ML15313A064
| ML15313A064 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 11/06/2015 |
| From: | Division of Reactor Safety III |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML15124A054 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML15313A064 (2) | |
Text
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Clinton Date of Exam: 3/26/15 Exam Level: RO~ SRO Item Description
- 1.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading
- 2.
Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check >25% of examinations)
- 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/- 4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
- 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
- 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name I Signature
- a. Author Ton D. Jennin s I
- b. Facility Reviewer(')
Jim Lucas I
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)
- d. NRG Supervisor(*)
Initials a
b Date 3130/15 3130/15
(')
The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 5 of 5 c
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 Facilit : CLINTON Date of Exam: 3/26/2015 Exam Level: RO 5{)
SRO C8J Initials Item Descri tion a
b c
- 1.
Clean answer sheets co ied before
- 2.
Answer key changes and question deletions justified rJ /J.
and documented
?:
- 3.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors
~f ~ Jt-(reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations
- 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, (3f ~
licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail as a
- 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades 8f JZ-If are *ustified
- 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training Bf oz-ff deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a Ii cants Printed Name/Signature Date
- a. Grader J)RC
- b.,J:.aemty Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor(*)
~ ~-
4m,/t5
~~~~
~ I 4'
Lffaz/;s
¢~-!
(*)
The facility reviewer's signature is not app icable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
~'5 4/'lJI 15
'f~v~
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Clinton Date of Exam: 3/26/15 Exam Level: RO~ SRO Item Description
- 1.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading
- 2.
Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check >25% of examinations)
- 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/- 4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
- 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
- 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name I Signature
- a. Author Ton D. Jennin s I
- b. Facility Reviewer(')
Jim Lucas I
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)
- d. NRG Supervisor(*)
Initials a
b Date 3130/15 3130/15
(')
The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 5 of 5 c
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 Facilit : CLINTON Date of Exam: 3/26/2015 Exam Level: RO 5{)
SRO C8J Initials Item Descri tion a
b c
- 1.
Clean answer sheets co ied before
- 2.
Answer key changes and question deletions justified rJ /J.
and documented
?:
- 3.
Applicants' scores checked for addition errors
~f ~ Jt-(reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations
- 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, (3f ~
licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail as a
- 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades 8f JZ-If are *ustified
- 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training Bf oz-ff deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a Ii cants Printed Name/Signature Date
- a. Grader J)RC
- b.,J:.aemty Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor(*)
~ ~-
4m,/t5
~~~~
~ I 4'
Lffaz/;s
¢~-!
(*)
The facility reviewer's signature is not app icable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
~'5 4/'lJI 15
'f~v~