IR 05000220/1988013
| ML17055E030 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 07/18/1988 |
| From: | Anderson C, Paolino R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17055E029 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-220-88-13, 50-410-88-11, NUDOCS 8808010370 | |
| Download: ML17055E030 (40) | |
Text
U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
50-220/88-13 Report Nos.
50-410/88-11 Docket Nos; 50-410/50-220 License Nos.
DPR-63 Licensee:
Nia ara Mohawk Power Cor oration 301 Plainfield Road S racuse New York 13212 Facility Name:
Nine Mile Point Unit 1 8
Inspection At:
Scriba New York Inspection Conducted:
A ril 11-15 1988 Inspector:
R. J Pao ino, Senior Reactor Engineer-PSS/EB date Approved by:
/g E'$'.
J, Anderson, Chief, Plant Systems date Section-EB/DRS Ins ection Summar:
Inspection on April 11-15, 1988 (Combined Inspection Report Nos.
50=220/88-13 and 50-410/88-11).
A~:
i i
'
f lE and non-class lE classification of components in General Electric Control Panels (PGCC).
Review and assess commercial grade dedication process for commercial grade purchases prior to 1985 for NMP-1 and during the period 1985-1986 for NMP-2.
Results:
(1) The licensee and the NRC are presently in the process of reviewing the General Electric (GE)
FMEA submittal of April 8, 1988; (2) The licensee plans to request deletion of license condition 2.D.vi, upon NRC acceptance of the GE test program results for the Nine Mile 2 Neutron Monitoring System.
The evaluation and analyses for the Nuclear Steam Supply System and the Reactor Protection System for safe power operation for Unit 1 and 2 were revised and redocketed; and, (3) The inspector questioned the adequacy of the licensee's program for purchasing commercial grade bulk items prior to 1985 (NMP-1) and during the period of 1985-1986 (NMP-2) (i.e., Okonite tape, lubricating grease,
"0" ring) and the dedication process for these items in that critical characteristics of the commercial grade items were apparently not considered or evaluated by engineering when dedicating commercial grade item for use in safety related/Eq systems or components.
88080i0370 88072i GDR ADOCK 05000220 PNU
Details 1.0 Persons Contacted 1. 1 Nia ara Mohawk Power Com an
"R. B. Abbott, Station Superintendent
"S.
K. Agarwal, Site Licensing/Materials Engineer C.
G.
Beckman, Manager Quality Assurance
"P. Francisco, Lead Licensing Engineer
+"S.
ED Geier, Lead Materials Engineer
+ G. Gresolf, Manager Nuclear Engineering
+*Wm. Houston, Site Licensing/Materials Engineer (NES)
"N. S.
Kabarwal, Electrical Engineer
+ J. Kroehler, Manager Quality Related Engineering
+ M. G. Mosier, Lead Engineer Safety Analysis
+*G. Pace, Manager Materials Engineering
- R. Pasternack, Manager Site Engineering
- A. Pinter, Site Licensing Engineer
- T. Roman, Station Superintendent, Unit 1
+ Wm. Schaffer, EQ Engineer
- A. G. Vierling, Lead Engineer
+"P.- K. Wilde, Supervisor Quality Assurance
- J. Willis, General Superintendent
+ D. Weaver, Lead Materials Engineer
+ M. Wetterhahn, Conner 5 Wetterhahn - Counsel 1.2 New York State
- P. D. Eddy, Site Representative
- PSC
- P.
D. MacEwain, Site Representative EG 1.3 Stone 8 Webster En ineerin Cor oration
"A. H. Della Greca, Lead EQ Engineer 1.4 U.S. Nuclear Re viator Commission
+ C.
+ R.
+ L.
+ D.
- W.
+ J.
+ M.
+ R.
+ F.
+ J.
+ p, J. Anderson, Chief, Plant Systems Section - DRS/RI Benedict, Project Manager NMP-l, NRR/PDI-1 HQ Cheung, Senior Reactor Engineer DRS/RI Caphton, Acting Section Chief, Operations Project Section - DRP/RI A. Cook, Senior Resident Inspector Our r, Chief, Engineering Branch - DRS/RI Haughey, Project Manager NMP-2, NRR/HQ Gallo, Chief, Operations Branch, DRP/RI Hawkins, Chief, Quality Operations Section, QAB-NRR/HQ Johnson, Chief, Projects Section DRP/RI Kelley, Resident Inspector
+ T, Koshy, Lead Reactor Engineer - DRS/RI
+ G. Napuda, Senior Reactor Engineer - DRS/RI
+ U, Potapovs, Chief, Special Projects Section/VB-NRR/HQ
"W. Schmidt, Resident Inspector
+ R. Temps, Operations Engineer - DRP/RI
+ E. Wenzinger, Sr; Branch Chief, Reactor Projects Section 2 - DRP/RI
- Denotes personnel attending exit meeting of April 15, 1988 at the NMP-2 site.
+ Denotes personnel attending Management Meeting of May 18, 1988 at the NRC Region I Office.
2.0
~Pur use The purpose of this inspection was to review and determine status of General Electric non-class 1E and class 1E equipment/components applicable to the PGCC system at Nine Mile Point 2.
Examination of procurement practices for purchase and dedication of commercial grade items prior to 1985 for Unit 1 and during the period 1985-1986 for Unit 2.
3.0 Back round non-lE/Class 1-E issue at NMP-2 During April 1987, the licensee (NMPC) was An NRC meeting with the licensee was held on June 10, 1987 at which time the NRC requested more information regarding the FMEA and a commitment to replace all non-1E components.
On June 16, 1987 the licensee docketed a
letter with a revised FMEA to justify interim operation of Unit 2 and proposed permanent fixes.
A technical meeting was held on June 18, 1987 between the NRC, NMPC and GE to discuss the June 16, 1987 submittal.
On June 19, 1987 GE and the NRC met to discuss generic implications of the RPS non-1E component issues.
It was determined that two other systems had non-1E devices in 1E systems.
These systems included The Neutron Monitoring System and The Nuclear Steam Supply System.
GE, via the white paper (rescinded on July 2,
1987) stated that these components in these systems were class 1E.
On June 22, 1987 in a conference call between the NRC, NMPC and GE, the NRC asked GE to provide an FMEA and a generic resolution to the neutron monitoring system issue.
On June 23, 1987, NMPC withdrew the old FMEA on reviewing design changes for Unit 2 associated with the MSIV actuator logic when they determined that there were non-1E components in the General Electric (GE) Reactor Protec-tion System (RPS).
A Failure Modes Effect Analysis (FMEA) done by GE and submi.tted to the NRC on May 18, 1987 concluded that the safety function of the 1E system was not impaired by the inclusion of the non-lE device,0 the RPS system since the components were non-1E and filed a new one for the Neutron Monitoring System isolation devices accompanied by an exemp-tion request for NMP2 and a commitment to implement any generic resolution imposed by the NRC.
On June 24, 1987, the NRC notified NMPC that they should not wait for a generic resolution of this issue before resolving this issue at NMPS.
The NRC requested that NMPC make a firm commitment to replace the neutron monitoring system isolation devices independent from any generic resolution imposed on other utilities.
NMPC was also asked to provide a written action plan describing how it planned on verifying G.E.'s June 19, 1987 statements pertaining to upgrading of non-1E components to class lE.
NMPC responded to this concern on June 25, 1987.
The NRC inspected the G.E. facility on July 20, 1987 to verify the June 19, 1987 white paper.
The NRC found that implementation of the G.E.
gA program for activities described in the white paper could not be fully determined.
A similar inspection by NMPC on August 9, 1987 could not substantiate the white paper for all components.
On January 22, 1988 in a
meeting requested by G.E. the NRC staff-met with G.E. to discuss, on a
generic basis, the history associated with the classification of electrical equipment and circuits at various BMR plants.
The results of this meeting conclude that:
1) the NRC audit of GE's San Jose Office related to the verification of G.E.'s generic gA program revealed a lack-of-traceability for verification that non-class 1E electrical components were qualified for class lE application; 2) G.E.'s presentation indicated that 90% of the associated components are separated from class 1E circuits through class 1E isolation devices; and, 3) the remaining 10% of the components have been analyzed and tested to demonstrate acceptability (adequacy of this 10% led to the follow-up gA audit referenced above).
A detailed FMEA including type test data which addresses all of electrical components classified as "associated" which were analyzed and tested (10%)
to demonstrate acceptability for their application is to be submitted for NRC review.
In a telecon dated February 3, 1988 G.E. notified the NRC staff that the information would not be submitted until April 8, 1988.
Status of Non-lE/class 1E Issues NMP-2 In a letter to the licensee dated March 2, 1988, the NRC requested certain information regarding the status of generic concerns related to the General Electrical (GE) electrical component safety classification program as applied to Nine Mile Point, Unit 2.
Items asked for, include:
Identification of the impact of the January 22.,
1988 G.E.
statements made to the NRC on NMP-2 license and prior docket correspondence to the NR ~
Schedule and status of the Niagara Mohawk effort to correct previously docketed information.
~
Justification for continued safe operation of Nine Mile Point Unit 2 while GE is resolving the generic concerns with the NRC staff.
The G.E.
Company's generic safety classification issues affect three different electrical systems.
They are the Neutron Monitoring Systems (NMS), The Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS), and the Reactor Protection System (RPS).
For the Neutron Monitoring System, a justification for continued operation was provided in the form of an FMEA and data indicating satisfactory performance in other BWR's for periods of over 15 years.
In addition, G.E. undertook a test program which demonstrated the Neutron Monitoring System's isolation devices could perform their intended functions.
The program results were submitted to the NRC for review on March 7, 1988.
The-licensee plans to request the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to delete the licensee condition 2.D. vi from full power license NPF-69 upon NRC acceptance of the G.E. test program results.
For the Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS),
the issue concerns the use of non-1E electrical components in the system without isolation from 1E power supplies or other lE components.
G.E.
had reported to the NRC on June 19, 1987 that the subject components had gone through a dedication process and should be considered lE.
NMPC used the GE letter as the basis for its letter NMP2L-L055 dated June 23, 1987 which stated that 95 percent of the work required by low power license condition 2.D. vii had been completed and the remaining 5 percent need not be done based on the G.E. letter.
As a consequence the NRC'considered the issue closed and did not include it in the full power license NPF-69.
For the Reactor Protection System (RPS),
use of non-1E electrical components was identified by the licensee in a letter to the NRC on May 18, 1987.
The letter contained a failure mode and effects analysis which indicated the inclusion of non-1E components would not affect safe operation of NMP-2.
The analysis was later revised and redocketed with a commitment to replace certain components and an exemption request to defer such replacement until after the first refueling outage.
Following the statements made by G.E. in the June 19, 1987 letter regarding 1E status of electrical components via the dedication process.,
NMPC withdrew its exemp-tion request, The withdrawal and the reasons for it are documented in license letter NMP23-1056.
G.E. is performing tests and analysis to demonstrate that there is no degradation of 1E components.
Pending resolution of this issue, continued safe operation of NMP-2 is discussed in the safety analysis docketed on June 16, 198.0 Commercial Grade Dedication NMP-I/NMP-2 On April 6, 1986 the licensee informed the NRC in a detailed review of Unit 1 purchase orders issued between August 1,
1985 and August 1, 1986 that numerous commercial grade items had not received proper dedication prior to application in safety grade systems.
The NRC inspector reviewed similar documents for NMP Unit 1 purchase orders dating prior to 1985, The inspector confirmed licensee's finding in that the commercial grade items had not received proper dedication for use in safety grade systems.
Purchase order numbers reviewed include P.O.
Nos.
CG"86-1009, CG"86-1008, CG-86"1007, CG-86-1005, CG"86-1004, CG-86-1025, CG-86-1031 and CG-86-1067.
The inspector observed that P.O.
No. CG-86-1005 for Okonite electrical tape (T-95) did not contain an engineering evaluation in dedicating the Okonite tape.
There was no indication that the tape which has a shelf life of 18 months, was identical or similar to the original tape tested.
Discussions with the licensee indicate that no testing was performed on the Okonite tape other than a megger test.
The licensee could not provide accept/reject performance criteria for the Okonite tape.
The inspector questioned the licensee on the use of Okonite electrical tape in making electrizal splices and qualification of the tape.
The licensee could not provide similarity analysis of critical characteristic for Okonite tape (i.e. vulcanizing properties, temperature limitations, moisture absorp-tion, radiation affects and aging) in the dedication process for comparing the commercial grade replacement tape to tape previously used in safety related system.
This item is unresolved pending NRC review of licensee evaluation of commercial grade dedication process and requirements for dedicating commercial grade purchases of bulk items such as the Okonite tape, lubricating grease and "0" rings etc.
(50-220/88-13-01)
The NRC inspector reviewed similar purchase order documents for NMP-2 for the period 1985-1986.
Purchase order s selected for review included P.O.
Nos.
FP0-25286, FP0-24207, FP0-25653-1, FP0-26856, FP0-26699-1, FP0-24741, FPO-24741-1 and FP0-26800.
The inspector observed that P.O.
No.
FPO-26800 was for '"0" Rings purchased commercial grade for use on Eg equipment
GTS
"MOV2B.
The inspector questioned the "0" ring dedication package in that it did not contain a critical characteristic evaluation for qualifying the "0" rings.
However, it was determined that the licensee based acceptability of the
"0" Rings on its audit of the vendor and the vendor's gA progra.0 Mana ement Meetin A management meeting was held in the NRC Region I office, on May 18, 1988, at the request of the Region.
The licensee was asked to provide a history of the Commercial Grade Issues at NMP-Units.l and
(attachments 1 and 2).
Items covered by the licensee included:
(1) Technical adequacy of the audit of pre-1985 commercial grade procurements for NMP-1 and the audit of NMP-2 commercial grade procurements made during the period of 1985-1986; (2) Technical adequacy of commercial grade dedication of "bulk" items such as electrical tape used in termination splices, greases and 0-rings; and, (3) Resolution and status of outstanding issues.
The Nine Mile Point Unit 1 facility is in a shutdown condition.
The licensee determined on April 6, 1988 that multiple systems were inoperable due to lack of acceptable commercial grade dedication.
The licensee indicated (attachments 1 and 2) that all issues have been resolved except for three items (CAR 87-3036, CAR 87-3037 and CAR 3038) for NMP-2 with resolutions scheduled for completion by July 29, 1988 and one item (CAR 86-3093) for NMP-1 with resolution scheduled for June 15, 1988.
The licensee's evaluation and response to commercial grade dedication of bulk items such as Okonite electrical tape and lubricants (greases)
was questioned.
Critical characteristic were not evaluated or verified to ensure similarity of replacement bulk items.
For the Okonite tape the licensee stated that they performed a megger test.
However, the staff commented that megger tests do.not establish material similarity (composi-tion) of electrical tape.
For lubricants the licensee reviews maintenance records to determine (after the fact) whether the lubricants are similar.
There was no,explanation as to how these records establish similarity for lubricants.
7.0 The licensee agreed to evaluate the adequacy of present methods for ensuring qualificatio'n of bulk components procured as commercial grade.
Unresolved items Unresolved items are matters that require additional information in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable or violations.
Unresolved items are identified in section 5.0.
8.0 Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee personnel and representatives (denoted in Oetails, paragraph 1.0) at the conclusion of the inspection on April 19, 1988 in the NMP-2 Technical Center.
The inspector summarized the scope of the inspection and the inspection findings.
At no time during the inspection was written material given to the license ATTACHMENT 1 NINE NILE POINT UNIT -
CONNERCIAL GRADE ITENS PROGRAM REVIEW AND STATUS
NINE MILE POINT - UNIT 1 HISTORICAL COMMERCIAL GRADE TIMELINE 6/85 CAR 85.3845 ISSUB I
I 9/85 2/86 CAR 85.3845 CLOSB I
I CAR 86.5%6 ISSUED I
I 3/86 6/86 7/86 12/86 BEGAN NES REVIIM STARTB NT-815.1 CONPLEIB I
I 4AeN I
I CAR 86.5886 CLOSB I
I UNIT 1 NNPC IAC C
AUDIT ALLEGATINS (
CAR's ISSUED)
RKCO
NAT EN6 GROU 1 CAR CIA5B 3895 I
I 2/87 I
3/87 7/87 I
I
CARS CIASB 89$
892 ITE G NKKRIHG SS GHB I ES NCLUDE ROCURENKNT
$
EN A
P TECHNICAL RKVIGI NmTION ORN KRIALS NEERING P
Coco Erro START 8 Sl ITIES E
IHEERIH6 LLOCAIB rUlG5 rOR ADDITINAL NANPOHER I
9/87 EN6I NEERI H6 NAHAGENKNT DIRECTS LL CG EV WATINS IHRU SITE EH6INEERIN6 11/87 I
I HANAGKR HATERIALS EN6INEERIHG S SIGNED 1 CAR CIASB 3894 I
I 1/88 I
I PRES BIT HATERIALS ENGINEERING GROUP ESTA LISHED I
I HKL-815a N ISSUB STOP HORN I
I 2/88 I
I ACCELERATB REVIEH Or P ST PROCUREHENTS CAR 3891-1 SUBNITTEO I'OR CLOSURE I
I 4/88 5/88 I
CAR 3891-1 CLOSED 6/15/88 KSTINATB CLOSURE DATE Or CAR 3893
NINE MILE POINT - UNIT i COMMERCIAL GRADE EVALUATION TIMELINE PREVIOUS PROGRAM CURRENT PROGRAM 1988 AUGUST l.985 SEPTEMBER 198/
NES REVIEW CAR 86. 389I ITKNS NITHOUT ENGINEERING KUAWAIION o
SVB PO's
o 17 NITH SAFETY APPLICATION l54 PO'
~ 3893 SECOS RKVIKM OF CG EUALUATIONS FOR CONSISTENT APPROACH o
148 ENGINEERING EVALUATIONS o
15 FOR INSTALLED ITEHS TO COHPLETE 6/15/88
NINE NILE POINT - UNIT i NES REVIEW CAUSEi CASE OF A
COMMERCIAL GRADE ITEN INSTALLED IN A SAFETY RELATED (EQ)
APPLICATION WITHOUT DEDICATION PURPOSE DETERS I NE IF THIS WAS AN ISOLATED OCCURENCE OR IF OTHER CGI'
HAD BEEN INSTALLED THAT DfGRADED PLANT SAFETY SCOPE o
TOTAL OF APPROXII1ATELY 335 PO'
FOR CGI'
PRIOR TO 8J'85 o
REVIEWED 154 PO'
APPROACH o
IDENTI FY MATERIAL I SSUES o
IDENTIFY WORN REQUEST THAT INSTALLED CGI o
R E V I E W E N G I N E ER I N G, P R 0 C UR E t1 E N T, A ND l1 A I N T E N A N C E D 0 C U I1 E N T A T I 0 N o
DETERMINE ACCEPTAB ILI TY o
DOCUMENT REVIEW RESULTS NO ITEMS WERE INSTALLED THAT DEGRADED PLANT SAFETY
NINE MILE POINT - UNIT I REPRESENTATIVE BULK ITEM EVALUATIONS
AMP LUGS ACCEPTANCE METHOD Audit perfortvled of 'AMp in the tiMe period of the procuretnent which addressed the necessary attributes 2 0 SPRINGS ACCEPTANCE METHOD Critical characteristics of the springs were determined, i.e. Material, sprang constant, dimensions.
Testing and inspection was perforMed for each characteristic.
3 0
GE-RTV SEALANT ACCEPTANCE METHOD
,.5 Audit performed of GE-Waterford, NY which is
%4 the sole Manufacturing fac i 1 ity, was perf creed to address the vanuf acturing contra 1 s necessary to assure product quality.
OHONITE TAPE ACCEPTANCE METHOD Critica characteristics evaluated for the tape.
A post nstallation eegger test of the splice was performed.
EQ report reviewed to verxfy acceptability of the tape
~
5.
MOBIL LUBRI CANTS ACCEPTANCE METHOD A substantial nuMber of Work Requests were reviewed by Engineering to establish that maintenance records inKicated acceptable performance of Mobil Lubricant NINE NILE POINT UNIT - l.
S 0 NNAR II OF OPEN CONNERC I AL GRADE 8t 1 BCFR PART 21 AUDIT CAR's NUMBER/'ACTION ADVERSE COND ITION CURRENT STATUS 86. 3893 l; NMPi)
VARI OUS NMP-1 CG REVIEW FORMS FA ILED TO,PROPERLY SPECIFY CRITICAL
'H4RACTERI ST I CS AND IDENTIFY APPROPRIATE RECEIPT INSPECTION ATTR IBUTES AND TOLERANCES THE MATERIALS ENGINEER IHG GROUP IS CURRE NTLY REVIEW IHG 4PPROXIM4TELY 48 REMAINING CGRF'
FROM AN ORIGINAL POPUL4T ION OF 148.
CORPORATE QA AUDITS ARE MONITORING ACTIVITY.
THE ANTICIPATED CLOSING DATE IS 6/15888 NCR 1-88-8887 IDENTIFICATION OF COMMERCIAL GRADE ITEMS INSTALLED h IN THE WAREHOUSE.
ALL IN PLANT WERE FOUND ACCEPTABLE I TENS TAGGED ~
ANTI C IPATED CLOSURE 6i2/88
NINE MILE POINT - UNIT 1 REMAINING OPEN ITEMS
- CLOSEOUT OF CAR 86,3893
.:ATTACHMENT 2 NINE MILE POINT UNIT -
COMMERCIAL GRADE ITEMS PROGRAM REVIEW AND STATUS
NINE MILE POINT - UNIT 2 HISTORY OF COMMERCIAL GRADE ISSUES AT NMP2 CAR 87.3969 ISSUB SHKC CGs fOR GE PARTS STOP NRR OH 6E CG ITKNS I
I A SURVEILLANCE DEHTlf ED C SSUE H THOU BIQ ION I
I NEL-915H INST 1lUIB ISITKRIALS KNGINKKRIH6 I
I PRES EHl NAIERI4LS EH6 NEKRIHG GROUP ESTABLISHB I
I 2/88 I
RKVIBS Of SHEC BOP CG's CNPLEIED I
I 1QR SUBHITTB fOR CLOSURE I
I 5/88 I
4/87 I
Iue) QRs 87.3933-87.3942 ISSUB SMEC CG KVALS I
8/87 I
I NT-915r NSTITUTB fOR ALL NNP2 CG EVALS I
NHPC EH61HEERIHG APPROVES CG EVALUATINS I
I 6/87 EVAL Of GE 1 CAR CLOSB HS 4LLB PARIS CONPLETBI I E NANAGKHKNT D
HIS RATIVE OLD PU N RKHAINIHG GE PARTS I
3 QRS CMSB I
1/88 I
I NAHAGER NATKRIAL 1MINEERIHG ASSIGNB I
4/88 I
I STOP NRX DPANDB TO ALL CG ITEHS I
I I
I 1QR SUBNIIIB KOR CMSURE 1 CAR
CAR CLOSB CLOSED I
I I
I I
I 3/87 I
5/87 I
7/87 I
11/87 I
I I
flV CAR SCH COH DAI JUL E RENA
's AV BU ED PLETIO ES HR Y 1 88 INING E
H OUGH
NINE l1ILE POINT - UNIT 2 SCOPE OF REVIEWS PERFORNED ON PAST NMP2 CG EVALUATIONS ABOUT 1983 7/85 7/87 PP99 SCOPE OP ORIGINAL CARs PP99 CG EVALUATIONS 889 BOP CG's 989 GE CG's NT-UI5.I EXPANDED SCOPE DUE TO STOP NRR ORDER 15,688 ITENS 478 ADDITIONALCG ITENS NOT IDENTIPIKD IN ORIGINAL SCOPE CONCLUSIONS REACHED NO HARDWARE CONCERNS DUE TO PAST CG EVALUATIONS 2 ~
95M'ROCURRED FROM OR I GINAL EQUIPMENT SUPPLIERS 3.
65'.
BOP CGI PROCUREI1ENTS INVOXE 18CFR58, APPENDIX B
NINE MILE POINT - UNIT 2 PAST METHODS OF COMMERCIAL GRADE PROCUREMENT AT NMP2 1983 3/84 7/85 7/86 7/87 1/88 GAX IAL ARlS PG35 SMEC BK PROCUR CONNERC GRADE P FOR IIP2 SMKC PP-99 RKV. e C
ISED SME P-REV GIVE CI I CII C
DE I
PK RK FOR GRA RKV. 1 C
ox OlOKRCIAL IDS P
D F
Rg P99 RKVe 2 NNPC IIPC rsED 'r-ersr NEI ersx IRECTION INPLENENIED INPLENENIED OR C UIRENENIS PURCH fIPP EN MRNUF ABED PER DIX B L Y FR A I1 R I GINAL I1EN T ACTURER SPEC IF I C CG D 0 C U I1 E N T A T I 0 N NOT REQUIRED BY PROCEDURE PURCHASED PER APPEND I X B USUALLY FRSI1 THE OEI1 STARTED SPECIFYING CR ITICAL CHARACTERISTICS CG. DOCUI1ENTATION REQUIRED PER PP99 NI1 PR FO EP GU PC OGRAI1 LLOWS RI IDELINE P R E U I 0 U 8 4aeeam aasaaat C U R R E N T PROGRAI1 PROGRAI1
NINE NILE POINT UNiT -
SUMMARY OF OPEN COMMERCIAL GRADE 5 18CFR PART 21 AUDIT CAR's NUMBER/ ACTION ADVERSE CONDITION CURRENT STATUS
~ 3836 PROJECT PROCEDURE
ALLOWS THE SELECTION OF COMMERC I AL GRADE VENDORS BASED OH IHCLUS ION ON THE QUALIF I ED RAT ING LIST.
THIS PRACTICE IS UNSAT S IHCE THE QRL I S BASED ON IMPLEMENTATION OF A
NUCLEAR-UNIQUE APPEND I X B QR PROGRAM OHE RE-SURVEY REMA I NS.
TELEMECHANI QUE IS SCHEDULED FOR 6/88 COMPLET I OH
~ 3837 PO'
FOR COMMERCIAL GRADE ITEMS 'IMPOSE f.HCFR58 APPENDIX B ON VENDORS.
THIS PRACTICE IS UNSAT SINCE APPENDIX B IS NUCLERR UN I QUE.
IMPLEMENTATI OH OF AN ACTION PLRN IS IH PROGRESS
~
SCHEDULED COMPLET I OH DATE IS 6/'15/'88.
87. 3838
).I
.,
GPE CONTROL VALVE PARTS MANUFACTURED ONLY FOR NMP2 (ED G.
NUCLEAR UNIQUE)
WERE PURCHASED COMMERC I AL GRADE.
ADDITIONALLY VELAN VALVE 'PARTS WITH NUCLEAR UNIQUE ASPECTS WERE PURCHRSED COMMERCIAL GRADE ~
RESOLUT I OH OF GPE PARTS SCHEDULED FOR 7/29/88 COMPLETIONS
0
NINE NILE POINT UNIT -
SUNNARY OF OPEN CONNERCIAL GRADE 5 18CFR PART 21 AUDIT CAR'
NUMBER/ACTION ADVERSE COND IT ION CURRENT STATUS 87. 3839 QA AUDITS STARTED TO VER IFY 5i3/'8 8.
ENGINEERING FAILED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO PROPERLY IDENTIFY COMPLETED>
AWAITING CR IT I CAL VERIFICATION ACTIVITY CHARACTER I ST I CS FOR AND CLOSURE.
SOME COMMERC I AL GRADE PROCUREMENTS 87. 3868
+4 V
I (n PQC NOT A BASIS FOR ACCEPTANCE BECAUSE VENDOR WAS NOT SURVEYED FOR CGI'
~
VERIFICATION IS 75%
COMPLETE ~
NO PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED.
ANTICIPATED CLOSURE 6i38i88 ~