BSEP-90-0668, Forwards Monthly Status Rept on Plant Integrated Action Plan

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Monthly Status Rept on Plant Integrated Action Plan
ML20059N894
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/09/1990
From: Starkey R
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Ebneter S
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
BSEP-90-0668, BSEP-90-668, NUDOCS 9010220018
Download: ML20059N894 (97)


Text

.. . . , , ,, . . . . . . . , . , , , , , . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . , _ , _ . - _ . - -

d O s . . - ;u t ~)i,f t'

f- I

., m- R V,?i .

.si Brunswick Nuclear Project P. O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461 0429 FILE: B09 13510A

__ SERIAL: BSEP/90 0668 Mr. S. D. Ebneter, Administrator U. S. Nuclear Reguintory Commission Suite 2900 101 Marietta Street, !N Atlanta, GA 30323 BRUNSk'ICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT UNITS 16 2 DOCKET NOS. 50 324, 50 325

& LICENSE NOS DPR 62. DPR 71 m INTEGRATED ACTION PIAN STATUS b

Dear Mr. Ebneter:

Enclosed is our monthly status report on the Brunswick Integrated Actton Plan.

Please give me a call if you have any questions concerning this report.

Very truly yours, r

i R. B. Starkey, J ,, Vice President Brunswick Nuclear Project KMC/cj Enclosure ec: BSEP Resident Office Mr. K. B. Altman

  • Mr, R. E. Carroll Mr. J . L. Harness Mr. L. I. Loflin e J '# v h.

C O.2 0 ~

/ 9010220018 901009

/ gl>

, PDR ADOCK 05000324 m ruu sg m , .r. t .s . ,_ s\

- -1

.O O

~"

Carolma Power & Light Company me r, ce neanaent, Brunswick Steam Electric Plant MEMORANDITM TO: Mr. R. i. Watson PROM: R. B. Stu, key, Jr.

SUBJECT:

Integrated Action Plan As of August 31,1990, 43 of 63 Level 1 Action Items were complete; 16 of them significantly ahead of schedule.

Attached are the Level 1 and Level 2 Integrated Action Plans, which are current through August 31. Changes from last month's report are indicated by an asterisk. Also attached are graphs which show our Level 1 and Level 2 progress against the schedule and illustrate our actual and projected schedule performance on Level 1 Action Items.

l l A cignificant change was made to the scope and schedule of Item D7,

- " Confirm Design Basis for Key Brunswick Systems." The Nuclear i Engineering DepartmJnt has recently completed a review of the I

current scope of the Design Criteria Turnover Project and provided recommendations for program enhancement. Management has accepted these recommendations, which will substantially increase the scope of this action item. The projected completion date has been extended from December 31, 1991 to December 31, 1993 in order to accommodate this additional scope.

L Additionally, an Integrated Action Plan Schedule of Independent Reviews is attached, which is also current through August 31. It indicates that 34 independent reviews by CP&L personnel are complete and that 11 other independent reviews are underway.

17, KMC/byc Attachment cc: Distribution

,, .-.m, - . - .

O O Mr. R. A. Watson IAP Memo Distribution:

Mr. K. B. Altman Mr. M. D. Hill Mr. J. W. Moyer Mr. H. R. Banks Mr. J. R. Holder Mr. R. C. Phillips Mr. R. M. Barrett Ms. T. M. Jones Mr. B. R. Potest Mr. C. F. Blackmon Mr. T. L. Kosmatin Mr. R. B. Richey Mr. J. M. Brown Mr. J. P. Leviner Mr. W. W. Simpson Ms. K. M. Core Mr. L. I. Loflin Mr. M. S. Staton >

Mr. C. R. Dietz Mr. A. M. Lucas Mr. J. G. Titrington Mr. W. J. Dorman Mr. L. H. Martin Mr. G. .E. Vaughn Mr. M. W. Drake Mr. B. D. McFeaters Mr. R. L. Warden Mr. J. L. Harness Ms. P. D. Morris Mr. R. M. White 4

4 1

l

m BTEGRATED ACTIOV PLAX LEVEL 1 STATLS E SCIIEDULED PROJECTED 2 COMPIEl'E 70 - -

A 63 -

. si 82 C E 56-49- 4s 4s 47 "

[ 43

    • E ~

0 42- 4' .o N 35 -

E y

k b E +3 .

28 h I . h.

7 T 21 3 _

3 - . . .

h 5 h k

,,2g5IgIk

{ 15 E; b M

14-13 3

ya 3

(;,

y g

'l Q

~

f 1 f

i 7~~

g 3 5 - -

S 3 4 4 1:a u

W * ^ ^'

0 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR 'APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1991 1993 1989 1990 -

NOTE: One of the 63 items originally scheduled in June has been recategorized as "to be determined." and is not included in the projected totals.

O IXTEGRATED ACTIOX PLAX LEVEL 2 STATUS e l PROJE(, scusoumo TED g COMPl.ETE 300-- N z7s N z7s 269 2** 2*8 250- y m zis

  • 2* 288 9 21.'. T 200 m y .g ]

T mm I'28 @ $ i A

,'N -

. + .

S 150-

' ** "7 C $ n @  % e Ei N E & 'N K mm h'A g y p g g'i :s S 11:387 g  ;' g , 4 4 (g y 100- ~'A '

e Q $

w W w 1 r- u -

S A # 4 y h4 1 3 2 Rl 50- N f4 N b * '

X j!! 2 ff gj 44 9 s I

4 -

.bi 1 9 2  ; e .

g t y 7: # s # .si ir 4 0- SEP OCT NOV DEC '1991 1993 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG 1989 1990 NOTE: THREE ITEMS ORICINALIX SCilEDUED PT)R JUNE IIAVE BEEN DESIGNATED AS ~TO BE DETERWINED* AND ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE PROJECTED 1DTAIS. TWO ITEMS WillCII WERE DESIGNATED AS ~N/A" AND TilREE ITEMS WlilCII WERE TRANSFERRED AND INCORPORATED INTO OTIIER ACTION ITEMS IIAVE BEEN DEETED FROM TIIE SCilEDULED mfd PROJECTED TUTALS.

-~. -n--

O.

IAP . LEVEL 1 SCHEDU L E PERFORMANCE 40 COMPLETED ITEMS & 22 PROJECTED ITEMS AS OF AUGUST 31,1990 35 31 30 EE3 Late A

C 25 M Early T

l O 20 -

N l 15 -

T E -

y 10 -

S 5 5 5 -

3 2 22 22

' ' 'V ' '

0 1413121110 9 8 766 432 1 OT 1 23 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12+

MOKTHS < = > ORIGINAL TARGET LAP 6 Note: One Action Item has been designated as "to be determined," and is not included in this graph.

E==e

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT INTEGRATED ACTION PLAN STATUS: August 31,1990 .

ORIGINAL CURRENT IAP NO. ACTION ITEM - TARGET DATE TARGET DATE COMMENTS Al Communication Strategy for Goals, 12/31/90 Complete Priorities Expectations Improve External Relationships 01/31/90 Complete The CP&L/NRC Interaction Plan A2 (revision 2) has Inn published and implemented.

BI implement Technical Support 09/30/90 09/30/90 Improvements Implement NED Organizational 06/30/90 Complete 02 Improvements Implement Nuclear Training 06/30/90 Complete B3 Organizational Improvements Implement Control & Administration 12/31/89 Complete B4 Organizational Improvements Implement Nuclear Plant Support 06/30/90 Complete B5 Organizational Improvements Implement Outage Management & 12/31/89 Complete OA B6 Modifications Organizational Improvements 06/30/90 Complete Programs / processes are in place to Cl Implement Corporate Nuclear prioritize new work and existing Prioritizatwn Process backlogs.

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPSI 1
o BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT - *~

INTEGRATED ACI' ION PLAN STATUS: August 31,1990 ORIGINAL CURRENT i I AP NO. ACTION ITEM TARGET DATE TARGET DATE COMMENTS Establish NED Budget item for Generic 12/31/89 Complete 1990 Budget.  ;

C2  !

Work Establish Budget & Release Process for 12/31/89 Complete C3 Non-IPBS Engineering C4 Develop Long Range Planning Budgets 12/31/90 12/31/90 for fmerging issues / Regulations Resolve Surveillance Test Program 03/31/90 Complete Di Questions Improve Management of Maintenance 06/30/90 Complete D2.1 Backlog Strengthen Maintenance Planning 06/30/90 Complete D2.2

  • Functions Fine Tune MOV Maintenance Program 06/30/90 Complete D3 l

l Complete D4 Develop Post-Maintenance Testing for 10/15/*>9 f ASME Code Repairs D5 Implement Recommendations of 11PCI 12/31/90 02/28/91

( Reliability-Centered Maintenance Study l

11/30/90 Tied to the Unit 1 Refueling I

D6 Address Service Water System Design 11/30/90 l Outage. Unit 2 is complete.

Issues

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPSI 2

.)

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT INTEGRATED ACTION PLAN STARIS: August 31,1990 ORIGINAL CURRENT IAP NO. ACTION ITEM TARGET DATE TARGET DATE LOMMENTS D7 Confirm Design Basis for Key Brunswick 12/31/91 12/31/93*

  • Management has reviewed and Systems approved r. proactive approach which wi'A provide a comprehensive reconstitstion of the BNP safety-related syste elesign basis. This is a major scope increase for Action Item D7.

D8 Complete Update of Corporate and Site 03/31/90 Complete Design Procedures D9 Implement Corrective Action Program 04/30/90 Complete Improvements DIO Develop and Institutionalize Corporate 12/31/90 12/31/90 Corrective Action Program DIi Develop Corporate Program for 02/15/90 Complete

  • Consistent Performance of Safety Reviews D12 Improve Business Planning Process 06/30/90 Complete D13 Review BNP Procedures for Compliance 04/01/90 Complete with PAM Intent D14 Improve Consistency of Procurement 10/01/90 10/15/90 Processes by Nuclear Plants ,
  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPSI 3

i - .._

BRUNSWICK' NUCLEAR PROJECT INTEGRATED ACTION PLAN STATUS: August 31,1990 L

ORIGINAL . CURRENT IAP NO. ACTION ITEM TARGET DATE ' TARGET DATE COMMEFES DIS Require Nuclear Services Department 12/31/90 12/31/90 lavolvement in Regulatory Driven Modifications ,

i Dl6.1 Increase Role of Nuclear Plant Support in 12/31/90 Complete Development of Consistency among ,

Nuclear Plants

'D16.2' Formalize Initiatives to Standardize 12/31/90 Complete

  • Processes and Procedures D17 Increase Use of ISD's Directives and 12/31/89 Complete i Resources Dl8 Submit Simulator Certification 12/31/90 02/15/91 This item delayed approximately two months due to utilization of the i simulator for additional operator training, which impacted certi-fication testing and modifications.

D19.1 Implement System for Responding to 05/31/90 Complete Al-ll has been written and Training Requests approved.

D19.2 Provide Coordinated Response to 05/31/90 Complete Regulatory-related Training Requests D20 Revise Standing Instructions Procedure to 10/27/89 Complete OG-01 (revision 0) dated 10/24/89.

Require Index Log D21 Review SWFCG Charter / Guides for 07/31/90 Complete Current Goals, Priorities

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPSI 4

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT

  • INTEGRATED ACTION PLAN STATUS: August 31,1990 ORIGINAL CURRENT I AP NO. ACTION ITEM TARGET DATE TARGET DATE COMMENTS D22 Implement Tagging and Labeling . 02/28/90 Complete AI-97 (revision 2) approved improvement Program 01/09/90.

D23 Integrate PM Vibration Program with 12/31/90 12/31/90 ASME Sec. XI IST Program D24 Implement Budgeting of Small 12/31/90 Complete Engineering Projects -

D25 Use Project Management Approach in 07/31/89 Complete Planning / Execution of Outages

'326 Formalize Plant Work Schedule 12/31/89 Complete Adherence Control D27 Improve Tracking / Disposition of 12/31/89 Complete

  • Temporary Repairs / Conditions to Expedite Elimination D28 Revise EOP's to Simplify and Match 12/31/90 12/31/90 BWROG Guidelines D29 Implement NGG Guideline Re- Structure 06/30/90 Complete of CP&L ISI Programs,and Establishment of 6-Month Information Exchanges D30 Implement Actions for Administrative 06/30/90 Complete Cost Containment D31 Consolidate, Update, Simplify BNP 09/30/90' 09/30/90 Procedures .
  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPSI 5

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT

  • INTEGRATED ACTION PLAN STATUS: August 31,1990 -
  • ORIGINAL CURRENT IAP NO. ACTION ITEM . - TARGET DATE TARGET DATE COMMENTS D32 Implement Brunswick Nuclear Project 01/15/91 01/15/91 Department Licensed Operator Training Improvements D33 Implement Nuclear Services Department 03/29/91 08/31/91 This item extended until 08/31/91 Licensed Operator Training in order to accommodate additional Improvements Level 2 action *s".

El Define, Track Operational and 12/31/89 Complete Management Performance; Document Goals to be Used to Manage Performance E2 Ensure Improvement Programs are 09/30/90 Complete implemented / Monitored E3 Revise LOR Program, Emphasizing 01/31/90 Complete V

Effective Control Room Log Entries E4.1 Issue Integrated Audit / Surveillance Plan -12/31/90 12/31/90 for BNP Engineering E4.2 Develop Corporate QA Performance- ' 12/31/90 . Complete Portions of this action item have Based Overview Plan been transferred to item E5 because of potential for overlapping efforts.

E4.3 Adjust Audit Improvements in Progress 12/31/90 Complete to Address DET Conclusions

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPSI l 6

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT

  • INTEGRATED ACTION PLAN STATUS: August 31,1990 ORIGINAL CURRENT I AP NO. ACTION ITEM TARGET DATE TARGET DATE COMMENTS -

E5 Analyze Methods of Independent 12/31/89 12/31/90 Scope expanded to include Assessments for Performance Evaluation development of a company-wide program to improve the quality of CP&l *s nuclear oversight functions.

E6 Revise pts for Proper Evaluation of 04/28/90 Complete Revisions approved iI/24/89.

Service Water Pump Performance FI Implement Career Development and Job 06/30/90 To be determined This item was not completed in Rotation Process June 1990 as originally scheduled.

A new target completion date is currently under review.

F2 Incorporate Quality, Safety and Cost 06/30/90 Complete This item slipped one month in Effectiveness Criteria in Performance order to ensure consistency with the Appraisal Program Corporate Performance Management Program to be implemented in 1991.

F3 Review Awards and Incentives; Develop 12/31/90 12/31/90 Plans f)r Enhancements .

F4 Provide Formal Training in Business 03/31/90 Complete Fundamentals

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPSI 7

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT

  • INTEGRATED ACTION PLAN STATUS: August 31,1990 ORIGINAL CURRENT IAP NO. ACTION ITEM TARGET DATE TARGET DATE COMMENTS GI Implement Actions to Resolve People 02/28/90 12/31/90 Instead of a Brunswick-only Issues Including Employee Suggestion system, a corporate program will be System . developed, with Brunswick as an implementation pilot. An implementation design team has been formed to develop, pilot, and evaluate this program by the end of 1990.

- G2 Reemphasize and Encourage Support of 03/31/90 Complete TQ Process G3 Improve Organizational and Individual 03/31/90 12/30/90 Scope expanded to include Ownership Commitments, Including monitoring of implementation and Procedural Adherence an opinion survey of operators.

l

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPSI 3

~ BRUNSWICK NbCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP I AP NO. REF. ' ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS AI CRCi . Communication Stratt 3y for Goals. Starkey Complete CRC 5 Priorities, Expectations- BNP CRC 1I

a. ' Develop and document strategy for Core Complete Issued to Site Management by ,

Brunswick. C&A R. B. Starkey memo dated 02/05/90.

b. Track and document implementati'n Core Complete One year of historical of strategy components. C&A documentation of the com-munications strategy has been collected and organized as of the end of June.
  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2' 1

. ~ . . . . - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

z --

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90

-LEVEL 2 IAP RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS I AP NO. REF. ACTION ITEM Improve External Relationships- Watson Complete A2 NGG Centralize accountability for NRC/ Watson Complete OA CRE 33 a.

INPO effectiveness. NGG Cutter Complete CRE 34 b. Finalize CPAL/NRC Interaction Plan.

CRO 27 NSD CRO 28 -

Cutter Complete CP&L/NRC Interaction Plan CRO 29 c. Assign clear responsibilities, goals, (revision 2) has been published CRO 30 - and time frames for each policy and NSD which assigns clear program development action in the responsibilities, goals, and time CP&L/NRC Interaction Plan. frames for each policy and program development.

t

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 2

l

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP -

I AP NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS BI Implement Technical Support Improvements: llelme 09/30/90 Tech Support CRE 10 . a. Clearly define and communicate mission IIelme Complete The mission and functions and functions. Tech Support have been defined and com-municated to Technical '

Support Management. They are contained in ENP-01, Rev.

5, dated 02/08/90.

CRE 11 b. Consolidate / streamline organization tielme Complete OA structure. Tech Support CRE 12 c. Determine long-range human resource IIelme Complete OA needs. Tech Support CRE 13 d. Continue system engineerine, development IIelme Complete ENP-606 (revision 2) was efforts. Tech Support issued on February 15,1990.

CRE14 e. Relocate Technical Support personnel to Simpson To be within the plant protected area. C&A Determined t

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. LAPS 2 3

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT ' 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP I AP NO. REF, ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBII.ITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS B2 Implement Nuclear Engineering Department Brown * - Complete Organizational Improvements- NED CREI a. Complete organization and staffing Brown

  • Complete OA CRE6 of Bs ...swick site NED group. NED CRE5 b. Determine long-range human Brown * ' Complete OA CRE7 resource needs. NED CRE8 ,

Establish a Brunswick-Raleigh NED Brown

  • Complete NED policy on personnel l CRE9 c.

rotation program, by deve;oping a NED' rotation approved on policy to include appropriate tasks February 28,1990.

and skills, candidate performance, schedule and temporary assignments.

CRE 21 d. Develop detailed and plant specific Simpson Complete implementation plans for standard- C&A ized site /NED procurement functions.

CRE 27 e. Transfer Brunswick EDBS function and Simpson* Complete The EDBS function was parsonnel to NED. C&A transferred to NED in 1989, as recommended by Cresap. In early 1990, the EDBS group was temporarily transferred back to Brun, wick in order to facilitate effective implemen-tation of an enhanced commercial grade procurement program.

The NRC considers this Action item "Open."

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. LAPS 2

.4

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP I AP NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS B3 Implement Nuclear Training Organizational Martin Complete Improvements- Nuclear Training CRA 32 a. Review activities performed at the Martin Complete OA E&E Center and plants, to identify Nuclear Training werk needing more emphasis and tasks that are not being cost effectively performed.

CRA 33 ' b. Where appropriate, reallocate training Martin Complete OA responsibilities and personnel among Nuclear Training nuclear program training units.

CRA 34 c. tiedirect organizational focus of re- M artin Complete wurces remaining at the E&E Center. Nuclear Training CRA 35 d. Implement procedures and practices Martin Complete to improve instructor utilization. Nuclear Training CRA 39 e. Transfer Real-Time Training from Martin Complete all plant organizations to the Nuclear Training Brunswick Training Unit, except Operations RTI'.

CRA 40 f. Address BTU use of contractors. Martin Complete Nuclear Training CRA 41 g. Clarify training mission, roles, Martin Complete and respersibilities between BTU Nuclear Training and the EAF Center.

CRA 42 h. Resoive conflicting objectives Martin Complete between BTU and Betinswick I'lant Nuclear Training and industry regulators.

The NRC considers this Action item "Open.'

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 5

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP .

REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS IAP NO.

B4 Implement Control & Administration ,

Simpson Complete Organizational Improvements- C&A CRA 3 a. Clarify roles and responsibilities Smith Complete t l

CRA 5 for completing plans and budgets. B&BP CRA 23 b. Evaluate Information Services George Complete staffing needs and document in SISU Business Plan.

CRE 23 c. ' Transfer all site procurement Simpson Complete engineering activities and personnel C&A to Control & Administration.

CRE 24 d. Develop Procurement Engineering Jones Complete mission statement, job descriptions, Proc Eng and performance goals.

CRE 25 e. Develop plan to limit Procurement Simpson Complete Engineering design basis respcnsibility C&A consistent with the CDO concept.

CRE 26 f. Develop long-range staffing plan Jones- Complete for Procurement Engineering C&A ,

.l

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 6

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP .

I AP NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS B5 Implement Nuclear Piant Support flill Complete OrganizationalImprovements - NPS CRA 50 , a. Undertake thonough review of liill Complete OA activities performed by NPSS cost NPS reporting and administrative services units.

CRA 51 b. Merge NPSS cost and administrative 1 1i11 Complete OA units and eliminate / downsize activities NPS and functions not core to Company's overall objectives.

CRO 24 c. Establish a stronger role for the Nuclear Ilill Complete OA Flant Support Section. NPS CRO 26 d. Staff the NPSS with individuals who Ilill Complete have plant experience, using rotation NPS program.

CRA 52 e. Standardize remaining corporate nuclear Coats Complete support activeies.

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. LAPS 2 7

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP .

IAP NO. REF. ACI' ION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE . COMMENTS B6 Implement Outage Management & Iloider Complete Modifications Organizational OM&M improvements:

CRA 38 - a. Reassign and/or eliminate . Kelly Complete training activities performed OM&M by BCU.

CRE 04 b. Continue efforts to evaluate Kelly Complete alternative methods for OM&M modification / outage support.

i The NRC considers this Action Item "Open."

t

,

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 8

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90-LEVEL 2 IAP IAP NO. .REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS C1 CRA 6 Implement Corporate Nuclear Prioritization Wagoner Complete Programs / processes are in Process- OM&M . place to prioritize new items and existing backlogs.

. a. Develop guidelines / procedures for - Wagoner Complete use of the prioritization process. OM&M

b. Develop guidelines / procedures for Wagoner Complete linkage between priority ranking OM&M and budget inclusion.

CRE 15 . c. Finalize TQ Team efforts to develop Wagoner Complete corporate prioritization. OM&M CRE 16 d. Adapt corporate process of Wagoner Complete Site processes now incorporate prioritization of work to Brunswick. OM&M Nuclear Prioritization Process.

CRE 17 e. Apply prioritization process to new Wagoner Complete CRE 18' work and existing backlogs. OM&M .

The NRC considers this Action Item "Open."

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 9

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT -08/31/90

. LEVEL 2 IAP REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS J AP NO.

. Establish A Nuclear Engineering Brown

  • Complete Accomplished as part of C2 CRE2 Department Budget item for Generic Work. NED 1990 budgeting process.

i

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 10

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT. 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP RESPONSIBII ITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS -

IAP NO. REF. ACTION ITEhl .

Establish Budget and Release Process for Wagoner Complete 12/18/89 memo from L. V.

C3 CRE3 Wagoner to R. E. IIelme, CRE 18' Non-IPBS Engineering- OM&M re- Identifying. Scoping, and Scheduling Work through PCN-G0015 A, "Small Modifications."

Develop criteria for this category Worth Complete a.

of project (e.g., engineering - Tech Support manhours, type of work, etc.)

. Estimate number of projects Worth Complete b.

which will fit this category. Tech Support Establish a budget item in 1990 Worth Complete c.

Business Plan / budget. Tech Support Develop releasing mechanism and Worth Complete d.

approval levels for funds for Tech Support such projects. Wagoner OM&M Establish a cost tracking Worth Complete e.

mechanism. Tech Support l

)

Wagoner OM&M Smith B&BP O Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 II

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP

' RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE , COMMENTS I A P NO. REF. ACTION ITEM C4 CRE 35 Develop Long-range Planning Budgets for Vaughn 12/31/90 Emerging Issues / Regulations- NSD

a. Annually, in support of long-range - Loflin 12/31/90 planning process, coordinate develop- Licensing ment / update of comprehensive cost and schedule forecast for emerging issues /

regulations.

l l

l l

l t

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 l

I 12 1 - .

4 BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP -

I A P NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS

'DI Resolve Surveillance Test Program ~ Starkey . Complete Questions: BNF

a. Develop a plan to sample the Jones Complete Tech Spec. data base to gauge ONS accuracy.
b. Re-evaluate the Brunswick electrical Brown
  • Complete Completed on 03/08/90.

distribution system for compliance NED with GDC-17.

c. Complete actions in response to LER Starkey Complete LER submitted 11/1/89, 1-89-016 (stroke time testing for BNP BSEP/89-0961.

certain containment isolation valves.)

d. Improve sampling plan for QA sur- Dorman Complete veillance of Technical Specification CQAD requirements.

The NRC considers this Action Item "Open.'

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 13

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT - 08/31/90 LEVEL'2 IAP ..

I A P NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE ~ COMMENTS D2.1 CRE 18' Improve Management of Maintenance Warden . Complete CRO 21* Backlogs- Maintenance CRO 22' Apply the Nuclear Prioritization Smith Complete On November 6,1989, the CRO 23' a.

Process to the maintenance backlog. ' Maintenance new prioritization system was implemented.

b. Improve utilization of t'he Automated Warden Complete Maintenance Management System. Maintenance
c. Implement a new Maintenance Backlog Warden Complete SOP 2.45," Maintenance Management Procedure. Maintenance Work Order Management" was issued in September, 1989.

The NRC considers this Action Item "Open."

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 14

- ~~. .. .. -

m \

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT ' 08/31/90

. LEVEL 2 IAP RESPONSIBII.ITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS I AP NO. REF. ACTION ITEM Strengthen Maintenance Planning Functions: Warden Complete D2.2 CRO 19 Maintenance Musser Complete

a. Finalize the charter / mission statement of the Brunswick Maintenance Planning Maintenance Subunit.

Complete the position description for Musser Complete b.

the Maintenance Planner / Analyst. Maintenance Establish specific guidelines for Musser Complete c.

Planner / Analyst. Maintenance Develop or acquire a formal Maintenance Musser Complete d.

Planner / Analyst Training Program. Maintenance Planner / Analyst Supervisors working with representatives from the Brunswick Training Unit have developed training matrices for each planner position.

Implement Planner / Analyst Training Musser Complete e.

Program at Brunswick for existing Maintenance and prospective Planner Analyst.

Increase the amount and scope of Musser Complete f.

Maintenance planning completed Maintenance before scheduled outages.

The NRC considers this Action Item "Open.'

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. LAPS 2 15

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP .

REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS I AP NO.

D3 Fine Tune MOV Maintenance Program: Warden Complete Maintenance

a. Revise OCM-M0500 (lubrication of Warden Complete actuator gear boxes). Maintenance
b. Review and make necessary changes Musser Complete to MOV testing procedures. Fiaintenance
c. Review adequacy of MOV preventive Musser Complete maintenance program and scheduling. Maintenance
d. Review engineering procedures for Johnson Complete consistency. Tech Support a
  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 16

--- ~ __ _

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL' 2 IAP ,

1 IAP NO. R e.e . TION ITEM R ESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS D4 Develop Post-Maintenance Testing for' IIelme Complete ASME Code Repairs: Tech Support

a. Complete development of ENP-16.12. IIelme Complete Tech Support
b. Complete development of PLP-08. IIelme Complete Tech Support .

The NRC considers this Action Item "Open."

  • Indicates change from previous month's repcrt. IAPS2 17

~*-

. Cr .. ; .. ,J.

.. y r  ? . . . .

^

_, a s

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP ' ,

s RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS IAP NO. REF, ACTION ITE_M

IIelme .02/28/91 11PCI engineer is on site D5 CRO 13 Implement Recommendations of IIPCI Tech Support (effective March 6,1990).

CRO14 Reliability-Centered Maintenance Study-Helme Complete

a. Review IIPCI RCM and list recommendations, evaluate and Tech Support prioritize recommendations, categorize recommendations, perform cost / benefit analysis of recommendations, and ~

perform potential problem analysis.

Helme Complete * *The Manager - Technical

b. Obtain management direction on Tech Support Support held a meeting with recommendations. the responsible System Supervisor and System Engineer to discuss the recommendations.
c. Implement changes requiring procedure llelme i1/01/90 revisions only. Tech Support IIelme . 09/01/90
  • Management comments
d. ' Initiate PID's on items requiring modifications,if any. Tech Support on the IIPCI RCM have been incorporated into the report. A meeting will be held on September 18,1990, between the Manager - Technical y Support and the responsible supervisor to discuss PIDs to be

] initiated, if required.

e. Obtain vendor concurrence on llelme i1/01/90 recommendations affecting vendor Tech Support recommendations.

O Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 18

I .-

s ,

s BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90--

. LEVEL 2 IAP '

RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS IAP NO. E ACTION ITEM

f. Initiate diesel generator RCM in - IIelme 12/31/90 D5 CRO 15 conjunction with CNS SSFI on Tech Support -

- diesel generators, by performing ~

actions in (a.) above for diesels.

g. Present results to management of HPCI llelme 11/01/90 work to date. Tech Support Establish program to review impact IIelme Beginning h.

of 11PCI RCM quarterly. Tech Support 11/01'90

i. Assess value of RCM for RCIC and - IIelme 02/01/91 CRO 16 other safety systems. Tech Support IIelme Beginning
j. Repeat actions of HPCI RCM for diesel generators, starting with Tech Support 01/01/91

- (b.) above.

k. Present results of RCIC and other IIelme 02/28/91 CRO 17 safety systems' RCM review to Tech Support management with recommendations.
  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 19

e i

l BRUNSWICK NUCLFAR PROJECT m/31/90 v

LEVEL 2 IAP RESPONSIBIIITY TAltGET DATE COMMENTS Mr. NO. REF. ACTION ITEM Address Service Water System Design Brown I1/~)D/90 D6 NED.

issues-Bishop Complete Issued 12/28/89.

a. Issue final report documenting hydraulic bases for system and NED system compliance with the bases. l Bishop Complete Review completed
b. Complete review of SW mods. to ensure that they are encompassed NED 04/30/90. Documentation has been filed.

by design analyses and test activities.

Bishop II/30/90 Tied to Unit i Refueling

( Compl**e installation of upgraded Outage. Unit 2 complete.

cross-tie valves. NED Bishop Complete

d. Complete upgrade of fourth SW pump motor. NED Establish temperature monitoring Bishop Complete e.

program to track remaining life NED for SW pump motors.

Bishop Complete issued 12/29/89.

f. Issue final SW proyect report.

NED Jones Complete

g. Perform a safety system functional inspection (SSFI) of the SW system. ONS
  1. Idi:stes change from previous month's report. IAPS2 20

~ ___

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 '

LEVEL 2 IAP IAF NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILIFY TAltCET DATE COMMENTS D7 Confirm Design Basis for Key Brunswick Brown 12/3I/93*

Systems- NED Complete the United Engineers & Bishop 12/31/93* *NED completed a review of a.

NED the current scope of the Constructors (UEAC) and General Electric System Design Criteria Design Criteria Turnover  !

Turnover Project. Project and provided recom-mendations for program en-hencement. Management review concluded tha' .*.is proactive approach will

  • provide a comprehensive reconstitution of the BNP safety-related system design basis far teyond the original scope of this project.

Langlois 12/31/91 Schedule completion being

b. Complete the UEAC Piping Design Tornover Project. NED monitored by large and sman bore piping system milestone date charts. One of Frfteen small bore systems is complete.

Five of seventeen large bore systems are complete. Next system scheduled completion date is 9/30/90.

O Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 21

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS IAF NO. REF. ACTION ITEM Brown Complete *SSFI completed 12/20/89.

D7 c. Evaluate the results of the SW mod- The evaluation report was ification review and SSFI findings NED and the HPCI and SLC SSF1 results, and Bishop issued 06/28/90, meeting the NED commitment date. Manage-commitment date. Management to is identify and document any further ment has reviewed the necessary actions. recommendations and concurred.

N

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 22

e BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP ,

ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DAi6 COMMENMii IAF NO. REF.

Complete Update of Corporate and Brown Complete The completion of this item D8 resulted in instructions being Site Design Procedures. NED issued on the superseding, cross-referencing and dispositioning of 24 procedores versus the 27 procedures previously reported.

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IA S 23

s .

a BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 '

LEVEL 2 IAP ACE 10N ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMsfENTS I AP NO. REF.

Implement Corrective Action Program Harness Complete D9 Improvements- BSEP Develop a Brunswick nonconformance Harness Complete PGMM 90-002. reviseen I.

CRO3 a.

policy statement. BSEP Harness Complete PGMM 90-002, revision I.

CRO4 b. Establish incentives for self-CRO5 identification of nonconformances. BSEP Moyer Complete PLP-04, revisi<m 3 issued

c. Issue revisions of PLP-04 whkh Operations March 30.1990 I) lower the threshold levels.
2) improve trending, and 3) improve training.

Complete additio*tal training on Moyer Complete CRO6 d.

CRE 32' PLP-04. Operations

e. Identify a Brunswick corrective Harness Complete action program coordinator. BSEP
f. Identify a senior Human Performance Harness Complete Evaluation System (HPES) coordinator BSEP at Brunswick.

Issue PLP-06. System Engineer Helme Complete g.

Program. Tech Support l

l The NRC considers this Action item Open."

l l l

  • Indicates change from previous month's report T A N2 24 l

.h a

N g

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP REF. ACT10N ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS LA' NO.

Develop and Institutionalize Corporate Watson 12/31/90 Nuclear Generation Groep DIO Corrective Action Progrant NGG is meeting with task force members periodically and providing guidance.

a. Establish a group task force to Watson Complete develop the corporate Corrective NGG Action Program.
b. Complete task force assignment. Burkhart 12/31/90 Activity of task force is NPS continuing on track, as stated above.
  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 25

0 BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 06/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP #

I AF NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS Dil Develop Corporate Program for Consistent Martin Complete

  • Performance of Safety Reviews- CNS
a. Complete development of a corporate Crawford Complete Program Manual approved program to ensure a consistent method CNS on February 14,1990.

for performing safety reviews (10CFR50.59),

incorporating the best features from CP&l 's three nuclear sites and supporting organizations, and NUMARC guidance.

b. Procedure development, training, and Martin Complete * *240 on-shift personnel implementation of the program. Nuclear Training were trained as saf ety reviewers. This program will be used on an ongoing basis to
support outage needs and to compensate for attrition from the qualified population.

i

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 26

' BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP ,

IAP NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS D12 Improve Business Planning Process- Simpson Complete i C&A CRA1 a. Formalize the process for initiating Smith Complete and finalizing badget and business B&BP plan targets.

CRA 2 b. Enhance the business planning process Simpson Complete to clarify the

  • roll down" from the C&A long-range plan and " roll into" the budget. -

CRA 10 c. Ensure that business plans and Simpson Complete budgets are receiving appropriate C&A attention.

d. Ensure contents of business plans Smith Complete are appropriately communicated. B&BP
e. Improve consistency between the Simpson Complete business plan, the long-range plan, C&A and the backlog of modification projects.

CRA 9* f. Assign budget and cost control Simpson Complete responsibilities for corporate CAA programs to support departments.

4

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 27

C BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT m/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP #

IAP NO. REF. ACHON ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS D13 Review BNP Procedures for Compliance flill Complete with PAM Intent NPS

a. Develop list of criteria to utilize Frazier/Daniels Complete in procedure review. NPS
b. Obtain copies of recently issued Daniels Complete Report issued 12/28/8?.

procedures (since 7/1/89) and NPS perform review.

c. If deviations of significance exist, Simpson Complete Response to report issued recommend corrective actions to bring C&A February 27.1990.

procedure development in compliance.

t The NRC considers this Action Item "Open."

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 23

_ ~ _ . - ..- -

Q BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90

+

LEVEL 2 IAP ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS IAF NO. REF.

Improve Consistency of Procurement 10/15/90 items h - p dropped from this Dl4 CRE 20 Ifill action item, per direction from CRE 22 Processes by Nuclear Plants- NPS December I1,1989 Nuclear Senior Management meeting.

a. Assign Manager, Corporate Nuc! ear Ilill Complete Assigned task Technical Support to manage tasks NPS 11/17/89.

a through h.

b. Identify all related and overlapping Waldorf Complete Cresap, DET, and IAP recommendations NPS and other regulatory or Company activities.
c. Summarize results of *b* and provide Waldorf Complete for management review. NPS
d. Interview individually affected NGG Waldorf Complete managers and Senior V'P, NGG, to obtain NPS management expectations in view of their review of summarized results in *c*.
e. Summarize interview results and Waldorf Complete transmit to interviewees. NPS
f. Develop a definitive set of management Waldorf Complete
  • objectives based on the expectations NPS gathered during the interviews.
g. Present objectives to NGG dept. heads Waldorf 10/I5/90 and Sr. VP, NGG, and obtain feedback NPS on needed changes and endorsement of agreed-to objectives.
  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 29

O BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90

+

LEVEL 2 IAP I AF NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS D15 CRE 36 Require NSD Involvement in Regulatory . Vaughn 12/31/90 Driven Modifications- NSD

a. Develop NSD/NED interface document Loflin/ Licensing Complete Interface document i to ensure up-front, contimaed, and Lucas/NED signed and issued close-out involvement of NSD. July II,1990.
b. Re eise NSD and NED work flow Loflin/ Licensing 12/31/90 procedures, as necessary. Lucas/NED i
  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 30

o BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS IAP NO. ItEF. ACTION ITEM Increase Role of NPS in Development of Cutter Complete The 1991-96 Business Plan is

!si6.i CRE 19' in the normal annual approval CRO 25 Consistency Among Nuclear Plants- NSD cycle.

Direct NPS to identify, cost Ca.tter Complete OA a.

justify, and pursue opportunities NSD to achieve consistency among the nuclear projects, where warranted.

Direct NPS to provide focused Cutter Complete OA b.

direction to Operations, Maintenance. NSD Technical Support, and Outage managers at the 3 nuclear sites.

Specify within the NPS Business Ifill Complete M. D. iiill memo c.

NPS NPSS-90-318 dated 05/23/90 -

Plan those factors that will be ~ Brunswick Integrated Action targeted for assessment or surveil-Plan.*

lance during the year.

O Indicates change from previous month's report. TAPS 2 3i

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP

  • IAF NO. REF, ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS D16.2 CRE 19' Formalize Initiatives to Standardize Vaughn Complete
  • CRE 38 Processes and Procedures- NSD
a. Assign NPS the responsibility for Cutter Complete standardizing processes. NSD
b. Develop an action plan that Hill Complete M. D. Ifill memo identifies major candidate processes, NPS NPSS-90-318 dated 5/23/90 and schedules evleations.
  • Brunswick Integrated Action Plan"
c. Assemble teams to conduct evaluations Hill Complete' 'Each evaluation action plan and make recommendations. NPS establishes th " team
  • or

! manager responsible for the 4

conduct of that evaluatior.

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAFS2 32

o 4

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP .

IAF NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS Dl7 CRA 24 Increase use of ISD's Directives and Simpson Complete Resources- C&A

a. Establish SISU as point of coordin- George Complete ation for information system SISU resource justification.
b. Utilize ISD guidelines for hardware George Complete and software requisition / replacement. SISU
c. Establish SISU as point of coordination George Complete for ISD-sponsored training. SISU CRA 25 d. Formalize activities of site computer - George Complete l users foram. SISU
e. Ensure that BNP personnel are aware George Complete of the resources available through SISU SISU.

t I

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 33

o BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 06/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP -

IAF NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS D18 Submit Simulator Certifiestion- Martin 02/15/91 Nuclear Training

a. Integrate and complete the test Geise Complete program for the upgraded boiler / core BTU models.

. b. Complete test program required for Geise II/I5/91 Training utilization certification. BTU of simulater and its impact on certification testing and mods.

c. Complete document to support Geise Ol/l,l/91 certification. BTU
d. Submit certification package to Geise 01/15/91 management for review. BTU
e. Submit package to NRC. Geise 02/15/91 BTU
  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 34

ERUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP ,

REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS IAF NO.

DI9.1 CRA 36 Implement System for Responding to Martin Complete Training Requests- Nuclear Training Provide for coordination of requests Martin Complete Administrative Procedure, a.

through a single point of contact Nuclear Training Al-I1 has been approsed.

develop criteria for screening, establish committee for review, and integrate reviews into periodic meetings.

b. Create mechanism for transfer of Martin Complete funds from plant to training section Nuclear Training for expanded training scope or requests for new services.
  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 35

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP ,

I AF NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS

- Dl9.2 CRA 37 Provide Coordinated Response to Martin Complete Regulatory-Related Training Requests- Nuclear Training

a. Develop regulatory commitment data Martin Complete base for training activities- ' Nuclear Training match requesting agency with request and company response, update data base interactively to ensure it contains a living history of responses.
b. Establish mechanisms to screen new Martin Complete regulatory-related requests against Nuclear Training past initiatives ensure that responses to regulatory agencies take into account historical commitments.

1 i

t

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 M

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP .

IAF NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMEN~IS Revise Standing Instructions Procedure Moyer Complete OG-01, revision 10, D20 to Require Index Log: Operations dated 10/24/89.

a. Approve revised Standing Instructions. Simon Complete

" Operations i

i 1

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 ,

37

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP. +

IAF NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET D ATE COMMENTS D21 Review SWFCG Charter / Guides for Current Peeler Complete Goals, Priorities- OMAM

a. Review current SWFCG Process. Feeler Complete OM&M
b. Compare with existing procedures. Peeler Complete OM&M
c. Draft new SWFCG procedures. Feeler Complete OM&M
d. SWFCG review new procedure. Feeler Complete OM&M
e. AMMS process review (possib!e Peeler Complete changes to support SWFCG. OM&M incorporate changes into SWFCG procedures).
f. Revise SWFCG procedures as Peeler Complete necessary following review. OM&M
g. Approve and implement procedure. Peeler Complete OM&M
h. Verify adequacy of new procedure. Peekt Complete OM&M 4
  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 38

~. - -

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP -

IAF NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS D22 Implement Tagging and Labeling Warden Complete Improvement Progrant Maintenance

a. Provide draft recommendations. Hagewood Complete Maintenance Titrington Operations
b. Management Review. Warden Complete Maintenance Moyer Operations
c. Appoint label coordinator and review. Harness Complete BSEP Warden Maintenance
d. Centralize equipment and personnel. Hagewood Complete Maintenance Titrington Operations
e. Draft procedure and interface Hagewood Complete agreement. Maintenance
f. Labeling procedure approved, and Hagewood Complete Al-97, Rev. 2. approved action plan for retagging. Maintenance 01/09/90.

The NRC considers this Action item "Open."

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 39

.4 BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP -

IAF NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS D23 Integrate Preventative Maintenance Helme 12/31/90 Vibration Program with ASME Sec. XI IST Tech Support Progrant

a. Approve and implement a Vibration Helme Complete ENP 2702.2 approved Monitoring Procedure. Tech Support II/28/89.
b. Ensure all equipment is marked. Helme Complete Equipment will be marked as indicating points from which to Tech Support baseline data is taken in order take readings. to reduce radiation exposure.
c. Purchase data collector instrumentation IIelme Complete to be used to collect the vibration Tech Support data.
d. Provide Real-Time Training to Auxiliary Helme Complete Operators on operation of data Tech Support collectors.
c. Develop reference values and baselines Helme 12/31/90 to establish the initial points and Tech Support determine the
  • alert" and
  • required action" ranges.
f. After establishing mark points and Helme 12/31/90 Upon completion of ranges, revise ITs accordingly. Tech Support the PT revisions this item will be closed. ,

i 4  !

. l

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAFS2 43 ,

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP -

IAF NO. REF. ACTION TTEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET D ATE COMMENTS D24 Implement Budgeting of Small Helme Complete Engineering Projects. Tech Support The NRC considers this Action Item "Open.~

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. TAPS 2 4I

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 06/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP .

IAP NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS D25 Use Project Management Approach in Moore Complete Planning / Execution of Outages. OM&M CRO20 a. Adopt a modified project management Moore Complete approach to planning and executing OM&M unit outages.

4 t

  • Indicates change from previous month's report.- IAPS2 42

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PEGJECf 06/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP -

IAF NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS 1

D26 CRO 18 Formalize Plant Work Schedule Adherence llarness Complete Control BSEP

a. Issue a policy statement that Harness Complete Reference PGMM 89-003 establishes as a goal Maintenance BSEP dated 12/14/89.

supervisors scheduling 80% of their manpower on the weekly schedule developed by the Site Work Force Control Group (SWFCG).

b. Establish a practice of holding Ilarness Complete Reference PGMM 89-003 accountable anyone who makes a BSEP dated 12/14/89.

decision to interrupt or postpone a scheduled job.

c. Direct the SWFCG to issue weekly to IIolder Complete SOP-2.41, rev. 2. 01/22/90 Section/ Unit Managers an annotated OM&M eddresses this accountability copy of the previous week's schedule and documents per Attachment that shows for those scheduled jobs A of the SOP.

which were interrupted or not started-reason for the decision, person who made decision, number of manhours diverted to other work, and impact on plant.

i

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 43

o.

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAD PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP .

IAF NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS D27 CRE Ig* Improve tracking / disposition of lielme Ccmplete*

CRO 10 temporary repairs / conditions to Tech Support CRO II expedite elimination-CRO 12*

a. Identify temporary conditions that fielme Complete The types of conditions which require tracking and disposition Tech Support are termed as
  • temporary

' at BNP. conditions" have been identified. The definition will be formalized in PLP-011, the Tracking of Plant Temporary Conditions.

b. Designate a unit manager to track each Harness Complete type of temporary condition. BSEP
c. Establish a priority for close-out fielme Complete Temporary conditions are efforts through application of the Tech Support prioritized using BSP-36.

site-wide nuclear plant prioritization Revie ar and closcout will occur system. routinely at the monthly PNSC meeting.

d. Assign responsibility for each item, liarness Complete with completion dates assigned. BSEP
e. Track performance against targets: lielme Complete * *This item was reported report status monthly to BNP Section/ Tech Support complete in March 1990, but Project management; include assessment was re-opened as a result of schedule deviations / technical of an independent internal problems with corresponding corrective review. Revision I of actions; asscss the significance of PLP-Oll was approved by the backlog quarterly; and adjust priorities PGM on August 13.1990.

accordingly. Section 6.3 has been added to more explicitly define the scope of PNSC.

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 44

I

! BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP -

ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBIf ITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS I AF NO. REF.

Proceduralize program to track, lielme Complete D27 f.

disposition and control temporary Tech Support repairs.

Incorporate into applicable BNP iielme Complete' ' Revision I of PLP-Oli

g. was approved by the PGM on procedures committee review / Tech Support August 13.1990. Section approval of temporary conditions; 6.2 was added, which re-prioritization of close-outs; require-quires that extensions of ment to develop detaikd support for temporary condition due each extension request; and backlog dates be approved by the PGM.

significance assessment. The temporary condition extension request (Form 2) is required to document the justification for an extension.

I l

l l

I

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAI52

( 45 l

l

e.

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP -

IAF NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS D28 Revise EOP's to Simplify and Match Moyer 12/31/90

  • Work in progress; on target.

BWROG Guidelines- Operations

a. Prepare PSTG. Ahern Complete Reference 01-37 (draft).

Operations 4

b. Prepare writer's guide. Ahern Complete Reference Of-28, rev.14 Operations dated 12/18/89.
c. Write procedures. Ahern Complete Draft procedures have Operations been placed in IAP file.
d. Preliminary verification. Ahern Complete Operations
e. Preliminary validation Ahern Complete Operations
f. Incorporate changes. Ahern Complete Operations
g. Final verification and validation. Ahern 10/01/90 Operations
h. Training. Ahern 10/22/90 Operations
i. Follow-up training,if required. Ahern 12/3f/90 Operations J. Incorperate changes, approve. Ahern 12/31/90 Operations
  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 46

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS IAP NO. REF, ACTION ITEM Hill Complete D29 Imriement NGG Guideline Re- Structure of CP&L ISI Programs, and Establishment NPS of 6-month Information Exchanges-Waldorf Complete

a. Assign individual within Corporate Nuclear Technical Support Unit to NPS raanage this task. ,

Dept. Mgrs Complete

b. Assign individual from designated departments to participate and support BNP/liNP/RNP this tasic BNP, HNP, RNP, NED. NED Bauer Complete
c. Assigned individuals meet to establish the desired " basic structure
  • NPS of CP&I *s ISI programs (responsibility and organization structure).

Summarize desired structure and identify Bauer Complete d.

any inconsistencies between nuclear NPS project departments with recommendations as to final structure.

Ilill, NPS Complete

c. Obtain Senior Management decision on Cutter, NSD recommendations.

Watson, NGG Assigned NPS Complete items f. through j.

f. Draft NGGG and action steps for Task Manager and revised due to reeval-implementation for each affected uation of recommendations department. assigned support personnel by Senior Management.

Transmit Nuclear Generation Group Frazier Complete g.

Guideline for approval. NPS O Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 47

BMUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP RESPONSIBILIT i TARGET DATE COMMENTS I AP NO. REF. ACTION ITEM Hill Not Applicable See memo dated 06/26/90

h. Transmit action steps for approval.

'D29 NPS from M. D. Hill to W. W. Simpson, subject IA P Item D29. .

b Complete Guideline was approved on Approve Nuclear Generation Group Designated .

i. July 16,1990.

Dept. Mgrs &

Guideline. .

Watson, NGG Designated Not Applicable See memo dated 06/26/90

j. Approve action steps for implementing

- Dept. Mgrs & from M. D. Hill to steps as called for in Implementation W. W. Simpson, subject I AP Watson, NGG guideline. Item D29.

  • Indicates change from previous month's report.. IAPS2 48

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP L ,

RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS IAP NO. REF. ACTION ITEM i

Implement Actions for Administrative Simpson Complete D30 Cost Containment CAA CRA 7' Complete

a. Eliminate / consolidate financial Boyte CRA 11 CRA 12 reports and improve accounting and CC&A CR A 15 financial reporting processes.

Boyte Complete CRA 13 b. Evaluate and recommend cost containment methodologies. CC&A I Eliminate / minimize performance of finan- Simpson Complete OA CRA 14 c.

ial functions within nonfinancial units. C&A .

Identify and eliminate accounting Boyte Complete CRA 16 d.

process inefficiencies. CC&A l Improve contracting practices. Gray Complete CRA 26 e.

CRA 27 M&CS CRA 28 CR A 29 CRA 31 Willetts Complete CRA 17 f. Improve effectiveness of secretarial /

CRA 18 clerical support. Office Services Improve document control practices. Kesmodel Complete CRA 19 g.

Records Mgmt CRA 20 CRA 21 CRA 22 Re-evaluate tire Equipment Database Jones Complete CRE 28 h.

System (EDBS) development effort, Proc Eng CRE 29 CRE 30 and modify direction as appropriate.

CRE31

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 49

__ _ _ . _ _ - . _)

~ -

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90' LEVEL 2 IAP -

I AP NO. REF, ACIION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS D31 - Consolidate, Update, Simplify BNP ' Simpson 09/30/90 Procedures- C&A CRE 37' a. Identify and document all site Kesmodel Complete Listing developed.

procedures, including purpose, Records Mgmt Retained in Records content, administrator, and Management unit.

distributx>n.

b. Identify and evaluate relevant Kesmodel Complete Administrative and site administrative processes. Records Mgmt procedures have been revised to identify processes.
c. Identify regulatory bases for Kesmodel Complete Revision 126 to procedures. Records Mgmt Administrative procedure i identifies regulatory basis.
d. Develop evaluation schedule. Kesmodel Complete Evaluation to determine Records Mgmt major candidate procedures completed.
e. Conduct evaluations and update, Kesmodel 09/30/90 consolidate, simplify, and eliminate Rtcords Mgmt procedures.
  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IA?S2 30

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 ,

LEVEL 2 IAP -

IAP NQ, REF. ACI' ION ITEM . RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS D32 Implement Brunswick Nuclear Project flarness 01/15/91 Department Licensed Operator Training BSEP improvements T 2.3.2 a. Review the Operations organization, with IIarness Complete The review was complete a focus on changes needed to seinforce BSEP- 06/90. Based on the review, an team crmeepts, both on shift and in the operating structure has been simulator. 'dased on the review results, proposed (and approved) em-establish a schedule for any additional phasizing team concept.

corrective actions. ,

Additionally, the MCR command structure has also been prestructured.

T 2.4.3 b. Evaluate the Operations control room liarness 09/10/90 A new command structure command structure, and based upon the BSEP was approved by management review results, establish a schedule 07/31/90. Implementation for any additional corrective actions. will be completed by 09/10/90.

T 1.1.4 c. Issue a communication to Nuclear Simpson 09/15/90 i Generation Group managers and super- C&A visors, stressing the importance of:

ensuring a thorough transfer of infor-mation when personnel leave a position; maintaining an effective nuclear generation succession plan and rotational program; allocat.'an of resources in a timely manner, when a key vacancy occurs; investigation and action to the reasons for personnel turnover; and the controlled timing of internal transfers of key personnel.

T 2.3.1 d. Establish a task force to evaluate long liarness Complete

  • The task force is a PQT, and T 2.3.3 term comraand and control standards, and BSEP was established July 1990.

establish a completion schedule for task John Moyer is the team leader.

force activities.

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 51

4 s

A

%S t 35%

s.3

  • M ,k C g

~T MP6 Q

- w a5*hct g

$ Y 3ScS3 oo c .g -

- y h CY8 s

4.

O Dk +

A. o r  ?

h )

%e r P,

S e#

> *+

@64 4

- - h aa 3N *

.G 9 ,@a 77W Sa  ;%a Nik

%5 * *. 2

  • S

\\'B

  • Mi 5 3>o s s. %,

.N .# ,C, C .

SPC0$ I 1w

  • E 3 .c 1 c,

3go 9 .9 L .s-we

.>DoeCD M

$0S*o G

b P

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP IAP NO. REF. ACrlON ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGETDf5E [_OMMENTS T 2.1.10 e. Review the policy for Brunswick Harness Ot/I'i/91 In progress. John D32 Operations Unit observation and BSEP Moyer, Frank Bisckmon, participation in industry activities, and John Titrington to and revise as necessary to encourage give recommendation by participation. 11/01/90.

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. !AFS2 52

er BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECI' 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP .

IAP NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS D33 Implement Nuclear Services Department Martin 08/31/91 ~

Licenssd Operator Training Improvements Nuclear Training 6

T 2.1.4 a. Review the adequacy of training staffing Martin Complete levels, and identify near term needs. Nuclear Training T 2.1.6 - b. Increase the number of simulator training Martin Complete

  • T 2.2.3 - hours to a minimum of sixteen hours per Nuclear Training T 2.4.1 quarter per licensed operator, and assess the impact of this change.on the adequacy of training staffing levels. t T 2.4.6 c. Revise the Licensed Operator Requal- Martin 10/31/90 ification Training Instruction to enstre Nuclear Training operators receive adequate simulator i training time in all licensed positions for which they may be examined.

T I.2.3 d. Establish rigorous standards, performance Martin 10/31/90 T 2.2.2 exr,ectations, and monitor operator per- Nuclear Training formance, via reports and personal involv- Moyer ment, especially for the annual dynamic Operations i simulator evaluation. Periodically sample the results of simulator training to monitor operator performance. (Periodic monitoring i

and assistance in administering annual

simulator examinations will be provided 1

i by Operations.) Place these requirements in the appropriate training instructions.

i l

l l

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 53

. , - ~ . . . -

N i-BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP -

TARGET DATE COMMENTS IAP NO. BE ACTION ITEM - EESPONSIBILITY D33 T 1.2.l e.. ' Revise the appropriate training procedures Martin . 10/31/90 T 2.2.5 to establish objective simulator performance Nuclear Training evaluation criteria for both Licensed '

Operator Requalification and Hot License examinations, at least as stringent as the NRC test criteria.

T 2.4.4 f. Incorporate installation of an uninterrupt- Martin 12/15/90 ible power supply for the simulator into Nuclear Training the prioritized work planning process.

T 1.2.2 g. Establish a remedial training program Martin 12/15/90 T 2.2.6 which addresses the operators' deficien- Nuclear Training cies, minimizes the disruption to Operations anj Training work schedules, and provides nigorous feedback to enhance the operator training program.

T 2.1.5 h. Review and establish long-term resource - Martin 12/31/90 staffing needs and associated training Nuclear Training staff requiremenu. ,

t T 2.1.3 i. Revise the responsibilities of the existing Martin 12/31/90 i Training Advisory Committee to include Nuclear Training a review, on a quarterly basis, of changes r

in operating philosophy, regulatory require-ments, operator crew composition, et cetera (other than simulator changes), that might affect the training program. ,

T 1.1.2 L j. Improve the use of available information Martin 01/15/91 t

T 2.1.8 by establishing guidance to assure that Nuclear Training indurtry information is properly analyzed, disseminated, and used to improve performance.

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 54

' BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL' 2 IAP -

ACTION ITEM R_ESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS IAP NO. REF.

D33 T 1.1.3 k. Establish guidance for Brunswick Training ~ Martin O!/15/91

T 2.1.9 Unit observation and participation in - Nuclear Training

~

. industry activities, and incorporate this guidance into Nuclear Training Section procedures.

T 2.1.1 1. ' Enhance the process for the identification Martin 01/15/91 and incorporation of needed changes to the Nuclear Training simulator training process.

T 2.1.2 m. Establish procedural guidance which Martin . 01/I5/91 provides direction for ensuring that . Nuclear Training simulator modifications are properly identified, and that appropriate training for these modifications is provided to licensed personnel.

T 2.1.7 n. Incorporate scheduling of training on Martin 01/15/91 T 2.2.4 Emergency Core Cooling System malfunc- Nuclear Training tions and interlocks into appropriate documents.

T 2.2.1 o. Develop a self-assessment process that Martin 01/15/91 will be used to increase the effective- Nuclear Training

.. ness of the training program, based on test results at the conclusion of each

- Hot License Class and each year's Licensed Operator Requalification, which will serve to identify weaknesses and changes needed in the LOR and HLC programs.

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 55

. ~ . .

BRUNSWICK' NUCLEAR PROJECT - 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP -

REF. ACTION ITEM -  : RESPONSIBILITY - TARGET DATE COMMENTS IAF NO.

~

T 1.1.6 -p. Conduct an independent evaluation, prior ' Martin .01/31/91 *A contractor's services have D33 '

to the 1990 examinations, using personnel - Nuclear Training been retained. Evaluations who are not directly conducting training will be conducted for the i of the Licensed Operator Requalification October exam the week of examination readiness, and incorporate a . September 21,1990.

requirement for the independent evaluations of the Licensed Operator Requalification and Hot License examination readiness into the Brunswick Training Instructions.

T 2.2.5 q. Develop a formal Simulator Scenario Martin 02/28/91 ,

T 2.4.2 Writers's Guide for all phases of -- Nuclear Training the Licensed Operator Requalification examination, to include guidelines for the development of more challenging I scenarios into the Licensed Operator Requalification examination, and to identify equipment and training aides to be used in simulator training I scenarios, and to include direction in the periodic use of video and audio equipment to allow the operators to become accustomed to them.

T I.1.1 r. Develop self-assessment criteria that will Martin 03/29/91 be used to increase the effectiveness of - Nuclear Training the training program, based on test results at the conclusion of each Hot License Class and each year's Licensed Operator Requal -

ification, which will serve to identify weaknesses and changes needed in the LOR and HLC programs. Implement the criteria in the appropriate unit and section training procedures.

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. LAPS 2 56

- .= a .

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL-2 IAP ,

REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS L4P NO.

D33 s. Implement scheduled improvements in Martin 08/31/91 Refer to ARTEMIS run operator training program procedures. ' Nuclear Training " Training Activities" of - ,

August 13,1990.

I i

h

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 57

a 1 BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT '08/31/90

. LEVEL 2 IAP RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS IAF NO. BEE. ACTION ITEM Starkey Complete

'El Define, Track Operational and Management Performance; Document Goa'.s to be Used BNP -

to Manage Performance-Starkey Complete

a. Develop preliminary de:partment goals for 1990 - 1994. BNP Starkey Complete Memo from R. B.
b. Direct Section Managers to develop Starkey, Jr. dated section goals for 1990 - 1994 which BNP 11/29/89.

support department goals.

Starkey : Complete

c. Direct Section Managers to ensure that goals are established for all . BNP levels of their organizations which support their section goals.

Starkey. Complete Section goals reviewed by

d. Review section goals.

BNP 12/31/89.

Starkey Complete No revisions were deemed

c. Revise department, section, and necessary.

lower level goals as necessary. BNP The NRC consi(en this Action item "Open."

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2

.58

.= - - .x =. - -- --- - .- - _ _ - - - . _ - -

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90'

! LEVEL' 2 IAP ~

l i'

IAP NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS E2 CROI Ensure Improvement Programs Are . Starkey - Complete CRO2 Emplemented/ Monitored:: BNP i a. ' Identify programs / initiatives Starkey Complete Letter dated 01/03/90 from  ;

i requiring completion at Brunswick. BNP W.-W. Simpson documented i

' that this activity was I completed on 12/18/89.
b. . Designate a project manager for Starkey Complete Letter dated 01/17/90 each project. BNP from R. B Starkey designated 8 project managers for the 8 improvement programs.
c. Establish a completion plan for each Starkey Complete project. BNP
d. Establish a tracking mechanism Starkey Complete for each project. .BNP 4

The NRC considers this Action item "Open."

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 59

. -- _ _-. _-- . ___ _= __. .. _ _ _ - _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

-ev

. BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 06/31/90

. LEVEL 2 IAP -

3 IAP NO. REF, - ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS E3 Revise LOR Program, Emphasizing Effective Martia Complete -

Control Room Log Entries- Nuclear Training -

. a. Revise LOR-SIM-GEN 01 to add emphasis Poulk'- Complete to log-keeping practices. Nuclear Training

b. Deliver training during Phase I Fouff Ccmplete LOR 1990. Nuclear Training

=

i

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 60

.. ;4- .___ , - -

g , , -- .s,. --.- -._ p .. ,

,9 7..,_. , sa y

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90.

LEVEL 2 IAP . t REF, ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY , TARGET DATE COMMENTS IAP NO.

E4.1 ' Issue Integrated Audit / Surveillance . Banks 12/31/90-Plan: CQAD

a. Identify BNP engineering activities. Kosmatin/ Complete .

Dorman CQAD.

b. Define QA Auditing Unit and BNP Kosmatin/ Complete QA/QC Unit audit / surveillance Dorman responsibilities for 1990.~ CQAD
c. Implement BNP engineering audit / Kosmatin/ Complete surveillance plan. Dorman ~

CQAD

d. Evaluate results to determine if Kosmatin/ 12/31/90 increased and more effective Dorman .-

overview has been achieved.- CQAD l

L

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 61

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT ' ~ 08/31/90' LEVEL 2 IAP. .

IAP NO, REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS E4.2 Develop Corporate QA Performance- Banks Comolete Items a and b were based Overview Plan- CQAD. completed as originally planr*ed. Responsibility for -

the scope of items c through e has been transferred due to potential overlap with IAP i . Item ES," Analyze Methods of Independent Assessments for Performance Evaluation." _The development of plans for performance-based assessments is within the scope of item E5.

t

a. ' First draft developed. . Whitehead / Rose / Complete Dorman/Baur CQAD
b. Issue draft for comments. Whitehead / Rose / Complete Dorman/Baur CQAD ,

i

c. Resolve comments and make . Whitehead / Rose / Transferred presentation to CQAD managernent. Dorman/Baur CQAD
d. Resolve comments and obtain Whitehead / Rose / Transferred necessary approvals. Dorman/Baur 4 CQAD l
e. Implement plan. Whitehead / Rose / Transferred i

Dorman/Baur CQAD l The NRC considers this Action Item "Open." ,

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 62

j BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90-LEVEL 2 IAP ,

IAP NO. REF. ACTION ITF31 RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS E4.3 Adjust Audit Improvement Plans in Banks Complete Progress to Address DET Conclusions- CQAD

a. Identify adjustments required. ' Whitehead Complete

'CQAD ,

b. Incorporate into ongoing improve- Whitehead ' Complete ment plans; create new improve- CQAD ment plans as necessary.

The NRC considers this Action item "Open."

  • Irdicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 63

e _

a

~

. e BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL' 2. IAP IAP NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS E5 Analyze Methods of Independent ' _ Banks 12/31/90 The scope of this item Assessments for Performance Evaluation- CQAD includes the original intent of IAP E4.2c., d., and e., which have been transferred to this Action Item.

a. Select members for Project Quality Eury Complete Team to analyze nuclear evaluation EVP and oversight functions.
b. Gather data on industry evaluations Bowles/PQT Complete Initial data gathering complete.

and programs to incorporate best CQAD Additicnal contacts will be practices into Company programs. made if it appears beneficial,

c. Identify desired changes in nuclear Bowles/PQT Complete The Nuclear Assessment evaluation and oversight functions CQAD Project Quality Team report and attendant organizational and recommendations were structures. submitted to Senior manage-ment on August I,1990.
d. Implement desired changes in nuclear Eury 12/31/90 evaluation and oversight functions EVP and attendant organizational structures.
  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 64

BRUNSWICK-NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP l

REF. ACTION ITEM E_ESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS I AF NO.

E6 Revise FI's for Proper Evaluation of Moyer Complete Service Water Pump Performance . Operations

a. Revise SW Pump ITs IPT-24.1-1.. Mabry - Complete Revisions approved I1/24/89.

~ and 2PT-24.1-2, based on Technical Operations Support mark-up.

i l

The NRC considers this Action Item *Open."

  • Indicates change from, previous month's report. IAFS2 65

w

~

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90

~ LEVEU 2 IAP IAP NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS F1 CRA 43 Implement Career Development and Job Watson - To be This item was not Rotation Process- NGG determined completed in June 1990 as CRA 44 CRA 45 originally scheduled. A new target completion date is currently under review.

CRA 46 a. Modify commitments made to Auxiliary Watson Complete ,

CRC 4 Operators.' NGG CRC 10 .

b. Develop a job rotation and management Watson 10/15/90 Employee Relations assistance CRC 14 development program. NGG and support from outside CRC 26 consultants are in place.

CRC 29 .

CRC 30 c. Incorporate use of employee involve- Goodnight To be  !

CRC 31 ment techniques into supervisory Emp. Relations determined CRO8 ed managerial skills training.

CRO9 Review nuclear sepervisory training . Watson 10/15/90 This task will be completed d.

programs to determine adequacy and NGG . as part of b. above.

effectiveness in building management skills,

e. Implement a senior operations Harness To be (SOS and SF) personnel shift . BSEP determined rotation program at Brunswick.

i i

i I

'* Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 66

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90..

LEVEL 2 IAP . ..

ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS I AP NO. REF.

  • CRC 12 Incorporate Quality, Safety and Cost Starkey Complete F2
  • CRC 17 Effectiveness Criteria in Performance BNP
  • CRC 18 Appraisal Program- .
a. Evaluate the proposed CP&L Simpson Complete performance appraisal program for .C&A applicability to Brunswick.

Develop criteria for appraisal Warden Complete . Presentation to Site b.

of leadership skills. Maintenance Management made on 02/26/90.

c. Identify other criteria for incor- Simpson Complete poration into appraisal program. C&A.

Develop performance appenisal Simpson Complete The training program has d.

C&A been developed for super-training program for Brer. wick visors, which covers the leadership evaluation process, and an update of the performance appraisal program.

Conduct training of Brunswick Simpson Complete ' Leadership program training e.

managers and supervisors. C&A completed 07/31/90.

Revise position descriptions of Simpson Complete Accountabilities for quality,

' f.

all Brunswick personnel. C&A safety, and cost effectiveness have been incorporated into position descriptions effective 07/31/90.

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 67

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .___-____. . . _ _ __ __ _ . _ _

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAPJ v IAP NO. REF. ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE . COMMENTS CRA8 Review Awards and Incentives Watson 12/31/90 A corporate program is F3 Possibilities and Develop Implementation NGG. under development and will CRC 3 be reviewed for specific -

CRC 8 Plan for Enhancements-application to the Nuclear CRC 9 Generation Group. Brunswick

- will be one of three pilot projects, beginning in September,1990.

CRC 16 a. Consider alternate rewards techniques Watson 12/31/90' CRC 19 that share cost savings with. NGG CRC 20 - employees.

CRC 21 CRC 22 b. Consider recognition programs that Watson 12/31/90 CRC 23 focus on group innovations. NGG CRC 24 CRC 25 c. Ensure that the performance Watson 12/31/90 CRC 27 appraisal system and the merit pay NGG system are appropriately linked.

d. Consider methods for non-financial Watson ' 12/31/90

- recog Mon. NGG

e. Identify training, as required, for Watson 12/31/90 implemt ntation of new rewards and NGG inceri;ves programs.

-

  • indicates change from previous month's report.- IAPS2 68.

3 - . <_  %.-

~ - . - - - - -_

y .,# .

,m. -m 3 __-e - _ . - <_._ --+,..r-' * - . _ _ - - "' -' "_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ .-

.t BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT ' 08/31/90 LEVEL 2 IAP e I AF NO. RFF ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS F4 CRA 4 Provide formal Training in Business - Simpson - Complete CRA 7* Fundamentals- C&A .

CRA 9*

CRA 30

a. Develop budgeting and business planning- . Smith Complete course objectives and curriculum. B&BP-
b. Identify personnel to be trained in Smith Complete budgeting and business planning and B&BP schedule classes.
c. Conduct budgeting and business Smith Complete planning classes. B&BP
d. Develop contract administration Gray Complete Memo BSEP/19-1103, course objectives and curriculum. M&CS 12/13/89, from C. H. Gray to Plant Management Group.
e. Identify personnel to be trained Gray Complete in contract administration M&CS classes.

! f. Conduct centract administration Gray Complete training. M&CS

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 69

. . - . e , .. .% ,-i- o.- ,_. .-. ...m. ...

g BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90:

~

LEVEL 2 IAP- 'i I AP NO. It EF, ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS GI CRC 2 Implement Actions to Resolve People Issues, , Simpson .12/31/90 Instead of a Brunswick-only

~ CRC 6 - Including an Employee Suggestion System- C&A ,

System, a corporate program CRC 7 - will be developed, with Brunswick as an implemen-tation pilot. An implementation design team has been formed to develop, pilot, and evaluate this program by the end of 1990.

CRC 13 a. Establish a system for employees to Simpson 12/31/90 make suggestions to management. C&A

b. Provide for effective follow-up .Simpson 12/31/90 by management to suggestions. C&A
c. Ensure that cost-effectiveness is Simpson 12/31/90 the key focus of the suggestion ' C&A system.

t f

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 70

.e.

BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PROJECT 08/31/90

-LEVEL 2 IAP ',

IAF NO. REF, ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE COMMENTS G2 CRA 4"' Re-emphasize and Encourage Support of Simpson Complete CRA 48 TQ Process- CA A '

a. Evaluate status of management TQ Core Complete Memo to W. W. Simpson -

training and development needs. C&A from K. M. Core,01/18/90,

" Status of Management TQ Training Needs.*

CRA 49 b. Develop communication program for Core Complete CRC 15 middle management, re-emphasizing 'C&A importance of the Total Quality program. ,

t i

The NRC considers this Action Item "Open."

  • Indicates change from previous month's report.- IAPS2 71

~ ~

c BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR-PROJECT 08/31/90

'w LEVEL 2 IAP ACTION ITEM RESPONSIBILITY - TARGET DATE COMMENTS '

IAP NO. REF.

-G3 CRO7- Improve Organizational and Individual Moyer 12/30/90 Ownership Commitments, including Operations Procedural Adherence-

a. Survey operators' attitudes. Titrington Complete Operations
b. - Initiate contract request for Titrington - Complete procedure writers. Operations
c. Approve funds and contract for Moyer Complete procedure writers. Operations
d. Organize review and schedule Titrington Complete 01-28 backlog reduction. Operations Monitor backlog reduction. Titrington Complete Reports are issued monthly.

. c.

Operations . A June report was issued.

f. Perform second operator survey. Titrington Complete Operations
g. Compare results of survey and Titrington Complete provide recommendations. Operations Complete reduction of backlog. Titrington 12/30/90
  • Work in progress; on target.

h.

Operations

  • Indicates change from previous month's report. IAPS2 72

~.c:

(

L.

INTEGRATED ACTION PIAN l SCIIEDULE OF INDEPENDENT REVIEWS August 31,1990 INDEPENDENT APPROXIMATE IAP NO.' DESCRIPTION REVIEW BY SCilEDULE" COMMENTS Al . Communication Strategy for Goals, Audit Services August 1990 Complete

  • Priorities, Expectations A2 Improve External Relationships Corporate OA May 1990 Complete B1 Implement Technical Support . Audit L i . es May 1990 Status of step e will be Improvements ' August 1990 reviewed by Audit Services October 1990* in October 1990.*

B2 Implement NED Organizational Management July 1990 Complete '

Improvements Services B3 Implement Nuclear Training Management September 1990* Underway '

Organizational Improvements Services B4 Implement Control & Administration Management September 1990* Underway .

Organizational Improvements Services B5 Implement Nuclear Plant Support Management July 1990 Complete Organizational Improvements - Services

  • Indicates a change from previous month's report.

" Schedule subject to change based upon availability of resources and shifting priorities.

IAP-SIR 1

v INTEGRATED ~ACITON PLAN SCHEDULE OF INDEPENDENT REVIEWS August 31,1990 INDEPENDENT- APPROXIMAlli DESCRIITION REVIEW BY- ' SCHEDULE" COMMENTS IAP NO.

Audit Services August 1990 Complete

  • B6 Implement Outage Management &

Modifications Organizational Improvements Management August 1990 Complete

  • C1 Implement Corporate Nuclear Prioritization Process Services Establish NED Budget Item for Management May IM Complete C2 Generic Work Services Management September 1990* Underway C3 Establish Budget & Release Process for Non-IPBS Engineering Services Develop Long Range Planning Management _ 1991 C4 Budgets for Emerging Services Issues / Regulations Resolve Surveillance Test Program Audit Services July 1990 Complete D1 Questions Management July 1990 Complete D2.1 Improve Management of Maintenance Backlog Services
  • Indicates a change from previous month's report.

" Schedule subject to change based upon availability of resources and shifting priorities.

IAP-SIR 2

  • ' ^ ' '^ * '

C~. # i ~'^ .I^'

lf

? . :.. .r . .

-9 INTEGRATED ACTION PIAN SCHEDUIE OF INDEPENDENT REVIEWS August 31,1990 .

INDEPENDENT APPROXIMATE REVIEW BY SCIIEDULE" COMMENTS IAP NO. DESCRIPTION Strengthen Maintenance Planning Management July 1990 Complete -

D2.2 Functions Services BNP Site OA September 1990 Underway D3 Fine Tune MOV Maintenance Program Develop Post-Maintenance Testing for BNP Site QA July 1990 Compicte D4 ASME Code Repairs Implement Recommendations of BNP Site OA April 1991 D5 IIPCI Reliability-Centered Maintenance Study Address Service Water System Design BNP Site OA February 1991 D6 Issues Confirm Design Basis for Key BNP Site OA March 1992 D7 Brunswick Systems Audit Services May 1990 Complete D8 Complete Update of Corporate and Site Design Procedures

  • Indicates a change from previous nmnth's report.

" Schedule subject to change based upon availability of resources and shifting priorities.

IAP-SIR 3

\ _ _ _ _-_

s INTEGRAHD ACHON PLAN SCHEDULE OF INDEPENDENT REVIEWS Aupt 31,1990 INDEPENDENT APPROXIMATE DESCRIFI'lON REVIEW BY_ _ SCilEDULE" COMMENTS IAP NO.

BNP Site QA March 1991 This item has been D9 Implement Corrective Action Program partially reviewed.

Improvements Completion of the review has been deferred until the review of DIO can be accomplished.

Develop and Institutionalize BNP Site OA March 1991 DIO Corporate Corrective Action Program Develop Corporate Program for BNP Site OA 5;ptember 1990 Underny D11 Consistent Performance of Safety Reviews Management August 1990 Complete

  • D12 Improve Business Planning Process Services Audit Services May 1990 Complete D13 Review BNP Procedures for Compliance with PAM Intent

" Indicates a change from previous month's report.

" Schedule subject to change based upon availability of resources and shifting priorities.

4 IAP-SIR __ _ _.

t

?

INTEGRATED ACITON PIAN SCHEDULE OF INDEPENDENT REVIEWS August 31,1990 INDEPENDENT APPROXIMATE IAP NO. DESCRIP'I1ON REVIEW BY SCIIEDULE" COMMENTS D14 Improve Consistency of Procurement Management November 1990 Underway

  • Processes by Nuclear Plants Services D15 Require Nuclear Services Department Management 1991 Involvement in Regulat9ty Services Modifications D16.1 Increase Role of Nuclear Plant Management June 1990 Complete Support in Development of Services Consistency among Nuclear Plants D16.2 Formalize Initiatives to Standardize Management July 1990 Complete Processes and Procedures Services D17 Increase Use of ISD's Directives and Management May 1990 Complete Resources Services D18 Submit Simulator Certification BNP Site OA March 1991 D19.1 Implement System for Responding to Management September 1990' Underway Tmining Requests Services
  • Indicates a change from previous month's report.

" Schedule subject to change based upon availability of resources and shifting priorities.

IAP-SIR 5

(

IN11EGRATED ACTION PIAN SCllEDULE OF INDEPENDENT REVIEWS August 31,1990 INDEPENDENT APPROXIMATE IAP NO. DESCRII" TION REVIEW BY SCilEDULE" COMMENT 3 D19.2 Provide Coordinated Response to Management Sep* ember 1990' Underway Regulatory-related Training Requests Services D20 Revise Standing Instructions Corporate QA May 1990 Complete Procedure to Require Index Log D21 Review SWFCG Charter / Guides for Management August 1990 Complete

  • Current Goals, Priorities Services D22 Implement Tagging and labeling Audit Services May 1990 Complete Improvement Program D23 Integrate PM Vibration Program with BNP Site QA January 1991 ASME Sec. XI IST Program D24 Implement Budgeting of Small Management May 1990 Complete Engineering Support Projects Services .
  • Indicates a change from previous month's report.

, " Schedule subject to change based upon availability of resources and shifting priorities.

IAP-SIR 6

t 7

INTEGRATED ACTION PLAN SCIIEDULE OF INDEPENDENT REVIEWS August 31,1990 INDEPENDENT APPROXIMATE IAP NO. DESCRIFFION REVIEW BY SCIIEDULE** COMMENTS D25 Use Project Management Approach in Audit Services August 1990 Complete

  • Planning / Execution of Outages D26 Formalize Plant Work Schedule Management June 1990 Compicte Adherence Control Services D27 Impr.we Tracking / Disposition of BNP Site QA July 1990 Compicte Teruporary Repairs / Conditions to Expedite Elimination D28 Revise EOPs to Simplify and Match BNP Site QA March 1991 BWROG Guidelines D29 Implement NGG Guideline Re: BNP Site QA August 1990* Complete
  • Structure of CP&L ISI Programs, and Establishment of 6-Month Information Exchanges D30 Implement Actions for Administrative Management August 1990 Complete
  • Cost Containment Services -
  • Indicates a change from previous month's report.
    • Schedule subject to change based upon availability of resources and shifting priorities.

IAP-SIR 7

+ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _e _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

i INTEGRATED ACHON PIAN SCIIEDULE OF INDEPENDENT REVIEWS August 31,1990 INDEPENDENT APPROXIMATE IAP NO. DESCRIITON REVIEW BY SCIIEDULE" COMMENT 3 D31 Consolidate, Update, Simplify BNP Audit Services October 1990 Procedures D32 Implement Brunswick Nuclear Project Corporate April 1991 Department Ucensed Operator Nuclear Safety Training Improvements D33 Implement Nuclear Services Corporate September 1991 Department Licensed Operator Nuclear Safety Training Improvements El Define, Track Operational and Audit Services August 1990 Complete

  • Management Performance Document Goals to be Used to Manage Performance E2 Ensure Improvement Programs Are Management August 1990 Complete
  • Implemented / Monitored Services E3 Revise LOR Program, Emphasizing BNP Site QA July 1990 Complete Effective Control Room Log Entries
  • Indicates a change from previous month's report.

" Schedule subject to change based upon availability of resources and shifting priorities.

IAP-SIR 8

i INTEGRATED ACITON PLAN -

SCHEDULE OF INDEPENDENT REVIEWS August 31,1990 INDEPENDENT APPROXIMATE IAP NO. DESCRIPTION REVIEW BY SCllEDULE" COMMEffl3 E4.1 Issue Integrated Audit / Surveillance Audit Services January 1991 Plan for BNP Engineering E4.2 Develop Corporate OA Performance- Audit Services January 1991 Based Overview Plan E43 Adjust Audit Improvements in Audit Services August 1990 Complete

  • 1 Progress to Address DET Conclusions

~

E5 Analyze Methods of Independent Audit Services January 1991 .

Assessments for Performance Evaluation E6 Revise Frs for Proper Evaluation of BNP Site QA July 1990 Complete Service Water Pump Performance F1 Implement Career Development and Management To be Underway Job Rotation Process Services determined

  • Indicates a change from previous month's report.

" Schedule subject to change based upon availability of resources and shifting priorities.

IAP-SIR 9

s 3

INTEGRATED ACTION PLAN SCIIEDULE OF INDEPENDENT REVIEWS August 31,1990 INDEPENDENT APPROXIMATE IAP NO. DESCRIITION REVIEW BY SCIIEDULE" COMMENT 3 .

F2 Incorporate Quality, Safety and Cost Management August 1990 Complete

  • Effectiveness Criteria in Performance Services Appraisal Program F3 Review Awards and Incentives; Management 1991 Develop Plans for Enhancements Services F4 Provide Formal Training in Business Management July 1990 Complete Fundamentals Services GI Implement Actions to Resolve People Audit Services October 1990 Issues, including Employee Suggestion System G2 Reemphasize and Encourage Support Audit Services August 1990 Complete
  • of TO Process G3 Improve drganizational and Audit Services January 1991 Individual Ownership Commitments, including Procedural Adherence
  • Indicates a change from previous month's report.

" Schedule subject to change based upon availability of resources and shifting priorities.

IAP-SIR 10

- -