ML15313A064

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2015 Clinton Power Station Initial License Examination Forms ES-403-1
ML15313A064
Person / Time
Site: Clinton Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/06/2015
From:
Division of Reactor Safety III
To:
Shared Package
ML15124A054 List:
References
Download: ML15313A064 (2)


Text

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Clinton Date of Exam: 3/26/15 Exam Level : RO~ SRO Initials Item Description a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check >25% of examinations)
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/- 4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name I Signature Date
a. Author Ton D. Jennin s I 3130/ 15
b. Facility Reviewer(') Jim Lucas I 3130/15
c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)
d. NRG Supervisor(*)

(') The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facilit : CLINTON Date of Exam: 3/26/2015 Exam Level: RO 5{) SRO C8J Initials Item Descri tion a b c

1. Clean answer sheets co ied before ~'5
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented rJ/J.  ?:
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations ~f ~ Jt- 4/'lJI 15
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail (3f ~ 'f~v~
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are *ustified 8f JZ- If
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of Bf oz- ff uestions missed b half or more of the a Ii cants Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Grader ~ ~- 4m,/t5

~~~~

J)R C

b. ,J:.aemty Reviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) ~I 4' Lffaz/;s
d. NRC Supervisor(*) ¢~-!

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not app icable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Clinton Date of Exam: 3/26/15 Exam Level : RO~ SRO Initials Item Description a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check >25% of examinations)
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/- 4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name I Signature Date
a. Author Ton D. Jennin s I 3130/ 15
b. Facility Reviewer(') Jim Lucas I 3130/15
c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)
d. NRG Supervisor(*)

(') The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facilit : CLINTON Date of Exam: 3/26/2015 Exam Level: RO 5{) SRO C8J Initials Item Descri tion a b c

1. Clean answer sheets co ied before ~'5
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented rJ/J.  ?:
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations ~f ~ Jt- 4/'lJI 15
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail (3f ~ 'f~v~
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are *ustified 8f JZ- If
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of Bf oz- ff uestions missed b half or more of the a Ii cants Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Grader ~ ~- 4m,/t5

~~~~

J)R C

b. ,J:.aemty Reviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) ~I 4' Lffaz/;s
d. NRC Supervisor(*) ¢~-!

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not app icable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.