IR 05000220/1979016
| ML17053B053 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 08/02/1979 |
| From: | Kister H, Napuda G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17053B054 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-220-79-16, NUDOCS 7910030838 | |
| Download: ML17053B053 (10) | |
Text
U. S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Region I r
~) 'l
~
Report No. 50-220/79-16 I
Docket. No. 50-220 License No.
DPR-63 Priority:
Category:
C Licensee:
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard West Syracuse, New York 13202 Facility Name:
Nine Mile Point 1 Station Inspection at:
Scriba and Syracuse, New York Inspection cond ed:
May 4-8, 1979 Inspectors:
G.
da, acto In tor a e signed Approved by:
H. Kister,
, Nuclear S pport Section No. 2, R08NS Branch d
e igned Ins ection Summar
Ins ection on Ma 14-18 1979 Re ort No. 50-220/79-16 inspector of previously identified items, quality Assurance Program implementation in the area of design changes/modifications and inde-pendent inspector effort.
The inspection involved 33 inspector-hours onsite and 8.5 inspector-hours at the corporate offices by one NRC regional based inspector.
Results:
No items of noncompliance were identifie DETAILS Persons Contacted
"T. Bassett, Supervisor, Systems guality Control W. Bryant, Manager, quality Assurance W. O'Angelo, Manager, Generation Engineering D. Fowler, Supervisor of gC-Operations
~R. Jutras, Coordinator of Station Modification Proposals
"G. Leskiw, Assistant gC Supervisor-Operations C.
Mangan, Manager, Production Plant Engineering L. McNeer, Secretary, Safety Review and Audit Board
"T. Perkins, Station Superintendent The inspector also interviewed other licensee employees including administrative, engineering, maintenance, operations, quality, records and technical personnel.
"Denotes those present at the exit interview.
2.
Licensee Action on Previous Ins ection Findin s
(Closed)
Unresolved Item (77-12-02):
Retention/Storage of detail design documents.
The inspector toured the corporate records
... processing areas, specifically the unit that was established,to process detail design input documents into the permanent records
- system 'nd interviewed various records personnel.
The inspector also interviewed a number of design engineers regarding their".
handling of the subject types of documents.'ased on the fore-going, it appears that design documents dating to 1974, that had been previously retained by the cognizant design engineer, have been purged from a clerical standpoint.
These records are now undergoing a purge by appropriate engineering personnel from a technical standpoint, after which they will be incorporated into the permanent records system.
These activities are being accom-plished in accordance with memorandum Manager-Staff Engineering/
All Applicable Engineering and Other Personnel, dated June 7, 1978, and existing appropriate procedures.
Further, the licensee has developed a
CPM type of master schedule by which to monitor the accomplishment and progress of this effort so as to assure its completion by the date stated in the licensee's letter to RI dated November 28, 1978.
Based on all of the foregoing, the inspector determined that the current status of incorporating detail design documents into the records system was consistent with the licensee's current commitments in this area.
. The licensee acknowledged the inspector's statement that he had no further questions and this area will be reviewed during a subsequent routine inspection(s).
This item is resolve P
-3-(Open) Infraction (220/78-11-01):
Failure to assess the scope of the gA Program through the triennial review of gA policy manuals.
The licensee representative stated that FSAR Supplement 13, guality Assurance Program, would not be submitted to NRR by May 1979, as stated in their letter (NMP-1079) to RI dated December 29, 1978, but would be forwarded by July 31, 1979.
The licensee representa-tive further stated that this delay was caused by the manpower impact of the recent plant outage and the extensive review cycle made necessary by the inclusion of additional corporate divisions into the gA Program.
The inspector noted that typed draft copies of the FSAR supplement have been widely distributed within the corporation.
The inspector stated that this item remains open pending further review by RI during a subsequent inspection(s).
(Closed) Deficiency (220/78-11-02):
Audit reports not issued within thirty days of audit completion by gC-Operations.
The inspector verified that the reports of audits conducted since September 1978 have been i'ssued within the thirty-day requirement and additional permanent clerical help'has been provided to the gC-Operations Group.
The inspector deter'mined that the corrective action was consistent with the licensee's statements in the licen-see's letter (NMP-1054) to RI, dated September 28, 1978.
This item is closed.
(Closed) Infraction (220/78-11-03):
Audit of deficiencies by Safety Review and Audit Board (SRAB) not conducted once per six months during calendar year 1977 as required by Technical Speci-fications Paragraph 6.5.2.10.c.
The inspector verified that the SRAB secretary is maintaining an audit schedule and that the required biannual audits were conducted during calendar year 1978.
The inspector determined that corrective action was consistent with the. statements in the licensee's letter (NMP-1054) to RI dated September 28, 1978.
This item is closed.
(Closed) Deficiency (220/78-11-04):
SRAB Training and Staffing Audit Report not distributed within ninety days of audit comple-tion per T.S.
Paragraph 6.5.2. 10.c.
The inspector verified that the reports of SRAB audits conducted since September 1978 were distributed within the required ninety days and the SRAB chairman stated that he personally reminds the auditor(s) of report due dates.
The inspector determined that the corrective action is consistent with the statements in the licensee's letter (NMP-1054)
to RI dated September 28, 1978.
This item is closed.
(Closed)
Unresolved Item (220/78-11-06):
Biennial review of gA Procedures 1.01, 1.02, 1.10, 4.25 and 11.50.
The inspector veri-fied that the subject procedures had been reviewed and reissued during November and December 1978.
This is consistent with the
licensee's statement in IE Report 50-220/78-11.
This item is closed.
Desi n Chan es/Modifications a 0 b.
References FSAR Supplement 12, Section
T. S.
Paragraph 6. 5.1. 6. d APN 9, Station Modification, Revision
Review The inspe'ctor selected and reviewed the design changes/modi-fications listed below to verify, as applicable, that:
they were accomplished in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59 and the licensee's gA Program requirements; code requirements and specifications were included; acceptance tests including acceptance values and standards were included; records of equipment performance were reviewed and accepted; and, prints/drawings and operating procedures were appropriately revised.
The modifications reviewed were:
N1-75.45 (MO 4847),
Feedwater Recirculating Loop includ-ing Flow Controller and Blocking Valve (awaiting final acceptance testing per MP 45.28)
N1-77.57, Peelle Door Modification-Reactor Building Extension N1-78.08, Feedwater Pump Impeller Change Nl-78. 17 (MO 0935),
Replace Reactor Cleanup Piping in Drywell (installation not completed yet)
'l-78.20, Remove Rodblock in Startup Mode When Refueling Platform Power is Off (awaiting final acceptance testing per MP 45.17)
N1-78.29 (MO 4830),
Sample (testing) taps for RBLV Nl-79.08, Reroute. Containment Spray Lines (compl'eted but drawings, inspection results, etc. still under review)
gy
~
The inspector also examined the installed Modification Nl-75.45 with respect to applicable drawings/instructions (except Control Panel wiring) and general workmanship.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
4.
Plant Tours During the course of this inspection, the in'spector made a number of'ours including the Control Room and work areas in the Turbine Building and other non-Primary/Secondary Containment locations.
The inspector observed work in progress, housekeeping and cleanli-ness in the subject areas.
Protecti'on and cleanliness of equipment and components were verified to be within requirements.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
5.
Exit Interview
The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in,-.
Paragraph 1) on May 18, 1979 at the conclusion of the inspection.
The scope and findings of the inspection as stated in this report were summarized by the inspecto