IR 05000250/1985036
| ML17342A324 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 12/03/1985 |
| From: | Belisle G, Michael Scott NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17342A323 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-250-85-36, 50-251-85-36, NUDOCS 8512240280 | |
| Download: ML17342A324 (13) | |
Text
~p,S REQyv Vp.O~,
A0O YI~
/p 4~*~0 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTASTREET, N.W.
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30323 Report Nos.:
50-250/85-36 and 50-251/85-36 Licensee:
Florida Power and Light Company 9250 West Flagler Street Miami, FL 33101 Docket Nos.:
50-250 and 50-251 License Nos.:
DPR-31 and DPR-41 Facility Name:
Turkey Point 3 and
Inspection Conducted:
October, 28 November 1,
1985 Inspector:
M. A.
cott Approved by:
WF G. A. Belisle, ting Section Chief Division of Reactor Safety Date igned Da e Signed SUMMARY Scope:
This routine, unannounced inspection entailed 32 inspector-hours on site in the areas of 'previous enforcement matters; procurement; and receipt, storage, and handling.
Results:
No violations or deviations were identified.
851+gyapaa 8~
DOCK OgPpO
REPORT DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees R. Acoste, Quality Assurance (QA) Superintendent J. Adonis, Site Engineering Supervisor
- J. Arias, Licensing Supervisor 0. Arredondo, Puchasing Supervisor J.
Balaquero, Technical Support Engineering Supervisor T. Bruno, QA Engineer, Construction K. Clotfelter, Senior Plant Engineer T. Coste, QA Supervisor, Construction W. Coutier, Senior QA Engineer, Corporate
"P.
Crown, QA Engineer, Plant J.
Ferrare, QA Engineer, Plant
"D. Grandage, Operations Superintendent J.
Harper, QA Engineer, Plant
- R. Longtemps, Maintenance Superintendent
"R. Reinhardt, Quality Control (QC) Supervisor, Construction J;
Rhoades, QC Supervisor, Plant E. Suarez, Configuration Control Supervisor
"H. Young, Plant Manager (Acting)
Other licensee employees contacted included engineers, technicians, mechanics, and office personnel.
NRC Resident Inspectors T. Peebles D. Brewer
"Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on October 31, 1985, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings listed below.
No dissenting comments were received from the licensee.
Inspector Followup Item:
Material Destined to be Installed in Plant, paragraph 5.
The abbreviations used in this report are as follows:
AP Administrative Procedure ASP Administrative Site Procedure
FPL ICW JPE JUMA QA QAD QC QI QP PCM Florida Power and Light Inlet Cooling Water Juno Project Engineering Joint Utility Management Audit Quality Assurance Quality Assurance Department Quality Control Quality Instruction Quality Program Plant Configuration Modification The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters (Closed)
Unresolved Item 250, 251/83-36-02:
Safety Classification of Material and Use of Q List.
NRC Inspection Reports 50-250/84-33 and 50-251/84-34 document an equipment classification review.
Equipment classification upgrading was scheduled for completion by the middle of 1985.
References:
(a)
CFR 50, Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants (b)
CFR 50.54(a)(1),
Conditions of Licenses (c)
Topical Quality Assurance Report, FPLTQAR 1-76A (d)
CFR 21, Reporting of Defects and Noncompliance (e)
Regulatory Guide 1.38, Quality Assurance Require-ments for Packaging, Shipping, Receiving, Storage, and Handling of Items for Nuclear Power Plants (f)
ANSI N45.2.2-1972, Packing, Shipping, Receiving, Storage, and Handling of Items for Nuclear Power Plants (g)
Regulatory Guide 1.33, Quality Assurance Program Requirements (Operations)
(h)
ANSI N18.7-1976, Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants
(i)
Regulatory Guide 1.123, Quality Assurance Require-ments for Control of Procurement of Items and Services for Nuclear Power Plants (j)
ANSI N45.2. 13-1976, Quality Assurance Requirements for Control of Procurement of Items and Services for Nuclear Power Plants The inspector reviewed the licensee procurement program required by references (a) through (j) to determine if the program had been established in accordance with regulatory requirements,-industry guides, and standards.
The following criteria were used during this review to determine the overall acceptability of the established program:
Administrative controls were established to assign departmental responsibilities for procurement activities.
Administrative controls were established to identify safety-related equipment, supplies, consumables, and services to be procured under the QA program.
Administative controls were established to provide measures and assign responsibilities for the preparation, review, approval, and changes to procurement documents.
Procedures were established for qualifying and maintaining approved vendors, suppliers, and contractors.
Procedures were established to assure that vendors, contractors, and suppliers conform to procurement and quality assurance document requirements, industry standards and codes, and that nonconformances are properly reported and corrected.
Controls were established to provide for audits and surveillances of procurement activities.
The documents listed below were reviewed to determine if the above criteria had been incorporated into the licensee QA program to control procurement of safety-related items and services:
QI3 QA03 QI4 QADl QI6 QA02 QI7 QAD1 QI7 QAD3 QI7 QAD4 QI7 QAD5 QI7 QA06 Review of FPL Originated Specifications, Revision
QA Review of Procurement Documents, Revision
Maintenance of Supplier QA Manuals, Revision
Written Communications to Suppliers, Revision
Source Surveillance of Supplier Activities, Revision
Supplier Annual Review, Revision
Establishing and Maintaining the QA Approved Supplier List, Revision
Methods for Supplier Evaluation, Revision
f ~
QI16 QAD3 AP 0190.4 AP 0190.15 ASP-7 PUR7-8 QP 4.1 Control ling Contractor/Supplier Audit Open Items, Revision
Procurement Document Control, April 10, 1985 Plant Changes and Modifications, July 31, 1985 Procurement, Revision
Instructions for the Review, Transmittal, and Disposition of Supplier Deviation Notices, Revision
Control of Requisitions and the Issuance of Purchase orders for Spare Parts, Replacement Items, and Services, Revision
The inspector conducted interviews with on-site staff which included the QA, JPE, QC, and Puchasing departments to assess their involvement in the procurement area.
Each group's functional area and interface points were discussed.
All concerns identified by the inspector were eventually resolved or found to be previously identified in licensee audit reports.
The inspector did not contact corporate personnel involved with vendor survei 1 lances but did talk with site employees who perform survei llances.
The inspector was informed by site personnel that a
new Q-list which details all safety-related components will be issued by November 15, 1985.
The new Q-list is being expanded and contains more plant components.
The addition of these new Q-list items will result in a significant increase of on site work effort since. many phases of procurement, storage, handling, inspection, and documentation will be affected by these items.
Audit reports performed by FPL Corporate QA, site QA, and JUMA in the areas of procurement and receipt, storage, and handling that were reviewed by the inspector are as follows:
Audit Number Performance Dates QAO-PTP-83-12-512 QAO-PTP-84-01-524 QAP-PUR-84. 1 QAP-85-361 QAS-QAD-85-1 QAO-TPB-85-110 QAO-TPB-85-107 December 20, 1983 to January 5,
1984 January 13, 1984 to January 30, 1984 June 26, 1984 to August 10, 1984 February 5 to April 3, 1985 March 25 to March 29, 1985
- Construction QA exited with construction personnel on October 10, 1985.
- "Construction QA was in the final stages of this audit.
Draft copies of both asterisk (s)
marked audits were provided to the inspector.
The significance of audit QAO-TPB-85-107 is discussed in paragraph r,
The inspector reviewed completed PCM packages for material ordering information to verify that correct material had been utilized.
This review disclosed information that is discussed in the next four paragraphs.
The PCM packages reviewed were as follows:
PCN Number Title 84-89 82-322 80-79 Containment Purge Valve Bolts ICW Check Valve Replacement Modifications to Auxiliary Feedwater Turbine Steam Supply Valves Although FPL construction performs the majority of PCM work, plant groups do perform some modifications.
Both PCM installation groups are separate and so are the gA and gC groups overseeing the work.
Although many instructions regarding PCM performance are common between groups, several are not.
There are currently no checklists or formats for content of a PCM package.
Construction gA has recently been tasked with the final review of all completed packages which should improve content continuity.
PCM packages 84-89 and 82-322 did not contain purchase orders or ordering specifications, while 80-79 did.
Site procedures do not require that purchase orders remain with the PCN package.
The purchase orders were identified in package 84-89 and were retrievable after several investigatory steps.
Purchase order retrieval for package 82-322 required several more site and corporate contact points prior to retrieval.
Specifications were retrievable once the purchase orders were located.
Packages 84-89 and 80-79 were construction backfit PCMs while package 82-322 was a plant PCS The PCN 82-322 package contained a letter from the valve vendor which indicated that only one pressurized air dampener (in lieu of two on the previous, replaced valves) would be required on the new valves.
No drawing changes were indicated in the package for the air supply to the valves.
The inspector talked with a technical support engineer about the actual valve dampener configuration.
Although it was not documented, two dampeners were observed by the inspector to be installed on the valves and, thus, an air supply drawing change would not be warranted.
Although not documented in the
.PCM package, the need for two dampeners per valve was documented in separate correspondence between JPE corporate and site.
The detailed valve drawings for the ICW valves of PCN 82-322 were not in the PCM package..
The drawings were ordered by the valve purchase order.
In conjunction with gC personnel who had used the drawings during valve receipt inspection, the inspector located the valve drawings.
The technical support group who are generating two PCN proposals on the ICW check valves were unaware of the drawings but indicated that the drawings would be placed in their filing system.
The inspector reviewed the Purchasing Department's supplier deviation notice system.
Whenever a supplier cannot provide material as specified on a
FPL purchase order, certain licensee actions must be performed.
The inspector looked at followup actions on ten purchase order deviation Within this area, no violations or deviations were identified.
5.
Receipt, Storage, and Handling of Equipment and Materials (38702)
References:
(a)
CFR 50.54(a)(1),
Conditions of Licenses (b)
Tpical Quality Assurance Report, FPLTQAR 1-76A (c)
CFR 50, Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants (d)
Regulatory Guide 1.38, Quality Assurance Require-ments for Packaging, Shipping, Receiving, Storage, and Handling of Items for Nuclear Power Plants (e)
ANSI N45.2.2-1972, Packing, Shipping, Receiving, Storage, and Handling of Items for Nuclear Power Plants (f)
Regulatory Guide 1.33, Quality Assurance Program
'Requirements (Operations)
(g)
ANS?
N18.7-1976, Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants The inspector reviewed the licensee program and procedures required by references (a) through (g) to determine if controls were established and being implemented for receipt inspection, initiation of nonconformance reports, disposition of nonconformances, handling, storage, and issue of safety-related equipment.
The following criteria were used during this review:
Administrative controls were established for conducting and documenting receipt inspections and reporting nonconformances.
Administrative controls were established for disposition of items, marking, storing, and protection during storage.
Administrative controls were established for limited shelf-life items and for performing audits and surveys for storeroom activities.
The following procedures were examined to determine if selected elements of receipt inspection, storage, and handling were being implemented.
QI16 QAD4 Corrective Action Follow-up for Quality Assurance Audits, Revision
QI16 QAD6 Turkey Point Construction Quality Assurance Survei 1-lances, Revision
AP 0149.1 Special Nuclear Material Accountability, January 14, 1982 AP 0190. 12 Nonconforming Material, Parts, or Components, February 8, 1982 AP 0190.72 Receipt Inspection, Identification and Control of Nuclear Safety Related and Fire Protection Parts, Material, and Components, May 24, 1985 AP 0190.73 Quality Control Inspection and Surveillance Program, May 21, 1985 ASP-9 ASP-11 ASP-14 Material Control, Revision
Construction Turnover, Revision
Control of Material Temporarily Removed from Normal Operating Position, Revision
QI-13-S-1 Handling, Storage and Shipping Power Plant Stores, Revi si on
Presently, the two-warehouse system at the site is changing.
Two separate warehouses, receipt inspections, and storage controls had been operated by the plant and construction groups.
At the time of this inspection, safety-related material was being transferred from the plant warehouse to the construction warehouse where it would be maintained on a
permanent basis.
Many fine points of the transition were being worked out.
Audi.t Report QAO-TPB-85-110, performed by construction QA, addressed problems that were occuring with material transition to the construction warehouse.
The problem areas in the report were as follows:
Failure to maintain storage requirements Failure to observe vendor storage requirements Shelf-life program not being effectly implemented The QA report findings had been presented to the responsible groups and corrective actions had been determined.
Plant QA was in the process of performing an audit of plant receipt, storage, and handling during this inspection.
The inspector questioned the auditors about the scope, depth, and findings that occurred during the audit.
The auditors were aware of findings discussed above and in audit QAD-TPB-85-107; the auditors were looking in those additional areas.
The plant auditors had not found any significant, findings at the time of this inspectio The inspector tracked two material nonconformance reports that were generated on site during the inspection.
The inspector evaluated the nonconformance issues, the handling controls, and the technical resolutions of the material problems.
Nonconformance report 85-166, which was written by plant gC, revealed several problems with a pump motor bearing ordering data.
The gC group and JPE were taking action to correct data problems which even involved original Mestinghouse information.
The plant gC receipt inspection group has recently reorganized.
Due to the reorganization, new supervisors had been assigned.
Since the reorgani-zation, material identification problems have increased dramatically during receipt inspection.
Mithin this area, one inspector followup item was identified.
Paragraph 5.2. 13.3 of reference (g)
requires control/identification of material, parts, and components from receipt through installation and throughout plant life.
A draft of Audit Report gAO-TPB-85-107, finding I, which was not yet presented to site personnel, cited numerous items in storage and items issued but not yet installed that were not identified with appropriate markings or tags.
The report further stated that site personnel were not required to verify correct material at installation.
The inspector had independently come to the same conclusion that material control post receipt could cause regulatory if not actual problems.
Until the utility resolves these self-identified problems, this item will retain an inspector followup item 250, 251/85-36-0 e