ML091270227

Hostile Action Based EP Drills - Elements of a Successful Demonstration

ML091270227
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	05/04/2009
From:	Calabrese D Florida Power & Light Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response
McCoppin, Michael NSIR/DPR 415-2737
References
Download: ML091270227 (17)

Text

Hostile Action Based EP Drills Elements of a Successful Demonstration Donna Calabrese EP Manager FPL - St Lucie Plant

Contributors to a Successful Demonstration

• Planning Horizon

• Level of Detail Applied

• Team Ownership

• Practice and Learn

Elements of an Effective Tabletop

• Preparation

- Assessment/Benchmarking

- Use of tools provided

- Partner with Offsite Agencies

- Scenario

- Participants

- Facilitators

- Walkthrough

I. Hostile Action Based Drill Objectives Responsibility NUREG Performance Attributes 0654 S Planning e C Standard S

c o L T O E I t E C u u L S S O C a N R r n E C C F P t C i t A e

t y y

0. Demonstrate the ability to coordinate and conduct fire X X X F, L *Coordinate deployment of fire and medical nd medical responses in the field. response resources between ICP, on-site ERO facilities (if activated), and security.

• Responses should be demonstrated to both multiple personnel causalities and a fire in the protected area potentially or actually affecting safety-related equipment.

1. Demonstrate the ability to account for on-site personnel X J Discuss and/or implement appropriate nce the threat is neutralized. (refer to D.15) strategies for conducting accountability and facilitating movement of on-site personnel (including assembly and release as required) in the post-threat environment.

2. Demonstrate radiation protection measures for off-site X X X K As appropriate to the post-threat environment, esponders. (refer to E.4) discuss and/or implement measures such as dosimetry, KI, respiratory protection, etc.

3. Demonstrate the ability to perform an assessment of off- X I *Perform an off-site dose projection based on ite radiological consequences from a projected release. a possible (e.g., what-if) radiological release).

refer to E.2) *Determine if the projection results cause or alter PARs.

I. Hostile Action Based Drill Objectives Responsibility NUREG 0654 Performance Attributes Planning Standard S

e C S

c o L T O E I t E C u u L S S O C a N R r n E C C F P t C i t A e

t y y

14. Demonstrate the ability to assess the impact of the X None *Security management should assess the effects of attack on the security plan, and to identify and implement the attack on the ability to control access (to both the compensatory measures if needed. site and the protected area), maintain defensive positions (officer casualties, damage to protective enclosures, etc.), and operate security-related equipment.

• Compensatory measures should be developed to restore physical security; this may include use on law enforcement personnel and resources.

• As needed, security should advise the appropriate ERO personnel of the need to invoke 10 CFR 50.54 (x) oERO and Operations perform subsequent notification to the NRC

15. Demonstrate the ability of the ERO to coordinate the X X X X X X G Integrate public information officials from law development and release of public information with the enforcement agencies into JIC operations. Press ICP. (refer to G.5) releases and statements must be vetted for sensitive and safeguards information prior to issuance.

Elements of an Effective Tabletop

• Facilitation

- Use of a team approach

- Demonstration Criteria

- Define key messages

- Understand the phases

- Maintain focus while allowing for free play

- Summarize when appropriate

Incorporate Lessons Learned from Tabletop

• What do the participants need to succeed?

- Training

- Integration (inside and outside the fence)

- Information (verbal, written)

- Logistics

- Strong Controller Organization

Good Practices

• Training

- Onsite personnel

- OROs

• Facility Process Aids

- Whats different?

Good Practices

• Integration

- Incident Command and Utility Partnership

• Briefs (Incident Commander and Utility)

• Use of White Boards to demonstrate IC functions

Good Practices

• Information

- Scenario needs to be solid

- Communications plan

• Conference Bridges

• Open line with wireless headsets

- Visual Cues

Good Practices - Visual Cues Good Practices

• Logistics

- Grab N Go Kits at Fire Stations

• LLEA Maps with grids

• Procedures

• Photos of key licensee responders

• TLDs

• KI

Good Practices

• Controllers are critical to your success

- Timeline

- Areas of expertise

- Visual cues

Good Practices - Visual Cues Movement of Onsite Personnel

• Coordination with LLEA

• Establish priorities

• Understanding conditions of the plant

• Establish travel routes

• Security escorts

Assessment /How do you measure success?

• Did you demonstrate all the objectives?

- Security Event

• Plant response

• ORO response

- Local, state and federal

• Protective Actions

• Media

For additional information Donna.Calabrese@fpl.com 772-467-7185 (office) 772-201-0596 (cell)