IR 05000410/1979007
| ML17053B282 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 11/01/1979 |
| From: | Cerne A, Finkel A, Mcgaughy R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17053B281 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-410-79-07, 50-410-79-7, NUDOCS 7912200457 | |
| Download: ML17053B282 (18) | |
Text
eport No. 79-07 Docket No. 50-410 U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AHD EHFORCEMEHT Region I License No.
CPPR-112 Priority Licensee:
Nia ara Mohawk Power Cor oration 300 Erie Boulevard, Mest S racuse, New York 13202 Facility Name:
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 2 Inspection at:
Scriba, New York Inspection conducted'ctober, 9-12, 1979 Inspectors:
A.C. Cerne, Reactor Inspector
.E.
danke
,
Re ctor Inspector Category date sigred Sr /l7 date signed
/
Approved by:
.W. McGau
, Chief;=Construction-
'rojects Section, RCSES Branch date, signed II I ate signed Ins ection Summar:
Ins ection on October 9-12 1979 Re ort No. 50-410/79-07
~A<<;,
d b
by dd bb dd b
of electrical procedures and instructions; downcomer installation and records; audits; the GE safety relief valve status; and a review of the status of outstanding items.
.The inspection involved 48 inspector-hours onsite by two regional based inspectors.
Results:
No items of noncompliance were identified.
Region I Form 12 (Rev. April 77)
g 9lgeo~+57
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Nia ara Mohawk Power Cor oration
- S. E.
J.
L.
- L. G.
- C. G.
- R. A.
- R. L.
Czuba, QA Engineer Dillon, QA Engineer Fenton,,
QA Engineer (Syracuse)
Honors, Construction Engineer Norman, Senior Site QA Representative Patch, QA Technician Stone and Webster En ineerin Cor oration SQ<
P. Barbadora, QC Engineer T. Britt, Senior QC Engineer
- B. F. Gallagher, Senior Resident Engineer
- C. E. Gay, Superintendent of Field QC E. Magilley, Senior QC Engineer M. Matthews, Assistant Superintendent of Field QC
- M. G. Pace, Assistant Project QA Manager
- J.
E. Rogers, Chief Office Engineer
- L. E.
Shea, Head, Site Engineering Office J. Taylor, Senior QC Engineer ITT Grinnell Cor oration Grinnell R. Graiko, Project Engineer D.
R. Giguere, Field QC Manager Cives Cor oration P.
Dowe, Field Superintendent, Miscellaneous Steel Erection
Denotes those present at the exit interview.
The inspector also interviewed other licensee and contractor employees during the inspectio.
Plant Tour The inspector observed work acti vities in-progress, completed work and plant status in several areas of the plant during general inspection of the plant.
The inspector examined work for any obvious defects or noncompliance with regulatory requirements or license conditions.
Particular note was taken of presence of quality control inspectors and quality control evidence such as inspection records, material identification, nonconforming material identification, housekeeping and equipment.preservation.
The inspector interviewed craft personnel, supervision, and quality inspection personnel as such personnel were available in the work areas.
The inspector witnessed the 'preparation and firing of "B" type cadweld splices to the drywell containment liner and observed the condition and status of the stainless structural steel and connections in the wetwell.
He later discussed the torquing requirements and inspection criteria for this structural steel erection with the responsible gA and gC engineers.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
3.
Downcomer Installation and Material Certification a ~
The inspector observed the overall condition and methods of protection of the installed downcomers.
Particular note was made of material type, stud and plate dimensions, and weld sizes and acceptability.
These items were checked against the applicable portions of Dravo Corporation drawings E-3133-DPB and DPC, both Revision 3, and S8W drawing EV-79A-3.
The following Grinnell installation documents for one downcomer (Nark DPC-1) were reviewed to verify that in-spection criteria were consistent with engineering require-ments:
Inspection Reports IP 55 and IP 56, both May 8, 1979.
Field Planner and Control Reports, FP 57M, April 30, 1979 and FP 60M, May 1, 197 gA and gC Deviation Report, 395, closed May 14, 1979.
Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) 8-1-7-7 (September 26, 1977) with Procedure gualification Records (PgR)
14532 (July 23, 1976)
and T-19658-A (April 4, 1977).
A material certificate for the E308L electrodes (heat 782823, lot 54971)
used in the downcomer installation field tack welding process was checked for compliance with the delta ferrite test requirements of S8W Specification P301Y and Regulatory Guide 1.31, Revision 1.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
b.
The following SQJ downcomer receipt records for Mark Numbers DPC-1, 2, 4, and 8 were reviewed and evaluated for compliance with the technical requirements of S8W Specification P301Y with Addenda 1-4; the receiving inspection requirements of SSW guality Assurance Directive, gAD-7.7, Revision A and Attribute List D7.7-8142; and the specific stud weld inspection criteria of SSW Nonconformance and Disposition Report, NSD 1286, closed May 15, 1978.
S8W Material Receiving Report, MRR 79-0987 for January 24, 1979.
SSW guality Assurance Inspection Report for the shop inspection of Dravo on January 26, 1979.
S8W Certificate of Compliance, January 23, 1979.
S8W guality Control Inspection Report gCIR P9001203, January 26, 1979.
Two Oravo stud welding procedures (WPS 1-1-S7010-A5, Revision
and 1-1/8-H0100-E7, Revision 1) used in the downcomer fabrication process were qualified with Procedure gualification Records for which the inspector verified adherence to Section IX of the applicable edition of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code with respect to the specified essential variables.
The inspector also spot checked downcomer (Mark DPC-1) mill test reports for the required solution annealing of stainless steel material and reviewed the Dravo NPP-1 Data Report, dated January 15, 1979.
No items of noncompliance were identifie C
The inspector reviewed the most recent S&W Audit Reports (NM2-Cl, June 1, 1979 and NM2-C3, August 10, 1979) of ITT Grinnell Industrial Piping, Inc. and spot checked various S&W Quality Control Inspection Reports covering "Piping Surveillance" of the downcomer installation.
He verified that the
"QA Activities" section of the SEW Monthly Project Report met the intent of the PSAR commitment regarding reporting of audit activities to the licensee.
QA and QC personnel were interviewed regarding the conduct and scheduling of audits with regard to other PSAR commitments.
The above items were evaluated against criteria established in the S&W QA Program, Sections 2 (Revision C) and 18 (Revision D);
S&W Quality Standard QS-18.1 (Revision A) with Change 1; and S&W Quality Assurance Directive QAD-18.1 (Revision B).
No items of noncompliance were identified.
5.
Electrical Procedures and Instructions The inspector ascertained that procedures and instructions are in the process of being written to handle the safety-related electrical equipment in the areas of:
Receipt Inspection, Handling and Storage, Installation, Material and Component Identification, Inspection and Construction Testing, Relay Coordination Study.
a.
Recei t Ins ection, Handlin and Stora e
The inspector verified that the licensee's procedures require that safety-related items be verified in conformance with listed purchase specifications.
Storage and handling procedures with regard to specific cleanliness and maintenance criteria are required.
The following procedures and specifications were reviewed by the inspector:
Receiving Inspection - General - S8W guality Assurance Directive (gAD-7.7, Rev'ision A, December 28, 1977.)
Mechanical Equipment Erection - Grinnel1 Specification NMP2-P275C, Addendum 1, May 25, 1979.
Electrical Installation -
SSW Specification E061A, Revision 1, February 7, 1979.
b.
Installation The inspector reviewed the following listed procedures to ascertain that instructions have been issued which reflect the PSAR commitments.
The listed guality Assurance Inspection Plans (gAIP's) detail the installation inspection criteria:
Tray Installation - N2-0E061A-002, Revision 2, May 23, 1979.
Field Inspections of Metallic Conduit Installations-N2-0E061A-003, Revision 1, June 5, 1979.
Manholes, Handholes and Duct Lines - N2-0E061A-004, Revision 2, March 20, 1979.
Field Inspection of Richmond Anchors Installation -N2-OE061A-006, Revision 2, July 2, 1979.
Field Inspection of Sills for Electrical Equipment -N2-OE061A-007, Revision 1, March 20, 1979.
Field Raceway Supports (Hangers)
Inspection - N2-OE061A-008, Revision 1, May 17, 1979.
Field Verification of Construction Crimp Tool Program-N2-0E061A-030, Revision 1, March 20, 1979.
I Field Unscheduled Cable Installation - N2-0E061A-035, Revision 1, July 20, 197 c.
Material and Com onent "Identification The inspector verified that both S8W gAD-7.7 and Grinnell Specification NMP2-P275C identify requirements, from receipt to. installation, of the safety-related items.
Nonconforming items are identified and processed through procedures listed in the S&W and ITT quality reporting systems.
d.
Ins ection and Construction Testin The inspector verified that specific electrical test require-ments are defined in the Electrical Installation Specification (E061A) and other equipment specifications.
The inspector reviewed the equipment specifications for the Standby Diesel Generator - NMP2-E31A, Addendum 3, January 18, 1978.
The requi.rements referred in the PSAR were included in this specification.
The verification that the purchase order reflects the specif ication requirements for the diesel gen<<<<<<wi11 be reviewed during a later inspection, since this documentation was not at the site at this time.
e.
Rela Coordinator Stud The safety-related portions of the facility onsite AC power system was discussed with the licensee.
The protective devices and methods to be used by the licensee will be verified during a later inspection.
For the above-referred items, no items of noncompliance were identified.
6.
Electrical Cables and Terminations The inspector ascertained that the PSAR commitments on electrical requirements for cables and terminations have been. addressed in the following type of specifications:
procurement, storage, installation, inspection, identification, testing, separation, load requirements, fire, and change control;
P
SSW Specification E061A and Grinnell Specification NMP2-P275C define the requirements for electrical equipment.
The environmental requirements are defined in Specification E061A and the applicable orders
~
Electrical Construction and inspection procedures are in the process of being prepared, but the inspector did review the issued procedures as listed in paragraph 5b, above.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
Ri in and Handlin Procedures The inspector reviewed the licensee's Rigging and Handling Procedures for the site.
The licensee's procedure identified detailed handling instructions for equipment by weight classification, but not as to the safety classification.
The inspector indicated that the procedures should identify the specific acceptance criteria required by ANSI N45.2.2 for the handling of applicable safety related equipment.
This matter is considered to be unresolved (410/79-07-01).
~Cb1 S
1 i S8W Electrical Installation Specification E061A, Revision 1, appears to allow cable splices during installation.
It does not define limitations on use and location of these splices, particularly with regard to the PSAR commitment that splices will not be allowed in cable trays.
This matter is considered to be unresolved (410/79-07-02).
S ecification Review Line 1935 of S8W Specification E061A requires that when the temperature is less than 14QF, cable. at this temperature shall not be pulled for 3 days, while it warms to room temperature.
The inspection criteria in gAIP N2-0E061A-035, Revision 2, states that after 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> in a heated area, the cable can be pulled.
This matter is considered to be unresolved pending resolution of this conflict between engineering and inspection criteria (410/?9-07-03).
10.
Safet Relief Valve Status The inspector inquired as to status of the GE safety relief valves manufactured by G. Dikkers and Co., which had been identi-fied by the NRC Region IV Vendor Inspection Branch (VIB) as possibly having radiographic film with a density below minimum code requirements.
The licensee indicated that the. 18 valves presently onsite have been placed in "Reject" status, while the nine spare valves remaining in Dikkers'hop have been re-shot without finding any unacceptable indications.
Representatives of GE have informed the licensee that they believe the existing films can be interpreted despite the question-able density.
The licensee is currently awaiting GE's recommendations before deciding upon further. action.
Pending the licensee's decision on the course of action with regard to the relief valves onsite and pending any further NRC Vendor Inspection Branch resolution as to the acceptability of these valves, this item is unresolved (410/79-07-04).
ll.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of noncompliance, or deviations.
Unresolved items disclosed during the inspection are discussed in paragraphs 7, 8, 9 and 10.
12.
Exit Interview At the conclusion of the inspection on October 12, 1979, a meeting was held at the Nine Nile Point Unit 2 site with representatives of the licensee.
Attendees at this meeting included personnel whose names are indicated by notation (*) in paragraph 1.
The inspector summarized the results of the inspection as described in this report.