ML20091M561

Withdrawal of Eddleman Contentions 85/86 & Second Motion to Reinstate Contention 58(2d) Re Financial Qualifications

ML20091M561
Person / Time
Site:	Harris
Issue date:	06/05/1984
From:	Eddleman W EDDLEMAN, W.
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20091M518	List: ML20091M512 ML20091M535 ML20091M561 ML20091M569
References
82-468-01-OL, 82-468-1-OL, OL, NUDOCS 8406110343
Download: ML20091M561 (1)

Text

i 'a j' ,

j&g ,

?2 I

/

)

' I DOCKE'E" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 5 N June k,198k NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ,

84 'JUN -8 Pk:55

' ,_ BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD OCNLib3 s 5Eiw '

l

, BRANCH

' ('- Glenn O. Bright .

s Dr. ]nues M. Ctrpenter

~." '

,r Jamer' L. Kelley, Chairman A. '

'Xn the Matter of  ; _

Docket 56 400 OL CAROLINA POWER AND 'I,IGHT .CO. ' et al. )

(Shearon Harris Nyclear Power Plant' ) '-

Unit 1) ) ASLBP No. 82-1466-01

) OL

[

j \

/ . , . ,

s 1

I Notice of Withdrawl of Eddleman Contontions. 85W'l and second

' 'I, Motion to Reinsta'ce Contention g 58(2d) (Financ'f a'l duelifications) n .

,,a y t' ,

[.'

This is :tc coihErm tiiat c,c'dtenti6ns 85/66 'abe withdrawn for

! f

. >< / , a procedural reasons (tc allow tir.e for hearing on Joitic II and Eddleman 8F91). I believe'CP&L's people were working towcrd, and asymptotically huproaching, a' $,cttlement on the lines outlined by Judge Carnenter.

> \

MOTION /

Counsel advises me that on April 16, 1984 the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, issu 8 its mandste striking down the NRC's deletion of financial qualifications from NRC. br'o,ceedings. Counsel advises n8g that thei Court,'s < date invalidates the rule of 1982 by which the owe .

88r /

NPC removed the financial cualificationss tissue fmin conaj deration, *

tt) 6 .

1 *S ie and therefore r a motion to'. reinstate contentiotk '56'2d) is in order.

if

• :h (' / .

Qg 7 It appears to me that the NRC has no. authority or power to r , -* o . >?

1. 3\ overrule or evads- the Court's mandate; %erefore, ' contention 58(2d)

^

. mc.o ought to be admitted now to avoid delaying 'the proceedings later.

/~

I understand a sinilar, contention is now u,nder litigation in Byron pursuanttotheCourk'n' mandate.

, ,4 8

Wells Eddleman k h v- -

-