IR 05000498/1997014

From kanterella
Revision as of 15:00, 30 June 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-498/97-14 & 50-499/97-14 on 970324-28.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Plant Support.Portions Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
ML20138C096
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 04/25/1997
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20138C088 List:
References
:50-498-97-14, 50-498-97-14, 50-499-97-14, NUDOCS 9704300040
Download: ML20138C096 (2)


Text

DOCUMENT CONTAINS S AFEGUARDS INFORMATION ENCLOSURE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

Docket Nos.: 50-498 50-499

'

License Nos.: NPF-76

NPF-80 Report No.: 50-498/97-14 i 50-499/97-14
Licensee
Houston Lighting & Power Company Facility: South Texas Project Electric Generating Station, Units 1 and 2

,

Location: FM 521 - 8 miles west of Wadsworth Wadsworth, Texas

]

Dates: March 24-28,1997 l

Inspector: Thomas W. Dexter, Senior Physical Security Specialist

&

Approved By: Blaine Murray, Chief, Plant Support Branch Division Reactor Safety i

Attachment: Supplemental Information DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE lS DECONTROLLEC 9704300040 970425

-

PDR ADOCK 05000498 i

G PDR

.

,

-2- DOCUMENT CONTAINS S AFEGUARDS INFORMATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY South Texas Project Electric Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 NRC Inspection Report 50-498/97-14;50-499/97-14 This was a special, announced, inspection of the licensee's implementation of the land vehicle control measures implemented in accordance with 10 CFR Part 73, " Physical Protection of Plants and materials," utilizing Temporary Instruction 2515/132, " Malevolent Use of Vehicles at Nuclear Power Plants," dated January 18,199 Plant Suonort

  • The installed vehicle barrier system was consistent with the summary description previously submitted to the NRC, encompassed all vital areas of the f acility, and was accurately described in the security plan (Section S1.1). i
  • The installed vehicle barrier system meets the rule guidance for protecting required plant vital equipment from a vehicle bomb blast. The bomb blast analysis was consistent with the summary description previously submitted to the NR Distances between the vehicle barrier system and vital equipment exceeded the minimum standoff distance (Section S1.2).
  • The licensee's procedures adequately addressed security surveillance, maintenance, and compensatory security measures. Additionally, proper procedures had been implemented for access control measures for vehicles, and other procedures addressing vehicle access control and the safe shutdown of the plant (Section S1.3).

,

DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGG IS DECONTROLLED