05000333/LER-2015-006

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LER-2015-006, Transitory Secondary Containment Differential Pressure Excursions
James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant
Event date: 09-22-2015
Report date: 2-4-2016
Reporting criterion: 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C), Loss of Safety Function - Release of Radioactive Material
Initial Reporting
ENS 51512 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(C), Loss of Safety Function - Release of Radioactive Material
3332015006R01 - NRC Website
LER 15-006-01 for James A. FizPatrick Regarding Transitory Secondary Containment Differential Pressure Excursions
ML16035A444
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/04/2016
From: Brian Sullivan
Entergy Nuclear Northeast, Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
JAFP-16-0002 LER 15-006-01
Download: ML16035A444 (6)


Reported lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry.

Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Privacy and Information Collections Branch (T-5 F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555- 0001, or by internet e-mail to Infocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

CONTINUATION SHEET

Background

The Secondary Containment (SC) [EIIS identifier: NG] boundary surrounds the primary containment and refueling equipment. The boundary forms a control volume to contain, dilute, and hold up fission products.

The SC consists of four systems which include the Reactor Building, the Reactor Building Isolation and Control System, the Standby Gas Treatment (SBGT) System [BH], and the Main Stack. Secondary Containment is designed to provide containment for postulated design basis accident scenarios: loss-of-coolant accident and refueling (fuel handling) accident. Since pressure may increase in Secondary Containment relative to the environmental pressure, support systems are required to maintain a differential pressure vacuum such that external atmosphere would leak into containment rather than fission products leak out.

The systems which maintain a differential pressure vacuum inside Secondary Containment include the normal Reactor Building Ventilation and Cooling (RBV) System [VA] (during normal plant operations) and the safety- related Standby Gas Treatment System for post-accident conditions.

Technical Specification (TS) Surveillance Requirement (SR) 3.6.4.1.1 requires the SC differential pressure to be maintained more negative than 0.25 inches of water vacuum relative to the atmosphere. Failure to meet this SR, except for momentary transients due to gusty wind conditions (TS Bases 3.6.4.1.1), results in the Secondary Containment Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) not being met, and requires the Secondary Containment to be declared Inoperable.

Event Description

On September 22, 2015 at 17:03, with James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant operating at 100 percent power, the Emergency and Plant Information Computer (EPIC) EPIC A-3348 indicated a spike in SC differential pressure during performance of a surveillance test associated with automatic isolation of SC and initiation of the SBGT.

An operator was subsequently dispatched to the ventilation control panel. In general, the control room indications (i.e. the ventilation control panel) are used for operability determinations. They verified that Secondary Containment differential pressure was more negative than the Technical Specification allowed value; therefore, the SC was determined to remain Operable.

On September 29, 2015, as part of the investigation into RB differential pressure response during the process of isolating the reactor building, Operations determined that EPIC does correspond with plant status.

An NRC notification was made via ENS 51512 on 11/3/2015. This Licensee Event Report (LER) is being submitted per 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C) as an event or condition that could have prevented the fulfillment of a safety function to control the release of radioactive material. The failure to immediately report the condition was entered into the JAF Corrective Action Program.

Reported lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry.

Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Privacy and Information Collections Branch (-1-5 F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555- 0001, or by internet e-mail to Infocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not requ'red to respond to, the information collection

Event Analysis

Cause

The Secondary Containment differential pressure has a tendency to move towards a slight positive, when the RBV is switched from normal to an isolation mode. This is also observed from the readings obtained in the control room for the SC pressure during the transition phase. The cause of the increase in d/P is the difference in closure time for the supply and exhaust isolation valves. The supply and exhaust isolation valves are designed to close within 15 and 5 seconds respectively. After the exhaust valves are closed (within the first 5 seconds), the operating supply fans keep bringing outside air in for the remaining 10 seconds of the supply valves closure, causing SC d/P to rise.

The condition of an increase in SC d/P during transition between normal and isolation modes of the RBV System is an expected response, and attributable to the design of the non-safety related RBV System. The cause of this condition is not associated with any component failure or malfunction.

Similar Events Internal Events The JAF Plant Data System (PDS) was utilized to review the Secondary Containment differential pressure response over the previous three years during surveillance testing resulting in isolation of the Secondary Containment and automatic initiation of the SBGT System (i.e. ST-34A and ST-34B). The review identified twelve (12) instances where the transition between normal and isolation mode of the RBV System resulted in a d/P that was less negative than the TS requirement. The results are shown in Table 1.

The JAF Paperless Condition Reporting System was reviewed to confirm that the Secondary Containment differential pressure responses depicted in Table 1 were not associated with any failure or component malfunction. The transitory spikes are an expected condition, and were not previously documented in the JAF Corrective Action Program.

Table 1 — Differential Pressure Response Date Surveillance Test Peak (in. wg) Duration (sec) 3/29/2013 ST-34B -0.01 25 3/29/2013 ST-34B +0.38 45 4/1/2013 ST-34B -0.03 20 6/27/2013 ST-34A +0.14 25 6/27/2013 ST-34A -0.13 10 10/30/2014 ST-34B +0.04 23 10/30/2014 ST-34B -0.13 10 10/30/2014 ST-34B -0.08 15 10/30/2014 ST-34B -0.03 15 10/30/2014 ST-34B -0.18 5 10/30/2014 ST-34B -0.20 5 9/22/2015 ST-34A +0.04 25 Reported essons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry.

Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Privacy and Information Collections Branch (T-5 F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555- 0001, or by internet e-mail to Infocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant 05000333 External events:

Susquehanna Steam Electric Station; Unit 1: LER 2015-005, Loss of Secondary Containment Differential Pressure During Ventilation Damper Testing.

Columbia Generating Station; LER 2013-007-01, Secondary Containment Pressure Exceeded During Severe Weather Conditions.

Fermi Nuclear Generating Station; Unit 2: LER 2015-001-01, Secondary Containment Declared Inoperable After Loss of Reactor Building Ventilation from Freeze Protection Actuation.

Corrective Actions

Completed Actions

  • Discuss the guidance in NUREG-1022 Revision 3 with applicable Operations and Regulatory Assurance personnel.

Safety Consequence and Implications There were no actual consequences caused by these events. SC provides a control volume to contain fission products that leak from primary containment, or are released directly to the secondary containment as a result of a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) or Refueling Accident (RA).

The difference in closing time between the inlet and exhaust valves of the reactor building during transition from normal to isolate mode represents a potential exfiltration pathway for released activity. This potential exfiltration pathway has been conservatively quantified, and is included in the JAF design basis accident analyses. Dose consequence results remain well below the 10 CFR 100 and 10 CFR 50.67 guidelines for all postulated accident conditions.

The Design Basis (DB) LOCA event results in a rapid primary containment pressure increase and reactor water level decrease. Drywell High Pressure or Low Reactor Water Level signals directly isolate the RBV, and start SBGT. Fuel damage caused by a DB LOCA is not expected until a rise in fuel cladding temperature after coolant is lost. The SC differential pressure was positive for a maximum of approximately 45 seconds during the RBV isolations reported in this LER. Therefore, it would have occurred early in the DB LOCA event. RBV isolation and initiation of SBGT would have been completed prior to fuel failure and release of radiological materials.

The DB RA event results in a release of radioactive material by a dropped fuel assembly during refuel operations. Radiation detectors would detect the release and initiate SC isolation. The pressure changes reported in this LER could have caused some exfiltration before the isolation was complete; however, the amount of exfiltration, consequentially the offsite and control room doses, would remain below regulatory limits as analyzed.

Reported lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry.

Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Privacy and Information Collections Branch (T-5 F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555- 0001, or by internet e-mail to Infocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.

References

  • Technical Specifications