Similar Documents at Fermi |
|---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20217N4261999-10-25025 October 1999
Forwards Amend 17 to License DPR-9 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Revises TS by Deleting SR D.3.c,which Required Weekly Observation of Nitrogen Cover Gas Pressure within Sodium Storage Tanks Located in Sodium Building
NRC-99-0085, Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, IAW 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Without Encl1999-10-22022 October 1999
Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, IAW 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Without Encl
NRC-99-0094, Forwards Safeguards Event Rept 99-S01-00 for Reportable Event That Occurred on 990922.Commitments Made by Util Listed1999-10-22022 October 1999
Forwards Safeguards Event Rept 99-S01-00 for Reportable Event That Occurred on 990922.Commitments Made by Util Listed
ML20217P1661999-10-21021 October 1999
Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-17 on 990927-1005.No Violations Noted
ML20217M0771999-10-19019 October 1999
Confirms Discussion Between GL Shear,M Mitchell,E Kosky, D Williams,B Rumins,D Harmon & W Rutenberg in Public Meeting on 990923.Purpose of Meeting Was to Discuss Current Status RP Program at Enrico Fermi 2
ML20217N9231999-10-15015 October 1999
Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 40
ML20217E5671999-10-14014 October 1999
First Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Records in App a Already Available in Pdr.App B Records Encl & Being Released in Entirety
NRC-99-0087, Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-341/99-10.Licensee Contests Subject Violation,Due to Listed Reasons1999-10-12012 October 1999
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-341/99-10.Licensee Contests Subject Violation,Due to Listed Reasons
NRC-99-0083, Submits Requested Response to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal1999-10-0707 October 1999
Submits Requested Response to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal
ML20217D5331999-10-0707 October 1999
Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 39
ML20217F5931999-10-0707 October 1999
Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-11 on 990724-0908.Two Violations Re Failure to Follow Procedures While Sampling Standby Liquid Control Tank & Wear Dosimetry Properly Being Treated as Noncited Violations
ML20217B8261999-10-0404 October 1999
Forwards Summary of Decommissioning Insp Plan for Fy 2000. Plan Will Be Updated Annually & May Be Revised at Any Time Based Upon Future Insp Findings,Events & Resource Availability
ML20212J8121999-10-0101 October 1999
Discusses Plant,Unit 2 Completion of Licensing Action for GL 98-01 & Suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. Ack Efforts That Licensee Have Completed to Date in Preparing Plant for Y2K Transition
ML20212K8881999-09-30030 September 1999
Refers to 990928 Meeting Conducted at Fermi Unit 2 to Discuss Initiatives in Risk Area & to Establish Dialog Between SRAs & PSA Staff
ML20217A3261999-09-30030 September 1999
Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 38
NRC-99-0091, Forwards NRC Form 536,in Response to NRC Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations1999-09-27027 September 1999
Forwards NRC Form 536,in Response to NRC Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations
ML20212J8331999-09-27027 September 1999
Responds to Licensee 990924 Request That NRC Exercise Discretion Not to Enforce Compliance with Actions Required in TS 3/4.6.1.8.Ltr Documents 990923 Telcon with Util in Which NRC Orally Issued NOED
ML20216G9791999-09-24024 September 1999
Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 37
NRC-99-0092, Documents Util Request for Enforcement Discretion with Respect to Requirements of TS 3/4.6.1.8 Re Drywell & Suppression Chamber Purge Sys1999-09-24024 September 1999
Documents Util Request for Enforcement Discretion with Respect to Requirements of TS 3/4.6.1.8 Re Drywell & Suppression Chamber Purge Sys
ML20216H3561999-09-23023 September 1999
Informs That During 990914 Telcon,L Sanders & M Bielby Made Arrangements with NRC to Inspect Licensed Operator Requalification Program at Fermi Nuclear Station for Week of 991129 Which Coincides with Util Regularly Scheduled Exam
ML20216H4541999-09-23023 September 1999
Informs That During 990914 Telcon L Sanders & M Bielby Made Arrangements for Administration of Licensing Exams at Fermi Nuclear Station for Week of Jan 31,2000.NRC Will Make Exam Validation Visit to Facility During Week of Jan 10,2000
ML20212F3241999-09-20020 September 1999
Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 36
NRC-99-0081, Submits Eight Relief Requests Associated with Containment Inservice Exam Program for Fermi 2 Plant,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iv).Requested Relief Does Not Adversely Affect Health & Safety of Public1999-09-17017 September 1999
Submits Eight Relief Requests Associated with Containment Inservice Exam Program for Fermi 2 Plant,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iv).Requested Relief Does Not Adversely Affect Health & Safety of Public
ML20217A9421999-09-0909 September 1999
Informs That NRC Plan to Conduct Addl Resident Insps Beyond Core Insp Program Over Next 6 Months to Assess Improvements in Areas of Procedural Compliance & Quality of Work. Historical Listing of Plant Issues Encl
NRC-99-0079, Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev1999-09-0808 September 1999
Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev
ML20211Q0991999-09-0303 September 1999
Forwards Rev 35 to Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section)
NRC-99-0090, Forwards Proprietary Operator License Renewal Application, NRC Forms 398 & 396 for SW Burt,License SOP-30199-3. Proprietary Encls Withheld1999-09-0303 September 1999
Forwards Proprietary Operator License Renewal Application, NRC Forms 398 & 396 for SW Burt,License SOP-30199-3. Proprietary Encls Withheld
NRC-99-0066, Forwards semi-annual fitness-for-duty Rept for Fermi 2 for Period of 990101-0630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d)1999-08-30030 August 1999
Forwards semi-annual fitness-for-duty Rept for Fermi 2 for Period of 990101-0630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d)
ML20211G4951999-08-24024 August 1999
Forwards Rev 34 to Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section)
NRC-99-0055, Forwards Rev 5 to Inservice Testing Program for Pumps & Valves for Fermi 2 Second 10-Year Interval, Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(f)(5)(iv).Rev Includes Four Pump Relief Requests & Ten Valve Relief Requests Requiring NRC Approval1999-08-19019 August 1999
Forwards Rev 5 to Inservice Testing Program for Pumps & Valves for Fermi 2 Second 10-Year Interval, Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(f)(5)(iv).Rev Includes Four Pump Relief Requests & Ten Valve Relief Requests Requiring NRC Approval
IR 05000341/19990131999-08-19019 August 1999
Discusses Insp Rept 50-341/99-13 & OI Rept 3-98-039 Conducted Into Potential Misconduct of Operator Formerly Employed by De.Nrc Determined That Violation of NRC Regulations Occurred.Synopsis of IO Rept Encl
NRC-99-0056, Forwards Rev 2,change 0 to ISI-Nondestructive Exam (ISI-NDE) Program (Plan) for Piping,Components & Integral Attachments, for Second ten-year Interval of Fermi 2 Plant Operation1999-08-19019 August 1999
Forwards Rev 2,change 0 to ISI-Nondestructive Exam (ISI-NDE) Program (Plan) for Piping,Components & Integral Attachments, for Second ten-year Interval of Fermi 2 Plant Operation
ML20211C0521999-08-17017 August 1999
Forwards Tables for Sections 3.6 & 3.7 of Draft Safety Evaluation of Proposed Conversion of Current TS to Improved Standard TS
NRC-99-0089, Forwards Rev 13 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev1999-08-17017 August 1999
Forwards Rev 13 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev
ML20217E6181999-08-13013 August 1999
FOIA Request for Documents Re Implementing Regulations in 10CFR & Requesting That Region III Task Interface Agreement (TIA) Related to Fermi 2 Plant Be Made Available
IR 05000341/19990011999-08-10010 August 1999
Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-01 on 990619-0723 & Nov. Violation of Concern Because Operators Did Not Understand License Requirements & Placed Plant in Configuration Where EDG 11 Was Removed from Service
IR 05000341/19990121999-08-0606 August 1999
Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-12 on 990712-0716.No Violations Noted.Insp Focused on Implementation of Plant Chemistry & Radiological Environ Monitoring Programs & Operation of post-accident Sampling Sys
ML20211C4761999-08-0606 August 1999
Forwards Draft Safety Evaluation Re Proposed Conversion of Current TS to Improved Standard TS
NRC-99-0057, Forwards Rev 12 to ITS 980403 Submittal,Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.3,including Changes Associated with NRC Review of Rev 6 ITS1999-08-0404 August 1999
Forwards Rev 12 to ITS 980403 Submittal,Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.3,including Changes Associated with NRC Review of Rev 6 ITS
ML20210N5451999-08-0303 August 1999
Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 33
NRC-99-0077, Forwards Rev 11 to Fermi ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403,providing Update to Submittal for ITS Sections 3.5,3.6 & 3.8.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittals of Revs 5,5a & 7 to ITS1999-07-26026 July 1999
Forwards Rev 11 to Fermi ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403,providing Update to Submittal for ITS Sections 3.5,3.6 & 3.8.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittals of Revs 5,5a & 7 to ITS
ML20210J2121999-07-23023 July 1999
Discusses NRC OI Investigation Rept 3-98-039 Completed on 990524 & Forwards Notice of Violation
NRC-99-0053, Forwards Rev 14 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan.Summary of Changes Also Encl1999-07-15015 July 1999
Forwards Rev 14 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan.Summary of Changes Also Encl
ML20209H7211999-07-14014 July 1999
Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 32
NRC-99-0054, Forwards Rev 10 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal, , Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.4,RCS.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittal of Rev 4 to ITS Submittal1999-07-13013 July 1999
Forwards Rev 10 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal, , Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.4,RCS.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittal of Rev 4 to ITS Submittal
ML20209F6571999-07-12012 July 1999
Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-09 on 990516-0618.No Violations Noted.Weak Procedural Guidance,Communications Issues & Configuration Control Weaknessess Were Evident
NRC-99-0052, Forwards Rev 9 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403. Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev.Attachment 2 Contains Revised Pages for Submittal Along with Rev Instructions1999-07-0707 July 1999
Forwards Rev 9 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403. Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev.Attachment 2 Contains Revised Pages for Submittal Along with Rev Instructions
ML20196J5511999-07-0202 July 1999
Discusses GL 92-01,Rev 1,Supp 1, Rv Integrity, Issued by NRC on 950519 & DE Responses & 980729 for Fermi 2.Informs That Staff Revised Info in Rvid & Released Info as Rvid Version 2 as Result of Review of Responses
ML20209C6141999-07-0101 July 1999
Rev 31 to Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section)
NRC-99-0076, Forwards Rev 8 to ITS Submittal to Provide Update to ITS Submittal for ITS Section 3.7.Brief Abstract of Changes Included1999-06-30030 June 1999
Forwards Rev 8 to ITS Submittal to Provide Update to ITS Submittal for ITS Section 3.7.Brief Abstract of Changes Included
1999-09-09
[Table view]
Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARNRC-99-0094, Forwards Safeguards Event Rept 99-S01-00 for Reportable Event That Occurred on 990922.Commitments Made by Util Listed1999-10-22022 October 1999
Forwards Safeguards Event Rept 99-S01-00 for Reportable Event That Occurred on 990922.Commitments Made by Util Listed
NRC-99-0085, Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, IAW 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Without Encl1999-10-22022 October 1999
Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, IAW 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Without Encl
ML20217N9231999-10-15015 October 1999
Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 40
NRC-99-0087, Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-341/99-10.Licensee Contests Subject Violation,Due to Listed Reasons1999-10-12012 October 1999
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-341/99-10.Licensee Contests Subject Violation,Due to Listed Reasons
NRC-99-0083, Submits Requested Response to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal1999-10-0707 October 1999
Submits Requested Response to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal
ML20217D5331999-10-0707 October 1999
Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 39
ML20217A3261999-09-30030 September 1999
Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 38
NRC-99-0091, Forwards NRC Form 536,in Response to NRC Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations1999-09-27027 September 1999
Forwards NRC Form 536,in Response to NRC Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations
ML20216G9791999-09-24024 September 1999
Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 37
NRC-99-0092, Documents Util Request for Enforcement Discretion with Respect to Requirements of TS 3/4.6.1.8 Re Drywell & Suppression Chamber Purge Sys1999-09-24024 September 1999
Documents Util Request for Enforcement Discretion with Respect to Requirements of TS 3/4.6.1.8 Re Drywell & Suppression Chamber Purge Sys
ML20212F3241999-09-20020 September 1999
Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 36
NRC-99-0081, Submits Eight Relief Requests Associated with Containment Inservice Exam Program for Fermi 2 Plant,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iv).Requested Relief Does Not Adversely Affect Health & Safety of Public1999-09-17017 September 1999
Submits Eight Relief Requests Associated with Containment Inservice Exam Program for Fermi 2 Plant,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iv).Requested Relief Does Not Adversely Affect Health & Safety of Public
NRC-99-0079, Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev1999-09-0808 September 1999
Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev
NRC-99-0090, Forwards Proprietary Operator License Renewal Application, NRC Forms 398 & 396 for SW Burt,License SOP-30199-3. Proprietary Encls Withheld1999-09-0303 September 1999
Forwards Proprietary Operator License Renewal Application, NRC Forms 398 & 396 for SW Burt,License SOP-30199-3. Proprietary Encls Withheld
ML20211Q0991999-09-0303 September 1999
Forwards Rev 35 to Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section)
NRC-99-0066, Forwards semi-annual fitness-for-duty Rept for Fermi 2 for Period of 990101-0630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d)1999-08-30030 August 1999
Forwards semi-annual fitness-for-duty Rept for Fermi 2 for Period of 990101-0630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d)
ML20211G4951999-08-24024 August 1999
Forwards Rev 34 to Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section)
NRC-99-0056, Forwards Rev 2,change 0 to ISI-Nondestructive Exam (ISI-NDE) Program (Plan) for Piping,Components & Integral Attachments, for Second ten-year Interval of Fermi 2 Plant Operation1999-08-19019 August 1999
Forwards Rev 2,change 0 to ISI-Nondestructive Exam (ISI-NDE) Program (Plan) for Piping,Components & Integral Attachments, for Second ten-year Interval of Fermi 2 Plant Operation
NRC-99-0055, Forwards Rev 5 to Inservice Testing Program for Pumps & Valves for Fermi 2 Second 10-Year Interval, Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(f)(5)(iv).Rev Includes Four Pump Relief Requests & Ten Valve Relief Requests Requiring NRC Approval1999-08-19019 August 1999
Forwards Rev 5 to Inservice Testing Program for Pumps & Valves for Fermi 2 Second 10-Year Interval, Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(f)(5)(iv).Rev Includes Four Pump Relief Requests & Ten Valve Relief Requests Requiring NRC Approval
NRC-99-0089, Forwards Rev 13 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev1999-08-17017 August 1999
Forwards Rev 13 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev
ML20217E6181999-08-13013 August 1999
FOIA Request for Documents Re Implementing Regulations in 10CFR & Requesting That Region III Task Interface Agreement (TIA) Related to Fermi 2 Plant Be Made Available
NRC-99-0057, Forwards Rev 12 to ITS 980403 Submittal,Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.3,including Changes Associated with NRC Review of Rev 6 ITS1999-08-0404 August 1999
Forwards Rev 12 to ITS 980403 Submittal,Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.3,including Changes Associated with NRC Review of Rev 6 ITS
ML20210N5451999-08-0303 August 1999
Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 33
NRC-99-0077, Forwards Rev 11 to Fermi ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403,providing Update to Submittal for ITS Sections 3.5,3.6 & 3.8.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittals of Revs 5,5a & 7 to ITS1999-07-26026 July 1999
Forwards Rev 11 to Fermi ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403,providing Update to Submittal for ITS Sections 3.5,3.6 & 3.8.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittals of Revs 5,5a & 7 to ITS
NRC-99-0053, Forwards Rev 14 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan.Summary of Changes Also Encl1999-07-15015 July 1999
Forwards Rev 14 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan.Summary of Changes Also Encl
ML20209H7211999-07-14014 July 1999
Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 32
NRC-99-0054, Forwards Rev 10 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal, , Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.4,RCS.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittal of Rev 4 to ITS Submittal1999-07-13013 July 1999
Forwards Rev 10 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal, , Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.4,RCS.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittal of Rev 4 to ITS Submittal
NRC-99-0052, Forwards Rev 9 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403. Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev.Attachment 2 Contains Revised Pages for Submittal Along with Rev Instructions1999-07-0707 July 1999
Forwards Rev 9 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403. Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev.Attachment 2 Contains Revised Pages for Submittal Along with Rev Instructions
ML20209C6141999-07-0101 July 1999
Rev 31 to Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section)
NRC-99-0049, Submits Response to NRC GL 98-01,Suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. Disclosure Encl1999-06-30030 June 1999
Submits Response to NRC GL 98-01,Suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. Disclosure Encl
NRC-99-0076, Forwards Rev 8 to ITS Submittal to Provide Update to ITS Submittal for ITS Section 3.7.Brief Abstract of Changes Included1999-06-30030 June 1999
Forwards Rev 8 to ITS Submittal to Provide Update to ITS Submittal for ITS Section 3.7.Brief Abstract of Changes Included
ML20209C1081999-06-29029 June 1999
Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 30
NRC-99-0050, Forwards Rev 7 to ITS Submittal of 980403,to Provide Remaining Responses to NRC RAIs Re ITS Sections 3.5 & 3.8. Revision Instructions Included1999-06-24024 June 1999
Forwards Rev 7 to ITS Submittal of 980403,to Provide Remaining Responses to NRC RAIs Re ITS Sections 3.5 & 3.8. Revision Instructions Included
NRC-99-0075, Forwards Operator License Renewal Application,Nrc Forms 398 & 396 for CR Effan,License SOP-30186-3.Encl Withheld1999-06-22022 June 1999
Forwards Operator License Renewal Application,Nrc Forms 398 & 396 for CR Effan,License SOP-30186-3.Encl Withheld
ML20212J3861999-06-18018 June 1999
Forwards Rev 29 to Approved UFSAR LCR That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section)
NRC-99-0047, Responds to NRC 990513 RAI Re GL 96-06, Assurance of Equipment Operability & Containment Integrity During Design- Basis Accident Conditions. Revised Design Calculation DC-5957, GL 96-06 Calculations, Encl1999-06-0909 June 1999
Responds to NRC 990513 RAI Re GL 96-06, Assurance of Equipment Operability & Containment Integrity During Design- Basis Accident Conditions. Revised Design Calculation DC-5957, GL 96-06 Calculations, Encl
ML20195G2001999-06-0808 June 1999
Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy & Approved TRM Lcrs (Sorted by Section), Rev 28
ML20195E7391999-06-0303 June 1999
Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy & Approved TRM Lcrs (Sorted by Section), Rev 27
NRC-99-0046, Forwards Rev 6 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal ,to Provide Remaining Responses to NRC RAI Re ITS Section 3.3, & Update ITS Submittal to Reflect Responses.Brief Abstract of Changes Contained in Attachment 11999-06-0202 June 1999
Forwards Rev 6 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal ,to Provide Remaining Responses to NRC RAI Re ITS Section 3.3, & Update ITS Submittal to Reflect Responses.Brief Abstract of Changes Contained in Attachment 1
ML20207D9631999-05-26026 May 1999
Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy & Approved TRM Lcrs (Sorted by Section)
ML20195B3381999-05-19019 May 1999
Forwards Rev 25 to Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy & Approved TRM Lcrs (Sorted by Section)
NRC-99-0040, Requests NRC Approval of Revs to Weld Tables of Encl Relief Requests RR-A21,rev 1 & RR-A22,rev 1.Revs Do Not Impact Basis for Original Requests for Relief Because There Is No Change to Technical Basis or Proposed Alternative1999-05-14014 May 1999
Requests NRC Approval of Revs to Weld Tables of Encl Relief Requests RR-A21,rev 1 & RR-A22,rev 1.Revs Do Not Impact Basis for Original Requests for Relief Because There Is No Change to Technical Basis or Proposed Alternative
NRC-99-0039, Requests Relief from ASME Section XI Requirement to Examine Essentially 100% of Selected Category B-J Pipe Welds,Per 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iii).Relief Request RR-A23,encl1999-05-14014 May 1999
Requests Relief from ASME Section XI Requirement to Examine Essentially 100% of Selected Category B-J Pipe Welds,Per 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iii).Relief Request RR-A23,encl
NRC-99-0041, Requests Relief from ASME Section XI Requirements to Examine Essentially 100% of Accessible Category B-D Nozzle Welds,Per 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iii).Rev 1 to Relief Request RR-A6,encl1999-05-14014 May 1999
Requests Relief from ASME Section XI Requirements to Examine Essentially 100% of Accessible Category B-D Nozzle Welds,Per 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iii).Rev 1 to Relief Request RR-A6,encl
NRC-99-0038, Requests Relief from ASME Section XI 1980 Requirement to Examine Essentially 100% If Category B-A RPV Shell Weld Lengths,Per 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iii)1999-05-14014 May 1999
Requests Relief from ASME Section XI 1980 Requirement to Examine Essentially 100% If Category B-A RPV Shell Weld Lengths,Per 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iii)
NRC-99-0045, Forwards Rev 5a to Fermi 980403 Submittal,Converting TS to Its.Encl Rev Provides Remaining Responses to NRC RAIs Re ITS Section 3.6 Contained in NRC 990211 Rai.Brief Abstract of Changes & Responses to Rai,Encl1999-05-0707 May 1999
Forwards Rev 5a to Fermi 980403 Submittal,Converting TS to Its.Encl Rev Provides Remaining Responses to NRC RAIs Re ITS Section 3.6 Contained in NRC 990211 Rai.Brief Abstract of Changes & Responses to Rai,Encl
NRC-99-0044, Forwards Rev 5 to ITS to Provide Responses to RAI Re ITS Section 3.6 (Except ITS Section 3.6.1.3) Contained in & Update in ITS Submittal to Reflect Responses1999-04-30030 April 1999
Forwards Rev 5 to ITS to Provide Responses to RAI Re ITS Section 3.6 (Except ITS Section 3.6.1.3) Contained in & Update in ITS Submittal to Reflect Responses
NRC-99-0059, Provides Notification Required by 10CFR50.82(a)(7) of Changes to Fermi 1 Decommissioning Cost Estimate1999-04-29029 April 1999
Provides Notification Required by 10CFR50.82(a)(7) of Changes to Fermi 1 Decommissioning Cost Estimate
ML20206E2941999-04-28028 April 1999
Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy & Approved TRM Lcrs (Sorted by Section), Rev 24
NRC-99-0037, Forwards Rev 9 to Fermi 2 Ufsar,Per 10CFR50.71(e) & 10CFR50.4(b)(6).Summary of Changes to QA Program & Vol 1 of Technical Requirements Manual,Encl1999-04-26026 April 1999
Forwards Rev 9 to Fermi 2 Ufsar,Per 10CFR50.71(e) & 10CFR50.4(b)(6).Summary of Changes to QA Program & Vol 1 of Technical Requirements Manual,Encl
1999-09-08
[Table view] |
Text
Senior Vice President, Nuclear Generation Fermi 2 6400 North Dixie Huy, Newport, Michi;;an 4h106 Tel: 813M6.5201 Fax: 313.586.4172 Detroit Edison August 4,1998 NRC-98-01:4 ,
i U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington D C 20555-0001 L
References 1) Fermi 2 NRC Docket No. 50-341 NRC License No. NPF-43 1
- 2) NRC Letter to Detroit Edison, Fermi 2 - Safety Evaluation of Pump and Valve Relief Requests i for the Pump and Valve Inservice Testing Program, dated May 2,1996
Subject:
Relief Requests PR-8 and PR-12 Detroit Edison is submitting two Relief Requests for approval. Revision 2 of Pump Relief Request PR-8, Vibration Limits for Residual Heat Removal (RHR) Pumps A, B and D; and new Pump Relief Request PR-12, Vibration Limits for RHR Pump C.
PR-8, Revision 1, was originally approved by the NRC by Reference 2 and was applicable to all four RHR Pumps.
As data was taken on the upper thrust bearings on the four RHR pumps, it was observed that the C pump upper thrust bearing running speed peak and resonance frequency periodically combine to exceed the overall vibration amplitude and exceed the 0.325 in/sec Alen Level. Based upon our evaluation of the data, the most likely cause of the difference in vibration levels for RHR Pump C is the difference in syst em piping (and piping suppon) configuration from the other RHR pumps. Running speed vibration levels have remained essentially unchanged since the original data analysis in 1984. Therefore, vioration data is indicating no degradation. Based on the continued satisfactory performance of the pump, a new Alen Level value of 0.400
/
m \~
9eos1ioo6o 98o804 Kr> 1 /
PDR ADOCK 05000341 p PDR
USNRC 1
NRC-98-0114 Page 2 in/sec was developed. This new value will prevent the C RHR pump from being unnecessarily placed on an increased testing frequency. PR-12 was written to separate the vibration limits for the C RHR pump from the other three. The only difference m the vibration limits for the C Pump and the other three is that the C Pump upper thrust bearing Alert Level is being increased from 0.325 in/sec to 0.400 in/sec. PR-8 has also been revised to remove the C pump.
The C RHR pump has been on an increased testing frequency of 45 days; however, while waiting for NRC approval of these relief requests, C RHR pump vibration monitoring will be returned to its normal test frequency of 92 days. At this point there is no additional information to be gained by increased testing.
Ifyou should have any questions concerning this request, please contact Mr. Norman K. Peterson, Director Nuclear Licensing at (734) 586-4258 Sincerely,
's & , D. C 'C ~ -
Enclosures cc: B. L. Burgess G. A. Harris A. J. Kugler Regional Administrator, Region 111 Supervisor, Electric Operators, Michigan Public Service Commission l
l 1
- __ _ - _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ 1
- < Enclosure to NRC-98-0114 1
l RELIEF REQUEST PR-8-R2 VIBRATION LIMITS RHR PUMPS A, B, AND D 2 PAGES 1 4
i l
I i
I l
v !
ISI-IST Program Rev.4 4 Change 3 I PageA-16 of 33 RELIEF REQUEST PR-8-R2 SYSTEM: Residual Heat Removal System PUMPS:
Pump Code Class ISI Drawing E1102C002A 2 6M721-5813-2 El102C002B 2 6M721-5813-1 E1102C002D 2 6M721-5813-1 FUNCTION: The LPCI mode of operation of the RHR System pumps water into the RPV in time to cool the core, in case of low water level in the reactor or high pressure in the containment drywell.
SECTION XI CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR WHICH RELIEF IS REOUESTED:
Vibration amplitude displacement shall be measured quarterly during inservice testing (Table IWP-3100-1 and IWP-3400(a)).
BASIS FOR RELIEF: During preoperational testing, the vibration velocity measurements for the RHR pumps were high (.19 to .27 ips) relative to the vibration velocity ranges given in Relief Request PR-1. Three of the four pumps fell into the alert range.
The preoperational vibration velocity measurements were part of a series of vibration tests which included vibration amplitude. The results of the tests are summarized in Detroit Edison Research Report 84D98-2 which concludes:
"The vibration measurements which were taken during the preoperational test indicate that the pumps are operating in a satisfactory condition."
i Given that the pumps are operating acceptably at the higher vibration velocities, a new set of vibration velocity ranges were developed with the assistance of the vendor as described in Detroit Edison Engineering Research Report 85D15-5, Revision 1.
i Report 85D15-5 recommends the measurement of overall velocity (filter out), overall amplitude (filter out) and running speed amplitude (filter in). All three quantities will be measured at the pump bearing and compared to the ranges given in alternate testing.
l L- _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - __ _
1 ISI-IST Program Rev.4 Change 3 PageA-16 of 33 RELIEF REQUFST PR 8-R2 (Continued)
Testing data over 10 years using this criteria has revealed that the values for overall velocity have remained constant and that the action levels recommended in Report L 85D15-5 are not conservative. Therefore, the vibration limits contained in ASM/ ANSI OMa-1988, Part 6, Table 3 (ranges for test parameters) are being adopted as the vibration limits for overall velocity for the RHR pumps A, B, and D.
l The methodology of ASME/ ANSI Operations and Maintenance Code, Part 6 (OM-6), is to be utilized for RHR pump vibration monitoring. The provisions ofISTB 4.6.1,4.6.4, 5.2, and 6.1 will be met. The RHR pumps are vertical centrifugal pumps. Since all provisions of OM-6 are being met, no additional approval from the NRC is required per i NUREG-1482, paragraph 5.4.
ALTERNATE TESTING: Pump vibration over all velocity will be measured for each l RHR pump accessible bearing in accordance with OM-6, paragraph 4.6.4(a). The j acceptance criteria for RHR Pumps El102C002A, El102C002B, and El102C002D will
- be that of OM-6, Table 3a
l Overall Velocity I
Acceptable Range: s 0.325 in/sec Alert Range: 0.326 in/see to 0.700 irlsec Required Action Range: > 0.700 in/sec Overall Amplitude and Runreing Speed Amplitude will continue to be measured with the ranges given in Table IWP-3100-2 applied as
! acceptance criteria.
l Note: Pump Relief request 1% 12 addresses RHR Pump El102C002C l vibration limits l
i
Enclosure to NRC-98-0114 l t
i l
I l
t i
)
! RELIEF REQUEST PR-12 l
VIBRATION LIMIT RHR PUMP C 4 PAGES 4 1
J l
[
I I
l 2
ISI-IST Program Rev.4 Change 3 l Page A- 27 of 33 RELIEF REQUEST PR-12 l SYSTEM: Residual Heat Removal PUMP: Residual Heat Removal Pump C PUMP NO.: El102C002C l
CLASS: 2 l
ISI DRAWING: 6M721-5813-2 FUNCTIONS: The LPCI mode of operation of the RHR System pumps water into the RPV in time to cool the core, in case oflow water level in the reactor or high pressure in the containment drywell. 1 l SECTION XI CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR WHICH RELIEF IS REOUESTED:
Vibration amplitude displacement shall be measured during inservice testing (Table IWP-3100-1 l and IWP-3400 (a)). (Velocity readings are taken in lieu of mils displacement readings per Relief
- Request PR-8). IST evaluation 96-029 committed to taking the upper motor bearing vibration l since it carries the pump thrust. This was in response to an NRC open item during NRC Inspection 95002. This IST evaluation used OM-6 absolute limits (0.325 indseci- ALERT &
- 0.7 inisec. - REQUIRED ACTION) as the acceptance criteria.
1 BASIS FOR RELIEF: Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i) Detroit Edison is requesting relief i from ASME Section XI requirements to run the pump on an increased periodicity due to vibration level exceeding the OM-6 Alert limit. This is based on analysis of the vibration data indicating that no pump degradation is taking place. Detroit Edison is proposing to use alternative vibration Alert Limits based on historical vibration data and analysis of that data. This provides an ,
I alternative method that still meets the intended hmetion of monitoring the pump for degradation over time while keeping the required action level unchanged.
Since the initial IST data was taken at the upper motor bearing on the RHR C pump, the overall vibration limits have periodically exceeded the 0.325 inisec. ALERT limit. Vibration analysis has shown that the RHR C pump has the highest running speed peak (.2 .25 inisec.) of the 4 RHR pumps but this is well below any alen limit. The vibration data also indicates a resonant frequency between 9 - 14 Hz. Both these items were identified in the initial vibration Engineering Research Report 85D15-5, Rev 1 dated 1984. What was not identified when IST evaluation 96-029 and the Engineering Research Report was written was that the resonance frequency is cyclic, and/or changes from run to run, depending on small changes in flow. The combination of the running speed peak and the resonance frequency periodically make the overall vibration amplitude exceed the ALERT limit of 0.325 inisec. The running speed peak is the best vibration indicator i l
w____________________-__________________________________. . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . __ ._ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ________A
{ .
I *
. e
- ISI-IST Program Rev.4 Change 3 Page A- 27 of 33 for actual pump condition and this peak has remained unchanged. No bearing peaks have been identified in the vibration spectrum and all other indicators
- flow, oil analysis and pressures, indicate that the RHR C pump is operating in a satisfactory condition.
! ASME/ ANSI Operation and Maintenance Code Ohia-1988, Part 6 footnote to Section 4.3, states l " Vibration measurements of pumps may be foundation, driver, and piping dependent. Therefore, ifinitial readings are high and have no obvious relationship to the pump, then vibration measurements should be taken at the driver, at the foundation, and on the piping and analyzed to ensure that the reference vibration measurements are representative of the pump and that the
- measured vibration levels will not prevent the pump from fulfilling its ftmetion." This is exactly the case on the RHR C pump. The data has been analyzed in IST evaluation 97-042 and was found to be a resonant frequency between 9 - 14 HZ. This resonance frequency either alone or in combination with the mnning speed peak periodically make the overall vibration amplitude exceed the 0.325 inisec. ALERT LIMIT. The running speed peak has remained very steady (see trend
- 1) while the resonaut peak varies greatly from run to run (see trend 2). Each structure has it's
, own resonance frequency based on the mass and stiffness of the system. Minor changes in either l of these two components will change the resonance frequency. Differences in piping and hanger design between the four RHR pumps is the most likely cause for the difference in the resonance
- frequency and therefore the vibration levels. The reason that the vibration levels change from mn to run is that for a resonance frequency to " ring" it must be excited by some forcing function. In RHR C this forcing function is flow noise, which causes a broad band forcing frequency, that l varies slightly during each run.
The required monitoring range is from % mnning speed to 1000 Hz. A filter was used to filter out the resonance below 14 Hz (<l/2 Running Speed). This helped, but periodically the filtered overall vibration still exceeds 0.325 ips. The IST data taken 2/21/98 was .3587 in./sec. even with the filter. Vibration analysis of all the vibration points did not show any signs of a pump or motor !
problem. The only changes noted were an increase in the resonance peak.
l Given that the RHR C Pump is operating acceptably at vibration velocities at or slightly above the IST Program Alert Level with no change in running speed peak from the initial data taken in 1984, a new Alert vibration velocity level has been developed. This new velocity vibration alert level will allow for early detection of pump degradation prior to component failure while the Required Action level (0.7 in./sec.) will remain unchanged.
l i
I l l
\
. ISI-IST Program I Rev.4 j Change 3 Page A- 27 of 33 TREND 1 RUNNING SPEED
- .e- , i .d
,., pggs)g
$1 N ! D u d G.Rd.9 1 % S. @ s s u h s d N H W 6 UO+ iD15.htf90 NPt# .
fi A4:/
- 74
- bgA MM,{g .
% , ,. . 4 " ::q:
Qi li: Eg. . .. ......;......;.....;....... f. V:q h p p T.: . . . . .i. .. . . , . . . . . . . .i . .
,! '. . Mica .E q
j ;433g7.9 _ _
Ng
.<g y- s
,.. : Lea.wd.-
p z
y i:,
- ~ 4
.= oc ff A
3 9
n Wc. $.,,.,.,.c.,p; - - ..,. : :
$~.m 1 - 3 sc/sy. mar y : _._.~._._.__
~ <....._ t
. ED :: . :: 100ji DOC:: . . f: 300.7 . X400 WOO E ^
. . , w r
~y =. . ; O . ;
3; p m g g w. g _ , ,m. ,
.. . . . .,+a. , . . , . . , , . . , , , ,
f0:i 1100r!
h: ... .< * ? te :( if D..
U27148 i $$ 1' ' ij Uni: ~
' +
3 ., EW " ' ' .' .i.2:200 . . . . .. .?. !* 300 " "i T' 400:300:? ' ' ' S:T:tanJ:
fx an; ' ' E::DensO 0 E:Y. 2100,: KMi
~ '
0 W2108
/ D Z,a,4ALd!?.@d.h 3' ' n~L&:L42. gap y - gggn3,gg.g n gg,. Map m' w . . :. l -
.:. u
- . .p.
w a
h 9 E.
%:ww.rew.vm:rm-mmr~smyr. m.. .:g:.... r vmn.~., ...v,..sr.c ?, . .wy m m :w" m.m.r.yr.
h
. .e., .c. .. .
- : . tymy?~w w w>
~ ' ' "
.....;<-......,..,.sh M' ,.
' G.26f' Hrdt$ $t(PeaC ~ I ' ~ ~i:iy' :
4 2/21M S#00PM.) . ;. .. .,' = gg
~.. ,
, s ,. ..gh$0Gf / M ,
....,..,q ;-
.,..,.;,...,..y , . , , . . >
, , ,_ y
!; Ett0K0020; 5A2 C.L.,J::M:::O spete't.70ew f:.y d_i E ,b ,.,W N
jfoseoftA2& > 1; DitedtwihedtMelf221.M AqPW j s %, , ,
.........-...............................................................................................................................-.......-......-...-..........-.-.......-.....gz, TREND 2 5 -15 Hz RESONANCE i.-,i.... . puea 1 W. : ks s omp ; :: wag Ppp jtinkg.,nM.agb;2.mg..M Q 96a l iA) , , ,
7lf' %8) % ,.
0 c 6.o
^- - ,- , ,
-i- - -
.N 4W E M7,5IN \b W c:s s, n
,s , K m .:...x
,-- N.gmh.m
%q %:.s. :.:-
' 8.;gj2;13.gyg ,J l 4: 4 y. .. j . - ;.-.-t. . - . ::;.
l N e 1 /
- C2 j j- ' , - - -I h!M'2
[$26 Sk%Q r -- ~.. %
Q ap W m, ..: .k.. g~nu., n. . . =s 6% ,n. . .. . n . n;w. . . . < 4300 l:-nh.: 7 9:(03,-.s..-
. , , . . . .~:..., "..--,-m.. ,,
s
- :. , . . . - . , , . , , ....:....:;. .. .,y.. . . , .
L:.100 ? M.101 1,400ji;3001 ' *0f j1003 1200/: : 190) g400:.1;$00;3 ;
. ;~ iHtL. ., ; 3 set: W ., ;..~ :x . , . . (uni;
?us?' ~ ' ' F X19 7 '~ -
Mij: v DeteX.% iL68@L M/ :::mM l ,
l1.hi MMn? $U:1. . ,. WseO 2x ..:3c_Magy l * > : .s A . . .
gn<- ;'
l 1;p y >* - - < f ~+ *-
I M
.g. .. . . . , . . .
s _
.g
- (.. .
- ... p.. ..l % - - m sa~. . "> W n. . m : W .,-~c&*m. nL.~. .. d .~,. . ~'^mwwv. m,m. mmvs~,.
. ,. ~.m.xr~~m%
4 :. h. 3
- SM T.$ . . . . . , .
. . . '; MM?.L. 11MM? ?
{$Wi$ HgPeaQ J '
..%, s ,...-..m .,. ,
iX 44t97 t52:00 PW R < " " 1 8671s' ~"
H.PEPi . ,,.w [:1hM,PCRQMPSf. .],. . ., - 7. ,
(
]Et(D2C002C'i * ( A2p . . . T . T. J Speedi 1864. ,
jossen.AZ4 ii1CWectwhonanntal 44471 $2 PM.>:
- g. ISI-IST Program a-Rev.4 Change 3 Page A- 27 of 33 ALTERNATE TESTING: For the vibration points on the upper motor bearing, (0VVEAl, OVVEA2 & OVVEA3), revise the ALERT Limit for the overall vibration limits to 0.4 inisec.
This exceeds the OM-6 limit of 0.325 but is well below the alternate (2.5
- Vr) limit. Where Vr is the baseline vibration reference values. The Vr values for OVVEA1,0VVEA2 & OVVEA3 are 0.25, 0.22 & 0.29 in/sec. respectively. The required action level will remain at 0.7 inisec.
RHR C (El102C002C)
Vibration Required Alert Range Acceptable Parameter Action Range - Range Overall Velocity > 0.700 indsec. > 0.400 indsec. s 0.400 indsec.
(OVVEA1) to HorizontalInline 0.700 inisec.
Overall Velocity > 0.700 inisec. > 0.400 inisec. s 0.400 inisec.
(OVVEA2) to Horizontal 90 0.700 indsec.
Overall Velocity > 0.700 inisec. > 0.400 inisec. s 0.400 inisec.
(OVVEA3) to Vertical 0.700 indsec.
Overall Velocity > 0.700 in/sec. > 0.325 inisec. s 0.325 in/sec.
(OVVEC1) to
, HorizontalInline 0.700 inisec.
Overall Velocity > 0.700 indsec. > 0.325 inisec. s 0.325 inisec.
(OVVEC2) to Horizontal 90 0.700 in/sec.
L___.____________________________________________.________ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._ ._________.____________.._.________ _______ _ ___________ _ __________
