IR 05000250/1985007

Insp Repts 50-250/85-07 & 50-251/85-07 on 850409-12.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters,Maint Progress,Inservice Insp & IE Bulletin Followup

ML17346B019
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	04/24/1985
From:	Blake J, Kleinsorge W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML17346B018	List: IR 05000250/1985007 ML17346B017
References
50-250-85-07, 50-251-85-07, IEB-83-06, IEIN-83-13, IEIN-83-70, IEIN-85-15, IEIN-85-17, IEIN-85-19, IEIN-85-20, NUDOCS 8505170577
Download: ML17346B019 (24)

Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

101 MARIETTASTREET, N.W.

ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30323 Report Nos.:

50-250/85-07 and 50-251/85-07 Licensee:

Florida Power and Light Company 9250 West Flagler Street Miami, FL 33101 Docket Nos.:

50-250 and 50-251 License Nos.:

DPR-31 and DPR-41 Facility Name:

Turkey Point

a d 4 Inspection Co d ct"

- 12, 198@

Inspector:

org Approved by:

J.

J e, Section se En net ing Branch Di isibn of Reactor Safety rl ~Z ate igne 8s te igne SUMMARY Scope:

This routine, announced inspection entailed 35 inspector -hours on site in the areas of licensee action on previous enforcement matters, maintenance progress, inservice inspection ( ISI) (Unit 3), IE Bulletin (IEB), followup on IE information notices, and inspector followup items.

Results:

No violations or deviations were identified.

8505i70577 850503 PDR ADOCK 05000250

PDR

t

4

K

'

I4

"

I'I

~

~ )

1 It

41 II 1f,

'

Ii

II li

REPORT DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

• C. Baker, Plant Manager

• D. Grandage, Operations Superintendent

• K. L. Jones, guality Assurance Superintendent

• J. Arias, Jr., Regulation and Compliance Supervisor

• F. T. Carr, Inservice Inspection

."H. E. Hartman, Inservice Inspection E. L. Anderson, Inservice Inspection Other licensee employees contacted included engineers, technicians, and office personnel.

NRC Resident Inspectors T. A. Peebles D. R. Brewer

~,

• Attended exit interview Exit Interview

~

'he inspection scope and findings were summarized on April 12, 1985, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.

The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings listed below.

No dissenting comments were received from the licensee.

(Open)

Unresolved Item 250, 251/85-07-01:

"Nonretrievable or Nonexistent OgE" - paragraph

(Open)

Inspector Followup Item 250/85-07-02:

"IWF-ISI Inspection Plan"-

paragraph 6.a.(2)

(Open)

Inspector Followup Item 250, 251/85-07-03:

"Level III Procedure Approval" - paragraph 6.b.(1)

(Open)

Inspector Followup Item 250, 251/85-07-04:

"Snubber'Examiner gualification and Certification"

- paragraph 6.b.(2)

The licensee did not identify aq proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspectors during this inspection.

Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters (92702)

(Open)

Violation 250, 251/84-12-01:

"Failure to Follow Maintenance Procedure"

)f C

I

~

~C>>lyy'ly f

I I > ~>>'I"~<<

fhl 4 )

sl >>

I(I')

's tl )

') R>>

ts

>>M') r'>><<

,I >>4)

" )>>

~

I,l << 'lf,)I )

I >>yay C

f,

')( IQ'I M

~

M e

.

e I)>>

ly.l)

p <<.'ll l.'"'

I'

s$

II >>

)4 II

,)<<I

)

~ I '"'i)ll<<y<<,

""f<<)R '

", ll.. III IM>>

.III

~ '"

~

Rl '

'<<'M'I'*

l) sl/

<<<<f <

0 y>>s>>

r I") y t

4 II l,">>

j f>>

I

)'lI;II<<(

ls

<<Fyc f>>-) F>>

~

-<< l(ly yl j

>>

F<<0>>

))

<<I Mey F

)

I

'4

II(

I y. I. (l);I

.I,<,>> (.I 01))

1 I s i>>,.I, W

I 0 I F ly I II

>>

II

~>>y>>'R'M(X) 'q I

y)II'I '

0<< ~, y)I II Irh (s)I f>>

~','I, sflc"III

~ I I

.I

ls I 4

~ >>

~

'I

, ~ g'

~

~ y 134( I i

~ $ f),<<g,~

<<

<<0>>

,I>>III )

( )

I

'IQg'y,.f

)

I

s'Ily

"

I ',IIIII'.

gl

ll O'I

)

")

)0

>>I I I'

y>>~l ll I, I <<>>."<<II>>'>> yy

) >I

<< '" Vf)')0 s

0 ~

' '"')l l

. I)r)(

}

y))

) '<<

1l',>>>>

~4,

>>w,>> 4>> IJI/)

4 r}

,E)

I'

< IPI r I,

" )Il"ll

'

!I '~

.h

"", )[If'I}

','l y>>

F<<>>I 0 <<) f, I

Is(

II

Florida Power

& Light (FP&L) letter of response dated May 12, 1984, has be8n reviewed and determined to be acceptable by Region II.

The inspector held discussions with the responsible engineer and examined the corrective actions as stated in the letter of response.

The inspector concluded that FP&L had determined the full extent of the subject noncompliance, performed the necessary survey and follow-up actions to correct the present conditions and developed the necessary corrective actions to preclude recurrence of similar circumstances.

The corrective actions identified in the letter of response appear to have not been implemented.

FP&L letter of May 12, 1984 stated,

"In order to preclude recurrences, Mechanical Maintenance personnel

.

are being counselled in the importance of strict adherence to procedures" but when the inspector requested objective quality evidence (0(E) attesting to the counselling, it could not be found.

At the time of the exit interview it could not be determined whether the 0(E attesting to the above statement is not retrievable or does not exist.

Pending the resolution of the above, violation 250, 251/84-12-01 will remain open and the issue of nonretrievable or nonexistent 0(E will be identified as unresolved item 250, 251/85-07-01:

"Nonretrievable or Nonexistent OgE".

Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matter s about which more information is required to determine whether they are acceptable or may involve violations or deviations.

New unresolved items identified during this inspection are discussed in paragraph 3.

Independent Inspection Effort Maintenance Progress The inspector conducted a general inspection of the protected area and the turbine building to observed maintenance progress and activities such as welding, material handling and control, housekeeping and storage.

Within the areas examined, no violations or deviations were identified.

Inservice Inspection (ISI) (Unit 3)

The inspector examined documents, activities, and records as indicated below to determine whether ISI was being conducted in accordance with applicable procedures, regulatory requirements, and licensee commitments.

The applicable code for ISI is the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel (ASME B&PV) Code,Section XI, 1980 Edition through the Winter 1981 Addenda (80W81 as specified by paragraph 1.1 of FP&L "Inservice Inspection Second ten-year Inspection Plan",

Revision 0, and ASME B&PV Code Section XI, 70W70 Edition as specified by paragraph 4.2.3f of "Turkey Point Plant Units 3 and 4 Technical Specifications".

The licensee requested relief from the Technical Specification ISI requirements pursuant to title Ten Code of Federal Regulations Part 50.55a(g)(5)(iii).

NRC letter from Mr. S.

A. Varga, Chief Operating Reactors Branch 5'1, Division of Licensing to Mr. J.

W. Williams, Jr.,

Vice President FP&L of February 4, 1985, states:

p P I),tt w

~

r

'

'I

'I f f )a.l',l af'7,"

~

'. )g 1.

..,

p 1,

. ';.'<<

'

>>

a)

,

a l,f a

) '.<< '. '

a'jw l "

pl)

t )

'

g va I)'"

V f II QQ <<1<<v

<<

',

1')'<<

t

~ w,)P jjj

'I I

'

Pvg

1

-="w

"I""

<<

'

ll ac/

1 ~I'<<P'<<111<<I w<<f w

I la'

11<<t III CP I"'))vwI w

1) 'i

]

"

w,v

1

~

I

~ f,'"

w" I'I,l

<<I, II i,i'l

) I

=)

J It')f

,a~

1',~,

a

'

<<f

)1 ai lv, v.

w

) <<a

$

~ 1

','r<<I<<r)'v ',"

w f 7, I

, jjii a

<< f))) ) >rv

"y fl),w,>>V,w wc p

V t v,w q,,",I w

vpf

>Vtaw vpq

j<<I'

<

~ a) ) ',>,

'I I

~ ',, "',

<<r>t",'

r 1 t\\

r II

<<V

')

'"

fa I')

I ')V

)

".

wv"I'

a a

II

"f I )1 rfr rr'j

"1)

~,t I r I fa) 'V

") y

'"'1 fal) 1 V,pp wi.)

v

"~a)+

t<<'),rf

<<I p<<fw a

vf vv'

I

>>

rwf<<f V I

>>

<<Mww ll I 3<<.I vr gw C

I a

= it'\\

'ly -.

jl t 1, I'>>

il i f rlif 1 f

'I ~

) 1't

'll I

a

'w, r

. ~

Clip+

<<

II "(

)f

,'Vj I

<<"

0 ")

V

<<af) f lv

')'fI'I II<<V ii.1)

ll a ~

II 1<<t w<<

I

<<'vt~'1

~

II

~)

%111f,,

I 13

't'P r

1)

e'a

<<1 ~ y~

I'

ia P

ll 1>>

ptv<< ~ Pit ta pl'

II 1]

li

<<t I 1)a jfa Pav'I )

1't

+ v I'tv )Aw

"a

)',

t

<<

',Vffw

'1 11) f 3',,

~

Ill

~ 11 vl, )pal,'

II I, v

I'

vp Ia 1 )

p I wP rwa v<) a" f )'

rat Ct I

)')""

law,wl'fwr

')

1:<>ajd

~

<<

<<J )ji

)'s

+'

lw

)

rivi I III farar-t)w I ll1 I

• C a'V p

Ia fk 'I I

1 )Iv

,)j I f)I;, ',"P

"i

)f'll )

a f

1 f I

i ) Ja, Jfvapwp r ~

r1

!

<<'

I "'

v 1 lr r f

v I p

p.

w v c r III

<<

I )

~

Ilvwp

'f I

~

1'

vvrwl

V

v

~

'l

)

I 1 ~ f w 1

~

~

"During the period between now and the date we complete our detailed review of your submittals, you must comply with both your existing Technical Specifications and your proposed inservice inspection and testing programs.

In the event conflicting requirements arise for some components, you must comply with the more restrictive requirements

...",

In view of the above, the licensee will perform inservice inspection in accordance with the more restrictive of the two referenced codes.

a ~

Review of Program (Relative to Component Supports)

(73051B)

(1)

The inspector reviewed the below listed documents to ascertain whether the ISI program had been approved by the licensee, and whether adequate Quality Assurance (QA) plans and procedures had been established, (written, reviewed, approved, and issued)

in the following areas:

organization structure and QA personnel; audits; general QA requirements; work and quality inspection procedures; control of processes; corrective action; document control; examination control and control of examination equipment; quality records; and qualification of personnel-were controlled and accomplished.

The documents listed below were examined:

P-M - Paul Munroe FPSL - Florida Power 5 Light Document No.

Title P-M-OSS-QAP-M-1, Rev.

A of 4/I/85 P-M-OSS-QAP-2. 1-1)

Rev. 3/13/85 P-M-OSS-QAP-2.2-1, Rev.

A of 3/30/85 P-M-OSS-QAP-5.1-1, Rev. 3/21/85 P-M-OSS-QAP-9. 1-1, Rev. 3/21/85 P-M-OSS-QAP-9.2-1, Rev. 3/20/85 P-M-OSS QAP-9.3-1, Rev. 3/22/85

"On Site Services Quality Assurance Manual"

"Administrative and Program Control"

"Qual ificati on

Cer tification of Personnel"

"Shock Arrestor/Snubber Examination and Testing"

"Removal and Reinstallation of Mechanical Shock Arrestors"

"Tagging of Functional Test Specimens"

"Procedure for Disassembly, Cleaning, Examination, Overhaul and Reassembly of Pacific Scientific Mechanical Shock Arrestors" P-M-OSS-QAP-10. 1-1, Rev. 3/20/85

"Visual Examination of Mechanical Shock Arrestors"

S<<1 H

W Q)lls)

v

"W,I,

)

'W LI <<

N.),('I N t'fli~

v

<<

t ~ IS

) f V H II I<<'v I"II

'ilt

<< 'v l

)<<H sf,

~

~

w"I'

tl )tW J ~ H <<>>

I l(

I

)v

'I'NH

, ri)

N

>>

-'

IGNI" I'v N

N v

sttI HVQ fat N v

,l

)N

'I", ""

's, 'r W

INI'N" W <>

'.I

)U

<<

) Irc.

<<f j f I N<<vsl

<< I I w:<<N! 'i

'Il<<) I N1NN,)WWH)

I,

'Itlr

)$ <<f

)W

'WI-

'I I

r,v N

N)v

>><<II <<)r s

)

)

,I I << <<'t I ~ 1 W

<<'I(

v f 1 LIIH I st>> )

~

s H

)

WW II <<<>

I l

~

v tt

tl v s>>

~

I I'I, I

"

r)il wI,H II s <<<<

W

"<<v f<<r s

v 1 <<I lIW N

Nh 1<<

> It"."" "1 I)

) ) f, J

tI g<>fit ll

'I t

~

S

<<N.

<<

~ H J

v

P-M-OSS-QAP-10. 2-1, Rev. 3/20/85 P-M-OSS-QAP-10. 3-1, Rev. 3/20/85 P-M-OSS-QAP-ll.l-l, Rev. 3/21/85 P-M-OSS-QAP-15. 1-1, Rev. 3/21/85 P-M-OSS-QAP-17. 0-1, Rev. 3/27/85 P-M-OSS-QAP-19. 0-1, Rev. 3/27/85 P-M-OSS-QAP=20.0-1 Rev. 3/27/85 P-M-QAPM, Rev A dtd 12/18/84 FP&L-MP-0707.33, Rev 6, 1985 FP&L-AP-0190.83, Rev. 3/27/85 FP&L-AP-0190. 85, Rev. 3/27/85 FP&L-OP-209. 9, Rev. 3/27/85 FP&L-NDE 1.3, Rev.

FP&L-NDE 3.3, Rev.

FP&L-NDE 5.2$

Rev.

FP&L-NDE 5.4, Rev.

"Limited Functional Examination (VT-4) of Mechanical Shock Arrestors"

"Initiation and Handling of Examination Log"

"Functional Testing of Pacific Scientific Shock Arrestors"

"Initiation and Dispositioning of Deviation Reports"

"Completion and Storage of QA Records" Authorized Nuclear Inspector"

"Code of Federal Regulations

CFR 21"

"Quality Assurance Program Manual"

"Snubber Removal and Replacement"

"Mechanical Shock Arrestor Surveillance Program"

"Functional Testing of Mechanical Shock Arrestors"

"Visual Examination of Mechanical Shock Arrestors"

"Eddy Current Examination of NonFerromagnetic Tubing with Multi Frequency Techniques for Turkey Point Unit Nos.

& 4"

"Liquid Penetrant Examination Solvent Removable Visible Dye Technique (PSL-2 TPT-3

& 4)"

"Ultrasonic Examination of Fer ritic Piping Welds (PSL-2, PTP

& 4)"

"Ultrasonic Examination of Austenitic Piping Welds (PSL-2, PTP

& 4)"

1 11

>>f,>>hit)>>

h >)

>

)"J

" il I

>>Ill Wh '>>>I >>1 I

I f)h

~

g>>

"1

~

,

Wf),a'I

~

F 'h II IW r

Vl e>

<

~

~

1I tj>>

'>>

~ >>

)I

~ k

~

l1

)

h I

>>

h>>

~ >

V

>>>>

I 1 >>

l)>>.)

)>>I)

tr hh-)

'

Vh

')

'1 jl "

~

>>1 I'

ll jv h

I I

tw I

II >)

W'h, I,

I h,l I

li,

>>

Ih f

I,Ill'I>

II hg h>>>hw)

I V Ihfl>>

1i If

+

"I ~ I ~ 1 J!)'>>

>>II 1)

>1

, X-I g

W ~

.f)l,).>>

• ~

~

h>>t't

>>

()

>>

FP&L-NDE 2.2, Rev.

0 with FC OA FP&L-NDE 4.1, Rev.

1 -

FC 1A FP&L-NDE 4.2, Rev.

FP&L-NDE 4.3, Rev.

FP&L-NDE 5.1, Rev.

"Magnetic Particle Examination (PSL-2, PTP

& 4)"

"Visual Examination VT-1 for Welds/Bolting/Bushings/Washers"

"Visual Examination VT-2 Conducted During System Pressure Tests"

"Visual Examination VT-3/VT-4"

"Ultrasonic Examination of Pressure Vessel Welds Except Reactor Vessel" FP&L-NDE 5.5, Rev.

FP&L-CAL 1, Rev.

FP&L-CAL 2, Rev.

FP&L-CAL 3, Rev.

"Ultrasonic Examination of Primary Coolant Piping Welds (PTP-3 and 4)"

"Ultrasonic Instrument Linearity Verification"

"Calibration of Magnetic Particle Equipment"

"Calibration Verification of Temperature Measurement Devices" FP&L-CAL 4, Rev.

"Eddy Current Equipment Calibration and Certification" The inspector reviewed CIS-PTP-85-300,

"Ten Year Inservice Inspection Plan for Turkey Point Unit No. 3,"

Revision 0. to determine whether the ISI program relative to class 1, 2, 3 and MC component supports includes the following:

description of areas examined in accordance with ASME B&PV Code Section XI Article IWF-2000; examination category for each area; method of inspection for each area; extent of examination for each area and justifi-cation for exception to codes and standards.

The inspector determined that inspections required by IWF-2000 are not included in CIS-PTP-85-300.

The inspector discussed the above with the licensee, who indicated that, as they have not completed IEB 79-14, the existing as-built drawing may not accurately depict component supports.

A sample of supports taken from existing data will be inspected during the April 1985 Unit 3 outage.

In addition, a

walk down is currently in-process covering all the isometric drawings included in CIS-PTP-300 to provide accurate data for CIS-PTP-301,

"Ten Year Support/Hanger Inspection Plan" (in preparation).

I 'I l" <<'p

~ fl VI

<< ~

I,II<<,V P,I I',

I I t" V

V pF'p I Ip>>( Ilf l >><<<<<<i

<<'

""VI'II

<<>>,)

~ '<<,

p )

)v~)>> 'jf. P) V

<

>1f >>villj"'j l I ~f P ,p <<>> ll Vc>>f l F / <<,ll II) ) II >>>> lp / PI, r>>. I II>>

vol VI)i '"'<<

I ) IF I) IL>> .)l(',>> l pb.<< V ', j ")p,j, , " l' v.~ ) VlVPI V pr'I r )l >> p p 'r) << I>> P )II [ f I<</P ' I 'V f <<F)P ff<<P"g ~ << '<<J A t " 'p <<'l I << ~ f<< I I l gf 'J lI <<<<f p ~ P )Qa II 'I I','>> , I<<p <<l p) j ~ I )Q) IIIIII>>'Ã )<> P<<h ) f" I I<<t <<)>> q l)>>f I .'P'V'"',, "4 '...I j " ) r;","'P,, ) I VPP l ) " ') lI I) '>>,,i ,. ' ~,' f<<i(pl I 'I '(>> VIIp g The licensee expects CIS-PTP-301 to be issued prior to the second outage of the first inspection period of the second ten year program. The above matter will be identified as Inspector Followup Item 250/85-07-02: "IWF-ISI Inspection Plan." (3) The inspector reviewed the below listed documents to determine whether the personnel qualification program for ISI is consistent with applicable regulatory requirements. Document Identification P-M-OSS-QAP-2.2-1 (4) The inspector reviewed the below listed documents to determine whether the ISI program and referenced documents contained adequate provisions relative to the control of Nondestructive examination (NDE) records in the following areas: examination results; NDE equipment - listing; calibration data sheets; calibration blocks - listing; personnel qualifications; drawings, sketches, and work orders. The inspector reviewed the below listed documents to verify that responsibilities have been assigned for maintenance of required NDE records and that controls have been established to accomplish the following: define record storage facility; designate a custodian; describe the filing system; establish a method for verification that records and materials reviewed for storage are in agreement with transmittal documentation; provision governing access to files; and establishment of filing supplemental information. Document Identification P-M-QAPM P-M-OSS-QAP-17. 1-1 P-M-OSS-QAP-15. 1-1 P-M-OSS-QAP-10. 3-1 P-M-OSS-QAP-11. 1-1 P-M-OSS-QAP-10.2-1 P-M-OSS-QAP-9.2-1 b. Review of Procedures (73052B) (Unit 3) (1) Approval The inspector reviewed the below listed procedures to ascertain whether they had been approved by authorized licensee personnel and Level III examiners. P-M-OSS-10.1-1 P-M-OSS-10. 2-1 P-M-OSS-11. 1-1 I) 4 l'l I 5 tl l (crI 'r 4 I ca cc I c'l I, l y. r, 'III, I I I ) It ~ I ill I f I J I cj'( k ~ ,. ):~pc. N I Il I II r. ~44 f 'l lf J,l,.k l J f)i ~ ~ f I" f,y ,jl cp + c $ ~ I .k II I f,. I Of patt f f )kk" ~ ')ll'f Z, "fl "' I ~ tt ) f llt'llnJ 'f' rc)y f I ' 'r"lk cc;I Ir) II ll . f f.tt)IL. I l 0')f)~ f.'l ')fll'I,<<) . 3 f>>lJ > f.. >,'k) f jll II I k l,aye 'I I"l'I lf lk K~ I ,jl Ir k ~ 1',l l I tI I>>Ik t II "'S) f cctf 4 ) f t )< lIc la ~,f ff} lc g l.k f 41)< P ') fIkon fq f Vlf ) 4 4kff.k~1 I ' I f kk "cy')3 I 3' cl l r >,Il I ~ ~ It ilk I

f Ifk)" I I f I

ill'1') k y l I lcc" f I'I, I I .)'r' r ~ : f. . )ff,) 'graf'JAI Ia ) ff f f'l 'l J I f >> ")lf, ly lily I ~ c d I cl ~ <<4>> c,i I rr "f' 'l'Irc )., 'f ff )l rl~ I'l c I I'I )I kk ff I It l I I I'I , lk 1-r I ) t fkl 'f)~lc ) -4 y.'f)~J'yf <<l) t "Ital'f <kl:, ' y pkk'0 rfk'. "' '"I'4 ~ r I ) P Ii) FP&L-MP-0707.33 FP&L-OP-209.9 FP&L-NOE-1. 3 FP&L-NDE-3.3 FP&L-NDE-5.2 FP&L-NDE-5.4 FP&L-NDE-4. 1 FP&L-NOE-2.2 FP&L-NDE-4.2 FP&L-NDE-4.3 FP&L-NDE-5. 1 FP&L-NDE-5.5 FP&L-CAL-1 FP&L-CAL-2 FP&L-CAL-3 FP&L-CAL-4 With regard to the examination above, the inspector noted that no objective quality evidence could be located to verify that FP&L Procedure Nos. OP-0209.9, and MP-0707.33 were reviewed and approved by a Level III examiner certified in the examination method discussed in each procedure. It should be noted that the above procedures have not yet been used. This matter will be identified as inspector followup item 250/85-07-03: "Level III Procedure Approval". (2) gualification of NDE Personnel The inspector reviewed the procedures listed in (1) above to determine whether qualification requirements consistent with Regulatory Guide 1.58 - "gualification of Nuclear Power Plant Inspection, Examination and Testing Personnel," ANSI N45.2.6 or SNT-TC-1A were specified. With regard to the examination above the inspector noted that FP&L Procedures HP-0707.33 and AP-0190.85 do not require that personnel performing examination in accordance with those procedures to be qualified and certified in accordance with IWA-2300. It should be noted that the above procedures have not yet been used. This matter will be identified as inspector followup item 250, 251/85-07-04: "Snubber Examiner gualification and Certification". (3) Technical Procedure Review (a) Ultrasonic The inspector reviewed the below listed procedures to ascertain whether they had been reviewed and approved in accordance with the licensee's established gA procedures. The procedures were reviewed for technical adequacy and conformance with ASME,Section V, Article 5, and other licensee commitments/requirements in the following areas: type of apparatus used; extent of coverage of weldment; ~ I ~ I ~I y'l 'f- '! ~ ' g II 'I ~ = FJ 4 -: I I ~ 'I ) I JQ I lib I I W >>4Fl j )I' y ">>II'<< ) )y;f is ~I IQ ~ 3 "l'4)4>> ', ) ~ c yy ~ I t l'sh . '") ) syr Wlr 'ygjg It ~ ), f )~ I P 'll ~ r',.f 'I ~ h ) ) y), I lylf) I l W I ~ ))FIW) b 4, ) tl It rr ~ it ) ~ ity '9'rh ". r t",f) ) . rr)sb[ 'l l >>l " W>> yl 1>>b I '5 'I ).'"4 I~),, I It I I g WJ I >> ly ) IW )y '"'r ) It fit ' bll ) r R) w.wl,f]i".) i I, b ' >>,Jl J ) "ry' S I). I"*~ I J 'I)') y F,I 4 F'I y )1!f I ~ hf )I II I tl h I ' y-) l~ "IJ ' )4 y) wt )y " 4 y) J g I I) II )h, y shl <<I' i)'>I I, ) 1 ft)t), ' ", ")ar)ir f b I, I I ill'm I )3 Ey) l )'H ') llhs'It b" I y, I, hlr'b il ,)4 t, ll ) I WyWIWy!f f, yy $~)y h I') if)) II ) P O. c 'WfJ il y ) F I ~ ., ~ I W ).y ~ W , I g OFF a It r )) r+b"" y);k t)V )'4 y,,')'t)) F y I.>>I I) t'y>> 'I ) lb h I 'll) r F l'y r yp'l ) fsh ),l t'.) I )*F4 calibration requirements; search units; beam angles; DAC curves; reference level for monitoring discontinuities; method of demonstration of penetration; limits for evaluating and recording indications; recording significant indications; and acceptance limits. Procedure No. FP8IL-NDE-5. 1 FP8IL-NDE-5.2 FPSL-NDE-5.4 FPSL-CAL-1 FPSL-CAL-3 Liquid Penetrant The inspector reviewed the below listed procedures to ascertain whether they had been reviewed and approved in accordance with the licensee's established gA procedures. The procedures were reviewed for technical adequacy and conformance with ASIDE,Section V, Article 6, and other licensee commitments/requirements in the following areas: specific method; penetrant materials identified; penetrant materials analyzed for sulfur; penetrant materials analyzed for total halogens; acceptable pre-examination surface; drying time; method of penetrant application; surface temperature; solvent removal; dry surface prior to deve-loping; type of developing; examination technique; and evaluation technique. Procedure No. FPSL-NDE-3.3 FPSL-CAL-3 Hagneti c Parti cl e The inspector reviewed procedures listed below to ascertain whether they had been reviewed and approved in accordance with the licensee's established gA procedures. The procedures were reviewed for technical adequacy and for conformance with ASNE Section V, Article 7, and other licensee commitments/requirements in the below listed areas: examination method; contrast of dry powder particle color with background and surface temperature; suspension medium and surface temperature for wet particles; viewing condi-tions; examination overlap and directions; pole or prod spacing; current or lifting power (yoke) and; acceptance criteri ~y(j ~ r,f( ) J, !<< ~,<<y" "Pf(ff) vr )y try fgl j ytP '-f kjj ff t,"p, 'Pj p1,, pl" 'r f t fjij>>p j p t t,>>t i <<'.p <<r fy f'fg" j) <<<<<< 'pff jt gf tj, f )II< 'P il fff'h, V'fv>>I ~ g~ N r<<P<<P j ) P f <<f y'jr(jg(). "P I f'tlli f y y tl ' <<>=ttf>> ' ~ ~'l N y t<<(<< r ~ pj', I, f t,j I* '()(. Py 'I I "N(jt- <<j f<<f( fy,P, fp >> " f7")'y ffi, <<0'( jj;jf,y,"','ll(f ~ P ",g', 3(g ',r fr)<<y" f ' ~ ."p 'lp."pip ).f ',f" p jfr li" P( P 9 jr)3 f')') 'N',NIpf I f "', f, jj 1-, "P,I P I y tl yffl ' p( ' >l pf>) r ' ()f(a>>g' <<.'w I'p 1',t-,yl<<,II>>pt r~ p <<-) 3(l,f (f t 'N" (p" <<y f tt ) ft ' s 's'v'f y(,.- il f 'i')1", tftr <<ttpt't N' ~ ' 't p f< )ft p>> p,, at )p" r I >> j 4'vl)r,'V '" " g 'f p v yvc'.

""fj

<<(t fp ( j j p<<<< it<

>I ~ I>>,'. u " r>><<ltg NN<< P ) p p f "f"')'t ii (f', )" j ii j NVI yf, r.I+i) "> e tq>>,>>, py tp M P ~,) "". PI jI<<'tt)'p', 'I<<) 1 i" fN- 'N j p j <<i,f.t'y yf p <

> ir p l j j!J>>jfg>>t <<" I N " ,f H I Qy ) J>> <<j<<( 'p "f ) ) f>>)+ II p ppf gtj g tie~ y 5 ff<<L <<1 jjp << ~<<v) << fy'l j, f)Qp" j J i>> j'< vfj jet<'f if <<fp', t< f(r t f>> j<<y.y y,) "vy ~<<y , ',p <<(j ~ p"p,y; (I) p ',p .(,t f,>> ( yy y +PP j Jc r .! f 'I ~ ) 'r r.!,)P t P ~llfy(>> Ii ((p j i>> "p <<" j<<','lt" ) ' tj) ytyvvjp 'ii.)t p'j~yt ~ ~ 'jv<<"flf = ) j qfy Nrem j 1 r(pt" Ja, y j 'I 1'pf<<,f ft<<4 j p,)fg(p << f y'g ~ plj<<3( ~ v )yy'Pii yy I y)~<<f+ fy(N) II t ) lt<<<

>II Nil )If v f f htl f f I I h N ~>>5 t I I lk<< I I <"I, t',t C.f I ~ > Vf 'lh r. k" h 'Vft',,N )"" f,f)J 'I) vi <<>>t, I 'I l)PI "V f',r>> I' 'll r, IIfI " ','wl 'P <<f <<fil l r,, V '~l t lvk<<) J I ~ k kw 'N F W f)NNE, 1 )N ')kl 1) ) f' fN>>l I> I,'k II ilk , i.) ) O'D"fO - . 9lJ k I ' V)1$ I ~ )k "1'NI ~ t I)' t, I I f) t<< II VI VN '$<<,Wit ,)' h" V ~ ) I' Th) . N,I" "hf '4 ) ) ) ) 'N r ~)f W l I f" N 'k lf,' ') 6f/7 II hh ~ Nil ~ '.;; r ,I O'Y Ijt V, <<) kh k,f II )Jt 'VN VI I ~ VW kl>> I 1>><< I, Nh ~ ~ llf Pf 4h Within the areas examined, no violations or deviations were noted. IE Bulletin ( IEB) (92703B) (Open) IEB 83-06, "Nonconforming Materials Supplied by Tube-Line Corpo-ration." (Units 3 and 4) The inspector has reviewed FPSL letters of December 6, 1983, January 20, 1984, September 28, 1984 November 8, 1984, December 17, 1984, January 4, 1985 and FPSL letter L-85-76 inadvertently dated February 15, 1984, vice February 15, 1985, and determined that the requested actions of the bulletin have not been acceptably addressed. The inspector held discussions with the responsible engineer, reviewed supporting documentation and observed representative samples of work to verify that the actions identified in the letter of response have been completed. The bulletin requests licensees to review the general concerns expressed in the bulletin for applicability at their facilities and to describe in their responses the results of the review, and if the general concerns apply, they should describe the short-term and long-term corrective actions to be taken and the schedules thereof. The above has not been addressed by the licensee responses to date; therefore, pending such response and subsequent NRC review, this matter remains open. It should be noted that GULFALLOY, Inc., of Houston, Texas, incorrectly reported to FP&L in an October 25, 1983, letter, "GULFALLOY did not supply Tube-Line material to Florida Power and Light Company projects," when, in fact, GULFALLOY did provide FPKL Turkey Point with Tube-Line material. FPSL's audits, reviews and document searches of lOOX of GULFALLOY purchase documentation for safety-related piping components revealed that GULFALLOY had shipped Turkey Point 173 Tube-Line pipe fittings in 13 different heats. Turkey Point had installed 117 fittings consisting of eight heats. Chemical and physical testing of the eight installed heats of material verified that the installed materials physical and chemical properties were acceptable for their intended service use. Within the areas examined, no violations or deviations were identified. Followup on IE Information Notices ( IEIN) (Units 3 and 4) (92703B) The inspector verified that the IEIN were received, reviewed, and appro-priate corrective action taken or planned. These IEINs are addressed as they are issued and summarized below for record purposes. IEIN No. 83-70 83-13 85-15 Title "Vibration-Induced Valve Failures" "Consequences of Using Soluble Dams" "Nonconforming Structural Steel for Safety-Related Use" Licensee Status in-process Complete in-process I!I} I}~ I tf ~ 4 ~ ' I} tl N 4 ) I',N 'I I" N I 'll FNN t)r, 1<< N, f Il 4>>N I } <<,>a, '4 f ~ I N '- I ~ I NN};,,I ~ I tl Nl N }N',t>>IN I }I "IN ~ I ) ) V NF I Nr<<I I, )it f ) 4N P N f'4 Ih <<N, ~ <<NINA,} INI }4f t* FN = ',I 1 I ANN II N N fj ~ N I,, N>> } 'I 4 A [I AN I Il ~ I I t<<,f<<. fAAttl >>Al t ~ I I} tt I = Nll ~ A A M lit N }I N) 'j}"I j ~p,p 4<<" I 4N NN f C !, I }I J }}I I F >> 1 1 N 1 I I* ~ j} N I Ng I" 4l", N>> "I t'l >>>> 'ltl I } NN I'N F>>I FF<< I V f fj} ~ 1 -I . I F N I II I I ~ tl N ~ >>I I 85-17 85-19 "Possible Sticking of ASCO Solenoid Valves" Complete "Alleged Falsification of Certifications Complete and Alteration of Markings on Piping, Valves, and Fittings" 85-20 "Motor-Operated Valve Failures Due To Hammering Effect" in-process With regard to the above, the inspector noted that IEIN 85-17 "Possible Sticking Of ASCO Valves" was received, reviewed and closed out by the licensee with the following statement: "The Program Administrator has reviewed this Notice and has decided to close it for our plants. The Notice gives insufficient data about the subject for as to perform a meaningful evaluation." No further action was taken, no investigation to clarify the "insufficient data" was made, and the personnel responsible for valve performance analysis or maintenance were not provided with a copy of this Notice for information. The above indicates poor responsiveness to NRC initiatives, on the part of the licensee. 9. Inspector Fol1owup Items (92701B) a. (Closed) 250, 251/83-07-02: Liquid Penetrant Procedure Inconsis-tencies" Procedure FPSL-NDE-3.1 was cancelled without further application at Turkey Point and replaced by FPSL-NDE-3.3 discussed in this report. The inspector has no further questions in this matter. b. (Closed) Item 251/83-12-02: "ISI of Shell Clamp Restraints" This issue has been resolved by the issuance of the second Ten Year Inser vice inspection program plan. The inspector has no further questions in this matter. c ~ (Closed) Item 250/84-37-02, 251/84-38-02: "ISI Audits" Procedure FPSL-QI-18-QAD-3 Revision 4 includes FPL-PNS-CIS-QI-2.14 assuring ISI activities will be included in the audit program. The inspector has no further questions in this matte ~ g s ~ a ta)f glg a gllg'I <<J $ q "tgH g L)l < .1 ),)I, i>> ' t.I H H >~ - ')' i "H" '31ag ' 3", a>>t, g NQI ) ~all ~f"J Hg'4 I " '<<') ">> ") I 'HJ HH Y),.) <<l) ),'>> "'). I3")J I, -." 'HIH>>I<>.g i') H Hf ) ILI <<I I ~frat') 'H li",H"g,J gf g H'i ) H 'IHf') <>I tt )' I,' "">>': ' l),Il'/j fs )1'H )lt(] 'ga " ' g 'I tgg, ~ H>> g'J ' H""g' g " )'H HHJ g),H g<<g. I, J IH) a"H g l( g,g v ) )<), gv)H Jf I fg 'gg' a I I<<g) I s ~ ~,JH 'll I" J g g)+ llfI" g,l f ~.. tl-f,",;, [H.H g 'LH il a'g f))' Hl f)I~ 4H H I a<LH I g H s,g ~ tt gvtw. ') "H "1 )1 J tl I '>3g '>>') fft'> I ~ li ')"'a HLJ ) g')sf'" ) H.. ~ '1'c.g a<<)g I [gasp+ j ) g ala, j ) Itf a s gl'a Hl << H'>'f g ~ p II ~ 'I) 1 ~ I s f ".HY )'>T g.) '1 Y Hif) I H H) ,r 's P q )I IH a ") g ar L) c) It H ~ rHa ) ~I ' Ig]- Qgl, "I f ) "'J)~ I "I"". '. ""'J g)f ~ g ' I H sf ga tl f 1<I g H g I()t <<',, I g I I I g I )'g gfYH'" <<<< gg I s') Js,'w )f g <<I H H*gg)g ' }}