ML20148B572

From kanterella
Revision as of 07:57, 24 June 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Siting Plant W/Once Through Cooling Sys at Rome Point Unacceptable.Permit Will Not Be Issued
ML20148B572
Person / Time
Site: New England Power
Issue date: 01/30/1973
From: Bedrosian P, Corkin C
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
To: Casey Smith
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Shared Package
ML20148B545 List:
References
NUDOCS 7810310286
Download: ML20148B572 (2)


Text

.c.edhenab.Kana wa - GL a GRnVnCT ' zzz=2iC-= m .a Llf ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGEN.:Y a

't d a ,

.,- d

.;rf Paul Bedrosian E;j 'g7 Charles Corkin II oArci January 30, 1973 f

d, 3 Co-Chairmen' sunaccT, Committee for Power Plant Siting and Operation

  • n 3 New England Electric - Rome Point vo, 1 Dr. Clifford V. Smith j Deputy Regional Administracor s

i On Decembcr 22, 1972 representatives. of New England Power Company j met with the Regional Power Plant Committee and asked whether EPA would m iccue a permit for a once-through cooling discharge associated with d generating facilities of at least 900 megawatts. The answer to that

] question depends primarily on the opinion of experts in the field of j- biology.

t

] Our biologists, Robert Leger and Dr. Jan Prager, have reviewed all of l, the available studies on the West Passage of Narraganset Bay where Rome

%] Point is located and have concluded that a once-through cooling system would be tmacceptable. Attached hereto are copies of their reports.

~3 The Committee met on January 30, 1973 and voted unanimously to accept 1 e the conclusions of Messrs. Leger and Prager and to recommend that the  !

aj Agency inform the Company that a permit for once-through cooling would '

3 not be issued. A letter to Edward Plumloy. Vica Pracidant of Mcv Eng1:nd 4m Pe* hpry 1 ett: h:d f:r your ugy m ,ol.

j e .4, d .

9Ei .

1

-?

  • Y, y >

t .

$m .

M 1

yA '-

'>s

.c

/ ,/s'

h. ~

gj

, 78103.10 2$6 EPA Form 1320 4 (11 71) s .

j T Kgy P.9F [Tv / qgy,y,,, grmgn'rt ygw' a y ,ya. Ae p .t u f

n 'ip [Fi'cg 3 r a w-hai'AicG{is -T > {ip j ) '7 V +' ' se WY ' t T'* U' E

,n. - - '

.l }

' ' [

e,d.b

/ . UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY '

f

.t s 1

~ $1 -

SUBJECT:

New England Electric - Rome Point, Rhode Island ,

DATE: December 26, 1972

/ / l h

j  ; / ,

i' 4 FROM: Charles Cork:.n IO ' / I

] / 4 i To: The Files f V ,

.A -

h u; .

u

. - -k 3 On Deceriber 22, 1972, Edward Plum 1cy and Ogdon Savyer of the New 1

'(

England' Power Company met with the Committee for Power Plant Siting and 'i; cf Operation in order to request EPA to take a position on whether Rome Point i Rhode Island is an appropriate site'for a power plant.

r 9 } Present for the EPA
Jan Prager, Joan Harrison, Wally Woo (for j j Tony Cortese), Byron Keene (for Paul Bedrosian), Bob Leger and Charles Corkin.

Thi Company wants to conatruct and. operate power generating facilities [

consisti'ng of at least a 900 meg. plant but would like to have two eleven

.Q"s hundred meg.' plants. The preference is f6r atomic energy but, if necessary, si fossil fuel'can be used 1 s

b -

'd The specific problem with which this committee must first deal is 1 17 whather EPA shuuld allow the discharge of unrreated cooling water into the j; Mk estuary at Rome Point.

i]k The Com"pany will submit the results of a biological study done by George Matheson concerning the population of that marine environment and

% the probable effects of the heated effluent. f A

g1 . Bob Leger and Jan Prager will review the Matheson study.

1 Prager, Harrison and Corkin will revicu the Rome Point site as vc11 as i s; other potential sites on the Rhode Island coastline.

- Q( j. <

df6 , Ogden Sawyer indicated that if permission for once-through cooling 7 would be denied. the Company will not build a plant at Rome Point, but would seek a site more suitable for the discharge of heated water.

4 j "

? , ,

Sawyer and Plumicy were grateful for our assurance that we would review 'b the probicm and make a recommendation as soon as possible. ..

w y p

4 6 e a  ; . 6 - * '

l bd. A ed . w i>1 ,

j u

y >