IR 05000206/1982007
| ML20050L171 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 03/31/1982 |
| From: | Harnor J, Zwetzig G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20050L163 | List: |
| References | |
| TASK-1.A.1.1, TASK-1.A.1.3, TASK-1.C.5, TASK-1.C.6, TASK-2.E.4.2, TASK-TM 50-206-82-07, 50-206-82-7, 50-361-82-13, NUDOCS 8204140254 | |
| Download: ML20050L171 (6) | |
Text
..
...
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-
REGION V
50-206/82-07 Report flo. 50-361/82-13 Docket flo. 50-206: 50-361 (OPS)
License No. OPR-13 & NPF-10 Safeguards Group Licensee:
Southern California Edison (SCE) Comoany P. O. Box 800 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead. California 91770 Facility Name:
San onofre - Unit 1 and Unit ?
Inspection at:
San Onofre. California Inspection conducted: March 15-19. 19A?
/
L Inspectors :
/(l Ok i/U J
W. Hornor, Reactor Inspector Date Signed Date Signed Approved by:
M44cd 3/ /9/%
G. 3. Zwbezig, 0)iiet, Reactor Operations Projects Date Signed Section 1, Reactor Operations Projects Branch Summary:
Inspection on March 15-19, 1982 (Report Nos. 50-206/82-07_ and 50-361/82-13)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of the licensee's actions on previously identified items, TMI action items, seismic instruments program, housekeeping / cleanliness program, test and measurement equipment program, and independent inspection effort.
The inspection involved 40 inspector-
,
hours on-site by one NRC inspector.
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
8204140254 020401 PDR ADOCK 05000206 Fom 219 (2)
G PDR
-
.
_ -
..
-
_-
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
- P. A. Croy, Compliance and Configuration Control Manager
- F. Briggs, Compliance _ Engineer
- W. H. Ray, Instrumentation and Control Supervisor
- G. W. Mcdonald, Quality Assurance / Quality Control Supervisor, Unit 1
- J. D. Dunn, Project Quality Assurance Supervisor
- H. Key, Quality Assurance Engineer, Unit 1
- T. A. Mackey Jr., Compliance Engineer
- J. M. Francis, Compliance Engineer
- C. H. Welch, Quality Assurance Engineer, Unit 2
- D. B. Schone, Project Quality Assurance Supervisor, Unit 2 W. Matter, Clerical _ Supervisor J. Anaya, Instrumentation Supervisor T. Dawson, Maintenance Foreman N. Dickinson, SCE Unit 1 Project Engineer -
E. Talley, Station Administration Manager J. Reeder, Unit 1 Superintendent B. Girard, Health Physicist
-
W. Wilson, Instrumentation and Control Technical Administrator The inspector also interviewed other licensee and' contractor employees during this inspection.
'
- Denotes those attending the exit meeting on March 19, 1982.
2.
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Items (Closed) Open Item 82-05-01:
Inadequate Tracking of Requalification Training Lectures (Unit 1)
The inspector examined the new status board for tracking requalification training lectures. The inspector concluded that this status board would adequately address this previously identified concern.
(0 pen) Open Item 82-05-02:
Inadequate Completion of Maintenance Packages (Unit 1)
The inspector reviewed the licensee's new system for assuring completion of safety-related maintenance work packages performed by the Station Maintenance organization. The system appears to conform to Station Order S-M-103, " Maintenance Order." Four maintenance orders were examined and were found to be complete. The inspector will further verify implementation of the new system during a future inspection.
--.
.
... -
_
_ _
. _ _ -
_-
_
,_
.
.
-2-3.
Follow-up on TMI Action Items a.
(Closed) TMI Item I.A.1.1:
Shift Technical Advisor (Unit 1)
The inspector reviewed Engineering Procedure 501-V-5.7, Revision 0, dated October 14, 1981, "Outies, Responsibilities and Authority of the Shift Technical Advisor"; Training Memorandum 7-80, Revision 1,
" Shift Technical Advisor Training and Requalification Program";
and Station Incident Report No. 81-29. The inspector concluded that the shift technical advisor requirements as stated in NUREG-0737 appear to be satisfied.
b.
(0 pen) TMI Item I.A.1.3:
Shift Manning (Unit 1)
The inspector examined an SCE letter to the NRC, dated February 4, 1982 (K. Baskin to D. Crutchfield), and interviewed the Unit-1 Superintendent. The inspector concluded that the licensee is attempting to meet the TMI I.A.1.3 requirements on or before November 1, 1982, but even under adverse circumstances should meet the requirements not later than February 1, 1983.
c.
(Closed) TMI Item I.C.5: Feedback of Operating Experience (Unit 1)
The inspector reviewed the following documents:
(1) Engineering and Construction Department QA Procedure No. 40-9-19, Revision 3, dated January 8, 1982, " Review of Operating Experience Reports."
'
(2) Training Memorandum 4-81, dated January 29, 1981, " Feedback of Significant Operating Experience Items Into Training Programs."
(3)
Station Order 501-A-122, Revision 5, dated March 16, 1981,
" Review and Ireternal Communication of Operational and Safety Information."
Based on this reiiew, the licensee appears to conform to the NUREG-0737 requirements for TMI Item I.C.5.
d.
(Closed) TMI Item I.C.6: Guidance on Procedures for Verifying Correct Performance of Operating Activities (Unit 1)
The inspector reviewed the following documents:
,
-
- - - -
_ _ _ -
,
.
-
__y
.
_ _ _. _ _. _ _
_
_
.
_
. __ - -
_
.
.
-3-
,
f (1) Station Order 50123-M-5, Revision 2, dated February 8, 1982,
" General Maintenance Order."
(2) Station Order S-M-103, Revision 4, dated February 25, 1980,
" Maintenance Order."
l (3) Station. Order 50123-M-7, Revision 1, dated February 8, 1982, I
" Requirements for Maintenance Order Use and Control."
i (4)
Internal Form, dated February 1982, " Work Package Check List."
-
(5)
Station Order 501-0-114, Revision 0, dated July 31, 1981,
" Equipment Control Program,">(replacing 501-A-17, 501-0-9, S-A-133,.and S-3-2.38).
- ,
'
(6)
Station Or' der S01-14-12, Revision 2, dated February 5, 1982, i
"Equipmeilt Control-Implementation." ~
-
(7)
Surveillance Instruction S01-12.3-6, Revision 5, dated December 15, 1981, " Safety Related Systems Valve Alignment."
l Based on this review,'the program defined by listed documents appears to provide the necessary controls to satisfy TMI Item I.C.6.
e.
(Closed) TMI Item II.E.4.2(5): Containment Pressur_e Setpoint (Unit 1)
,
The inspector reviewed the following documents:
i i
(1)
San Onofre Unit 1 Technical Specifications Amendment No. 58, l
dated December 16, 1981.
(2)
Instrument and Test Procedure S01-II-1.80, Revision 1, dated September 16, 1981, with PCN #1, " Monthly Containment Isolation Channel Test."
(3) Surveillance Instruction 501-12.0-2, Revision 0, dated January 13, 1982, " Operating Surveillance Implementation."
(4) Surveillance Instruction S01-12.0-3, Revision 0, dated January 13, 1982, " Surveillance Requirements."
i Based on this review, the inspector concluded that the licensee l
appears to be in conformance with the requirements of TMI ItemII.E.4.2(5).
- -
$
!
.
, _. -, -
p--,,.
- -,
e.m-
. -.
,,, -
n,
-. w, _.,
,,.. -, -.
,,-,,.m..w,,
.,,-en
, -.
,., _-,...
..,. - - --..,
_
.
.
.
-4-4.
Seismic Event Monitoring and Recording (Unit 1)
The inspector examined the licensee's Seismic Event Monitoring and Recording Instrumentation Program.
Installation, maintenance, and calibration of the system is performed by Kinemetrics Incorporated.
Documentation relating to these activities is sent to the SCE Corporate Office as it is completed. The inspector reviewed the December 12, 1981 surveillance and calibration data supplied to SCE by Kinemetrics.
The inspector also reviewed Kinemetrics qualifications, personnel qualifications, NBS traceability, procedures, and Quality Assurance program. Based on this review, the inspector concluded that the licensee's program appeared to be appropriate and acceptable.
5.
Housekeeping / Cleanliness Program (Unit 1)
The inspector examined the Station Order S-A-10, Revision 9, dated February 1, 1980, " Station Inspections and Housekeeping," and Station Order S0123-M-5, Revision 2, dated February 8, 1982, " General Maintenance Order." Based on these reviews, the inspector identified that the program does not currently address housekeeping zones, control of housekeeping during work activities and prompt removal of combustibles.
Two new procedures, S0123-A-130 'and S0123-VI-1.5, reference and address these items and all requirements in ANSI N 45.2.3-1973 and ANSI N 18.7-1976.
These new procedures require on-site committee review and approval before implementation.
Cleanliness Control is also addressed in Station Order S0123-M-5 and in specific maintenance procedures.
These procedures reference and conform to applicable standards.
The inspector verified that cleanliness controls were appropriately referenced by examining several work packages.
The inspector, accompanied by licensee management, inspected housekeeping conditions both inside and outside of containment.
During this inspection, several instances were observed to be in nonconformance with the station program.
Station management issued corrective action orders to clean up these problem areas. All work was completed while the inspector was still on-site.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Test and Measurement Equipment Program (Unit 1)
The inspector reviewed Station Order S0123-M-12, Revision 1, dated
,
l February 8,1982, " Requirements for Calibration and Control of Measuring
and Test Equipment," and several maintenance and calibration procedures.
l The inspector also examined inventory and calibration records of electrical and mechanical test and measurement equipment.
l i
. _ _
..
,
-
-5-
Based on the above examination the inspector verified that the licensee's program for controlling test and measurement equipment established:
a.
Criteria and responsibilities to assure compliance with established calibration frequencies.
b.
Equipment inventory lists identifying all test and measurement equipment, calibration frequencies, calibration standards and procedures, c.
Requirements for marking each piece of test and measurement equipment with calibration status, d.
A recall system to assure calibration before the required date.
e.
Prohibitions against use of uncalibrated test and measurement equipment.
f.
A system requiring review of past calibrations performed with
]
test and measurement equipment found to be out of calibration.
The licensee connitted to adding a sign-off step to each procedure using test and measurement equipment to assure that test and measurement equipment documentation has been completed prior to closing out the job.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
Independent Inspection Effort a.
Unit 1 i'
The inspector examined the work packages for the following work i
to be performed during the current extended outage by the SCE Project Organization:
(1) Work package 3.2, " Reactor Head and Pressurizer Vent System" (2) Work package 8185, " Turbine Building North and West Seismic Modifications"
(3) Work package 8159, " Reactor Coolant Pump Lube Oil Collection" (4) Westinghouse contract work package, " Steam Generator Tube Examination"
,
The inspector determined that these safety-related work packages contained work assignment responsibilities; safety analyses; drawing status, material status, and equipment control documentation; cleaning requirements; retest requirements; QA/QC acceptance; and return to station approval.
The work packages reviewed also complied with station procedures and checklists.
,
- - - -
-
..-.
-
--
.. - _,.,. _. -,. - - -
,.
-. - _ -,.,,..
..~--y--.-
-..
-,.-,,,---,,
y-
,c,
-
'
,..
-6-The inspector examined the job locations referenced by the above work packages for evidence of compliance with the work package requirements.
.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
b.
Unit 2 i
.
.
'
The inspector examined the licensee's preliminary assessment and immediate corrective actions related to the following operating events:
'
(1) Reactor coolant system boron dilution.
(2) Loss of shutdown cooling.
(3) Dropping of a stainless steel rule inside the reactor vessel with the core loaded and vessel head in place.
The inspector found that the licensee was developing tests and
,
i experiments to determine and eliminate the causes of the first two events before continuing with the startup program. The third event was traced to inadequate tool control for the existing plant condition.
Temporary change notices were issued to correct the immediate problem. The long term solution will be to revise procedures to emphasize tool control whenever the reactor coolant system is open.
Subsequent to the third event, the licensee located the dropped rule using a borescope, removed the reactor vessel head and retrieved the rule.
At the close of the inspection period, the first two events were still being studied.
No items of noncompliance or deviation were identified.
8.
Exit Meeting The inspector met with the licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1)
on March 19, 1982. The results of the inspection were discussed and the licensee committed to change test and measurement equipment procedures to effect more positive control as described in paragraph 6.
I
.I
-
. _
_
_ _.. _.
_
.... _., _ _.. _. _ _.. _ _. _ __ _..-.