ML20127N996

From kanterella
Revision as of 09:42, 9 July 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 760513 Meeting W/Mark I Owners Group (GE) in Bethesda,Md Re Discussions on Program for plant-unique Torus Support Sys Analyses Presented in Ltr from GE to NRC Dtd 760426.List of Meeting Attendees Encl
ML20127N996
Person / Time
Site: Monticello Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/24/1976
From: Guibert J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 9212010474
Download: ML20127N996 (21)


Text

..~.

. V ,. ,.

(M UNITE 3 STATES - .

p* . .Ne\ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS$10N WASHINGTON, D. C. 2065S i

e ]

3 )ki k.o / ....

May 24, 1976 1

George Lear, Chief. Operating Reac' tors Branch (3, DOR DOCKETS NOS.: ~ 50-219, 50-220, 50-237..,50-245, 50-249, 50-254, 50-259, ,

50-260, # 263 50-265, 50-271, 50-277, 50-278, 50-293, 50-296, 50-298, 50-321,:50-324 325, 50-331, 50-333, 50-341, 50-354, 50-355, and 50-366.

i LICENSEESt Boston Edison Company, Carolina Power & Light Company,- '

Commonwealth Edison Company, Detroit Edison Company, Georgia-Power Company, Iowa Electric Light & Power . company 7 Jersey Central Power & Light Company,-Nebraska Public Power-District,_

J Niagara Mohawk Power Company, Northcast Nuc1 car Energy Company,  ;

Northern States Power Company,-Philadciphia. Electric Company, i

Power Authority State of_New York, Public Service Electric- i and Gas, Tennessee Valley _ Authority', -Vermont = Yankee Nuclear -

Power Corporation.-

FACILITIES: . Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Nine Mile Point Unit 1. Pilgrim l', Dresden Units-2 and 3 Millstone. Unit-1.-- .

Quad Cities Units 1 and"2, Monticello, Peach Bottom Units

!. 2 and 3, Browns Terry Unit -1, 2 and. 3. Vermont 1 Yankee, l Hatch Units 1 and 2, Brunswick Units:1-and 2,;Duane Arnold l Energy Center, Cooper, Fitzpatrick, Enrico Fermi Unit.-2, -

and Hope Creek Units 1 and 2.

SU' MARY _0F !!EETING HELD ON MAY 13, 1976 WITil' REPRESENTATIVES OF THE: MARK I OWERS CROUP ,

on May 13, 1976 a meeting was held in Bethesda-with representatives of.the-Mark I Owners Groap, General Electric Company- (CE), =and their: technical

-consultants. The purpose of the meeting was-(1) to discuss. the- program for the plant-unique torus support-system analyses presented in a letter from GE to the.NRC staff dated April 26,;1976, and (2) to discuss'the 1/4 scalet pool swell test: program objectives.- Enclosure 1-is a list _of, meeting. attendees.

SLMMARY' 1-l- N. Edwards, NUTECH,~ described the program for'the plant-unique analyses of l torus support systems and!.the piping ati: ached to the torus. Enclosure 2-l contains the slides-used.in this presentation. General discussion between the NRC staff and representatives of.the Mark I Owners Group resulted;in o

g 9212010474 760524 PDR ADOCK 05000263?

P pon

the identification of several outstanding areas of concern:

a. The criteria which will be utilized to evaluate the plant unique analysis results include specified "stlength ratios" (SR), where the SR for an '

elcecnt is defined as the stress (or strain) in the element for a given applied load divided by a lower bound of the value of the stress (or strain) in that element at which one would predict failure of the element.

The NRC staf f stated that general guidelines for defining "f ailure" for each failure mode being considered should be developed. A meeting j

between representatives of the Mark I owners group and the NRC staff l

w311 take place in early June 1976 to develop such guidelines.

b. Uith respect to the plant unique sensitivity analysis for upward loads, the NRC staff requested that GE investigate the effects of applying the load factor (LF) to the entire pressure-time history curve (i.e., to both the downward and the upward segments of the curve) in addition to applying the LF to the upward force segment of the curve alone,
c. The NRC staff requested information which supports the use of a static analysis (rather than a dynamic analysis) of piping systems attached to the torus to predict stresses due to a postulated torus uplif t.
d. The NRC staff stated that, in the application of the seceptance criteria for the attached piping, se should not be increased because of the dynamic strain rate effect.
c. The NRC staff stated that the following information should also be included in the plant unique analyses:
1. A description.of the procedures utilized in calculating the " total"
dynamic parameters (such as mass, stiffness, damping values, and I forcing functions) for the single degree of freedom equivalent model in terms of the actual system parameters.
2. A discussion of the effects of calculated torus uplift on the vent pipes and vent pipe bellows.
3. A discussion of the effects of calculated torus uplif t on the operability of active pumps and valves on piping lines attached to the torus.

l Representatives of the Mark I Owners Group stated that _ the reassessment of the Long Term Program Tasks has been delayed and that the Owners Group will not be prepared to discuss this reassessmen.t with the NRC staff until the l

first week in July 1976. ,

I G

t \

The NRC staf f stated that, based ~ upon the information which has been presented, application of a correction factor of 0.8 to the Most Probable Loads of January 28, 1976 is acceptable.

S. Stark, CE, described the preliminary design and test objectives of the 1/4 scale Mark I Containment testing facility. Enclosure 3 contains the slides used in this presentation. The NRC staff requested information related to future plans for thrco dimensional (3D) testing. R. Fernandez, EPRI, stated that ne;;otiations were in progress for developing a 3D testing program which would consist of a 1/12 scale test facility with multiple downcomers.

Representatives of the Ouners Group stated that they would keep the NRC staff advised of any future plans for additional testing.

/ ll 'l

  • r s C.2.(Ja ..s.'.. f" John Guibert Operating Reactors Branch #3 Division of Operating -

Enclosures:

1. Attendance List
2. Slides
3. Slides t

l 9

ENCLOSLTRE 1 ATTENDANCE LIST MEETING ECTUEEN MARK 1 OUNERS CROUP AND NRC STATT MAY 13, 1976

_NNIE ORGANIZATIOJ John Gulbert NRC George !. car NRC

h. D. Lim
  • NRC/EB G. ilagchi NRC/EB Ricnard J. Stuart NRC/ DOR /ENG. BR.

Jack Kodrich NRC C. C. Laina.e NRC C. J. Andetson - NRC C. I. CrJmes NRC

k. Tedesco NRC No r nan U. l'.chiard s NUTECll l R. E. Keever NUTECil ,

R. F. Petrokas NUTECil N. 7.. Macters GE S. J. Stark GC R.11. Buchholz GE L. V. Sobon GE U. E. Cooper Tcledyne Mat'l. Res.

J . A. llayward Teledyne flat 'l. Res.

C. W. Volf Jersey Central Power & Light B. Biava Jersey Central Power & Light T. T. Robin Southern Services K. R. Iy-Engar Southern Services G. Maisc Brookhaven Lab G.11. Neils Northern States Power D. Lynn Uhitt CB1 R. 11. Logue Philadelphia Electric Co.

R. F. Reedy Chicago Bridge & Iron W. F. Bauer Public Service E & G Co.

D. P. Galle Commonwealth Edison P. Kennedy Tokyo Elec. Power Co.

R. N. Smart NUS Co.

R. T. Fernandez EPRI F. E.'Gregor Detroit Edison Co.

l

NL1- 0 %.e; p DESCRIPTION OF SIIORT TERM PROGRAM PLANT UNIQUE TORUS SUPPORT SYSTEMS AND ATTACllED PIPING ANALYSIS Prepared for:

l Mark I Containmc t Owners Group 9

April 23, 1976 nutech

~

DESCRIt' TION OF Sfl0RT TERbl PROGRAb1 .

PLANT llNIQUE TORUS SUPPORT SYSTEh!S AND ATTACilED PIPING ANALYSIS TABLE OF_ CONTENTS Lags LIST OF PIGURES iii j

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1

2. 0 11ETil0D OF ANALYSIS 2.1 2.1 Downward Loads 2.1 2.2 Upward Loads 2.2 2.2.1 Torus Support Systems 2.2 2.2.2 Piping Attached to Torus 2.3 3.0 LOA 111NGS 3.1 4.0 CRITERIA 4.1 4.1 Base Caso Analysis 4.2 4.1.1 Torus Support System 4.2 4.1.2 Attached Piping 4.2 4.2 Load Sensitivity Analysis 4.3 4.2.1 Torus Support System 4.4 4.2.2 Attached Piping 4.4 4.3 Plant Unique Action Plan 4.5
5. 0 CONCLUSION 5.1

6.0 REFERENCES

6.1 4

e li nutech

1 u

HETHOD OF At1ALYSIS DOWiiWARD LOADS UPWARD LOADS TORUS SUPPORT ATTACHED PIPliiG 4

e O

nutech

n LOADINGS l

DEAD LOADS HYDROSTATIC EARTHQUAKE HYDRODYNAMIC POOL SWELL nutGCh I

,.....--=

BASE CASE ANALYSIS:

x _

ADDENDUM NO. 2 LOADS SEllSITIVITY ANALYSIS t.0AD = LF*[CF

  • AcoEnoua llo 2 LOADS)-

3 -

6" 9

?

t

!>)

b

, nutech

~

l l

CRITERIA BASE CASE At!ALYSIS .

TORUS SUPPORT SYSTFJ1 SR 1 0.5 ATTACHED PIPING iM

< 3.0 S c Z

iM

< 5.0 S c Z

9 9

9 e

nutech

i CRITERIA SEf!SITIVITY MlALYSIS 4

TORUS SUPPORT SYSTEl1 i

SR 5. 1.0 FOR LF = 1.5 ATTACllED PIPli1G LF = .1. 5 , ,

f s

nutsch r


1 1.0 -

I

-l .- .

l -/i 4 - l /.

e I c_.,

Curve Bx I i

1-i D I C

i-a .

-l i~ -l .

i EB 0.5----------------------------------- i fa n

<. c=

I Curve A l

l

I

~l .

l~

l l" 1 -1

I l 2

I - l

. I i i i O.0 1.0 1.5

, .0 , 0.5

1. DAD FACTOR

> /-

1 FIGURE 4.2-2 Criteria. for. Upward 1.oad .

S nutech 4.7- .

3 4

, --w, ,w - . - - - , , e e ---r~ vn - , ,-e ,

A P' ANT Ut110UE ACT10il PLAll LF AT WHICll CRITERIA IS SATISFIED DESCRIBE PROPOSED ACT10il i

DISCUSS WITl1 NRC 1

J 8

DUI9Ch

- a 2 ,. w,t & . - a a _ -n. y a a m . .-. , s s.

l \ /'t Sede b.AE C o ,An menF Ted i

4 6

l _

L n s k ru.m ew M c; 4-i o n 4

b k l Pro g ca m N\ t \e s 40 ne s i

l 1

4

)

f

. an M'

n .

Des c rip 4 ion 04 Tes t FaaLily L

l L_ de d Up NLjei o& h SccJe. Ft.c i To c u.s b i x m e te.c = 9 3 inches b ec 4-ion WJich +-h = 12, 2 incLes 4

Vo\ uses L c c e c.5. e 6  % (sf Press u.ct s eJ Talc Ocs;we.u C A cSed %j In pro ve J T'n s 4r w me n-\-di on (. LaA-ec)

! I mpcoved c.e x 4to ( e4 .\ es 4- (. La br )

L_ .

~ - . - . - , . . . , _ _ . - . , _ , , _ . . . _ , . _ _

i o k '

  • T a i Ay, i _ , . ...- .. . .. -e .-+4 -

,  : e ..o .

n

( ..

il

'j a

n. ... .... .. I.

6 . .

,I

  • l,,-

l g

  • l~.

') .  !

1 .l l . isl *

{ .

I , ..l..

_ . 1 .; . .. a4 .

, 'h

. . . ,? .

. . b t*4: .  : 4,1 ! ..

i

( "! j ,p ql i ; '. . .' q:

, . .'4 \;,

t vu,: v: v.-

_ , 4. . } ;; } : l' .... ,. .

. . " . . ' * . - aj

... ,4.:

IIliislf I l ft i-S i t n, 3 et:e i 6

-4

! ?.,:  :;. t, f.,.13 i. - ; i-l, ,.+ g 1  ;

...n.,,. - - .. . ..

L.1.Ll21 J. L. -- --

i

.. -m- _.

)

, . --c. - -

=:

]

  • i . ,Q1 x

[

s

~ . k

.f...s M

'.1.1"_;.g e-l.?,h i  ! \l AWl, i', ."' ', l

.j k' C'#

i M "]- - Tr.,' ._,..F...e .

E'.'

g . . . . ..\. i .. . .l .1 -

1 o,

',-.3,

..e, . .

_ J,s.. . II4 r . ,I .- .. o. .

i., e ,. s

.ts

\ i . , qi --- ww. ..:s,'. +_

L., .- ., ..

1 .. s.....,,..o . ,, t

-.I' f +* j

5.a.e . w .. -t( ' .. ,

s e

\y .

s

,u

,...y.,-- N ,

% 9

~

, . e .

\. ,.

I .-.,._s,hD i f lif': f '

j ,.k' eO

i g .

j.

r,. . ..g. s m. - < - - . ..

L

- m s..,. __

_ _ . . , j

/,s  : ip is\ l N f iqa.g

'L q

i } N - t.ds.i\ t

, i w i .

t

. . . . . . i i, o.,

~

c.- * .

e.. ..

,g ..h ,

* - -- p, , ,'..,; =l M. . t-i

' (

i . -

i

=* 3 ( . .'

y

[*

.; ~

a- , sy s. .....,..,, ,

i

, c j ,[/' ~

\*g 4 [

%. anme me - -- .m $

.~ $

.y lil s

4 Q.a +b c.2 , ;

pg ,

1 ,

.: 3 $. *

  • }*

l g 4

h s  !

x l o e, u. I w t o I o i n i -

a_h- ,#,e ,-.L,2 aa_ __ 4 a ,__4

.u,4. ,a.-4.J.2 -- J._,,__a ..J. _ . . A.A. ._ . - _ , . A 1 , . ,

3 T- ws k ruew Mdi o n tw.p re V C.h R L\ Q{ $ pee d Dsk ChAntte.{5, iG Press u re i co n s d u ce r.s f .

\ bd 4. Press u.ce. ~ L ra.w s Au.ce c

) Ther me co u.ple i i G v, m ce.

1 C a ero E y n c-.h ron i wo -\-ion, i Fu.\( s> ; e u; F ro w +- WiwJow i

m FO ve d Timtw3 L n di cdion 3

Lo_c3er s c o _i e m .t 1 i L y .

Less Re\ dive L o w c c T r o a s i eu.ncer n. t kt J13 Ri 3 Lou;e.c-e_c Os,o \ u 4a Mress u.re Sc \c u9 Fa cb c- -

1 Tesb D Lje.ciri v e s, i

l Primetv:. I\ ssess W.\ i bib; oc Sco \ ig La.es Pea.k. Dounwo.ca Pre ss u ce. L od 4

l Pea _\c U p u.3ard Pre s s u.re Loc a M e 4- Pressuse Loo 6 Mis 4 cry l

Po c, \- $be.W \Ms 40nj l

Phew ment iime p g w.s u y l l

\/ ew 4 C. \ e a-r i n.3 Tra.nsie.nr J f

e I w E-\ v._ e.nc.e 04 8 r- eo_k 4.hro Sl y i

8ou.n da.n; C.o nd i hions be b by '"- "*$

l Veriks '

30 5e C o se a.wA h Pow /wy n

bC.On (,1.I\ l ~ -

a' 6bbM Id. '

b- .

YW 6- C D .

f0 i

L i L oc &.s r'

1

Pf0NSED TEST I70RIX RIJ1 SlEERENE, TORUS PESSUE DIE'ELUTORUS DE/WELL EMIF/ FUJX EET PSI ELTAP, P E550RIZAT10il BTU /SEC lii - H70 MlE, PSI /SEC KDIlN ORIFIE RLI6 1.0 3.68 0 24.2 360 1-8 9810 6.0 11812 12.0

  • 4 I#GE ORTFIE Rlf6 3.68 36.4 600 13-20 1.0 'O 21822 6.0 23 8 24 12.0

a -hAdA e._.ma-+4 da m. 4-' s Be A--abeJ. ed-va.Jul - - - ..-M.AMA4 4 A ,em.J n - -*. mad aeMmm ..e 4 m M,4 4 "

-ad . 4W M' =A . 4J J.

'4 .

s e

I, W

} a

I f

b D C.G F

  • in1%i i C. $.v Yo F"- O Y\ Si b DIG h 4

1 C (1 E. f 7% s66W $

a s

I s c_\ L J e.ci L Tes 4-bdu sis t

N;\\ Be

~

l'

,

  • w 1

4 L

l L

l r.

I e

~ , . ._.,.,,,_,_m. , _ _ . . - . . . _ . _ . . -

7cogca.m M i Le. sbe ne s C-o m p \ e. k-e.&

S c_o p2 A A. 0%e_c4-iyes N/'i2 / 74 Pre. b i a n- D e si gn C/" /74 F~o ce ca s 4 e c0 .

A p e ro ve_ bNd De sign. 7/s/7Q C- o m e t e \-e. Fo, c \ik F4 t i c. %4 i e,1 A nct Tn s k a R i;4-i ok r/.29]7j 4

C.ompie.4e. ~G s-\-s 9/se/7 j L&n; 4- Tes 4- Repc4 9 q 7e E

.