ML20148F132

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:50, 23 June 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Safety Evaluation Discussing Main Steam Isolation Valve Integrity During Accident Conditions.Combination of Analysis & Scale Model Testing Acceptable
ML20148F132
Person / Time
Site: Yankee Rowe
Issue date: 06/29/1976
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML20148F129 List:
References
NUDOCS 8011030843
Download: ML20148F132 (2)


Text

. .. - - - - - . -

  • ~ ^

Na* %' UNri LO STATES g V. ,,, 4 NUCLE Ait R EC.la.. . e %Y v, ..;f.m104 WASHlf toto?J o. C. ZZ5

'h6h.h,.h. 1 o,'pVtQ,'j s, w .  ;

l SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR R"GULATION REGARDING Tile INTEGRITY OF MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVES DURING ACCIDENT CONCITIONS YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPANY

. YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION (YANKEE-RONE)

DOCKET NO. 50-29 Introduction -

' Adverse operating experience concerning main steam isolation valves (MSIV's) has been reported to the Office of Inspection and Enforcement

-(OISE) following operational tests and spurious closures at various pressurized water reactor (PWR) stations over an extended period of time. In an effort to gain a better understanding of these events, Information Request No. 74-2 was sent to all PWR stations by OIFE. i The information thus obtained was used as input to a generic study conducted by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR). During i

our review, we had the benefit of discussions with personnel representing various valve manufacturers and'with utility representatives whose facilities were affected.

Our concern was the ability of specific types of.MSIV's to withstand the dynamic forces associated with rapid closure in the event of a steam line rupture. As a result of this generic study, it was determined that in some cases there may be a need to upgrade both the materials and the design of the MSIV's in order to prevent degradation during normal service and to assure performance of all design safety functions.

Therefore, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requested a number of

. licensees of PWR's to supply summary information on' the analyses or tests performed to confirm the ability of the MSIV's to withstand the forces associated with rapid closure under postulated steam line break conditions.

On May 13, June 12,1975, and April 29, 1976, we requested Yankee Atomic Electric Company (the licensec) to submit information on the angle non-return valves of the lift-check type installed at Yankee-Rowe.

By letters dated May 23, July 24, October 20, 1975, and May 10, 1976, the liccnsee responded to our requests. Our evaluation of this informa-

~

tion, relative to the concerns of M91V perfn-n< a m @ r postuinted main steam line break conditions and d" -sd "in" ~

"M during norral service, is su: mari:cd below.

80110308//3

=.'. . -

-y_ &_

2- -

P Evaluation .

1 The licensee has used an elastic analysis to determine the deflecticas 1 and energy absorption of the main steam check valve disc and stem at '

the onset of yielding. As this analysis indicated that the seat would .

begin to yield plastica 11y. well before the disc, a scale model of the seat was prepared to detemine the energy absorption capabilities of the ,

seat when subjected to plastic deformation.

e .

The results of the scale model testing indicate that the seat will undergo j extensive plastic deformation and that this deformation occurs in such a .

way as te absorb the impact energy without loss of flow stooping capability.

Therefore, the licensee made no. changes to the main steam check va2ves.

Conclusion .

Based on our review, we have concluded that the combination of analysis  ;

and scale model testing of the main steam check valve is acceptable, and  ;

provides assurance that these valves will perform the intended function i when needed. l f a Date: June 29,1976 ,

l e

d e

4 e

i 1

4 9

4

+

r y g- -