ML091270227

From kanterella
Revision as of 17:01, 26 August 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Hostile Action Based EP Drills - Elements of a Successful Demonstration
ML091270227
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/04/2009
From: Calabrese D
Florida Power & Light Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response
McCoppin, Michael NSIR/DPR 415-2737
References
Download: ML091270227 (17)


Text

Hostile Action Based EP Drills Elements of a Successful Demonstration Donna Calabrese EP ManagerFPL - St Lucie Plant Contributors to a Successful Demonstration

  • Planning Horizon
  • Level of Detail Applied
  • Team Ownership
  • Practice and Learn Elements of an Effective Tabletop
  • Preparation

- Assessment/Benchmarking

- Use of tools provided

- Partner with Offsite Agencies

- Scenario- Participants

- Facilitators

- Walkthrough I. Hostile Action Based Drill ObjectivesResponsibility NUREG 0654 Planning StandardPerformance Attributes C R T S C O S C E O F S e c u r i t y I C P C o u n t y S t a t e L L E A E N C10. Demonstrate the ability to coordinate and conduct fire and medical responses in the field.

X X XF, LCoordinate deployment of fire and medical response resources between ICP, on-site ERO facilities (if activated), and security.

Responses should be demonstrated to both multiple personnel causalities and a fire in the protected area potentially or actually affecting safety-related equipment.11. Demonstrate the ability to account for on-site personnel once the threat is neutralized. (refer to D.15)

X JDiscuss and/or implement appropriate strategies for conducting accountability and facilitating movement of on-site personnel (including assembly and release as required) in the post-threat environment.12. Demonstrate radiation protection measures for off-site responders. (refer to E.4)

X X X KAs appropriate to the post-threat environment, discuss and/or implement measures such as dosimetry, KI, respiratory protection, etc.13. Demonstrate the ability to perform an assessment of off- site radiological consequences from a projected release. (refer to E.2)

X IPerform an off-site dose projection based on a possible (e.g., what-if) radiological release).

Determine if the projection results cause or alter PARs.

I. Hostile Action Based Drill ObjectivesResponsibilityNUREG 0654 Planning StandardPerformance Attributes C R T S

C O S

C E O

F S e c u r i t y I C P C o u n t y S t a t e L L E A E N C14. Demonstrate the ability to assess the impact of the attack on the security plan, and to identify and implement compensatory measures if needed.

X NoneSecurity management should assess the effects of the attack on the ability to control access (to both the site and the protected area), maintain defensive positions (officer casualties, damage to protective enclosures, etc.), and operate security-related equipment.

Compensatory measures should be developed to restore physical security; this may include use on law enforcement personnel and resources.As needed, security should advise the appropriate ERO personnel of the need to invoke 10 CFR 50.54 (x)oERO and Operations perform subsequent notification to the NRC15. Demonstrate the ability of the ERO to coordinate the development and release of public information with the ICP. (refer to G.5)

X X X X X X GIntegrate public information officials from law enforcement agencies into JIC operations. Press releases and statements must be vetted for sensitive and safeguards information prior to issuance.

Elements of an Effective Tabletop

  • Facilitation

- Use of a team approach

- Demonstration Criteria

- Define key messages

- Understand the phases

- Maintain focus while allowing for "free play"

- Summarize when appropriate Incorporate Lessons Learned from Tabletop* What do the participants need to succeed?

- Training- Integration (inside and outside the fence)

- Information (verbal, written)

- Logistics- Strong Controller Organization Good Practices

  • Training- Onsite personnel

- OROs* Facility Process Aids

- What's different?

Good Practices

  • Integration

- Incident Command and Utility Partnership

  • Briefs (Incident Commander and Utility)
  • Use of White Boards to demonstrate IC functions Good Practices
  • Information

- Scenario needs to be solid

- Communications plan

  • Conference Bridges
  • Open line with wireless headsets

- Visual Cues Good Practices - Visual Cues Good Practices

  • Logistics- Grab 'N Go Kits at Fire Stations
  • LLEA Maps with grids
  • Procedures
  • Photos of key licensee responders
  • TLDs* KI Good Practices
  • Controllers are critical to your success

- Timeline- Areas of expertise

- Visual cues Good Practices - Visual Cues Movement of Onsite Personnel

  • Coordination with LLEA
  • Establish priorities
  • Understanding conditions of the plant
  • Establish travel routes
  • Security escorts Assessment /How do you measure success?* Did you demonstrate all the objectives?

- Security Event

  • Plant response

- Local, state and federal

  • Protective Actions
  • Media For additional information Donna.Calabrese@fpl.com 772-467-7185 (office) 772-201-0596 (cell)