|
---|
Category:INTERVENTION PETITIONS
MONTHYEARML20069H4641983-03-29029 March 1983 Joint Motion for Production of Documents Generated During 830309 Emergency Planning Exercise.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071B4181983-02-19019 February 1983 Motion to Reinstate Portion of Contention 3.2 Re Util Workers.F Fischer Will Testify on Issue.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20028F1901983-01-24024 January 1983 Memorandum Re ASLB 830107 Memorandum & Order Reformulating Contentions Under Commission Questions 3 & 4.Contentions 3.1 & 4.1 Should Be Reformulated & Contentions 3.4,3.6,3.7,3.9, 4.2 & 4.7 Eliminated.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028E9871983-01-24024 January 1983 Response to ASLB 830107 Memorandum & Order Reformulating Contentions Under Commission Questions 3 & 4.Contention 3.2 Shows Clear Nexus to Central Point of ASLB Investigation. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028E8601983-01-24024 January 1983 Response to Reformulated Contentions 3 & 4.Issue of New Suggestions for Improving Emergency Planning to Ack Unique Population Density Around Plant Should Be Heard.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028F1951983-01-24024 January 1983 Response to ASLB 830107 Memorandum & Order Reformulating Contentions Under Commission Questions 3 & 4.Supports Elimination of Contentions 3.2,4.3,4.5 & 4.6.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083N2631983-01-24024 January 1983 Response to ASLB 830107 Memorandum & Order Reformulating Contentions Under Commission Questions 3 & 4.Requests Reconsideration of Order to Reinstate Contentions 3.2,4.5 & 4.6.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028E3831983-01-0606 January 1983 Submission Re Revised Contentions on Commission Questions 3 & 4 Concerning Emergency Planning & Offsite Emergency Procedures.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20079K8381983-01-0606 January 1983 Motion to Dismiss Contentions 2.1(a) & 2.1(d).Actions of Ucs/Ny Pirg,Sponsor of Contentions,Have Prejudiced Licensees by Denying Licensee Right to Complete Presentation of Case ML20079K8611983-01-0606 January 1983 Memorandum Supporting Licensee 830106 Motion to Dismiss Contentions 2.1(a) & 2.1(d).Intervenor Failure to Make Witnesses on Contentions Available for Deposition Prejudices Licensee Case.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20064C8441982-12-28028 December 1982 Submission Supporting Contentions on Questions 3 & 4 Formulated by ASLB 820423 Memorandum & Order.Original Contentions Supported by Substantial Factual Bases Are Not Abandoned.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20070L5431982-12-24024 December 1982 Proposed Revised Contentions on Commission Questions 3 & 4. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20070L4801982-12-17017 December 1982 Response Opposing Con Ed Motion to Eliminate Contentions. Witness Identity Was Provided to Con Ed Who Advised Pasny. List of Documents Upon Which Witnesses Would Rely Sent to Licensees ML20070D0131982-12-0909 December 1982 Responses Opposing West Branch Conservation Assoc 821104 Application for Reinstatement of Contention 2.2(d) & Assoc 821104 Objection to ASLB Restatement of Contention 2.2(b). Certificate of Svc Encl ML20067B2511982-12-0101 December 1982 Motion to Dismiss Contentions 2.1(a) & (D) Re Filtered Vented Containments & Separate Containments Respectively & 2.2(b) Re Specific Pressurized Thermal Shock Responses. W/Certificate of Svc ML20028B2201982-11-24024 November 1982 Application for Reinstatement of Contention 2.2d & Objection to ASLB Reformulation of Contention 2.2(b).Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20066E6701982-11-0909 November 1982 Response Opposing Ucs Oral Motion to Amend Contentions. Requested Amends untimely.Two-prong Test Re Contentions Not Met.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054B6711982-04-0909 April 1982 Augmentation by Greater Ny Council on Energy of Basis for First Contention,Per ASLB 820402 Order.Establishment of Reasonable Alternative Energy Supply Strategy & Economic Impact on Ny City Necessary to Address ASLB Question 6 ML20050C0101982-03-29029 March 1982 Greater Ny Council on Energy (Gnyce) Amend to Contentions & Response to NRC 820211 Reply to Gnyce 820115 Answer to Objections to Contentions Re Economic Impact of Shutdown. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041D3341982-02-26026 February 1982 Ny State Assembly Special Committee on Nuclear Power Safety Response to NRC & Licensee Replies to Petitioners Answers to Opposition to Petitions to Intervene.Aslb Should Consider Accident Consequences & Emergency Planning First ML20040H5891982-02-11011 February 1982 Reply to Responses to Objections to Petitioners' Proposed Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20040H5861982-02-11011 February 1982 Reply Memorandum Re Petitioners' Proposed Contentions. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20040G0021982-02-0505 February 1982 Petition to Amend New York City Council 811106 Petition to Intervene,Adding Addl Signatories ML20040E2821982-01-29029 January 1982 Response to NRC & Utils' 811231 Objections to Ucs/Ny Pirg Contentions. Basis for Contentions Sufficient ML20040C0001982-01-15015 January 1982 Reply of Greater Ny Council on Energy to NRC & Licensee Responses to Contentions.Economic Impact Study of Facility Shutdown Must Be Done W/Ref to Economic Sys in Which Plants Operate.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20040A4181982-01-11011 January 1982 Reply to Objections to Filed Contentions.Association Was Ignorant of Rules When First Papers Filed.Specific Contentions & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039F8411982-01-0707 January 1982 Response to NRC Response to Friends of the Earth Contentions.Lists Sufficient Basis & Specificity to Support Contention 1.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039E3211981-12-31031 December 1981 Memorandum Re Proposed Intervenors' Contentions.Position Stated on Listed Petitioners' Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039E9851981-12-31031 December 1981 Objections & Answers to Contentions of Potential Intervenors.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039G0581981-12-31031 December 1981 Objections & Answers to Contentions of Potential Intervenors.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039E2961981-12-21021 December 1981 Response to NRC Response to Petition to Intervene.Nrc Should Be Required to Show Cause Why Affidavits Required & Why Affidavits Submitted Insufficient.Friends of the Earth Have Complied W/Aslb Requirements Re Intervention ML20039C2211981-12-21021 December 1981 Reply Opposing Amended Petitions to Intervene & Rl Brodsky Petition to Intervene.Defects in Petitions Not Cured by Amended Petitions ML20039C2401981-12-21021 December 1981 Answer to Amended Petitions to Intervene.Ucs Petition Should Be Denied.Ny Pirg,Parents Concerned About Indian Point & Ny City Audubon Soc,Inc Petitions Should Be Granted Upon Submittal of Aspects Statements.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062M6141981-12-10010 December 1981 Amend to Petition to Intervene in Proceeding & Response Opposing Nrc,Con Ed,Pasny Challenges to Ucs Standing.Notice of Appearance & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062M5831981-12-10010 December 1981 Amended Petition to Intervene in Proceeding as Interested State.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062M7091981-12-10010 December 1981 Amended Petition to Intervene in Proceeding & Request for Hearing.Affidavits & Affidavits of Svc Encl ML20062M9881981-12-10010 December 1981 Amended Petition to Intervene in Proceeding & of Parents Concerned About Indian Point.Affidavits & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062N0091981-12-10010 December 1981 Amended Petition to Intervene of Greater Ny Council on Energy in Proceeding.Affidavits & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039D0221981-12-10010 December 1981 Contentions of Parents Concerned About Indian Point ML20039A5661981-12-10010 December 1981 Petition to Amend Petition to Intervene of Ny City Council- Members.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039A5631981-12-0909 December 1981 Greater Ny Council on Energy Response to NRC & Licensee Answers to Council Petition to Intervene, & to Prehearing Memoranda.Nrc Listed Shortcomings in Petition Remedied ML20062N1461981-12-0808 December 1981 Petition for Leave to Amend Portions of Joint Petition to Intervene in Proceeding.Affidavits,Notice of Appearance & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039A5821981-12-0808 December 1981 Amended Petition to Intervene of Ny State Assembly & Special Committee on Nuclear Power Safety.Affidavits & Notice of Appearance in Proceeding Encl ML20039A5901981-12-0808 December 1981 Answer of Ny State Assembly & Special Committee on Nuclear Power Safety to NRC 811124 Response to Petition to Intervene.Identifies Representative & Assures Representative Authorized to Represent Assembly.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062M9781981-12-0808 December 1981 Suppl to Petition to Intervene in Proceeding.Affidavits, Notice of Appearance & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039A5881981-12-0808 December 1981 Response of Ny State Assembly & Special Committee on Nuclear Power Safety Opposing Util 811124 Answer to Petition to Intervene.Assembly & Committee Is Separate & Coequal Branch of Ny State Govt ML20062M5991981-12-0707 December 1981 Supplemental Petition to Intervene in Proceeding as Interested State ML20039D0201981-12-0202 December 1981 Contentions of Friends of the Earth & Ny City Audubon Soc ML20039C9881981-12-0202 December 1981 Amend to 811202 Petition to Intervene.Affidavits Encl ML20038C1961981-12-0202 December 1981 Parents Concerned About Indian Point Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl 1983-03-29
[Table view] Category:RESPONSES & CONTENTIONS
MONTHYEARML20069H4641983-03-29029 March 1983 Joint Motion for Production of Documents Generated During 830309 Emergency Planning Exercise.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071B4181983-02-19019 February 1983 Motion to Reinstate Portion of Contention 3.2 Re Util Workers.F Fischer Will Testify on Issue.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20028F1901983-01-24024 January 1983 Memorandum Re ASLB 830107 Memorandum & Order Reformulating Contentions Under Commission Questions 3 & 4.Contentions 3.1 & 4.1 Should Be Reformulated & Contentions 3.4,3.6,3.7,3.9, 4.2 & 4.7 Eliminated.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028E9871983-01-24024 January 1983 Response to ASLB 830107 Memorandum & Order Reformulating Contentions Under Commission Questions 3 & 4.Contention 3.2 Shows Clear Nexus to Central Point of ASLB Investigation. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028E8601983-01-24024 January 1983 Response to Reformulated Contentions 3 & 4.Issue of New Suggestions for Improving Emergency Planning to Ack Unique Population Density Around Plant Should Be Heard.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028F1951983-01-24024 January 1983 Response to ASLB 830107 Memorandum & Order Reformulating Contentions Under Commission Questions 3 & 4.Supports Elimination of Contentions 3.2,4.3,4.5 & 4.6.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083N2631983-01-24024 January 1983 Response to ASLB 830107 Memorandum & Order Reformulating Contentions Under Commission Questions 3 & 4.Requests Reconsideration of Order to Reinstate Contentions 3.2,4.5 & 4.6.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028E3831983-01-0606 January 1983 Submission Re Revised Contentions on Commission Questions 3 & 4 Concerning Emergency Planning & Offsite Emergency Procedures.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20079K8381983-01-0606 January 1983 Motion to Dismiss Contentions 2.1(a) & 2.1(d).Actions of Ucs/Ny Pirg,Sponsor of Contentions,Have Prejudiced Licensees by Denying Licensee Right to Complete Presentation of Case ML20079K8611983-01-0606 January 1983 Memorandum Supporting Licensee 830106 Motion to Dismiss Contentions 2.1(a) & 2.1(d).Intervenor Failure to Make Witnesses on Contentions Available for Deposition Prejudices Licensee Case.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20064C8441982-12-28028 December 1982 Submission Supporting Contentions on Questions 3 & 4 Formulated by ASLB 820423 Memorandum & Order.Original Contentions Supported by Substantial Factual Bases Are Not Abandoned.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20070L5431982-12-24024 December 1982 Proposed Revised Contentions on Commission Questions 3 & 4. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20070L4801982-12-17017 December 1982 Response Opposing Con Ed Motion to Eliminate Contentions. Witness Identity Was Provided to Con Ed Who Advised Pasny. List of Documents Upon Which Witnesses Would Rely Sent to Licensees ML20070D0131982-12-0909 December 1982 Responses Opposing West Branch Conservation Assoc 821104 Application for Reinstatement of Contention 2.2(d) & Assoc 821104 Objection to ASLB Restatement of Contention 2.2(b). Certificate of Svc Encl ML20067B2511982-12-0101 December 1982 Motion to Dismiss Contentions 2.1(a) & (D) Re Filtered Vented Containments & Separate Containments Respectively & 2.2(b) Re Specific Pressurized Thermal Shock Responses. W/Certificate of Svc ML20028B2201982-11-24024 November 1982 Application for Reinstatement of Contention 2.2d & Objection to ASLB Reformulation of Contention 2.2(b).Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20066E6701982-11-0909 November 1982 Response Opposing Ucs Oral Motion to Amend Contentions. Requested Amends untimely.Two-prong Test Re Contentions Not Met.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054B6711982-04-0909 April 1982 Augmentation by Greater Ny Council on Energy of Basis for First Contention,Per ASLB 820402 Order.Establishment of Reasonable Alternative Energy Supply Strategy & Economic Impact on Ny City Necessary to Address ASLB Question 6 ML20050C0101982-03-29029 March 1982 Greater Ny Council on Energy (Gnyce) Amend to Contentions & Response to NRC 820211 Reply to Gnyce 820115 Answer to Objections to Contentions Re Economic Impact of Shutdown. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20041D3341982-02-26026 February 1982 Ny State Assembly Special Committee on Nuclear Power Safety Response to NRC & Licensee Replies to Petitioners Answers to Opposition to Petitions to Intervene.Aslb Should Consider Accident Consequences & Emergency Planning First ML20040H5891982-02-11011 February 1982 Reply to Responses to Objections to Petitioners' Proposed Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20040H5861982-02-11011 February 1982 Reply Memorandum Re Petitioners' Proposed Contentions. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20040G0021982-02-0505 February 1982 Petition to Amend New York City Council 811106 Petition to Intervene,Adding Addl Signatories ML20040E2821982-01-29029 January 1982 Response to NRC & Utils' 811231 Objections to Ucs/Ny Pirg Contentions. Basis for Contentions Sufficient ML20040C0001982-01-15015 January 1982 Reply of Greater Ny Council on Energy to NRC & Licensee Responses to Contentions.Economic Impact Study of Facility Shutdown Must Be Done W/Ref to Economic Sys in Which Plants Operate.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20040A4181982-01-11011 January 1982 Reply to Objections to Filed Contentions.Association Was Ignorant of Rules When First Papers Filed.Specific Contentions & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039F8411982-01-0707 January 1982 Response to NRC Response to Friends of the Earth Contentions.Lists Sufficient Basis & Specificity to Support Contention 1.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039E3211981-12-31031 December 1981 Memorandum Re Proposed Intervenors' Contentions.Position Stated on Listed Petitioners' Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039E9851981-12-31031 December 1981 Objections & Answers to Contentions of Potential Intervenors.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039G0581981-12-31031 December 1981 Objections & Answers to Contentions of Potential Intervenors.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039E2961981-12-21021 December 1981 Response to NRC Response to Petition to Intervene.Nrc Should Be Required to Show Cause Why Affidavits Required & Why Affidavits Submitted Insufficient.Friends of the Earth Have Complied W/Aslb Requirements Re Intervention ML20039C2211981-12-21021 December 1981 Reply Opposing Amended Petitions to Intervene & Rl Brodsky Petition to Intervene.Defects in Petitions Not Cured by Amended Petitions ML20039C2401981-12-21021 December 1981 Answer to Amended Petitions to Intervene.Ucs Petition Should Be Denied.Ny Pirg,Parents Concerned About Indian Point & Ny City Audubon Soc,Inc Petitions Should Be Granted Upon Submittal of Aspects Statements.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062M6141981-12-10010 December 1981 Amend to Petition to Intervene in Proceeding & Response Opposing Nrc,Con Ed,Pasny Challenges to Ucs Standing.Notice of Appearance & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062M5831981-12-10010 December 1981 Amended Petition to Intervene in Proceeding as Interested State.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062M7091981-12-10010 December 1981 Amended Petition to Intervene in Proceeding & Request for Hearing.Affidavits & Affidavits of Svc Encl ML20062M9881981-12-10010 December 1981 Amended Petition to Intervene in Proceeding & of Parents Concerned About Indian Point.Affidavits & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062N0091981-12-10010 December 1981 Amended Petition to Intervene of Greater Ny Council on Energy in Proceeding.Affidavits & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039D0221981-12-10010 December 1981 Contentions of Parents Concerned About Indian Point ML20039A5661981-12-10010 December 1981 Petition to Amend Petition to Intervene of Ny City Council- Members.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039A5631981-12-0909 December 1981 Greater Ny Council on Energy Response to NRC & Licensee Answers to Council Petition to Intervene, & to Prehearing Memoranda.Nrc Listed Shortcomings in Petition Remedied ML20062N1461981-12-0808 December 1981 Petition for Leave to Amend Portions of Joint Petition to Intervene in Proceeding.Affidavits,Notice of Appearance & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039A5821981-12-0808 December 1981 Amended Petition to Intervene of Ny State Assembly & Special Committee on Nuclear Power Safety.Affidavits & Notice of Appearance in Proceeding Encl ML20039A5901981-12-0808 December 1981 Answer of Ny State Assembly & Special Committee on Nuclear Power Safety to NRC 811124 Response to Petition to Intervene.Identifies Representative & Assures Representative Authorized to Represent Assembly.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20062M9781981-12-0808 December 1981 Suppl to Petition to Intervene in Proceeding.Affidavits, Notice of Appearance & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039A5881981-12-0808 December 1981 Response of Ny State Assembly & Special Committee on Nuclear Power Safety Opposing Util 811124 Answer to Petition to Intervene.Assembly & Committee Is Separate & Coequal Branch of Ny State Govt ML20062M5991981-12-0707 December 1981 Supplemental Petition to Intervene in Proceeding as Interested State ML20039D0201981-12-0202 December 1981 Contentions of Friends of the Earth & Ny City Audubon Soc ML20039C9881981-12-0202 December 1981 Amend to 811202 Petition to Intervene.Affidavits Encl ML20038C1961981-12-0202 December 1981 Parents Concerned About Indian Point Contentions.Certificate of Svc Encl 1983-03-29
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARJPN-99-029, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirement for Nuclear Power Reactors1999-09-20020 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirement for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20212E4181999-09-15015 September 1999 Petition Per 10CFR2.206 Requesting OL for Unit 2 Be Modified or Suspended to Prevent Restart Until Reasonable Assurance That Licensee in Substantial Compliance with Terms of OL & Has Proper Consideration for Public Health & Safety JPN-99-022, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirements for Industry Codes & Stds1999-06-22022 June 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirements for Industry Codes & Stds ML20202J6321999-01-20020 January 1999 Transcript of 990120 Meeting in Peekskill,Ny Re Decommissioning.Pp 1-132.With Related Documentation ML20198E9721998-12-21021 December 1998 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities. Orders That Wh Clark Prohibited for 1 Yr from Engaging in NRC-Licensed Activities JPN-98-052, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Util Endorses & Supports Position Presented by NEI & Commends Commission for Initiative to Address Disconnects1998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Util Endorses & Supports Position Presented by NEI & Commends Commission for Initiative to Address Disconnects ML20198L2731998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Supporting NEI Re Proposed Rules 10CFR50, 52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments JPN-98-050, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants.Encourages NRC Staff to Withdraw Proposed Change & to Work with Nuclear Power Industry & Other Stakeholders to Accomplish Goal1998-12-14014 December 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants.Encourages NRC Staff to Withdraw Proposed Change & to Work with Nuclear Power Industry & Other Stakeholders to Accomplish Goal ML20155F4561998-08-26026 August 1998 Demand for Info Re False Info Allegedly Provided by Wh Clark to Two NRC Licensees.Nrc Considering Whether Individual Should Be Prohibited from Working in NRC-licensed Activities for Period of 5 Yrs ML20238F5271998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 IA-98-261, Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-461998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 ML20238F5241998-05-0606 May 1998 Transcript of 980506 Enforcement Conference Held in King of Prussia,Pa Re Con Edison,Indian Point.Pp 1-75 JPN-97-037, Comment on Final Direct Rule Changes to Paragraph (H) of 10CFR50.55a Codes & Standards. Effective Date of New Rule Should Be Delayed Until Listed Concerns Can Be Resolved & Appropriate Changes Incorporated1997-12-0101 December 1997 Comment on Final Direct Rule Changes to Paragraph (H) of 10CFR50.55a Codes & Standards. Effective Date of New Rule Should Be Delayed Until Listed Concerns Can Be Resolved & Appropriate Changes Incorporated ML20148M6471997-06-19019 June 1997 Comment Opposing Porposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems ML20133N0511997-01-0505 January 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Draft Policy Statement on Resturcturing & Economic Deregulation of Electric Util Industry ML20149M4621996-12-0909 December 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Draft Policy Statement on Restructuring & Economic Deregulation of Electric Utility Industry ML20077G3481994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Nuclear Power License Renewal ML20070P0561994-04-19019 April 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NRC Draft Policy Statement on Use of Decommissioning Trust Funds Before Decommissioning Plan Approval ML20029C5771994-03-11011 March 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Draft Rule on Decommissioning.Informs That 15 Mrem/Yr Unreasonably Low Fraction of Icrp,Ncrp & Regulatory Public Dose Limit of 100 Mrem/Yr ML20059C3031993-12-28028 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Definition of Commercial Grade Item ML20045H8751993-07-19019 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Exam Procedures for Operator Licensing.Supports Rule ML20045F2451993-06-28028 June 1993 Comment on Proposal Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning NRC-licensed Facilities.Opposes Proposed Criteria ML20044F5681993-05-20020 May 1993 Comment on Draft Commercial Grade Dedication Insp Procedure 38703,entitled Commercial Grade Procurement Insp. Endorses NUMARC Comments Dtd 930517 JPN-02-034, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl1992-07-0606 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl JPN-91-021, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments. Approx 300% Increase in NRC Fees for FY91 Will Have Major Impact Upon Operating & Maint Budgets of Plants1991-05-13013 May 1991 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments. Approx 300% Increase in NRC Fees for FY91 Will Have Major Impact Upon Operating & Maint Budgets of Plants JPN-91-005, Comment Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept. Util Concurs W/Numarc Comments.Analysis of Info from NUREG-1395 Insufficient to Complete Evaluation.Root Cause Analysis of Seven Themes Listed in SECY-90-347 Recommended1991-01-28028 January 1991 Comment Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept. Util Concurs W/Numarc Comments.Analysis of Info from NUREG-1395 Insufficient to Complete Evaluation.Root Cause Analysis of Seven Themes Listed in SECY-90-347 Recommended ML20066G4411991-01-23023 January 1991 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Substantive Typo in 901015 Filing on Behalf of Licensee Noted ML20058G6341990-10-30030 October 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty Program JPN-90-068, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS1990-10-22022 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS ML20065H7541990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Re Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 on Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Commission Assessment of Four Alternatives Should Be Expanded to Include Not Only Safety Considerations But Other Atomic Energy Act Objectives JPN-90-067, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC1990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC JPN-90-052, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR1990-07-0909 July 1990 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR JPN-90-050, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Proposed Rule Will Place More Stringent Restrictions on Licensed Operators & Unnecessary1990-07-0202 July 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Proposed Rule Will Place More Stringent Restrictions on Licensed Operators & Unnecessary ML20012C6491990-03-0909 March 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against PTS Events. Any Utilization of NRC Proposed Application of Reg Guide 1.99, Rev 2,would Be Inappropriate W/O re-evaluation by NRC ML20005F6521989-12-13013 December 1989 Comment on Proposed Draft Reg Guide DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Concurs w/industry-wide Position Presented by NUMARC & Offers Addl Comments ML20246P6061989-07-0707 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Significant & Independent Industry Efforts Already Underway to Address Issue ML20245K1941989-06-16016 June 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants1989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20235V9011989-02-24024 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Supports NUMARC Position.Proposed Rule Will Hinder Important Initiatives to Improve Maint JPN-88-063, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments1988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments ML20205L8521988-10-21021 October 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Cleaning or Disposing of Nuclear Waste.Incineration of Radwaste Oil Should Not Be Allowed JPN-88-015, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site1988-04-18018 April 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site JPN-88-002, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed1988-01-25025 January 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed JPN-87-062, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex1987-12-31031 December 1987 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex JPN-87-053, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection1987-10-15015 October 1987 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection JPN-87-051, Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl1987-09-28028 September 1987 Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl ML20235Y9911987-07-20020 July 1987 Notice of Issuance of Director'S Decision Under 10CFR2.206 Re Emergency Planning for School Children in Vicinity of Indian Point.* Request to Suspend OLs Denied ML20151C5061987-02-18018 February 1987 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning ML20093H6421984-10-15015 October 1984 Comments on Staff Presentation at Commission 841002 Meeting. Commission Should Conclude Proceedings Due to Inescapable Conclusion That Facility Safe to Operate & Poses No Undue Risk to Public.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098D2721984-09-26026 September 1984 Comments on Commission 840905 Meeting Re Facilities,Per Sj Chilk 840911 Memo.Licensee Agrees W/Staff That Further Mitigative Features or Plant Shutdown Unnecessary Due to Low Risk.Certificate of Svc Encl 1999-09-20
[Table view] |
Text
. . . . - - =. - . .
h - PROD. & tlTil. FAC. 50 -24 9 -
- f.
f
' G 9
, UcCkETES f r usite g 3 MAP. 31971
I Y g , et m smenn
, rex er cuer.s
//
4 N@ - _
9 CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY 0F NEW YORK, INC.
RESPONSES TO ROUND TWO QUESTIO!!S SUPPLIED BY THE HUDSON RIVER FISHERMAN'S ASSOCIATION ON FEBRUARY 22, 1971 t
1 MARCH 2, 1971 a
DATED:
4 i
OK0500hkh ,
^
PDR
L' -
Quention No. 1 Question: (a) llave any tests for radiological content or i effects been made on fish taken, dead or alive, from the intake screens at Indian
, Point Unit No. l? ,
'(b) If such tests have been made, produce all reports, analyses and conclusions derived therefrom.
Answer: (a) Yes.
(b) Analyses of fish taken from the intake screens at Indian Point Unit No. 1 have been performed; 4 These f by New York University during 1970.
s
't analyses consisted of gamma ray spectroscopy of an aliquot of an ashed blend of collected fish. While the preliminary results are shown u-in Table 1, attached, no reports analyzing the j results of these tests have been officially ,
i received. An analysis of the results is shown l on Table 2, which includes conversion of the i
Table 1 data to dose rates, and a comparison j 1
with natural background radiation. t I
l I
1 a
. 4
[
l _1_
. O O .
Question No. 1 A communication was received by Con Edison (Cont'd) with respect to Test No. 4. It is attached to this answer.
O e
T
. l a
- TABLE 1 . ,
j PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF RADIOLOGICAL - -
ANALYSES OF FISH SAMPLES -' .
- INDIAN POINT - 1970 (pc/Kg Wet)
Collected Species Date By K-40 Mn-54 Co-50 Co-58 Cs-134 Cs-137 % ASH # Fish-
- l) Tom Cod 1/13/70 Raytheon 1478 12 6.4 -8 7.0 15.7- 3.09 ~E0 ~4 (Screens) 36 i3
- 1.5 4 1.7 1 1.7 l2) Striped 1/13/70 Raytheon 1680 14.8 4.5 -10.1 6.8 29.9 3.67 ~ 122 Bass 47 i 4.4 i 2.1 5.8 2.3 2.3 -
(Screens)
- 3) Phite 1/13/70 Raytheon 1474 2.6 -2.1 -3.9 7.9 52.6 4.64 21 F Perch 40 1 4.7 2.3 6.3 2.5 i 2.6 (Screens)
.4 ) White 3/10/70 Dr. Lauer 1477 9.9 0.5 -17.0 10.5 37.8 Perch 4.48 30 W 52 5.5 2.7 9.7 t 2. 9' 3.0 (From Tinbkill) 5 ) '3hite 6/03/70 Raytheon 486 2320 3266 3446 310.5 578.5 Perch 5.76 16 C-217 52 21 i 190 15.7 15.8 (Screens)
Jgg
- 6) Phite 6/09/70 Raytheon 737
, Perch 62
-2.4 7.6 3.9 3.3 27.3 15.8 f.23.7 12.9 5.74 10 ?
3.6
- (Canal)
- 7) White 6/15/70 Raytheon 561 117 30.4 92.7 35.8 93.7 5.33 8 W-Perch 67 i 12.7 3.8 69.4 i 4.7 4.4 (Canal) g) White 6/15/70 Raytheon 380 110.7 36.3 298 75.5 Perch 122.0 4.59 13 W 65 11.1 4.2 32 4.7 4.6 (Canal)
KEY - W=Whole Fish -
F= Fillets Only -
G= Gutted Fish t
- - mu,,aw .- -
---,*%*-a,sy. _
o o
~
1 TABLE 2 Dose Rate to Fish From Radionuclides From Natural Done Indian Point ** to Fish
. 36 mrads/yr.*
Maximum 28 mrads/yr.
~
Minimum 0.09 mrad's/yr.
Mean 4.0 mrads/yr.
I
- 28 from cosmic rays; 8 from internal K-40
o 4
, - , . - . - , . - - - . . . - . , . - , , - - . - - - - - - - - ~ . . . - , . . _ . - . - - , . -
J '
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER I{
institute of Environmental Medicine
- 550 FIR $f AVENUI, NEW YORK, N.Y.10016 AREA 212 679 3200 ANTHONY l. LANZA RESEARCH L A80RAToRif 5 AT UNIVER$1TY VALLEY tong M1 ADOW ROAD, STERilNG f oREST, TUXf DO, N.Y.
Mall AND TIttPHoNE ADDRESS: 550 FIRST AV[NUE, NEW YORK. N.Y.10016 May 19, 1970 Mr. George Cowherd Consolidated Edison Company 4 Irving Place flew York, New York 10003
Dear Mr. Cowherd:
J As you requested during our recent telephone conver-sation, I have analyzed a sample of fish collected at .
Indian Point during the period 3/8/70 to 3W11/70 for gamma-emitting radionuclides. The only radionuclides detected in this sample were Cesium-137 and Potassium-40, the latter which occurs naturally in nature. The activities found in the sample were:
Cs-137: 59.6 picoCuries/Kg Live Wght.
K-40 : 1572 pico Curies /Kg Live Wght. .
~
The gamma spectra of the sample is included as verification.
To facilitate evaluation of the Cs-137 activity contained in this sample, the following activities of this nuclide have l
been found in Hudson River fish on other dates and other locations:
LOCATION DATE pC: 137Cs/Kg Live Wght.
Annual Average (Indian Pt.-Esopus#) 1964 36 1965 41 i
1966 29 1967 20 1968 31 Indian Point May 1969 -
42 June 1969 61 l July 1969 61 August 1969 48 l September 1969 59 l Esopus# May 1969 27 June 1969 24 July 1969 21 August 1969 30
. l
- p -. ._. _ _ - __.
o O
2 - continued In view of these results, the concentration of Cs-137 in the fish sample of 3/8/70 to 3/11/70 appears to be quite typical of values found in fish from this area of the river. The low-level aqueous discharges at Indian Point do account,,however, for the two to '
three-fold elevation of Cs-137 in fish from the vicinity of Indian Point, as compared to upstream locations.
It is unlikely that " dangerously" high levels of pure beta-emitting radionuclides , e. g. , Sr-90 and Tritium were present in these fish since the low Cs-137 levels which were measured imply an overall, low reactor-discharge of all radionuclides.
Sincerely, ,
sk w3 f k5 A~-
o.
Jack W. Lentsch JWL:bl .
Encl. . ,
J
- Esopus lies 40 miles north of Indian Point.
\ }
7-t.' -
l Icon s ..
+ + T+
A > DunwoRh.M - Lo. F._'. l
~-
_ r - ' -- - -
l n .__ .. '. . . . . . ... .. . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . _. . . _ . . . . . _ . _._,,)u pja,,g; . . m.h.,. l .
/, .kw
! i._ _. .
. _ _. . . . . _ . . 2- ..._ . . . . .. .s . _ . .
i
, (j/a.ed .
l , s. _. .. . .. ._.... . ... - .. . . .. . . .. .M i w iM I s _ ._ _ . _ .- _ _ .
t . .
,i o.....,. ....
_ s _. .f.3 .
. . . .. a . . .
t' 6 A .
3 ' , a j .
- t. g;
. 8,
(
' ' '.. g ..
3
.s
. . .-l.i*** .- . .
1 . . . .t* . L .-*..
1 . . ,6. . , .
=
.e . . , . .. s . .
4: , . g..
9
._..s. .. ....._7..
. ... p..
- a. . .
..j -
. .8 .
.4.
. _- 4. ....,.. ..g. . .
. ...L . p ..v . . ._. . .. ._.
- g. .g . . _ . . . . .i e. .
. - . -g . -
- g
. . . 5... . . . . . .. - .g. _ . . . ... - . . . . - .
..-~.1.. . g . a_.-+..-.y...
I 7....
t -) ...-
... . i_.. _.. g. ..
. .e..... uw..
L.; .
,_. . ... ._..8
. e. _L.t : _. . ' ;..
.....- L ;.L .1_.;__: . .! .
- r. . . . .' -
. 4 t.p.
.... _ .- . e ., _ . . _1 ..n . . . .. .
1 - , ..L . %. . , . . 4 . ; i }. sy .. . ;_. 7 . _. . L .}
-' 1 .. '
r-i- }- P - - - - ' ' - - - 8
- .;at .. ;_ - i).L L Ls L , .
- _ U .1 J o ' _ ; ..:. ; i :.
.I. l L*.p -.I
. . _ . . . . . _ . . ..... _r*
.-. 4, :q .I e
- j.
a
.jeg*.. *
. L, .y p i a 4 _3. *
..I ..
- g. 7 , .de F. -
i
-,- -i Lj i.
p7;
- . - - - - - - ..-.l
+ . ... . l . , ;. _{__$.4 ,
e g., I. b .b .e N' _ . . , . . . .
, a ag .. p *. . i. .
. s-.... . . .d. 4 . .. .
. . . . - ~ . - 4
,3 0*0' i 6 t i : g.,. . ; d I j
..~. ! . i . . ,e - l- .
t l ,,
l Q N
.i ,i .1 ,. g . gll ..i ..{ . !' . e.! . . s .i - . - . . . .i- p
. ti , }, # l e e * .
e .< '
13 il .
fn . . 9 s n
.** t**
."9 .* ' g
%' "1 j'
. r- .rc:
cp . [- !3 j. ,
7 7 d :. : . " . jhi % .::t q .,. . j8'et , e E I 5-t- ,# ._.
k . .
^ * : } ._. . * **N & f. .. $ ~~
. 1 .*
6 _
.s .. . ..._. .. .
.r
. ...~. ... .. ._... ... . . . . .
a..
y . . . -. . . 4
, y .,. ,
. ~ _ . . - . . . _ _ , .. .
. ,_.4... . . _ _. ... .,_ ..
....'.f.. .....] .& g ( . ._d
._~..
...4.,. . , . . 4._. ..$... . . . . . . . . . . . . .g..
..,.__ ~.4.. .p, . . , . . ..
- 7. . _ -- h = :: : -- : -. .: ;
....d..-- * . : .f.. . ..'. ..
' -* - : . . ... 3, . - - ..
~
.. ~ '*-
J*: t
.. .....'..!.T..-'.**...2.~I, '..-. * ' .. .*. ~. .. ~_*J .~~.~*.~T.. ^ 1: . - .
...t.:.'*-** 8
~ . *!..~ ~ ~. .J. ..... .;_^ .- .1
.0 .l,g~.
'. .:.~~.~...._'~1.
s 3_
...4.-...__. .,. .. ." . .. .". . .. ._. .._ ... , .
. . ... h . . . L.,
r.,-_
. ,. - . - . _ . , .. . + -
. _ . ... ...-~._. .( . .. .. . . _e....
w_
.. -.c.. s .-- _. . . - . - -. . .n. ..._ _.
C 4.. . !. .4w
- 4. _1. 9. ... . . .
.4 -....
_a_.-_.. _ .. j 4.,_. . .
.4
.. _. g
.}, ..L. .4. J.... 4...,..._ . . . .
.. . . r. ..
?..4 ,}q. '.
4_".. u. g._ .4 O. 2 l C1 * .l .. 4. y e..y_.. -.- g._. .p. ..
f.. 9.g. ..
- f a g .. . .s...;g. * . ..
3
. . ... - 4 f g, , .q ., .
. .}
1 i - ,
I
- n. l _p. * .d. _ ,.u i.
.-t__+;_3..w . ..
I _ . . . . . .. 4...
j i i t_ ____ _ .p.:_._ p . . -.T_.L , .A.._!.
t.
L .g.Qm_
' ! l' 4.L f
l 3: _
- g. ._
- y. y:i _ _ _ . . ..!
, ._. . L4 i . . a .g. -
-t _u _.L _ .._ .. i_t_ u _.
J_._.i. .
Iit. D_ N' a -
,o . 1 ,. -
' ' I ,II L _f'_. _a.L . 8 Ii . it >
,o _ 4 J. 1 I d ..
j i. l '. II~
,* . _ , . LL I '.,' i ..
' lli
. I J_ . ' _ ' . il I _4' l':. .
u_ , . ...'.i' .
I it i !ll .f i i _U I ll
_..1_I_. ._._
7 li'i - I.. i T' T 3;, g , i !l .
1 i i : t i e i l 1t a i i ,
I6*
- g. ,
-e . .:d.+ y -
. wi g r: .. j .
<-* r8 a ,
I
.- . . . . . . =.=.=_.. __: ]
- ~ = . _-. .c=. .:: .u. ..::. 2 _.. : r --
- - +
r.:.. : :: :
5 ,2 ,
. . -- . . a.. h. _ ._. .:. :.
un . -- ._.. ..._ ~ .- - *
.- . _ .. _ _ - .. ..- _- ..._- 4-._. ...._~
3._ . . . _. . ._. . . . . -. . .. .. . _ . . . .
p *+
3_
., v .... _
-.rp . ._T - . _ . . _. . . . Lra._. .
..+_... . , . ...u... o.. _ . . . .
...L' f. .~ . . . . . . . .
> - . .._... ;_i_ .. ._.a. . . _ . . . .
l .i . . . . . . . . .. _$. . 6- . T_. 4. ..- . . a~ i. .... .. . 4. - . e. , - - . 4 .. .._.. . _--
4
-g -
- -Li ' g.._; . F :i[ .4 , ; i :. .
- 2: -.. . ; : .-
3
_ . . .n. - __.u
. .. . . .c_ . . =_. m.. .: =_:.:.- ._2._: _.:_ -
- :... . _ . 4 .. ._.r
.... .w
.4_rt_,..
+_
g-
.i.._.. . _ .r._..4.-. 4. ...
6.,_. .p e T.._ ... ___ ... .2...~.4
+ ~ .9.:L.6
._e L... e
___.~ a _
r_ ._
. _. 4 a ... . _ . ..._-.
...2_M. L i.._i. . ,-. .
a_.._,_,. .
_t . . . I. . ._
.. .. . g .
j ;_j_g_ %.y g- . _h. . .a.{. _H...I ...a_g_ 4_7 _ .. g _:._u .p p. t . .; . _ ; .
7 .._ q a1.L .o{_.a.,. - ... ... . . _ . . . . . .. . . ,. ..
q_J....,.1_..i ,
j
...i- -.-....4_r.
.. ..L . J .p ,s. t 4
- a. 4_.4_
_.'. i
.t.. l l
. Er l 1 ..,. ... 3 .1 j . - .i4 i l.,.. . . . . . _ . _ ,
i 4 .... . . . .,. .
i i . ..._ ..
h.... g T.
g'id.p . i . p -5 .
k..} . .
i i.. .
. . .d y
6 t a lli 4e 1i ij ' 4 1 - * * . t e i t8 l i i
/C s4 d s? h,y b s*
~
A0 /c j'g* 5 /ec //O fl e ih of.
i 'dWLn,.~,a n
2 ._. % < s. . . k
.. N5 .. .m. . L'. _a c _~._ . .
U_ ~ _ll $f
.. .. -1 ..) .. .- _ . _ _ _ ._. .. . ._ _. I __ . ..i__ l_
- e. . m m y.
i
'#Au 2._ -. . _ . . _ .
I
._-.--l...._- . _ . . . _ _ _ _ . . . . _
]//}_ . . _ . _ . ..
l _... _f_.-----_---_.).--- ' _ . _ _ _ . . . f . - __ - - - ..d'_
t l
--dh . . _____....
. I
.. .t
. (
..l.
1 .. 2 t .
, , ai . . 2
-to-
I
--- 7 t
+-------f-- !
I 8 i 7, 1 : ; .
.i . . . . .
r e
i 6
l i t. t
. s_ . l
,L - j. j ... . . (. . _ - ,
{ _
.._ -) .
...l. i .[. b .. . .
t.
g..['_ q.g. , , (' a _ . . . . . _.
{
....y. ,... .
,f_ a -.
t_..
. .T 7.!, .. 4 . .
- L- ..
f.-_ -
. . [_ ..t }_ p , 3 .._.. ! t
..L i .'1-- ! .1 . _'
.._L
.; ' j
., p. 1- l .
.1_l 1-. iii, t i i ,
' t ' I
- l-,.- ll
- i i . ' i
. .I.7_j . f,a [.q..; i-.ji .. I . p
.t . i I l t 1 1
lj . . , _ ._t. - -
t i t c i l
I l i l
r ./
( r
- . j !
m I.
I I l l 3 l .
1 1 .
4 -
_ 4
- h- . h t n .
.I.
.t.. - 0
.. - a 6, . . . . . la
. _ - .. ._. . .I
_}.._
. _. . . _ _ .._.6 , . -,.
~
l- j - . l l
. _ l
. f- " i ,
l.
- g #
f -- _
.f__
~
., .I g
?_i ,
- - ~! _}.
, _ _ -' 5
. l . _i. _ .. _ - _. _._
. _ _ .a
- l. ~ . .. I.
. }._
, . , .... ,_, .-._._ ._. . _ ..a i .t ._. _ . _
.._.. s. .. .
g i ,
q :. . . . . _ .
, ,_i i
.t _py. . . _ . . _ . _
_.y_ _
. . _ . _t._. . . .
4 _. .4..
, 7;_._._ . .
.. _w n . - 4. -
. . . _ 2 _?_ .J ._. _ . _ . . _ . . . .
.___.._p_ _
_,. . . _._ _+- . _ . .
.j.,2
[7- _- -.Q_
. a .l. b p J . . ._ . _ _ . . . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . __...___t.. . _
.} . ;. g_t .
.._p.j _ _ _ .
T' {. j- -j..._
!t*-l
.a
- f. .i . i .j ' '-f-b i- i-
- f !') - T*JT. l - j-,-I ; T , -
i . -] .LT ., .
.i-- _
_ __L.'.
.d_i,
.~
1 6,
- _i_ I. . _ .i ,i.1 ,_i. .
i
.i ! i. . . l _ _. .__. . . _ . . . _ . .
...__d.____. _.. _ _.__.. .
>aI.
e I i i ; . . .I * '
t 0 l I l I I l _
,' ; .! i I !
l.
l
' i -
l -
~
t I i l l
.l'. ,
- _. f i l l_ l
~
' ~~ *
-~ .. : r;- - .i.: .1 - ~ -
i
.- . j_f2 _
f
. . . s
_..t,-..--- . . l 4 _
. __ . . _ _ _ . . . . ~ .
n.
. 4 __. - - -. .___6_~._.....
_ 4_ - _ . _ . . ._ 1 . __ _ _ . .
f I l l
. }
' l' '
_ t I f l .
. l 1 i .
. :. . . I^ ; J .
- r. . . *i *.'.._.' .'-[ a. , _ 6, 4_,_-- I. , , _
4... a e a 4 l i i r I I [
f i ,
l . .
a g I e l I ~i I I I'f f ,
L .' ' i ! '
l.1
. L_ ' . 4 l ..
l
.l ,
-r* [7.;.t'-
. .;, j ; ,
. 1 ,[ 3 .,
.. .t _p j .
i
] s' *b' '50 / *> i* /Q
~ ' l O O ;
Question No. 2 Question: Describe in detail the timing of radiological waste discharges into the Hudson River, i.e.,
is waste discharged' constantly or in batches:
if in batches, how often and in what quantities?
Answer: Padiological wastes are processed on a batch basis within the plant, before discharge to the Hudson River from Indian Point Unit No. 1. The Indian Point Unit No. 2 radwaste s,vstem will also process radiological wastes on a batch basis within the plant before discharge. Por both the present Indian Point Unit No. 1 and proposed Indian Point Unit No. 2 operation, liquid wastes are discharged continuously in a controlled manner after processing, and are monitored to assure compliance with allowable discharge limits.
During operation of Indian, Point Unit No. 1 the radwaste system processes a batch quantity of 2255 gallons approximately 5 times a day.
During operation of Indian Point Unit No. 2 the
'radwaste system is designed to process a batch quantity of 1000 gallons approximately twice a day.
l l
I i
i 4
. . , - , - ., . -, . - - - , , , , . . . . ~ , . , - , - - - , - , , . , . . . . . , . , , - , ..
~ '
O O l
I Question No. 3 Question: (a) Are there any reports of radiological tests on fish made to the A1:C before -
t August 1, 1968?
,( b) If not, why were tests on fish not made until that time?
(c) If not, why were tests on fish added at that time? -
Answer: Yes, radiological tests were made on fish before August 1, 1968 and were reported in the semi-i:
annual surveys of environmental radioactivity ;
in the vacinity of the Tndian Point Station. j.
A summary of the results of such tests for the period from 1960 to 1969 is,shown on the attached chart.
. The reasons for discontinuing these tests in 1966, and for resuming them in 1969 are presented in the semi-annual reports entitled " Survey of Environmental Radioactivity in the Vicinity of Indian Point Station" filed in Docket 50-3.
Essentially, radioecological fish samplinF as I
i i.
4 l
_.- _. _ __ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ . - _ - - _ _ . _. a
9 9 ~
Question No. 3 -
(Cont'd) part of the monitoring program was discontinued
'in 1966 because there had been essentially no-change in the average value of data obtained i.
over the first five years and the monitoring
, Program was modified to achieve more meaningful
. data. Fish sampling was resumed in 1969 when the monitoring program was-expanded in antici-Pation of the forthcoming addition of Units '
2 and 3. -
L
{.
I b
~
r
. I I
s 9
4
$ l
't..
3 8
, }
I.
I
P%
l %.
.. 4 .. 4 . .g ,g .
4,e . ,
..6 ..I .l ... .....J.a r . .
. . . . . . . ..p J. la i.. 1; . . .I. .
. ., ( y * ..a.
.* ,j e-6- *
.* * - t I .. ! !
., e g .i s..
.. e i.
e . . .
. ..g ..
.s.. .], . , 1, . . .. . .
- t. . . .
. . t
. ,. . . l
.].- . . .
,-.I. .. -l . j .
- s. .
- r. - _
. .. ...,. I......
- . .l.
. ; l.
i.. .j . . . . . ..
I. ,, , ,. . ..
.g. ..
s 4 . .. .
4
. . .. . . . .._I . ,
.. ..,..I..... . . ~ .. -
l' , , . . .
.,i.
i.... ..
.l
. . .._ .. . .. . . ..., .. .,g
, ,t i
1..
- g. . .. .. . .
s
..a
. 1
.,4 7
. g ! .,
g l
.e . g 6
.-.. . l ., .3
. . ..4?
. ,a
.. ... .._..._. ....._..p
. ... . . + .
.. g . . 4 .
,..l.e
. ,p...I.1..!... ..
1 .. .. .. . . , ..,.
, 1
] l, ..
!_ . 1 .
., ._. . i.... . ... .
. . . . . . i . . .
...._....e.l _. .. ...,l ,..,l
. l ..... . .. -
i ..
.l.
e.
e . .
.g... . .
..q g ,. . - g.. 1 .
m g . ... s I a. .. - - . . . . ... ..J. .
P's c
. -..f.;. _..- a .... 1 . ,. .
l
.. ., . . .J_.
y o .g. . . ... . . .
8.
- g. _- . . . 1 .
.. a, c . .. .. ...
l ..l . . . .
1.. .. .
.... . ... . . . . . _ . 1 i . . . , . . . -. .
m ,..-..l,., . . . .
2 ..
. I, .i.
U.
. i . ! l. .. . . _
d.
- k. E l.,. ,
g,'
n .
F> a; .
u -......._.! ...I . .
m--mme
.g
- p. .
1
.~.. . .
_ p 0 . . . . ._ ..e. _
l -
6m.3 . . - - - -
. . . . . . - . g
.. . g
- a. . . . . . . . : ,
3 , E ,.
-.I._..
g 6 . _ . . .
.I ,
!, . . ... ... ... J. . . .
g
. .. . . . 1
.1 I
., s
.-1..
B
....(.... . I - I I
a . ! q .. mem,. se
,e
. e , ... . . .._....... , l. . l. .-
.i. .
... 3, . .. . .
..6 .. I. J. .. ..I e.
..l 4 ..
4 p
e
. s .
y,,
. 1,... .1.l.-......., ..
. . .4... ..
..1.....
.l ..
. ) . .4.g. _. .. ..yj ,..0. .. ,....(. . [. . l [
.A I l
. . . . . . =. 1 . .
t e .
._-4_=._
4 .l ,
.. num-m ,
j .i ..!
, .i . 1. .. i 1
.=
.l , .,
. . 1..
' , . . . . . . . g -. .
- c. ,
l 1 .i . : 'l. . I ; 4 . . ..1.I i l-. ! - W . -
_ _ _ . r
. , . l. . . ..
. _ .....!....i . l ..
. i.
- s. . . .....j.._........ _
l . 4. . . . ..._! ,. ;-. . ,i . . . . . , . . . . ._ . .
. l .. l ,
m-,, i i
, e. . ;
- . ,! .i l .
,. ! .. . . . .) ... l l.l.
l l ,. . l.
. l.
- 1. . - 1 1
%e [l
. . . ,. [
. 1 , ,. . ..
.i . . .L. l e
. 1 I
- j. 6- .-
..i *e
.
- ,g,. _l
- 4 1 ,
ex-mem i;
. .. .- -. ... .. .~. . . . . . .. . . ~ .. ..
. .. _~... .
. . . . .._......n
. . . . . . g;,, .
. .~
. I
.mmmes
[ . ,. ,. . _..
. ]. [. . .
- p. .:
. e i . l l , 4 4
g-
... s l
(
.. . ~ . . .
. .. s -
{
- i. . . q . . .. j .
,i . . _ .
. . . . .-. .m. . .... . .. . .. .. .. . . . . . .. .,.,,
.. . . . . . . . .. _.. .. ,.. .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .. n ..
l .. ,jl. ..
- m. g,,
. l . -~- --
.. .. . ~. .
g
, . 1 . I j l .'
- " 6
, ,. . . ... . ~ . . . . . . , . . . . .
.... . . . . ~ . . .
. ... y .
. ..a.. ,-.-..
, l l
, g. i
...1 ,
G -!. - 1. . . . .. ... '". .... ;* , .. .. J $.
. . ;. ' l , .
l .. g.
.i 3
- ..- ..- t
. _ .,, , ~ . . _
. ... . . . . .. .. .. . ..w..
i . . . . l _. _ . ...l j
...o
.m
, . . . . 4 i , - . s. _ _-
- i. . .$. . l
. ,s . ..
_ . i.
. - - - _ . . _ .. ,mummme .
. . . i i
l I . l:. s ~
, I .l...
o
- ~ ~ -
sc.
c .
1: .; e r- -_
- s. .I _
...l..
g . . . . -g. .
m ... . gm g a j j j l l gj g .g g , .
., g j,..,* '
/ ,,3 8
{ 3 l 3
-l l -4. . . . . .
? ' - -l - - -
o
.w w w. ......,.2...... .. w '.; *
(
g
,o.
umc >:............ . . .
....m.... :., ,d
,, -. - -- e - -- - - - -
O O
~
Question No. 4 Question: On Page 4 of " Manmade Radionuclides in the Hudson River Estuary", it is stated that the M.P.C. of water into which Indian Point Unit No. 1 discharges was changed. Describe the 1 analyses, findings and conclusions which led to this change in M.P.C.
J Answer: The "MPC" has never been changed. The me't hod 1, for computing the fractional portion of MPC depends upon the state of knowledge of the identities and concentrations of the radioactive h
constituents of the waste.
j a
The M.P.C. for all discharges from Indian Point has always been that allowed by 10CFR20. The change referred to is as permitted within 10CFR20.
- Appendix B, Table II, notes 2 through 5, therein specify an allowable limit for liquid discharge concentration for an unknown mix of radionuclides.
This method was used for Indian Point discharges from 1962 to 1966. In 1966, procedures at Indian a
s
O O
. Quention No. 4 (Cont'd)
Point for release of radioactivity, were changed to include radiochemical analysis of radioactive wastes to determine isotopic content. With a i knowledge of isotopic content, the computation
,of MPC as specified for each isotope according
.to'10CFR20 Appendix B, Table II, became applicable.
4 l
l l .
i -
4 e
5
)
2 --
.t
.. ~ , . - - - - - - - - -
,, , -. ,- _- - _ _ - 2 - -- -----, ,,-------
. _ - . . ._ . = -.
O O
. Question No. 5 Question: Describe procedure by which fish were chosen
,' for radiological anaiysis on which reports [
u i
to the AEC were based.
Answer: Fish were collected by shore seining, gill nets, trawling, and at times from the screens, and were chosen so as to include a variety of l species.
4
. l
)
1 i
f i
i E
l
.i i i
e
,--,,,.n_---.n,.s -
.--,,-,~.--,.4 a- +- 4 _, ,,---- - , . , , ~ y - _-,-,,,,- --- -,-- - , , - - - - - 4 ---
~ '
O O Ouestion No. G Question: " Manmade Radionuclides in the Hudson River Estuary" states that in 1969 channes in radio-lorical matter in plants can be related to chances in radioloFical matter in fish. In its report
' covering February 1, 1969 to July 31, 1969, con Edison found no identifiable radiological L isotopes in fish tested. Explain the differences i in tests made which appear to lead to different results and relate the results of ETie two studies.
Answer: There are no inconsistent results between the ,
I h
New York University research program and Con ~ !
l Edison's environmental monitoring program.
There are differences, however, in the measure-ment sensitivities used by the two groups.
l The New York University research prof, ram requires the use of ultrasensitive techniques which go li far beyond the requirements of an environmental j monitoring program (for the nuclides analyzed in water samples the sensitivity of the New York University pro' gram is "% of MPC; 1
the sensitivity of the Con Edison monitoring program is 1% of MPC).
i
.? I a
h
O O i Quorntion tito. 6 (Cont *F1) -
4 1
The report " Manmade Radionuclides in the Hudson River Estuary" does not draw a general conclusion '
that changes in radiological matter in plants I
can be related to changes in radiological matter i in fish. The report does state that such a i
relationship exists for Mn-54. _,
l 4 il
- 1 4
l I
i l
, i i
i
, l i i 4
i i i k
i e
- f. . -- .