ML15313A062
| ML15313A062 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 11/06/2015 |
| From: | Division of Reactor Safety III |
| To: | |
| Zoia, C D | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML15124A054 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML15313A062 (3) | |
Text
ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 Tier I Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KIA SRO 295038 2.2.12 295038 2.2.12 was rejected because a psychometrically sound question 1/1 went to concerning knowledge of surveillance procedures in regards to High Off-700000 2.2.37 site Release Rate could not be written at the appropriate license level. Also rejected 295038 because of oversampling with the the IL T 14-1 Audit exam. Reselected E/APE 700000 from the list of T1G1 SRO topics because it was the only E/APE in T1G1 that had not been sampled on the IL T 14-1 Audit exam. Rejected 700000 2.2.12 because the only surveillance associated with Generator Voltage and Electric Grid Disturbances is 9082.01, which is required by a 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> action statement in ITS LCO 3.8.1 and is therefore RO knowledge. Randomly reselected generic KA 2.2.37 from the list of system generic KAs listed in ES-401 D.1.b. SRO 295002 A2.01 295002 was rejected due to oversampling with 062 on the RO written 1/2 went to exam. Randomly reselected 295032 from the remaining E/APEs in T1/G2 295032 A2.01 (SRO) and retained A2.01 to maintain outline balance. SRO 295034 A2.02 E/APE was rejected to prevent double jeopardy with 085. Randomly 1/2 went to reselected from the remaining 7 E/APEs in T1 G2 that are not being 295007 A2.02 sampled on the T1 G2 RO Written Exam (295007, 295008, 295010, 295012, 295013, 295017, and 295020). Did not include any of the secondary containment E/APEs in this list (295032, 295033, 295034, 295035, or 295036) because of the limited number of actions in EOP-8 Secondary Containment Control and the coverage these E/APEs have received on the IL T 14-1 Comprehensive Exams (3 questions), Audit Exam (1 question), and NRC Exam (1 question). SRO 295014 2.4.21 E/APE was rejected due to oversampling with RO 060. Randomly 1/2 went to reselected 295012 and retained 2.4.21 to maintain outline balance. 295012 2.4.21 SRO 263000 A2.02 KA was rejected due to inability to write a psychometrically sound question 2/1 went to at the appropriate license level. Reselected the remaining A2 KA available 263000 A2.01 in 263000 (A2.01}. SRO 2.2.43 KA was rejected due to inability to write a psychometrically sound question 3 went to at the appropriate license level. Knowledge of the process used to track 2.2.14 inoperable alarms requires RO level knowledge. SRO 245000 2.4.3 KA was rejected due to inability to write a psychometrically sound question 212 went to at the appropriate license level. Randomly reselected 214000 2.2.25 from 214000 2.2.25 the list of available systems not sampled on the RO written exam and the unused system generic KAs listed in ES-401 D.1.b paragraph 5. SRO 2.3.4 KA was rejected to eliminate overlap with the IL T 14-1 Audit Exam 096. 3 went to Randomly reselected 2.3.5 from the list of remaining generic KAs suitable 2.3.5 for use in Tier 3. SRO 205000 A2.04 KA was rejected due to inability to write a psychometrically sound question 2/1 went to at the appropriate license level. A DC failure has minimal impact for the 205000 A2.03 Shutdown Cooling Mode of AHR. Randomly reselected 205000 A2.03 from the list of remaining A2 KAs in 205000. SRO 217000 2.1.32 KA was rejected due to inability to write a psychometrically sound question 2/1 went to at the appropriate license level. The ability to explain and apply system ES-401, Page 27 of 33 217000 2.4.9 limits and precautions is RO level knowledge. Randomly reselected 2.4.9 from the list of available system generic KAs listed in ES-401 D.1.b paragraph 5. RO 295016A1.03 E/APE was rejected because there is no way to monitor rod positions T1G1 went to outside the MCA at Clinton Power Station. Randomly reselected 295016 295016 A 1.08 A 1.08 from the remaining A 1 topics in 295016. RO 295038 A2.01 E/APE was rejected because a psychometrically sound question could not T1G1 went to be written at the appropriate license level. The determination of "off-site" 295038 K3.04 releases is used in making E-Plan declarations, and is thus SRO only knowledge. E/APE was replaced with A2.01 (see 295026 below) to maintain outline balance. RO 295026 K3.02 E/APE was rejected because an appropriate RO question could not be T1G1 went to written for the A2 statements in E/APE 295038. E/APE was replaced with 295026 A2.01 A2.01 to maintain outline balance due to rejection of 295038 A2.01. RO 295002 A 1.04 E/APE was rejected to prevent overlap with 027 on the ILT 14-1 Audit T1G2 went to Exam, and was replaced with randomly selected E/APE 295002A1.05 to 295002 A 1.05 maintain outline balance. RO 205000 K4.01 KA was rejected to prevent duplication with 044 on the IL T 14-1 NRC T2G1 went to Written Exam. 044 (295021 K2.06) was written to test examinee's 205000 K4.02 knowledge of the impact of a high AHR heat exchanger room ambient temperature condition on the Shutdown Cooling System and the resultant impact on head spray. Randomly reselected 205000 K4.02 from the remaining K4 topics in 205000 to maintain outline balance. RO 215004 A4.03 KA was rejected due to inability to write a psychometrically sound question T2G1 went to at the appropriate license level. Randomly reselected 215004 A4.06 to 215004 A4.06 maintain outline balance. RO 209002 2.4.1 KA was rejected due to Generic Section 2.4 Emergency Procedures I Plan T2G1 went to which are not suitable for Tier 2 System KA's. Randomly reselected 209002 2.1.27 System Generic KA 2.1.27 to maintain outline balance. RO 264000 A 1.01 KA was rejected due to lack of DG lube oil temperature monitoring T2G1 went to instrumentation in the MCA. DG lube oil temperature monitoring is 264000 A 1.03 performed by non-licensed operators in the field. Randomly reselected 264000 A 1.03 from the remaining A 1 KAs in 264000. RO 262002 A4.01 KA was rejected to eliminate duplication with 046 on the ILT 14-1 Audit T2G1 went to Exam. Since 262002 A4 only contains one topic, KA was replaced with 262002 K6.01 262002 K6.01 in a swap with 259002 Reactor Water Level Control to maintain outline balance. RO 259002 K6.05 KA was rejected and replaced with a randomly selected A4 topic due to T2G1 went to rejection of 262002 A4.01 described above. 259002 A4.02 RO 202001 K3.06 KA was rejected because there are no RR System malfunctions that T2G2 went to directly affect LPCI injection logic. KA was replaced with A3.07 to maintain 202001 A3.07 outline balance due to rejection of 290001 A3.02 discussed below. RO 290001 A3.02 KA was rejected to eliminate duplication with 062 on the ILT 14-1 Audit T2G2 went to Exam. In addition, to prevent overlap with 030 on the IL T 14-1 written 241000 K3.06 exam, 241000 was randomly reselected from the list of T2G2 systems. K3.06 was chosen due to rejection of 202001 K3.06 described above. RO 226001 KS.06 KA was rejected because there are no operational implications of vacuum T2G2 went to breaker operation while Containment Spray is in service at Clinton (neither 226001 A4.08 procedural or system restrictions exist. The remaining KS topic in 226001 with an IA of> 2.5 (KS.02) was also rejected because a psychometrically sound question could not be written at the appropriate license level. Swapped KS.06 with the A4.08 in 239000 to maintain outline balance. RO 239001 A4.08 Swapped statements with 226001 as described in the line above. T2G2 went to 239001 K5.06 ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 RO 233000 K2.02 KA was rejected to eliminate double jeopardy with RO 058 which requires T2G2 went to knowledge of the power supplies to the LPCI Pumps to answer. Since the 233000 K6.01 remaining K2 topic (233000 K2.01) has an IA of 2.1, swapped K6 topics with 259001 Reactor Feedwater and randomly reselected K6.01 from the 4 K6 topics with IRs > 2.5. RO 259001 K6.13 K6 topic in 259001 was swapped with the K6 topic in 233000 as described T2G2 went to above. Randomly reselected 259001 1<2.03. 259001 K2.03 RO 295011 2.4.41 E/APE was rejected due to inability to write a psychometrically sound T1G2 went to question at the appropriate license level. EAL thresholds and 295011 2.4.46 classifications are SRO only knowledge. Randomly reselected 2.4.46 Ability to verify that the alarms are consistent with the plant conditions. ROT3 2.1.03 KA was rejected to prevent overlap with 066 on Comp Exam #1. went to Randomly reselected 2.1.29. 2.1.29 ROT3 2.3.13 KA was rejected to prevent overlap with 099 on the IL T 14-1 SRO written went to exam. Randomly reselected 2.3.14. 2.3.14 ROT3 2.3.4 KA was rejected due to inability to write a psychometrically sound question went to at the appropriate license level. All personnel on-site are required to know 2.3.15 their exposure limits. Randomly reselected 2.3.15 from the list of available KA 2.3 topics. SROT3 2.1.13 KA was rejected due to inability to write a psychometrically sound question went to at the appropriate license level. Main Control Room access control is a 2.1.9 shared responsibility between the RO's and SRO's, so the SRO-only justification could not be made. Randomly reselected 2.1.9 to maintain outline balance. ES-401, Page 27 of 33 ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 Tier I Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KIA SRO 295038 2.2.12 295038 2.2.12 was rejected because a psychometrically sound question 1/1 went to concerning knowledge of surveillance procedures in regards to High Off-700000 2.2.37 site Release Rate could not be written at the appropriate license level. Also rejected 295038 because of oversampling with the the IL T 14-1 Audit exam. Reselected E/APE 700000 from the list of T1G1 SRO topics because it was the only E/APE in T1G1 that had not been sampled on the IL T 14-1 Audit exam. Rejected 700000 2.2.12 because the only surveillance associated with Generator Voltage and Electric Grid Disturbances is 9082.01, which is required by a 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> action statement in ITS LCO 3.8.1 and is therefore RO knowledge. Randomly reselected generic KA 2.2.37 from the list of system generic KAs listed in ES-401 D.1.b. SRO 295002 A2.01 295002 was rejected due to oversampling with 062 on the RO written 1/2 went to exam. Randomly reselected 295032 from the remaining E/APEs in T1/G2 295032 A2.01 (SRO) and retained A2.01 to maintain outline balance. SRO 295034 A2.02 E/APE was rejected to prevent double jeopardy with 085. Randomly 1/2 went to reselected from the remaining 7 E/APEs in T1 G2 that are not being 295007 A2.02 sampled on the T1 G2 RO Written Exam (295007, 295008, 295010, 295012, 295013, 295017, and 295020). Did not include any of the secondary containment E/APEs in this list (295032, 295033, 295034, 295035, or 295036) because of the limited number of actions in EOP-8 Secondary Containment Control and the coverage these E/APEs have received on the IL T 14-1 Comprehensive Exams (3 questions), Audit Exam (1 question), and NRC Exam (1 question). SRO 295014 2.4.21 E/APE was rejected due to oversampling with RO 060. Randomly 1/2 went to reselected 295012 and retained 2.4.21 to maintain outline balance. 295012 2.4.21 SRO 263000 A2.02 KA was rejected due to inability to write a psychometrically sound question 2/1 went to at the appropriate license level. Reselected the remaining A2 KA available 263000 A2.01 in 263000 (A2.01}. SRO 2.2.43 KA was rejected due to inability to write a psychometrically sound question 3 went to at the appropriate license level. Knowledge of the process used to track 2.2.14 inoperable alarms requires RO level knowledge. SRO 245000 2.4.3 KA was rejected due to inability to write a psychometrically sound question 212 went to at the appropriate license level. Randomly reselected 214000 2.2.25 from 214000 2.2.25 the list of available systems not sampled on the RO written exam and the unused system generic KAs listed in ES-401 D.1.b paragraph 5. SRO 2.3.4 KA was rejected to eliminate overlap with the IL T 14-1 Audit Exam 096. 3 went to Randomly reselected 2.3.5 from the list of remaining generic KAs suitable 2.3.5 for use in Tier 3. SRO 205000 A2.04 KA was rejected due to inability to write a psychometrically sound question 2/1 went to at the appropriate license level. A DC failure has minimal impact for the 205000 A2.03 Shutdown Cooling Mode of AHR. Randomly reselected 205000 A2.03 from the list of remaining A2 KAs in 205000. SRO 217000 2.1.32 KA was rejected due to inability to write a psychometrically sound question 2/1 went to at the appropriate license level. The ability to explain and apply system ES-401, Page 27 of 33 217000 2.4.9 limits and precautions is RO level knowledge. Randomly reselected 2.4.9 from the list of available system generic KAs listed in ES-401 D.1.b paragraph 5. RO 295016A1.03 E/APE was rejected because there is no way to monitor rod positions T1G1 went to outside the MCA at Clinton Power Station. Randomly reselected 295016 295016 A 1.08 A 1.08 from the remaining A 1 topics in 295016. RO 295038 A2.01 E/APE was rejected because a psychometrically sound question could not T1G1 went to be written at the appropriate license level. The determination of "off-site" 295038 K3.04 releases is used in making E-Plan declarations, and is thus SRO only knowledge. E/APE was replaced with A2.01 (see 295026 below) to maintain outline balance. RO 295026 K3.02 E/APE was rejected because an appropriate RO question could not be T1G1 went to written for the A2 statements in E/APE 295038. E/APE was replaced with 295026 A2.01 A2.01 to maintain outline balance due to rejection of 295038 A2.01. RO 295002 A 1.04 E/APE was rejected to prevent overlap with 027 on the ILT 14-1 Audit T1G2 went to Exam, and was replaced with randomly selected E/APE 295002A1.05 to 295002 A 1.05 maintain outline balance. RO 205000 K4.01 KA was rejected to prevent duplication with 044 on the IL T 14-1 NRC T2G1 went to Written Exam. 044 (295021 K2.06) was written to test examinee's 205000 K4.02 knowledge of the impact of a high AHR heat exchanger room ambient temperature condition on the Shutdown Cooling System and the resultant impact on head spray. Randomly reselected 205000 K4.02 from the remaining K4 topics in 205000 to maintain outline balance. RO 215004 A4.03 KA was rejected due to inability to write a psychometrically sound question T2G1 went to at the appropriate license level. Randomly reselected 215004 A4.06 to 215004 A4.06 maintain outline balance. RO 209002 2.4.1 KA was rejected due to Generic Section 2.4 Emergency Procedures I Plan T2G1 went to which are not suitable for Tier 2 System KA's. Randomly reselected 209002 2.1.27 System Generic KA 2.1.27 to maintain outline balance. RO 264000 A 1.01 KA was rejected due to lack of DG lube oil temperature monitoring T2G1 went to instrumentation in the MCA. DG lube oil temperature monitoring is 264000 A 1.03 performed by non-licensed operators in the field. Randomly reselected 264000 A 1.03 from the remaining A 1 KAs in 264000. RO 262002 A4.01 KA was rejected to eliminate duplication with 046 on the ILT 14-1 Audit T2G1 went to Exam. Since 262002 A4 only contains one topic, KA was replaced with 262002 K6.01 262002 K6.01 in a swap with 259002 Reactor Water Level Control to maintain outline balance. RO 259002 K6.05 KA was rejected and replaced with a randomly selected A4 topic due to T2G1 went to rejection of 262002 A4.01 described above. 259002 A4.02 RO 202001 K3.06 KA was rejected because there are no RR System malfunctions that T2G2 went to directly affect LPCI injection logic. KA was replaced with A3.07 to maintain 202001 A3.07 outline balance due to rejection of 290001 A3.02 discussed below. RO 290001 A3.02 KA was rejected to eliminate duplication with 062 on the ILT 14-1 Audit T2G2 went to Exam. In addition, to prevent overlap with 030 on the IL T 14-1 written 241000 K3.06 exam, 241000 was randomly reselected from the list of T2G2 systems. K3.06 was chosen due to rejection of 202001 K3.06 described above. RO 226001 KS.06 KA was rejected because there are no operational implications of vacuum T2G2 went to breaker operation while Containment Spray is in service at Clinton (neither 226001 A4.08 procedural or system restrictions exist. The remaining KS topic in 226001 with an IA of> 2.5 (KS.02) was also rejected because a psychometrically sound question could not be written at the appropriate license level. Swapped KS.06 with the A4.08 in 239000 to maintain outline balance. RO 239001 A4.08 Swapped statements with 226001 as described in the line above. T2G2 went to 239001 K5.06 ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 RO 233000 K2.02 KA was rejected to eliminate double jeopardy with RO 058 which requires T2G2 went to knowledge of the power supplies to the LPCI Pumps to answer. Since the 233000 K6.01 remaining K2 topic (233000 K2.01) has an IA of 2.1, swapped K6 topics with 259001 Reactor Feedwater and randomly reselected K6.01 from the 4 K6 topics with IRs > 2.5. RO 259001 K6.13 K6 topic in 259001 was swapped with the K6 topic in 233000 as described T2G2 went to above. Randomly reselected 259001 1<2.03. 259001 K2.03 RO 295011 2.4.41 E/APE was rejected due to inability to write a psychometrically sound T1G2 went to question at the appropriate license level. EAL thresholds and 295011 2.4.46 classifications are SRO only knowledge. Randomly reselected 2.4.46 Ability to verify that the alarms are consistent with the plant conditions. ROT3 2.1.03 KA was rejected to prevent overlap with 066 on Comp Exam #1. went to Randomly reselected 2.1.29. 2.1.29 ROT3 2.3.13 KA was rejected to prevent overlap with 099 on the IL T 14-1 SRO written went to exam. Randomly reselected 2.3.14. 2.3.14 ROT3 2.3.4 KA was rejected due to inability to write a psychometrically sound question went to at the appropriate license level. All personnel on-site are required to know 2.3.15 their exposure limits. Randomly reselected 2.3.15 from the list of available KA 2.3 topics. SROT3 2.1.13 KA was rejected due to inability to write a psychometrically sound question went to at the appropriate license level. Main Control Room access control is a 2.1.9 shared responsibility between the RO's and SRO's, so the SRO-only justification could not be made. Randomly reselected 2.1.9 to maintain outline balance. ES-401, Page 27 of 33