Similar Documents at Fermi |
---|
Category:GENERAL EXTERNAL TECHNICAL REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20153B7921998-08-31031 August 1998 Rev 0 to Fermi 1 Sar ML20197A9921997-12-15015 December 1997 Rev 0 to Efp,Unit 1 Fermi 1 Sar ML20148A3191997-05-0202 May 1997 SE Summary Rept for Fermi 2, Rev 1 ML20137N1261997-03-25025 March 1997 Rev 0 to Leak-Before-Break Evaluation for Three Locations on Recirculation Sys at Fermi 2 ML20133A2311996-12-19019 December 1996 Ferm 2 CR Simulator Four Yr Rept ML20129A3511996-03-15015 March 1996 Rev 0 to Cchvac Duct & Duct Support Qualification ML20134J6241996-03-13013 March 1996 Rev 0 to Tmr 96-0003, Safety Evaluation ML20083A7591995-05-0808 May 1995 Safety Evaluation Summary Rept, Rev 7 NRC-94-0093, Main Turbine-Generator Vibration Monitoring & Balancing During Start-Up After RF041994-10-0707 October 1994 Main Turbine-Generator Vibration Monitoring & Balancing During Start-Up After RF04 ML20076J6211994-10-0606 October 1994 Safety Evaluation of Rev a to Edp 26726 ML20076J5831994-08-31031 August 1994 Turbine Failure Post-Event Earthquake Passive Instrumentation Data Evaluation ML20076J6081994-08-27027 August 1994 Root Cause Analyses of Fermi 2 Main Turbine Generator Event, Executive Summary ML20076J5891994-08-0808 August 1994 Structural Walkdown Final Rept ML20093N4781994-03-0303 March 1994 Gamma Spectroscopy Analysis Rept ML20093N4901994-03-0303 March 1994 Gamma Spectroscopy Analysis Rept ML20064L9841994-02-0404 February 1994 Turbine Failure,Post-Event Earthquake Instrumentation Data Evaluation ML20126J1141992-12-30030 December 1992 Nuclear Training Simulator Certification ML20099B9921992-07-10010 July 1992 Rev 0 to Updated NUREG-0619 Feedwater Nozzle Fatigue Crack Growth Analysis,Fermi Nuclear Power Plant Unit 2 ML20086P2551991-12-31031 December 1991 Nuclear Training Simulator Certification NRC-91-0039, Safety Evaluation Summary Rept 19901991-03-18018 March 1991 Safety Evaluation Summary Rept 1990 NRC-90-0041, Safety Evaluation Re as-built Notices1989-12-31031 December 1989 Safety Evaluation Re as-built Notices NRC-90-0104, Rev 1 to Decommissioning Cost Study of Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 11989-11-0808 November 1989 Rev 1 to Decommissioning Cost Study of Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 1 ML19354D4801989-10-20020 October 1989 Rev 1 to Safety Evaluation. ML19324B7551989-09-30030 September 1989 Radioiodine & Particle Transmission Through Sampling Lines for Standby Gas Treatment Sys Effluents at Fermi 2, Final Rept ML20248E7021989-09-30030 September 1989 Control Sys Common Power Source Failure Analysis Evaluation Rept for Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2 ML20247H8991989-08-31031 August 1989 Control Sys Common Sensor Line Failure Analysis Evaluation Rept for Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2 ML20245B3851989-06-13013 June 1989 ATWS Alternate Rod Insertion & Recirculation Pump Trip Response to NRC Rule 10CFR50.62 ML20235J4271987-09-30030 September 1987 Supplemental Environ Info Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 1 ML20235G3041987-09-29029 September 1987 Partially Withheld, Preliminary Investigation of Enrico Fermi II Nuclear Power Plant ML20237K6061987-07-31031 July 1987 Suppl 1 to Dcrdr ML20236C8291987-06-29029 June 1987 Preimplementation Audit Rept for Dcrdr for Fermi-2 ML20234C9821987-05-21021 May 1987 Insp Followup of Failure of South Reactor Feed Pump Turbine,Fermi Unit 2 Nuclear Power Plant, Technical Review Rept ML20236C8601987-05-11011 May 1987 Post-Implementation Audit Rept for Fermi-2,SPDS ML20204F1701987-01-31031 January 1987 Maint,Mod & Outage Mgt Monthly Rept. Maint/Mods for Period Ending 870222, Manpower Tracking - Labor Distribution & Period Ending 870125, Hours by Craft Rept, Also Encl ML20209B8231987-01-30030 January 1987 Rev a to Heavy Loads Handling Review,Control of Heavy Loads Over or in Close Proximity to Irradiated Fuel or Critical Safety Sys Components ML20214Q4521986-11-30030 November 1986 Dcrdr Summary Rept,Fermi 2 ML20211D4211986-10-0303 October 1986 Preliminary Steam Bypass Line Structural Evaluation ML20211D3961986-10-0303 October 1986 Preliminary Rept on Main Steam Bypass Piping Fatigue Analysis & Life Expectancy ML20214J8391986-08-31031 August 1986 Final Rept on Metallurgical Investigation of Various Defects on Surfaces of Diesel Engine Aluminum-Tin Bearings ML20209E7591986-07-0202 July 1986 Response to Independent Overview Committee ML20213A5901986-06-30030 June 1986 Investigation of Surface Scoring of Main Bearings:Fairbanks Morse 38TD8-1/8 Diesels at Fermi II Power Plant ML20209E7791986-06-26026 June 1986 Program to Evaluate & Resolve Engineering Issues ML20141M9441986-01-30030 January 1986 Evaluation of Detroit Edison Mgt at Fermi 2 ML20237J4711985-08-31031 August 1985 Rev 1 to Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2 Primary Containment Negative Pressure Analysis ML20128B7251985-06-30030 June 1985 Rev 4 to Evaluation of Containment Coatings A10089, Investigation of Engine Bearing Distress in Fairbanks-Morse Emergency Diesel Generators at Fermi-II Power Plant, Phase 1:Insp & Preliminary Conclusions1985-02-28028 February 1985 Investigation of Engine Bearing Distress in Fairbanks-Morse Emergency Diesel Generators at Fermi-II Power Plant, Phase 1:Insp & Preliminary Conclusions ML20115F3901985-02-28028 February 1985 Transfix Sys Description. W/Four Proprietary Drawings 8911-M-2000,2001,2006 & 9402-M-2100 Re Transfix Sys P&Id. Drawings Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML20115F4381985-02-28028 February 1985 Comparison of NUS Process Svcs Corp Mobile Radwaste Processing Sys W/Guidelines of Us NRC Reg Guide 1.143 ML20117D5201985-01-31031 January 1985 Rev 0 to Mark I Wetwell to Drywell Differential Pressure Load & Vacuum Breaker Response for Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2 ML20106G1221985-01-31031 January 1985 Evaluation of Fire Detection Placement at Fermi 2 1998-08-31
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217N4381999-10-25025 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 17 to License DPR-9 ML20217P3551999-10-22022 October 1999 LER 99-S01-00:on 990922,loaded 9mm Handgun Was Discovered on Truck Cargo Area of Vehicle Inside Protected Area.Caused by Inadequate Vehicle Search.Guidance in Procedures & Security Training to Address Multiple Vehicle Searches Was Provided NRC-99-0095, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Fermi 2.With NRC-99-0067, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Fermi 2.With NRC-99-0065, Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Fermi 2.With NRC-99-0088, Detroit Edison Co Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant,Unit 1 Annual Rept for Period 980701-990630. with1999-06-30030 June 1999 Detroit Edison Co Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant,Unit 1 Annual Rept for Period 980701-990630. with NRC-99-0064, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Fermi 2.With NRC-99-0062, Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Fermi 2.With ML20206J9301999-05-10010 May 1999 SER Concluding That Util Adequately Addressed Actions Requested in GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Powered-Operated Gate Valves ML20206G5081999-05-0505 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Approving Request for Relief PR-8,Rev 2 on Basis That Licensee Committed to Meet All Related Requirements of ASME OM-6 Std & PR-12 on Basis That Proposed Alternative Will Provide Acceptable Level of Safety NRC-99-0022, Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Fermi 2.With1999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Fermi 2.With ML20205Q7141999-04-15015 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 16 to License DPR-9 ML20205P9721999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Fermi 2 ML20204E0371999-03-17017 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Request for NRC Approval of Alternative Rv Weld Exam,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(i) & 10CFR50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(A)(5) for Plant,Unit 2 for 40-month Period ML20204D0361999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for Fermi 2 ML20198S3341999-01-0606 January 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 15 to License DPR-9 NRC-99-0005, Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Fermi 2.With1998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Fermi 2.With ML20207B7491998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Annual Operating Rept for Fermi 2 ML20205Q9621998-12-31031 December 1998 Revised Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-99-0021, 1998 Annual Financial Rept for Detroit Edison Co. with1998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Annual Financial Rept for Detroit Edison Co. with NRC-98-0153, Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1998 for Fermi 2.With1998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1998 for Fermi 2.With NRC-98-0160, Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for Fermi 2.With1998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for Fermi 2.With ML20154R2331998-10-21021 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 13 to License DPR-9 ML20154L1031998-10-14014 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Response to NRC Bulletin 95-002, Unexpected Clogging of Residual Heat Removal Pump Strainer While Operating in Suppression Pool Cooling Mode NRC-98-0139, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Fermi,Unit 2.With1998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Fermi,Unit 2.With ML20154H8161998-09-30030 September 1998 Rev 0 to COLR Cycle 7 for Fermi 2 ML20153B8811998-09-18018 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Request for Relief from Certain Requirements of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Xi,For Plant,Unit 2 ML20151X0651998-09-11011 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Re Inservice Testing Program Relief Request VR-63 for Plant NRC-98-0111, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1998 for Fermi 2.With1998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1998 for Fermi 2.With ML20153B7921998-08-31031 August 1998 Rev 0 to Fermi 1 Sar ML20237E1171998-08-25025 August 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Relief Requests for First 10-yr Interval Inservice Insp Nondestructive Exam Program ML20236X8611998-08-0505 August 1998 SER Related to Revised Feedwater Nozzle Analysis to Facility Operating License NPF-43,Enrico Fermi Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 NRC-98-0109, Monthly Operating Rept for July 1998 for Fermi 21998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1998 for Fermi 2 ML20236K3261998-07-0101 July 1998 SER Accepting Licensee Response Related to Revised Feedwater Nozzle Analysis to License NPF-43 for Enrico Fermi Nuclear Power Plant,Unit 2 NRC-98-0097, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1998 for Fermi,Unit 21998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1998 for Fermi,Unit 2 NRC-98-0127, Annual Rept for Period 970701-9806301998-06-30030 June 1998 Annual Rept for Period 970701-980630 NRC-98-0079, Monthly Operating Rept for May 1998 for Fermi 21998-05-31031 May 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-98-0076, Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1998 for Fermi 21998-04-30030 April 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-98-0072, Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1998 for Fermi 21998-03-31031 March 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-98-0050, Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1998 for Fermi 21998-02-28028 February 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1998 for Fermi 2 NRC-98-0019, Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1998 for Fermi 21998-01-31031 January 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1998 for Fermi 2 ML20198L4241998-01-0808 January 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Rev 2 to Relief Request VR-51 Under Fermi 2 Pump & Valve Inservice Testing Program Per 10CFR50.55a(f)(6)(i) for First 10-yr Interval NRC-98-0015, Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1997 for Fermi 21997-12-31031 December 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1997 for Fermi 2 ML20217N3821997-12-31031 December 1997 Annual Operating Rept for 970101-1231 NRC-98-0053, 1997 Annual Financial Rept for Detroit Edison Company1997-12-31031 December 1997 1997 Annual Financial Rept for Detroit Edison Company ML20205Q9601997-12-31031 December 1997 Revised Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1997 for Fermi 2 NRC-97-0141, Deficiency Rept Re Malfunction of EDG Number 11 Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR) Printed Circuit Board Rev B,Due to Failure of Operational Amplifier U8 Chip.Avr Board Rev B Was Sent Offsite to Independent Engineering Facility1997-12-23023 December 1997 Deficiency Rept Re Malfunction of EDG Number 11 Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR) Printed Circuit Board Rev B,Due to Failure of Operational Amplifier U8 Chip.Avr Board Rev B Was Sent Offsite to Independent Engineering Facility ML20197A9921997-12-15015 December 1997 Rev 0 to Efp,Unit 1 Fermi 1 Sar NRC-97-0131, Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1997 for Fermi 21997-11-30030 November 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1997 for Fermi 2 ML20248H1151997-10-31031 October 1997 Rev 1 to Colr,Cycle 6 for Fermi 2 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
.1; .
FERMI 2 INDEPENDENT OVERVIEW COMITTEE EVALUATION OF DETROIT EDISON MANAGEMENT AT FERMI 2 JANUARY 30, 1986 0
/
/
k'R. Calhoun, Chairman "
J ndependent Overview Committee 8603030094 860210 DR ADOCK 050 g 1 l
. 1, EVALUATION OF DETROIT EDISON MANAGEMENT AT FERMI 2 FERMI 2 INDEPENDENT OVERVIEW COMITTEE PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to present the results of the Independent Overview Committee's evaluation of the Fermi 2 management in accordance with that Comittee's charter. The Committee has been directed to identify, evaluate and analyze problems with management, management structure, and management systems.
INTRODUCTION By letter dated December 24, 1985, the Administrator for Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III requested that Detroit Edison furnish a response describing plans and programs to address management and programmatic weaknesses identified by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. This letter was issued in accordance with the provisions of 10CFR50.54(f) and specifically requested Detroit Edison to evaluate and address:
"The adequacy of management, management structures and systems that have contributed to the performance of Fermi 2; the adequacy of training to assure that responsible personnel recognize and respond, as appropriate, to significant safety conditions; and, changes in controls needed to assure improved regulatory performance. The areas of operations, maintenance, engineering and security should be included in your evaluation."
As part of Detroit Edison's program to respond to this letter, this Independent Overview Comittee was formed to provide advice to the Chief Executive Officer and the Board of Directors during startup testing of Fermt 2 and escalation to full power operation.
The Committee met initially with the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, the President, and the Vice President, Nuclear Operations to discuss the Committee's charter. The Chairman of the Board emphasized the independence of this Committee and indicated that channels are open for communication with personnel at all levels, with the Board Nuclear Review Committee, with the Board of Directors itself, or with any of its members.
During a one week period, the Comittee as a whole, or in groups of two or more members, interviewed the Vice President, Nuclear Operations, the Manager of Nuclear Operations, all four assistant managers, and other key managers in plant operation, maintenance, engineering, licensing, quality assurance, In addition, the entire security, administrative services, and training.
Committee also interviewed the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Senior Resident ,
Inspector. l
- r. .
During several sessions, the Committee evaluated and summarized the problems identified during the interviews and developed recommendations for possible corrective action. In reaching its conclusions, the Committee took advantage of the experience with Fermi 2 which some of its members have, either as members of the Nuclear Safety Review Group, as advisor to the plant manager, or as participants ir. other :cchnten1 and management work at Fermi 2.
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION Nc recognize that the Fermi 2 operating staff participated in plant completion and in the startup testing program up to five percent power. Furthermore, we find that management personnel are conscious of the need for safety in the operation, maintenance and support of Fenni 2.
While many elements of management are satisfactory, there are problems which have prevented the organization from achieving the high standards of performance to which Detroit Edison is comrr.itted. During the interviews, it was apparent that most of these problems had already been recognized by those persons interviewed. Following is the Independent Overview Committee's summary of the principal problems. We look forward to reviewing the responses to each of the problems identified below.
- A. Lack of Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Operatino Experience i
Of the levels of management and supervision from the Chairman of the Board down to the Nuclear Shift Supervisors, there is virtually no 4 experience with operating a commercial nuclear power plant. However, some personnel have naval reactor operating experience and others have been assigned for short periods at operating nuclear plants owned by '
other utilities.
- B. Leadership
- 1. Subordinates often do not know who is in charge, and in some cases have the impression that nobody is in charge.
- 2. Lack of a consistent definition of mission inhibits appropriate action.
- 3. Managers are reluctant to define goals and responsibilities and
! then require lower tier managers to carry them out.
- 4. The tendency of some upper level managers to engage in
{ micromanagement reduces the effectiveness of lower level managers and supervisors. ,
l
~
C. Accountability
- 1. Managers fail to hold their subordinates accountable and fail to follow up to verify accomplishment of assigned work.
- 2. In a few cases, demonstrated lack of management ability is accepted rather than corrected.
D. Management Ineffectiveness
- 1. There is some reluctance to face facts, identify problems, establish their sources or root causes, work toward timely and effective solutions, and take action to prevent recurrence.
- 2. There is evidence of lack of effective teamwork within the organization, in terms of concerted, combined efforts to support the needs of an operating plant.
- 3. Nuclear Production does not always receive the necessary support from other organizations at Fermi 2.
- 4. Planning is not effective for either short-term or long-term activities, and little consideration is given to contingency planning. ,
t 5. Unresolved interdepartmental conflicts persist.
- 6. Excessive amounts of time are taken to implement important agreements, management directives, and procedural changes.
- 7. Line management often abrogates its responsibilities by depending upon decisions by committee, a practice which results in too many meetings.
E. Organization
- 1. The division of responsibilities within Nuclear Engineering is not well balanced and reduces overall effectiveness of the organization.
- 2. The Quality Assurance organization does not report to a level of management consistent with the necessary emphasis on quality.
F. Management Systems
- 1. Administrative procedures and controls are excessively rigid and cumbersome.
- 2. There is no integrated system in use for planning, scheduling and establishing priorities for Nuclear Operations.
RECOW4ENDATIONS We consider that. Detroit Edison has sufficient management capabilities to develop the necessary action to resolve the problems listed above. i.c.ever, in the course of our deliberations, we formulated a number of recommendations which, if adopted, should result in overall improvements in the organization and management. We consider the recommendations and the actions to resolve the problems are not prerequisites for startup.
- 1. Intensify and expand efforts to recruit and hire personnel for certain key management positions who have extensive experter.ce with operating commercial nuclear power plants, with particular attention to positions in senior management.
- 2. For the Vice President, Nuclear Operations, provide an advisor who has extensive commerciel nuclear power plant experience, to serve in that capacity until the recommended recruitment efforts are successful.
- 3. Emphasize to other site organizations the importance of fully supporting Nuclear Production, with particular attention to resolution of conflicts with engineering, administration and security. A concerted team effort is needed to eliminate organizational and procedural impediments to accomplishing operational and maintenance objectives. ~
- 4. Establish challenging performance goals at all levels of management and, through a system of performance indicators, monitor progress toward achievement of those goals.
- 5. Realign the organizational structure of Nuclear Engineering and strengthen its overall management.
- 6. Acquire an expertenced nuclear security professional to improve the overall effectiveness of the Security organization. !
l 1
l
\
l 1
, _ ~ - - - - . _ - - - - . _ --,-.,_.m.--..,-....,__,.., ..-_,_s,- ,-.....r..,.. --