|
---|
Category:SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE
MONTHYEARIR 05000373/19960011996-10-17017 October 1996 SALP Repts 50-373/96-01 & 50-374/96-01 for 941127-960803 IR 05000373/19890011989-06-30030 June 1989 SALP Repts 50-373/89-01 & 50-374/89-01 for 880316 - 890630 ML20154A2471988-08-26026 August 1988 Errata to SALP Repts 50-373/88-01 & 50-374/88-01 for 861116-880315 ML20153D6821988-08-26026 August 1988 App to SALP Repts 50-373/88-01 & 50-374/88-01 for 861116- 880315 IR 05000373/19880011988-06-0101 June 1988 SALP Insp Repts 50-373/88-01 & 50-374/88-01 for 861116- 880315.Overall Performance Acceptable ML20209A8151987-04-22022 April 1987 App to SALP 6 Repts 50-373/86-06 & 50-374/86-07 for 851001-861115,summarizing 870313 Meeting IR 05000373/19860061987-03-0404 March 1987 SALP Board Repts 50-373/86-06 & 50-374/86-07 for 851001- 861115 IR 05000373/19850011986-04-14014 April 1986 App to SALP Repts 50-373/85-01 & 50-374/85-01 for May 1984 - Sept 1985,including Summary of 860218 Meeting Discussing Rept Contents ML20151Y9531986-02-11011 February 1986 SALP Board Repts 50-373/85-01 & 50-374/85-01 for May 1984 - Sept 1985 1996-10-17
[Table view] Category:TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
MONTHYEARIR 05000373/19990151999-10-0606 October 1999 Insp Repts 50-373/99-15 & 50-374/99-15 on 990729-0916.One Violation Noted & Being Treated as Ncv.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000373/19990141999-09-0808 September 1999 Insp Repts 50-373/99-14 & 50-374/99-14 on 990809-13.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Quality of Emergency Preparedness Program,Related Audits & Emergency Response Facilities & Equipment IR 05000373/19990131999-08-25025 August 1999 Insp Repts 50-373/99-13 & 50-374/99-13 on 990804-06 & 09-11. No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Effectiveness of Licensee Fire Protection Program IR 05000373/19990121999-08-17017 August 1999 Insp Repts 50-373/99-12 & 50-374/99-12 on 990623-0728.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations, Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000373/19990111999-07-14014 July 1999 Insp Repts 50-373/99-11 & 50-374/99-11 on 990614-18.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Routine,Announced Insp Assessed Effectiveness of Licensee Solid Radioactive Waste (Radwaste) Mgt & Transportation Program IR 05000373/19990041999-07-13013 July 1999 Insp Repts 50-373/99-04 & 50-374/99-04 on 990513-0622.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations, Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000373/19990031999-05-19019 May 1999 Insp Repts 50-373/99-03 & 50-374/99-03 on 990401-0512.Two Violations Noted & Being Treated as non-cited Violation. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operation,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000373/19990101999-05-14014 May 1999 Insp Repts 50-373/99-10 & 50-374/99-10 on 990419-23. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Security Procedures & Documentation,Staff Knowledge & Performance,Security Force Training & Qualification & Quality Assurance in Security IR 05000373/19990091999-05-0303 May 1999 Insp Repts 50-373/99-09 & 50-374/99-09 on 990406-09.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operational & Outage Radiation Protection Program IR 05000373/19990071999-05-0303 May 1999 Insp Repts 50-373/99-07 & 50-374/99-07 on 990329-0402. Non-cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000373/19990081999-04-20020 April 1999 Insp Repts 50-373/99-08 & 50-374/99-08 on 990311-26.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Review of Engineering Changes & Plant Matl Condition in Preparation for re-start of Unit 2 IR 05000373/19990021999-04-16016 April 1999 Insp Repts 50-373/99-02 & 50- 374/99-02 on 990217-0331.Non- Cited Violation Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support PNO-III-99-020, on 990409,Unit 2 Had Been Shut Down Since Sept 1996 for Refueling Outage That Was Extended in Order to Address Extensive Equipment Condition.Util Completed Comprehensive Corrective Action Program1999-04-13013 April 1999 PNO-III-99-020:on 990409,Unit 2 Had Been Shut Down Since Sept 1996 for Refueling Outage That Was Extended in Order to Address Extensive Equipment Condition.Util Completed Comprehensive Corrective Action Program ML20205D7051999-04-0202 April 1999 Notice of Violation from Insp & Investigation Concluded on 981119.Violation Noted:On 980511,supervisor Employed by Raytheon Corp Contractor at Lasalle,Confirmed Odor of Alcohol on Employee & Failed to Perform for-cause FFD Test ML20205D5891999-03-29029 March 1999 Notice of Violation from Insp & Investigation Concluded on 981119.Violation Noted:On 980511,supervisor Employed by Raytheon Corp Contractor at Lasalle,Confirmed Odor of Alcohol on Employee & Failed to Have Require for-cause Test IR 05000373/19990011999-03-10010 March 1999 Insp Repts 50-373/99-01 & 50-374/99-01 on 990106-0216.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000373/19980231999-02-0202 February 1999 Insp Repts 50-373/98-23 & 50-374/98-23 on 981121-990105.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations, Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000373/19980261998-12-18018 December 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/98-26 & 50-374/98-26 on 981026-1106.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering & Assessment of Actions Planned or Completed to Address Number of Events Discussed in LERs IR 05000373/19980221998-12-17017 December 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/98-22 & 50-374/98-22 on 981010-1120.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations, Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000373/19980251998-12-16016 December 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/98-25 & 50-374/98-25 on 981102-06.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Findings & Conclusions from Special Insp of Licensee Operator Workaround Program IR 05000373/19980211998-11-0707 November 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/98-21 & 50-374/98-21 on 980901-1009.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support PNO-III-98-047, on 981005,diver Lost Consciousness While in Unit 2 Suppression Pool.Diver Received Minor Contamination on Hair During Removal of Mask & Diving Suit.Diver Was Successfully Decontaminated1998-10-0606 October 1998 PNO-III-98-047:on 981005,diver Lost Consciousness While in Unit 2 Suppression Pool.Diver Received Minor Contamination on Hair During Removal of Mask & Diving Suit.Diver Was Successfully Decontaminated IR 05000373/19980191998-09-24024 September 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/98-19 & 50-374/98-19 on 980716-0831.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations, Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000373/19980201998-09-0808 September 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/98-20 & 50-374/98-20 on 980812-13. Non-cited Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Circumstances Surrounding 980723 Incident Re Transfer of Radioactive Samples from Storage Areas on Refuel Floor IR 05000373/19980171998-09-0202 September 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/98-17 & 50-374/98-17 on 980713-17.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Security Program Aspect of Plant Support ML20237A5901998-08-0707 August 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980713-16.Violation Noted: on 980526,two Construction Laborers Permitted to Enter Unit 2 a Reactor Water Cleanup Heat Exchanger Room,W/O Satisfying Provisions of TS 6.1.1.1 IR 05000373/19980181998-08-0707 August 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/98-18 & 50-374/98-18 on 980713-16. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Effectiveness of Aspects of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000373/19980151998-07-24024 July 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/98-15 & 50-374/98-15 on 980706-21. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering Performance Areas ML20236U3841998-07-24024 July 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980706-21.Violation Noted: as of 980717,testable Valves 1FP-160A,160B,161,236 & 234 in Fire Protection Sys Lines That Supply Fire Suppression Water to Control Room Not Cycled in Preceding 12 Months PNO-III-98-037, on 980724,Region III Issued Ltr to Util Indicating Sufficient Improvements Made to Support Unit 1 Restart.Unit 2 Will Remain Shut Down for Continuing Mods & Performance Improvement Activities1998-07-24024 July 1998 PNO-III-98-037:on 980724,Region III Issued Ltr to Util Indicating Sufficient Improvements Made to Support Unit 1 Restart.Unit 2 Will Remain Shut Down for Continuing Mods & Performance Improvement Activities IR 05000373/19980121998-07-23023 July 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/98-12 & 50-374/98-12 on 980511-0605.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations & Effectiveness of Corrective Action Program IR 05000373/19980111998-07-23023 July 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/98-11 & 50-374/98-11 on 980605-0716.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations, Maint & Engineering IR 05000373/19980161998-07-23023 July 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/98-16 & 50-374/98-16 on 980626-0706.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Observations of Crew Performance During Dynamic Simulator Requalification Exam IR 05000373/19980011998-07-0202 July 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/98-01 & 50-374/98-01 on 980423-0605. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations, Maint,Engineering & Plan Support ML20236L4541998-07-0202 July 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980423-0605.Violation Noted:Two Operators,Performing OOS Tag Removal & Positioning of Control Room Ventilation Sys Dampers,Did Not Perform an apart-in-time Independent Verification ML20248M1271998-06-0505 June 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980319-0421.Violations Noted:As of 980421,licensee Failed to Adequately Perform Combustible Loading Calculations Required by LaSalle Administrative Procedure 240-6,rev 36,dtd 970821 IR 05000373/19980051998-06-0505 June 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/98-05 & 50-374/98-05 on 980319-0421. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering IR 05000373/19980091998-05-22022 May 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/98-09 & 50-374/98-09 on 980311-0422. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000373/19980041998-04-10010 April 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/98-04 & 50-374/98-04 on 980124-0310.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000373/19980081998-04-0101 April 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/98-08 & 50-374/98-08 on 980317-19.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Evaluation of Licensee Performance During Plant Biennial Exercise of Emergency Plan IR 05000373/19980071998-03-25025 March 1998 Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-373/98-07 & 50-374/98-07 on 980223-27.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support ML20217D0671998-03-23023 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/97-23 & 50-374/97-23 on 971222-980306. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering ML20217D0611998-03-23023 March 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 971222-980306.Violation Noted:Licensee Failed to Ensure,Through Documentation & Other Activities That Applicable Design Basis & Regulatory Requirements Translated Into Procedures & Instructions IR 05000373/19980061998-03-18018 March 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/98-06 & 50-374/98-06 on 980223-27.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Chemistry & Radiological Environ Monitoring Programs & Selected RP Program Activities IR 05000373/19970171998-02-27027 February 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/97-17OL & 50-374/97-17OL on 971020-24 & 980121-22.No Viiolations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Review of Licensed RO & SRO Requalification Training Programs, Including Review of Written & Operating Exam Matls IR 05000373/19980031998-02-18018 February 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/98-03 & 50-374/98-03 on 980126-30.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Review of Emergency Preparedness Program,An Aspect of Plant Support IR 05000373/19970221998-02-0505 February 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/97-22 & 50-374/97-22 on 971219-980123.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000373/19970181998-01-26026 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/97-18 & 50-374/97-18 on 971024-1218.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Initial Operability Evaluation of Potential DG Cooling Water Piping Waterhammer ML20199F5291998-01-23023 January 1998 Insp Repts 50-373/97-20 & 50-374/97-20 on 971101-1218. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support IR 07100101/20120181998-01-23023 January 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 971101-1218.Violation Noted:Activities Affecting Quality Were Not Accomplished IAW Applicable Procedures 1999-09-08
[Table view] |
See also: IR 05000373/1988001
Text
.
.
.
'
Enclosure 2
ERRATA SHEET
PAGE LINE NOW READS SHOULD READ
20 26 .. 18 months .. 16 months
Basis - The length of the assessment period given in the report is
incorrect.
1
8809120122 080826 !
PDR ADOCK 05000373 I
O PD3
1
)
.._ _ __ . . _ - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.- - . _ _ _ _ _ _ __.
Enclosure 3
.
.
,
'
!. Quality Pronrams and Administrative Controls Affectina Quality
1. Analysis
, ..
Evaluation of this area addresses two related, but separate,
functions.
,
l
First, it includes the assessment of licensee management's
! activities to achieve quality in overall plant activities,
This assessment reflects the quality of licensee activities in I
,
the individual functional areas that have been addrh;.ed in
r
j' other sections of this report, ,
Secondly, it includes the assessment of the licensee's internal, ;
independent quality oversight activities, such as those
'
performed by the quality control / quality assurance organizations, j
i
Evaluation of the independent quality oversight activities (
consisted of three inspections by regional inspectors and i
continual observation by the resident inspectors. The areas
l examined during two inspections included followup of seven ,
j
i
findings in the area of procurement and audits previously !
i identified in 1984 and 1987. Quality assurance (QA) auditor l
l
qualifications were also reviewed. During the followup i
inspection, the seven previously identified inspection findings !
!
were closed with no safety issues or violations identified. !
- . t
l
Overall management involvement in ensuring quality has been I
i
good, and management has been aggressive in solving problems.
This was evident by the significant reduction in the nus.ber ,
1
of reportable events (19 for the current assessment period of ,
1
16 months compared to 26 for the previous assessment period i
of 13.5 months) and violations (21 for the current assessment i
,
period as compared to 34 for the previous assessment period) [
resulting from personnel error. These 1siprovements were the
,
l
l
result of site management aggressively identifying problems i
and pursuing resolutions that involved the plant workers so I
- '
l
that they became part of the solutions. An example of this is
I clearly demonstrated by the elimination of the problem with
redundant verifications, which was a concern in the latter part
of the last assessment period. The establishment of a site
j team made up of personnel from the different departments
< (operations, mechanical maintenance, instrument and control, (;
' and technical staff) has helped prevent the problem from '
l
recurring. Management involvement in improving plant
performance also can be recognized in the plant painting
program to improve housekeeping and plant appearance. l
f I
I
Management involvement was evident in the procurement area as :
'
indicated by improved procedures for the control of procurement.
Also, management involvement was evident in the audit area as l
l
i indicated by the timely revision of the audit schedule to ensure
20
i
L. __ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . - _ . _ _.__ _ _ _ __D
, . _ . _ __ __
, m. ,
.
'"
DAGE Enclosure 3
.
.
/N ERROR.
,
I. Quality Programs and Administrative Controls Affecting Quality >
l
, 1. Analysis
.
Evaluation of this area addresses two related, but s arate
functions.
First, it includes the assessment of licensee a gemen s i
activities to achieve quality in overo11 plant i s.
This assessment reflects the quality of lict pee ities in ,
the individual functional areas that have b r sed in
other sections of this report.
nsee's internal,
'
Secondly, it includes the assess nt of
independent quality oversight ivitie su as those
performed by the quality cont 1/ rance organizations.
Evaluation of the independent ity sight activities
consisted of three inspections by re 1 inspectors and
continual observation by the resi nspectors. The areas
examined during two inspections inc ded followup of seven
findings in the area of p cureme and audits previously
identified in 1984 and 19 u ty assurance (QA) auditor
qualifications were als r e- . During the followup
inspection, the seven i y identified inspuction findings
were closed with no s e ues or violations identified.
6
Overall mar.agement i ent in ensuring quality has been
good, and manag een aggressive in solving problems.
This was eviden significant reduction in the number
! of reportab ve t 9 for the current assessment period of
'
18 mon sc 26 for the previous assessment period
of 13 mont violations (21 for the current assessment
perio a co a to 34 for the previous assessment period)
result f ersonnel error. The:S improvements were the
result i management aggressively identifying problems
j and purs resolutions that involved the plant workers so
'
t at they ecame part of the solutions. An example of this is
early monstrated by the elimination of the problem with
d t verifications, which was a concern in the latter part
t last assessment period. The establishment of a site
te made up of personnel from the different departments
rations, mechanical maintenance, instrument and control,
j d technical staff) has helped prevent the problem from
i ecurring. Management involvement in improving plant
t
performance also can be recognized in the plant painting
program to improve housekeeping and plant appearance.
l Management involvement was evident in the procurement area as
- indicated by improved procedures for the control of procurement.
Also, management involvement was evident in the audit area as
! indicated by the timely revision of the audit schedule to ensure
<
20
.__. __. -__ . __
._ - . .- -__-_,- - -______- - - -
- .
. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
'
' Enclosure 4
'
CommonD' % Edison
. One Fast Na:o 8ta n C hca po.Is. e
MW W to Post Dmco Boa 767
- CNcago, Ilhos (Npo . 0767
August 19, 1988
Mr. A. Bert Davis
Regional A binistrator
U.S. Nuclear degulatory Comission
Region III
799 Roosevelt Road
Glen Ellyn, IL 60137
Subject LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 l
Response to the SALP 7 Board Report
MRC Decket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374__
Reference (a): A.B. Davis letter to Cordell Reed dated
June 1, 1986.
1
l
Dear Mr. Davis
Reference (a) transmitted the SALP 7 Board Report for LaSalle County )
Station and sumarised our performance ratings for the period November 16, 1986 '
thrcagh March 15, 1988. The purpose of this letter is to provide Coevnonwealth
Rolson's coments.
We believe that that SALP 7 Board Report is well written and generally
represents a balanced look at our strengths, improvements and problems encoun-
tered during the report period. We recognise this as the NRC's subjective
report card" which provides your perspective of the overall operation of
LaSalle. As was discussed during the SALP Meeting on June 21, 1988. we were
especially disappointed with receiving a rating of Category 2 in Plant
operations because of the improvements we have completed in this area and the
good coments which have been received f rom INPO and other organisations. i
, Your recognisetion that performance at Comonwealth Edison Company plants has I
iwproved and that the improvement at LaSalle has been dramatic is appreciated.
During the Sweary Remarks at the SALP meetlng it was indicated that,
j although the nurnerical ratings of SALP 7 were not substantially dif ferent f rorn
i
'
those in SALP 6, in balance, the station was much improved. Specifically, the
following were noted
-
The License area improved from a Category 2 to Category 1 rating
in SALP 7.
.enAoe# L r , -r _
m ovo 36 VW n 2.ff .
. _. __ . _ - - _ _ _ _ . -- . - - -AUGt41m.
--- --
!
.
.
,
Enclosure 4
A.B. Davis -2- August 19, 1988
.
-
Operations showed significant improvement, particularly in areas of
management involvement and response to MRC initiatives even though it ,
received a Category 2 rating. !
)
- Emergency Preparedness was rated a Category 2 and improving, versus
a Category 2 at the end of SALP 6. )
,
-
Quality Programs and A&ministrat!ve Controls affecting quality showed
improvement in areas of management involvement and response to NRC
Initiatives even though it was rated Category 2.
- The Maintenance Category 2 is "low" and increased attention need to
be given to the balance-of-plant area.
During your closing remarks at the meeting, you stated that "this is
not a bad SALP, but LaSelle did not stay up with the improvements pecurring in
the rest cf . the ladustry." As was discussed at the meeting, Commonwealth
Edison is committed to pursuing excellente and will concentrate more effort at
LaSalle in the form of a speelfic LaSalle SALP Improvement Plin. In that
plan, which will be presented to your staf f when complete, we will
aggressively work to improve SALP awareneas in station attitudes and also to
improve regulatory perception.
We believe that the improvement noted in your report and in your
presentation at the SALP m&eting, as well as the performance improvements
results which we presented to you earlier in 1988, are the direct result of
our cannitment to achieve sustained oncellent performance at LaSalle Station.
This comnitment continues and will be even more focused with our LaSalle SALP
Improvement Plan.
Please direct any comments you may have regarding this response to
this office.
Very truly yours,
a
Cordell Reed
Senior Vice President
in
ces P. Shemanski - Project Manager, NRR
R. D. Lanksbury - LaSalle Resident Inspector
5019K