ML20091M535

Statement of Matl Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue Re Eddleman Contention 67

ML20091M535
Person / Time
Site:	Harris
Issue date:	06/05/1984
From:	EDDLEMAN, W.
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20091M518	List: ML20091M512 ML20091M535 ML20091M561 ML20091M569
References
OL, NUDOCS 8406110333
Download: ML20091M535 (2)

Text

_ _

STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS IN DISPUTE RE EDDLEMAN CONTENTION 67

1. The Southeastern ILRW Compact has not been ratified.

2. The Staff and Applicants' affiants have contradicted the FSAR and made er approved errors in calculated LLRW volumes to be prodgced by Harris.

3 The volume of LLRW produced by Harris will fill twice as many 55-gallon drums as Applicants and Staff claim, or thereabouts, even with the volume reduct$ on systen working.

4 Without the volume reduction gystem, the annual output again of Harris LLvW would doubleg to about 7000 drums, over h times the Applicants / Staff figure.

5 This number of drums would fill all the storage space assert 6d to be available (areas not identified, nor soace on floor given, in affidavits) in about a year.

6. At most the storage would last 2 years or so, under the correction for Applicants / Staff errors in item 3 above.

7. Applicants nor Staff have guaranteed that Congress will anprove the Southeastern LLRW Connact by a year or 2 after the Harris plant opens.

8. The Staff's " Turkey Point test" inplied 6 years' storage and eventual assured disposal (Staff "Resnonse at 7).

8406110333 840605 PDR ADOCK 05000400 PDR g

NOTE: In my ooinion the Staff is as slavish as ever in l agreeing with Applicants even when they seem obviously wrong

! (compare 8F1 argument on size of coal particulates being increased by radioactive atoms ' attaching to then, so much that they could not be breathed into the deep lung).

- _ - . - = _ . . . _ _ _ _ - - . . _ . -_ . _ _

~

e SHNPP FSAR

. l TABLE 11.4.2-1 OUTPUT FROM SOLID WASTE PROCESSING SYSTEM *

(TWO UNITS)

@antity ff h 4antity***

Source 7 bra (cu ft/yr) (druns / year)

Spent Resins Solidified 4,250 (1) E 850(3)

Evaporator Bottoms Solidified 21,350 (1) 4,270 I

Filter Particulates Solidified 5,400** (1) $ 1,080**

Dry Solids Compressed 6,000 (2) h 1,000 5 Chemical Drains Solidified 375 (I) 75 TOTAL: '7,275 Notes: (Bases for Values)

1) Based on two volumes of waste per volume of solidification agent.

2) Based on a four to one reduction ratio. ,

! 3) Based on 55 gal. drums. High Integrity Containers (HIC) may be used as an , 5 alternate method of packing. ,

• Table gives anximum annual volumes; for expected volumes delete spent resin from the condensate demineralizers and the detergent evaporator bottoms. Thus, the expected volumes are those associated with primary systems and the maximum volumes include volumes associated with the secondary systems. ,

• • With the volume reduction subsystem the outputs of evaporator bottoms e, / -

! will be 2540 cu. f t./yr., 508 drums /yr.; the outputs of filter ,

particulates will be 643 cu. f t./yr. ,129 drums /yr. ~~

p

• • • These estimates are conservative since the volume per drum is assumed to ,

P' be substantiall /r ls ym ,+y) pless uosthan ft'the actual volume of the 55 l 15%q,n SPlew [.  ;, c i

9,5 t 3,;

y e ,

y.

A g.

4 j ldlE

• *~

Amendment No. 5

. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ , . . _ _ . . . _ __ , _ . _ _____. _ _