IR 05000206/1982012
| ML20052B248 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 04/12/1982 |
| From: | Eckhardt J, Wagner W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20052B246 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-206-82-12, NUDOCS 8204300210 | |
| Download: ML20052B248 (4) | |
Text
'
-
.
,
'
l U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0tHISSION a
-
REGION V
Report No. 50-206/82-12 (CON)
Docket flo. 50-206 License No.
npp-13 Safeguards Group Licensee:
Southern California Edison Comnanv 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemaad. California 91770 Facility Name:
san onnfre Unit 1 Inspection at: _ San Clemente. California Inspection conducted: March 29 - Anril 2. 1982 Inspectors:
dMb
/1 81 W
agner, React Inspector
/Date/ Signed Date Signed Approved b :
Y
[
g//g/6's
...
.
J. H. Eckhardt, Acting Chief Cate' Signed Reactor Projects Section 1 Summary:
Inspection on March 29 - April 2, 1982 (Report No. 50-206/82-12)
Areas Inspected: Routine, announced inspection by regional based inspector
of construction activities associated with the seismic upgrading of the turbine building. The inspection involved 33 onsite inspection hours by one NRC inspector.
Results:
No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.
!
!
!
l 8 2 0 4 3 0 O d-lO RV Fonn 219 (2)
..
.-.,,e
.
,
__y..
_
,
,. -.
..
.
DETAILS 1.
Individuals Contacted a.
Southern California Edison Company (SCE)
- J. M. Curran, QA Manager
- J. D. Dunn, Project QA Supervisor
- F. Briggs, Compliance Engineer
- M. J. Speer, Compliance Engineer
- J. M. Francis, Compliance Engineer
- P. A. Croy, Manager, Configuration Control & Compliance
- W. C. Marsh, Manager, Health Physics
- G. W. Mcdonald, QA/QC Supervisor
- H. A. Timmons, QA Engineer
- D. K. Nelson, Project Manager
Bechtel Power Corporation (Bechtel)
J. Sherman, Senior QA Engineer R. Nilius, Project Field QC Engineer G. R. Klien, Welding Engineer c.
U. S. Testing'
,
.
G. E. Fleming, ' Site Supervisor / Lab. Chief,-
'
- Denotes those at' tending exit meeting.'
Z
,
.
.
2.
Concrete Design, Manuf'acture 'and Placement
'
'
The inspector reviewed the activities involved in the design, manufacture and placement of concrete required to upgrade th,e seismic capability of the turbine. building.. The purpose was to assure that quality procedures were available.to cover these activities,'and that_these procedures
,
were being adequately implemented by qualified personnel.
a.
Review of Quality Assurance Implementing Procedures The inspector reviewed the following procedures for compliance with applicable codes and installation drawings:
_
_
.
_ __
..
- 2-(1) WPP/QCI No. 103, Concrete Pre-Placement (2) WPP/QCI No. 104, Concrete Placement (3) WPP/QCI No. 105, Concrete Post-Placement (4) QC Plan No.101, Inspection for Concrete Production (5) Mini-Specification No. C201-1-C-001, Mini-Specification for Ready Mix Concrete t
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
b.
Review of Records and Testing Results The following records were reviewed in order to verify that the above quality procedures were being properly implemented:
(1) Batch plant inspection activities including material control, equipment calibration, mix selection, moisture control, and control of concrete placeability during transportation to job site.
(2) Construction Inspection Data Report (CIDR) for production of concrete including slump testing, air content testing and molding of concrete compressive test cylinders.
(3) National Ready Mixed Concrete Association (NRMCA) certification of Lyman Ready Mix by a registered professional civil engineer for the -State of California.
(4) Qualification (proof test) for pre-qualified mix OT-2,.
which was qualified by Osborne Laboratories, Inc. on January 20, 1981. Osborne Laboratories, Inc. was previously qualified by U.S. Testing and Bechtel.
(5) SCE quality assurance field surveillance reports C-277-81 and C-329-81 for surveillance of U.S. Testing, and C-233-81 and C-338-81:for sur'veillance of Lyman's Ready Mix Concrete.
No items oflnoncompliance or deviation's were identified.
'
c.
Pre-Placement and Placement
';
,
The inspector obser'ved concrete pre-placementfactivities in the northeast section of.the turbine building.
Condition of the forms and reinforcing' steel appeared ' satisfactory, and pre-placement cleanup was in~ progress..The concrete plac'ement scheduled to take place during this inspection was postponed due to a higher than requir~ed water level under the' soil foundation upon which the concrete was Lto be placed.
.
., -
__.
-
-
_
.
.. -
__
.,.-
-3-No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
d.
Qualification of Inspection Personnel The qualification and certifications of two U.S. Testing QC inspectors and three Bechtel civil QC inspectors involved in concrete activities were reviewed by the inspector. This included one Bechtel welding QC inspector. Review of employment histories revealed that all inspectors had adequate work experience to perform their respective duties.
In addition all QC inspectors were qualified in accordance with ANSI N45.2.6.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Structural Welding Activity The inspector examined welding of a lateral structural support beam to a gusset plate in the west section of the turbine building. The field welding checklist identified the beam as diagonal brace G to H, column 13 installed to drawing number 5166422. Weld joint 430A was completed and weld joint 430B was in progress. Welding of these joints was in accordance with WPS No. P1-AT-Lh (structural). The inspector exaniined this procedure and the welding operations for compliance to AWS D1.1.
The inspector reviewed the performance qualification records for the two welders involved in welding these joints.
Both were qualified on the date the welds were made in accordance with AWS Dl.l.
The inspector examined the control, issue, return and storage of weld filler materials for compliance with procedural requirements.
All filler material located in holding ovens and in opened containers were correctly identified. The holding ovens were calibrated and operating within the required temperature range.
No_ items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
Exit Meeting The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1)
on April 2, 1982. The scope of the inspection and findings as detailed
in this report were discussed.