of June 18-June 28, 1990, and verified that sufficient qualified fire brigade personnel were on duty to meet the provision of the plants Technical Specifications.
In addition, the inspector verified that sufficient personnel were assigned to each shift on the above dates to meet both operational and fire brigade requirements.
The inspector also verified that the senior operator in the control room shall not be assigned fire brigade responsibilities.
(2)
The inspector reviewed the training and drill records for all of the above brigade leaders, fire brigade operators, health physics personnel, and chemistry personnel.
The records reviewed disclosed that all of the above had received the annual medical review, had attended the required training and participated in the required number of drills.
The inspector also reviewed the shift fire br igade drills conducted for each operations shift in 1990 and noted that the drill requirements for each shift were me (3)
Fire Brigade Drill During this inspection, the inspector witnessed an announced drill.
The drill scenario was a Class B fire in the Unit 3 steam Generator Feedwater Pump A.
Seven brigade members responded to the pending fire emergency.
The brigade assembled at the scene in full protective fire fighting turnout clothing and self contained breathing apparatus.
An initial size up of the fire scenario was made by the fire brigade leader.
A 1-1/2 inch backup hose was used to control the fire.
The fire was placed under control in five minutes.
The fire brigade utilized proper manual fire fighting methods and reacted to the fire drill scenario in an effective and efficient manner.
f.
Plant Tour
'a ~
The inspector performed an inspection of the following fire brigade equipment, consisting of hoses, nozzles, tools and miscellaneous equipment stored at the fire brigade equipment lockers located in the turbine building, auxiliary building and in the yard area.
The inspection disclosed that the correct number of coats, boots, helmets, gloves, tools, hoses and spanner wrenches and self contained breathing apparatus were stored at these locations.
Based on this inspection, the designated fire brigade equipment appeared to be properly maintained and stored in a
ready condition.
b.
The following safe shutdown related plant areas were inspected.
Auxiliary building, control room, Units
and
diesel generator building A and 8, cable spreading room, Unit 4a and 4b switchgear rooms, and invertor room.
The inspector visually inspected the fire/smoke detection capabi 1 ities, emergency 1 ighting, smoke detectors, sprinkler systems, hose stations, and fire barrier walls associated with the above plant areas.
Based on the visual inspection, it appears that the fire protection features, associated with the above plant areas were properly maintained and fully functional.
The plant tour also verified the licensee's implementation of the fire prevention administrative procedures.
The control of combustibles and flammable materials liquids and gases and the general housekeeping was found to be satisfactory in the areas inspecte e 4.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and results were summarized on June 29, 1990, with.
those persons indicated in paragraph 1.
The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection results.
Dissenting comments were not received from the licensee.
The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.
I
'
~
'