ML20091M561

Withdrawal of Eddleman Contentions 85/86 & Second Motion to Reinstate Contention 58(2d) Re Financial Qualifications

ML20091M561
Person / Time
Site:	Harris
Issue date:	06/05/1984
From:	Eddleman W EDDLEMAN, W.
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20091M518	List: ML20091M512 ML20091M535 ML20091M561 ML20091M569
References
82-468-01-OL, 82-468-1-OL, OL, NUDOCS 8406110343
Download: ML20091M561 (1)

Text

'a j'

j&g,

i

? I 2 /

)

DOCKE'E" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 5

N June k,198k NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 84 'JUN -8 Pk:55 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD OCNLib3 s 5Eiw BRANCH

('-

Glenn O. Bright Dr. ]nues M. Ctrpenter s

~."

,r Jamer' L. Kelley, Chairman A. '

'Xn the Matter of Docket 56 400 OL CAROLINA POWER AND 'I,IGHT.CO. ' et al.

)

(Shearon Harris Nyclear Power Plant'

)

Unit 1)

)

ASLBP No. 82-1466-01

)

OL

[

/

j \\

1 s

Notice of Withdrawl of Eddleman Contontions. 85W'l and second

'I, Motion to Reinsta'ce Contention 58(2d) (Financ'f a'l duelifications) g

[.'

n

,,a y

t' This is :tc coihErm tiiat c,c'dtenti6ns 85/66 'abe withdrawn for f

>< /

a procedural reasons (tc allow tir.e for hearing on Joitic II and Eddleman 8F91).

I believe'CP&L's people were working towcrd, and asymptotically huproaching, a' $,cttlement on the lines outlined by Judge Carnenter.

\\

MOTION

/

Counsel advises me that on April 16, 1984 the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, issu 8 its mandste striking down the NRC's deletion of financial qualifications from NRC. br'o,ceedings. Counsel advises n8g that thei Court,'s <

date invalidates the rule of 1982 by which the owe 88r NPC removed the financial cualificationss tissue fmin conaj deration,

tt)

/

6

• S ie and therefore a motion to'. reinstate contentiotk '56'2d) is in order.

1 r

• :h ('

if

/

Qg It appears to me that the NRC has no. authority or power to 7

r, -* o.

overrule or evads-the Court's mandate; %erefore, ' contention 58(2d)

>?

1. 3\\

^

. mc.o ought to be admitted now to avoid delaying 'the proceedings later.

/~

I understand a sinilar, contention is now u,nder litigation in Byron pursuanttotheCourk'n' mandate.

8 k

h v-

,4 Wells Eddleman

-