ML24009A184

From kanterella
Revision as of 23:37, 20 February 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (13) of Sean Bryan on Vistra Operations Company LLC; Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML24009A184
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 12/24/2023
From: Bryan S
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Office of Administration
References
88FR75629 00013, NRC-2022-0183
Download: ML24009A184 (1)


Text

1/9/24, 10:51 AM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/add242dd-7402-4707-bb21-a414a51102d3 SUNSI Review Complete Template=ADM-013 E-RIDS=ADM-03 As of: 1/9/24, 10:50 AM Received: December 24, 2023 PUBLIC SUBMISSION ADD: Tam Tran, Status: Pending_Post Antoinette Walker-Smith, Lance Rakovan, CarolineTracking No. lqj-sa7g-ikom Hsu, Mary Neely Comment (13)

Comments Due: December 26, 2023 Publication Date: Submission Type: Web 11/3/2023 Citation: 88 FR 75629 Docket: NRC-2022-0183 Vistra Operations Company LLC Comanche Peak Power Company LLC Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 Comment On: NRC-2022-0183-2581 Vistra Operations Company LLC; Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 Document: NRC-2022-0183-DRAFT-2589 Comment on FR Doc # 2023-24294 Submitter Information Name: Sean Bryan Address:

Glen Rose, TX, 76043 General Comment I own a residence in Somervell County and am in favor of the 20 year extension of the Comanche Peak licenses. I reviewed the draft environmental impact statement and participated in the on-line meeting on December 21. I have seen the numerous identical form comments opposed to the renewal but they seem to just regurgitate theoretical problems.

I do not see from the environmental review any material problems. I have not heard from the community any known material problems. Certainly, there is concern about aging materials, but it is not reasonable to think that will not be monitored and addressed. I heard advocacy for renewable energy sources and other non-nuclear sources of power for the State of Texas, but numerous problems are beginning to be reported with other renewable energy sources and it seems unreasonable to assume that changes in climate will not negatively effect current sources, such as wind farms. Nuclear power is clean and certain and known, and because of the increasing population of Texas we need dependable sources of power. Comanche Peak is a necessary part of the current power plan.

blob:https://www.fdms.gov/add242dd-7402-4707-bb21-a414a51102d3 1/1