NL-12-2271, Vogtle, Unit 2, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 4 of 14

From kanterella
Revision as of 01:19, 22 July 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Vogtle, Unit 2, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 4 of 14
ML12355A037
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Volodarsky D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2271 SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 1.0
Download: ML12355A037 (39)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet of2 Status:76} N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo. E2- -Equip.Class 1 2 it " i -- t5 Equipment Description = I r'- C \Ax L.A( t.ý f-Location: Bldg. .'-' FloorEl. Room, Area R Moto Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y N-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

0/'A e 4 X 7 P 1/4Q 0 ,k. ', .; ---r1 T<1),: A {; 0 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? YYN-] UI- N/AEI Y11NE] Ur N/AE1//NE] Urn N/A[]W-< NEI Ur N/I? Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. < C-3 )>PAGE 94 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- jSt2-c_7-001 Equip. Class" 2/( -Eauinment Descrintion Eauinment Descrintion Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free firom impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?1 0. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yi/NO ULJ N/AQ1 YR(NIK~ UE3 N/AE1 Y~dNEI VEI NIAOD Y[9/NE1 UEc Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could 4 No UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: I/ -{. / .Date:/ z PAGE 95 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONOO 08 302012 PAGE 96 of 433 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 97 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Se~t 1o12.Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo. P7-Cot Equip. Class 1 2 A)T/-1& ,t.li0 Equipment Description lS-- C.. .,Z¢t J i.- 'Ht .Location: Bldg. 07 '- FloorEl. 2C-0'-0" Room, Area tc Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) CGOus.S)S P;U'.tpý" tQ C" Instructions for Completing Checklist This.checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings; Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorae I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y.of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? 5, 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? 4.. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation'?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Y8YXEJ UO N/AD YIM/Nf UE0 N/AD YVND UD N/AD-Yf , NO L1U0 N/AD-6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yr NEI UIn potentially adverse seismic conditions? 12 Enter die equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. < C-3 >, PAGE 98 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-15012-77-0o0 Equip. Class'2 ,' 04T41- Pc'i/'Equipment Description E " -" Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y9} NO UD N/AE]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y4/N- UD N/AD Y[D/N[ UD N/AD YV/ND- U--Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEVEI 4 D U-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) C'ý' ZE ?- t(5'i'- C:7 -Cý'-'t A--c.2 tx-t_.Evaluatedby: k.Date: Sc< C-4 >-PAGE 99 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 100 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 26)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 7- 7-7 " aOI Equip. Classu 7TYý -#- t-tg,-. r- y /aýs z/Equipment Description r.sFWrr-, W4,-ra EXAA)61Oa-o 7/A-VA Location: Bldg. ,6O,,A~4. Floor El. z- a" Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) ;-4',j £ , Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YE/NFJ UD N/AD Y[' NEI UD1 N/AD1 Yt:/'] UD N/AD]Y'N[E UD1 N/AD Rx2Plk~'1.~ ~; ZXzIA/ r/-1-06).6z-7

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y[ý ND] [jD" Enter the equipment class name friom Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. <C-3>PAGE 101 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -/ '-"-c. Equip. Class'2" .T 7 s -d.,J 4.A--, r -C z I Equipment Description £35S.AT7X,-L tWLrE( ex4AA5C0,y 9 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets flee from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is.equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YM."NDI UD1 N/AD YD/N-- UD- N/AD Y[R'NE] UD- N/AD Y[O/N[] UD Other Adverse Conditions

./11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN( NDi UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 2t -052-C7k Evaluated by: Date: '> t f~:!< C-4 >" PAGE 102 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 103 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONOO 2 PAGE 104 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: Y 0 U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -/6o -f4-PC/ Equip. Cl.ass" 2o 4/,YrA Equipment Description /'.-'R 46 -5 / X- C AIeoa 7r1-!7 /J.Ite~ AqwVetS)Location: Bldg. elpgrRoS. FloorEl. ZZO / Room, Area A16 *Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) __Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Al~o/a YN UNEI N/A0, Y- NEI UE] N/AEl 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[J NEI U0 N/A;, 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE N-".UE N/AE*(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) ~ela'A 44eý: vel Sc4r4,H I&' ej~c W.r-dl_, e NA/ep7/oAJ IAIS TAk 0f 5 o 7-p (5/-(5 oL V 0,/6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE UE potentially adverse seismic conditionn /9 12 Enter the equipm, T ý -I?- 5-01~t-Z t cV+M cWr" VV4-ckun e -ft,; 61ýPAGE 105 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No./-/G6a- Equip. Class 1 2 zO Equipment Description /.'C. 5 / '4 C R40 ree /Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y06 NE UC N/A[]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YX NEI UC- N/ACl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yp Ng UC N/A'NY Un Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YA1 NC UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) /9, /,,zer/4 014,,-1-.-¢ 13y Y e -1 Q 65- -H /C-Evaluated by: ~A'~vataaAR3x% Date: A'elc ZLO/z2<C-4 >PAGE 106 of 433 /ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 107 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERS109 PAGE 108 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO 20'8 PAGE 109 of 433 O ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONOO PAGE 110 of 433 TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONPO 1- 171 1 PAGE 111 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:/ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z-U- 4F 5-P$1 Equip. Class'2 20 (" £ )Equipment Description PrOcS5 r I Location: Bldg. CiOh"'1o FloorEl. 22-D' Room, Area _.___Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) )i~ut, Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorag 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YEIN)2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is. the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions'?

Yý(N[E UO N/A[E YW-NEI UO N/AO YE) N[3 UE1 N/Ar YEI N[E UO N/AIý'YV'N0 LJO 2Enter the equipment class narme from Appendix 13: Classes of Ecaipmcnt. < C3 >PAGE 112 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-1W'- / Equip. Class' ,i0 -2_Equipment Description ..eoC-Eor /'goer /Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? ND UCD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NDI UI- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? /, 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN ND UCD N/AD Y0NO UD-Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NDI UCD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

2 " 64/ ~2/ -ý' OF' J9?/ /pT FP4 A 4e5?Pr-B Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 5E Z4F -/5"oo. -Q5- /-/V C Fo'R 1.ARO51 ( 4/gI-k-8 Y Evaluated by: 26= -44 VIP V t Date: ____________ < C-4 >PAGE 113 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION.PAGE 114 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- -4 $1/ Equip. Class 1 2 o (, ,7 , , Af,,L)Equipment Description A4 r ,eC4,E -f1or~aO4/e/ /IND. Z/ Location: Bldg.& Floor El. 4 0 -Room, Area g I Z C.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NX of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

dwr r-6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? Y" Nl LID N/A-YJW NO U- N/AD YX' NEI UL N/AD YO ND UDI N/Ajg YJ NO UID Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. < C-3>PAGE 115 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-/IMF-Equip. Classt" 204,JrS-1vxr AtleW / T-zo 14 Equipment Description /4" T- W47" 5,Ur/?o,/A /M ,E4.'I6 '/ 648 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YP NO UC N/AO Y4 NO VC N/AO YL9 NO UC N/AC YX NE UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YjX NC UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessiuy) Evaluated by: QJZA /. ./ .4./ Date: _ /' " M4.f f j r4w 'rim 1/2 L 12-j 4 C-4 >PAGE 116 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0~, PAGE 117 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 118 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 119 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:n N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo. 2E16 P-f I4 Equip. C .asszC L ra 4'/rMOZ ,4A'64)Equipment Description S-f5$/,,v, pA1 E: 7?.t/'Location: Bldg. eO/,,oz Floor El. ZOO' Room, Area &d4 76 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y4 NO'of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Y;R NC] UC] N/AC]YJX NEI UE] N/AC 3, Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface AlM'oR f.y/oA,/ce" 9./g.i,?.-

OPA 7-i-e $sqs6 49, MA14/-e (49Ar S1,06) 47'7-,.;,etr/1Aj4z.- $,7-)eiP ' , " ,,,e / e: ., 4. bg 6 f p eo64 a c 4. es ~anc iorage free of v~si~l6racks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NLC] UC] NIA, i~e-p- ',v Hcr1,A' T, gF~v&eP6F4 s5rcF4 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) 2XS'A630t-0ooc/4/ Vag,. 7".o 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? Y[ NC] UC] N/AC YK NO] U 12 Enter "he equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. < C-3 >PAGE 120 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. $OEquip. Class'2 Zo Equipment Description ,WA4 .7T1,VA" Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N[:D U- N/A-YX NEI UD N/AD Yg ND UD N/AD-YX NEI UD1 Other Adverse Conditions 1.1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yq ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) //*oNLE Evaluated by: 4'- ~ ~ e 7 go/?-__. 1< C-4 >, PAGE 121 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 122 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 123 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .00 PAGE 124 of 433 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 125 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status: ON U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -[r Os- "f Equip. Class'2 t c.n ., -ZO Equipment Description -i;a Su .2.4d t J Ts-I ccf- -r-; A Location: Bldg. Cai4ti[( Floor El. X)-0' Room, Area (o-&o( Ratv, ÷.,' -l. cko- 2, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) .Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yo NW of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YK NE UDl N/AD]YX NEI UD N/AD 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO ND] UD NIAX iuF1ýP, D Tv FA8-fED5 1-7>A77-6 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YD ND- UDO N/Ar rE/ND UD Y1Y NO bOI 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes ofEquipment. < C-3 >PAGE 126 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 s-rp Equip. Class'2 .CT.OkW.1r,61 Equipment Description .5014 YW SA ( -w; 7-'04- -" T i Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y NO U' N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yg NI- uiO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YJ9 NE UO N/A 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YX NEi Ui of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y; NE Uli adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

i1t / 4 a P I !; -,5 -//f 90o 7/-/ -lb .A, /,. --T Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by: t.~'O V~~AS/~ Date: ~ $ e~Z*ý-Vk/' M"qýw W;Jý:nsaý3)1 2-012-4 C-4 >PAGE 127 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 128 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ,/PAGE 129 of 433 I ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0R PAGE 130 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: YoU Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

" SOO ') Equip. Class'2 2 (LOW Voi*. S-4'Jef)Equipment Description id.ocIv( 1-rt Location:

Bldg. Co0n1'OI Floor El. I O' Room, Area 90 7 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yk(N-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y[] NEI UWN/AEI YEI NEI UWN/A-YEI NEI UO'N/Ar]YEI NOI UO"N/AQ-6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NE] W potentially adverse seismic conditions? 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. <C-3 >PAGE 131 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo. 2-}<,(rO0-Equip. Class' 2 [ LOtI wVol ý ' hI,' Iof)Equipment Description 4-rýci 1Thr,I Sw,'ltt 4 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines hbve adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Ye NEI UC- N/AC1 Y~f NC-] UC N/AC YCI NO'U0 N/AC Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YC) No( UC adversely affect the safety functions of the e ui ment?kkr ivC& 51703Z.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

No oAJNUVUý ( omifiJd../ MdA4L i'It$y Evaluated by:~Q 6 z~4 v(j~Date: _/_____U k?< C-4 >PAGE 132 of 433}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-12-2271,_Vogtle,_Unit_2,_SNCV061-RPT-02,_Ver._1.0,_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic,_Part_4_of_14&oldid=908766"