|
---|
Category:AFFIDAVITS
MONTHYEARML20064D1961994-03-0404 March 1994 Affidavit of Mj Angus Re Motion to Reopen Record ML20057B0261993-08-0909 August 1993 Affidavit of non-disclosure in Support of Access to Excerpts from INPO Rept Re Maint & Surveillance Activities at Plant ML20057B0301993-08-0505 August 1993 Affidavit of non-disclosure in Support of Access to Excerpts from INPO Rept Re Maint & Surveillance of Activities at Plant ML20057B0271993-08-0505 August 1993 Affidavit of non-disclosure in Support of Access to Excerpts from INPO Re Maint & Surveillance Activities at Plant ML20057B0181993-08-0404 August 1993 Affidavit of non-disclosure in Support of Access to Excerpts from Rept Prepared by INPO Re Maint & Surveillance Activities at Plant ML20057B0221993-08-0404 August 1993 Affidavit of non-disclosure in Support of Access to Excerpts from INPO Rept Re Maint & Surveillance Activities at Plant ML20045G9811993-06-30030 June 1993 Affidavit.* INPO Rept Should Not Be Disclosed Because San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Need for Document Do Not Outweigh Interests of Pg&E,Inpo & NRC & Public in Disclosure.W/Certificate of Svc ML20045G9821993-06-25025 June 1993 Affidavit.* Affidavit of Bw Giffin Re Info Contained in Util Response to Third Set of Supplemental Interrogatories & Requests for Production of Documents (Aging) Filed by San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace ML20045G9901993-06-25025 June 1993 Affidavit.* Affidavit of Bw Giffin Re Info Contained in Util Supplemental Response to Second Set of Interrogatories & Requests for Production of Documents Filed by San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace ML20045A7031993-05-26026 May 1993 Affidavit of Je Molden Re Util Response to Supplemental Interrogatories Re First Set of Interrogatories & Requests for Production of Documents (Cable Failures) ML20045A7041993-05-26026 May 1993 Affidavit of Je Molden Re Util Response to Miscellaneous Requests for Production of Documents ML20045G9931993-04-13013 April 1993 Affidavit.* Affidavit of Bw Giffin Re Info Contained in Util Response to Second Set of Interragotories & Request for Production of Documents Filed by San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace ML20128B8341992-11-30030 November 1992 Affidavit of as Masciantonio in Support of NRC Staff Response to Mothers for Peace Suppl to Petition to Intervene.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20116F0631992-10-0707 October 1992 Affidavit of R Becker.* Concerns Re Safety of Plant Operation During Period of CP Recapture Expressed ML20116F0361992-10-0606 October 1992 Affidavit of N Culver.* Affidavit Re Safety Concerns of Plant Operation During CP Recapture ML20116F0701992-10-0606 October 1992 Affidavit of Biesek.* Concerns Re Safety of Plant Operation During Period of CP Recapture Expressed. Encl ML20116F0551992-10-0606 October 1992 Affidavit of E Holder.* Concerns Re Safety of Plant Operation During Period of CP Recapture Expressed ML20235S0091987-10-0202 October 1987 Affidavit of Jd Shiffer.* Explains Util Planned Expansion of Facility Spent Fuel Storage Capacity & Why Delay in Reracking Schedule,Such as Would Be Occassioned by Stay,Will Cause Substantial Harm to Util.Certificate of Svc List Encl ML20216J8641987-06-29029 June 1987 Declaration of Ef Lowry.* Tm Novak Board Notification 87-05 Re Draft BNL Rept Beyond Design-Basis Accidents in Spent Fuel Pools (Generic Issue 82) Received in Late Mar or Early Apr 1987.Proof of Svc Encl ML20216J8471987-06-26026 June 1987 Affidavit of SA Silver Informing That Draft BNL Rept, Beyond Design-Basis Accidents in Spent Fuel Pools (Generic Issue 82) Not Received ML20216J8191987-06-25025 June 1987 Affidavit of RB Ferguson Re Notification of Generic Issue 82.* Board Notification 87-05 Re Generic Issue 82 Concerning Beyond design-basis Accidents in Spent Fuel Pools False & Misleading ML20216J8371987-06-25025 June 1987 Affidavit of N Culver Informing That Board Notification 87-05 Re Draft BNL Rept on Spent Fuel Pool Accidents Never Received ML20213A0331987-01-13013 January 1987 Affidavit of Kp Singh Re Mothers for Peace & Sierra Club 861215 Motion for Summary Disposition Concerning Design of high-density Spent Fuel Racks.Racks Designed in Compliance W/Applicable NRC & SRP Requirements.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20205F6271986-08-15015 August 1986 Affidavit of Pw Niles Reporting Results of Calculations Performed on Postulated Hosgri Event Data ML20206J4201986-06-24024 June 1986 Affidavit of Rc Herrick on 860624 Re Intervenors 860616 Application for Stay & RB Ferguson Affidavit Re Proposed Reracking of Spent Fuel Storage Sys ML20206J4751986-06-24024 June 1986 Affidavit of Wl Brooks Re Intervenors 860616 Application for Stay & RB Ferguson 860616 Affidavit Re Expansion of Spent Fuel Pools.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20206D7501986-06-18018 June 1986 Affidavit of Jd Shiffer Re Proposal to Increase Spent Fuel Storage Capacity,Approved by NRC on 860530.Intervenor Risk Allegations Refuted.W/Certificate of Svc ML20199D1271986-06-15015 June 1986 Affidavit of RB Ferguson Concluding That Spent Fuel Reracking at Facilities Presents Significant Safety Hazard to Surrounding Environ & Population & Poses Risk of Irreversible Contamination ML20099H6491985-03-0505 March 1985 Affidavit of a Jackson Supporting Jl Mcdermott & Tj O'Neill 840731 Petition Re Technical & Safety Significance of Issues Raised in 841115 Affidavit Re Flud Computer Program.Errors in Program May Lead to 100% Inaccurate Predictions ML20099H6261985-03-0404 March 1985 Affidavit of L Kinney Supporting Jl Mcdermott & Tj O'Neill 840731 Petition Re Charges of Matl False Statements by Util in Response to Allegations Jir 75-78 & 80 ML20099H6061985-02-24024 February 1985 Anonymous Affidavit Supporting Jl Mcdermott & Tj O'Neill 840731 Petition Re Concern Over NRC Response to 841127 Disclosure of Significant Engineering Errors & QA Violations in Design of Pipe Supports ML20099H7281985-02-22022 February 1985 Affidavit of Tj O'Neill Supporting Jl Mcdermott & Tj O'Neill 840731 Petition Re Matl Licensing Issues Resolved by NRC on Basis of False Statements & Omissions.Failure of Diablo Canyon Allegation Mgt Program Described.New Info Encl ML20099H5021985-02-0606 February 1985 Anonymous Affidavit Supporting Jl Mcdermott & Tj O'Neill 840731 Petition Re Deficiencies W/Engineering Practices on Large Bore Piping & Pipe Supports ML20099H5591985-02-0404 February 1985 Anonymous Affidavit Supporting Jl Mcdermott & Tj O'Neill 840731 Petition Re QA Problems in Drafting Dept,Hardware Deficiencies,Mgt Opposition to Reporting Deficiencies to QA & Failure to Follow Engineering Specs ML20099H5741985-01-23023 January 1985 Affidavit of Ho Hudson Supporting Jl Mcdermott & Tj O'Neill 840731 Petition Re Deficiencies in Cardinal Industrial Products Qa.Corrective Actions Did Not Address Matls Previously Installed.Supporting Documents Encl ML20099H7751985-01-23023 January 1985 Affidavit of Mc Thompson Supporting Jl Mcdermott & Tj O'Neill 840731 Petition Re Addl Concerns on Issues Examined in 850108 Interview.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20099H5271985-01-22022 January 1985 Affidavit of P Haffey Supporting Jl Mcdermott & Tj O'Neill 840731 Petition Re Allegations of Misconducting by Region V & of Util Matl False Statements Concerning Previous Allegations ML20099H6631985-01-21021 January 1985 Affidavit of Jl Mcdermott Supporting Jl Mcdermott & Tj O'Neill 840731 Petition Re NRC Mishandling of Previous Allegations.Fifteen New Allegations Listed ML20099H7541985-01-18018 January 1985 Affidavit of CC Stokes Supporting Jl Mcdermott & Tj O'Neill 840731 Petition Re Failure of NRC to Honor Rules of Allegation Mgt Program & Matl False Statements by Util in Response to Previous Allegations ML20107C4871984-11-0101 November 1984 Affidavit of Tm Devine Re Employee Concerns That Reactor Vessel Level Instrumentation Sys May Not Provide Reliable Readings ML20107C5011984-10-29029 October 1984 Affidavit of Lockert Re Const Qa,Licensee Character & Competence ML20107C4751984-10-22022 October 1984 Marked-up Affidavit of Mc Thompson Re Possible Fake Welds on Stanchions Holding Up Safety Injection Sys Lines in Unit 1 ML20098F9381984-10-0101 October 1984 Affidavit of Mj Jacobson & Tg De Uriarte,Signed Only by Tg De Uriarte,Re QA Program.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20093N2341984-07-30030 July 1984 Affidavit of Jl Mcdermott Re Need for Reinsps & Systematic Retraining of All Personnel at Facility ML20093K0621984-07-27027 July 1984 Affidavit of Dh Hamilton Re Location & Subsurface Geometry of Hosgri Fault & Tectonic Deformation in Region of Fault ML20093K0811984-07-27027 July 1984 Affidavit of Wh White Re Hosgri Fault Design Bases. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20093K0691984-07-26026 July 1984 Affidavit of SW Smith Re Regional Seismicity & Morgan Hill Earthquake ML20093J3481984-07-24024 July 1984 Affidavit of DG Bridenbaugh,Restating 810811 Affidavit Re Potential Hazards of built-up Fission Products Release. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20090A8501984-07-11011 July 1984 Affidavit of T Devine Notifying of Resignation of I Yin from Review Team Overseeing Plant Readiness for Commercial Operation ML20092B6621984-06-19019 June 1984 Affidavit of DA Rockwell Re Allegations of Mgt Harassment. Related Correspondence 1994-03-04
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARDCL-99-123, Comment on Prs 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & Draft NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Guidelines. Util Areas of Concern Includes ESF Actuations, Significantly Degraded Components & Historical Limitations1999-09-20020 September 1999 Comment on Prs 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & Draft NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Guidelines. Util Areas of Concern Includes ESF Actuations, Significantly Degraded Components & Historical Limitations ML20205N4081999-04-14014 April 1999 Comments Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR2,19 & 20 Re Proposed Repository at Yucca Mountain.Requests Information on How Much Radiation Being Released Now at Diablo & Hanford NPPs ML20205N4601999-03-21021 March 1999 Introduces K Schumann as Representative of Nuclear Waste Committee (Nuwic) of San Lius Obispo County.Informs That Nuwic & Nuclear Waste Management Committee Concerned with Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Rods from Dcnpp ML20195E8841998-11-24024 November 1998 Petition for Mod to OLs to Require Plant Owner to Have Independent Contractor Evaluate Plant Safety Culture ML20236T3011998-07-24024 July 1998 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Avtivities (Effective Immediately).Lh Brooks Prohibited for 5 Yrs from Date of Order from Engaging in NRC Licensed Activities ML20248C2261998-05-22022 May 1998 Comment Opposing Revised Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Protection & Safety Sys ML20129J4191996-10-18018 October 1996 Order Approving Application Re Corporate Restructuring of Pacific Gas & Electric Company by Establishment of Holding Company DCL-95-206, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-61 Re Improving Fire Protection Regulations1995-10-0606 October 1995 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-61 Re Improving Fire Protection Regulations ML20091P8721995-08-23023 August 1995 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-61 Re Nuclear Energy Institute Proposed Amends on Fire Safety for All NPPs DCL-95-001, Comment on Proposed Changes to Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity Rule 10CFR50.Endorses NEI Comments1995-01-0303 January 1995 Comment on Proposed Changes to Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity Rule 10CFR50.Endorses NEI Comments ML20077M7521994-12-30030 December 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low Power Operation for Nuclear Power Reactors DCL-94-270, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Rulemaking for NPP License Renewal.Endorses Comments & Changes Proposed by NEI 941208 Submittal1994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Rulemaking for NPP License Renewal.Endorses Comments & Changes Proposed by NEI 941208 Submittal ML20149H0851994-11-0404 November 1994 Initial Decision (Construction Period Recovery/Recapture).* Renewed Motion to Reopen Record 940808,denied.Served on 941104.W/Certificate of Svc ML20072L2651994-08-23023 August 1994 PG&E Opposition to San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Renewed Motion to Reopen Record.* Util Opposes San Luis Obispo for Peace Motion Based on Affidavit Stating No Evidence Found in Motion Re Flaw in Program.W/Certificate of Svc ML20072F0291994-08-12012 August 1994 Erratum to San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Motion to Reopen Record.* Intervenors Corrects Error in Renewed Motion to Reopen Record Re Application for License Amend to Extend Term of Operating License for Plant.W/Certificate of Svc ML20072B2651994-08-0909 August 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re FFD Requirements Concerning Random Drug Testing ML20072A5821994-08-0808 August 1994 San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Renewed Motion to Reopen Record Re PG&E Application for Amend to Extend Term of OL for Plant.* Motion to Reopen Record to Introduce Insp Rept Identifying Alleged Problems W/Plant.W/Certificate of Svc ML20071L2061994-07-26026 July 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Changing Current Drug Testing Policies to Exclude All Personnel in nonsafety-related Positions ML20072B8481994-07-26026 July 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Changes to FFD Requirements Concerning Random Drug Testing ML20071L1901994-07-20020 July 1994 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Relaxing Rule on Drug Testing of Employees Working at NPP DCL-94-134, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-60 Re Amend to 10CFR50.54 by Changing Frequency W/Which Each Licensee Conducts Independent Reviews of Emergency Preparedness Program1994-06-27027 June 1994 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-60 Re Amend to 10CFR50.54 by Changing Frequency W/Which Each Licensee Conducts Independent Reviews of Emergency Preparedness Program DCL-94-135, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Proposed Amend to 10CFR50.54(p) Concerning Frequency W/Which Licensee Conducts Independent Reviews of Security Programs1994-06-27027 June 1994 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Proposed Amend to 10CFR50.54(p) Concerning Frequency W/Which Licensee Conducts Independent Reviews of Security Programs ML20064D1791994-03-0707 March 1994 Pacific Gas and Electric Co Reply in Opposition to San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Motion to Reopen Record.* Motion to Reopen Record Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20064D1961994-03-0404 March 1994 Affidavit of Mj Angus Re Motion to Reopen Record ML20063L5721994-02-25025 February 1994 San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Re Util Application for License Amend to Extend Term of Operating License for Plant.* Advises That Record of Proceeding Should Be Reopened to Consider Insp 93-36 Re Util Surveillance of Asw Sys DCL-94-021, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication Facilitation1994-01-26026 January 1994 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication Facilitation ML20059D2431994-01-0707 January 1994 Package of Intervenor Exhibits Consisting of Related Correspondence Not Admitted Into Evidence.Related Correspondence ML20062N0001993-12-30030 December 1993 PG&E Reply Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.* Mothers for Peace Proposed Findings & Conclusions Do Not Provide Any Supportable Rationale to Change Findings & Conclusions Previously Proposed by Pg&E.W/Certificate of Svc ML20058P3931993-12-22022 December 1993 NRC Staff Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law in Form of Initial Decision.* Certificate of Svc ML20058K7491993-12-0202 December 1993 NRC Staff Motion for Extension of Time.* Board Has Extended Filing Time for Util Until 931230.W/Certificate of Svc. Served on 931206.Granted for Board on 931203 ML20058K8771993-12-0202 December 1993 NRC Staff Motion for Extension of Time.* Requests That Board Extend Date for Staff to File Findings Until 931222. W/Certificate of Svc ML20059M5291993-11-19019 November 1993 Applicant Exhibits A-21,A-22,A-24,A-25,A-26,A-29 & A-F1, Consisting of Related Correspondence Not Admitted Into Evidence.Related Correspondence ML20058E0741993-11-19019 November 1993 San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re Licensee Application for License Amend to Extend Term of Operating License for Plant.* W/ Certificate of Svc ML20059E8931993-10-28028 October 1993 Memorandum & Order (Motion for Extension of Time).* San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace 931018 Request for two-wk Extension of Time to File Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Granted.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 931029 ML20059E8531993-10-27027 October 1993 NRC Staff Response to Board Memorandum & Order Re Extension of Time.* Staff Believes That San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Has Shown No Good Cause for Requesting Extension to File Proposed Findings of Fact.W/Certificate of Svc ML20059E8631993-10-25025 October 1993 Pacific Gas & Electric Co Response to Motion for Extension of Time.* Util Does Not Agree W/Board Assessment That Mothers for Peace Request Appears to Be Reasonable But Will Not Oppose Request.W/Certificate of Svc ML20059B2191993-10-19019 October 1993 Memorandum & Order (Responses to Motion for Extension of Time).* Board Believes Intervenor Request for Extension of Time to File Proposed Findings of Fact Appears Reasonable. W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 931019 ML20059B1071993-10-18018 October 1993 San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Motion for Extension of Time for Filing Proposing Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.* Requests Extension of Two Wks or Until 931119 to File Proposed Findings of Fact.W/Certificate of Svc ML20057D0531993-09-23023 September 1993 Notice of Appearance.* Notice Given That Undersigned Attorney Enters Appearance in Listed Matter & Listed Info Provided.W/Certificate of Svc ML20057B0401993-09-14014 September 1993 NRC Staff Reply to PG&E Response to Staff Motion to Amend Protective Order.* NRC Staff Moves Board to Adopt Language Requested in 930817 Motion as Stated.W/Certificate of Svc ML20056G4891993-08-30030 August 1993 Pacific Gas & Electric Co Response to Motion to Amend Protective Order.* Staff Asks That Protective Order Be Clarified by Adding New Footnote to Paragraph 3 of Order. W/Certificate of Svc ML20059C7361993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-88,consisting of NRC Insp of Diablo Canyon Units 1 & 2 IR 05000275/19920161993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-137,consisting of Insp Rept Re Dockets 50-275/92-16 & 50-323/92-16,dtd 920707 IR 05000275/19930111993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-26,consisting of Re Insp Repts 50-275/93-11 & 50-323/93-11 ML20059M1381993-08-24024 August 1993 Staff Exhibit S-1,consisting of Re 920519 Enforcement Conference IR 05000275/19920131993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-140,consisting of 920416,mgt Meeting Repts 50-275/92-13 & 50-323/92-13 ML20059D0841993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-139,consisting of Insp Rept Re Dockets 50-275 & 50-323,dtd 920417 IR 05000275/19920261993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-118,consisting of Notice of Violation & Insp Rept Re Docket 50-275/92-26 & 50-323/93-26,dtd 921113 ML20059M5041993-08-24024 August 1993 Staff Exhibit S-2,consisting of Re Notice of Violation ML20059M8621993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-35,consisting of Rept, Self- Evaluation of Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Dtd Jul 1993 1999-09-20
[Table view] |
Text
-
-.- . . l - -
,e .
C. Field QC Inspectors did not " affix a hold tag to all discrepant items reported on a DCN".
During the Final Walkdown Inspection Program for Rupture Restraints no
......... hold. tags were affixed when a deficient condition was identified and then listed on the QC/Eng. Walkdown sheet.
Deficient (discrepant) conditions were identified on
.. [, ._ ,
paper, but were 'not identified in the field by having a These deviations from ESD 273 and ESD 268 hold tag affixed.
were carried out by Field QC Inspectors and Engineers
' . based on verbal instruction from QA/QC and Engineering Man-
~
agement.
Additional noncompliancies to ESD 273 were identified on DCN#476-030 (5/16/80):
- 1. Field QC Inspectors did not reference assembly drawings Verbal instructions for their examinations of the U Bolt.
on QA/QC Management to Field QC instectors was to only assure U Bolts were in place and not perform detailed 273.
examinations to the drawings as required by CES "W (cold kOh
- 2. Field QC Inspectors did not check pipe li;innc:
gaps) as required by ESD 273.
- 3. Field QC Inspectors did not examine assembly drawings I componentdfscriptionsagainstinstalledassembliestoin-sure all components had been installed. Verbal instructions from QA/QC Management were to only assume that U Bolts were in place and not to perform detailed examinations to the .
drawings.
ESD 273 would be revised by Pullman bnplementing the verbal in-structions used to perform all Unit I Final Inspections after the PG&E would approve whole Unit I Walkdown program was completed.
this revision in late May/early June 1980. k6ek The Unit I Final Walkdown Inspection Program would home identified significant numbers of discrepancies and resulted in major rework. Pullman DR#4259 is representative of the type of discrepancies identified. DR#4259 identified that connections on Rupture Restraint 126, modified in March 1976, were not to specification.
The following discrepancies were identified:
8406250225 8406R1 PDR ADOCK 05000275 A MVS
.=_..:_.-.,.--
- 1. A plate added was not documented on a material requisition or marked to identify source.
- 2. FW 32, designed as a full penetration weld on d three ' sides'of the added plate, was 1/16"-below flush an the weld'had not been ultrasonically examined and was
~
t now inaccessable.
- 3. Original eight bolt holes in the receiver plate were The technique used plug welded without documentation.
did not comply with AWS DI.0-69 code. --
- 4. The four new lower bolts were drilled through FW 32 The backing strap was not trimmed and its backing strap.
to facilitate full seating at the bolt head and the strap had a maximum gap of 1/4".
- 5. Design required eight 5/8" A 325 bolts but eight 3/4" Washers were installed under A490 bolts were installed. Bolts the turned element but not under the bolt head.
were not documented on a material requisition or marked to identify source. '
- 6. The top south bolt had received air arc damage resulting in fusion of the nut and bolt.
- 7. The bottom north bolt did not have full engagement.
- 8. All bolts have been tensioned, evidenced by torque seal, however, process sheets were not documented.
- 9. Splice plate had been installed with a 1/16" gap at top and 1/8" gap at the bottom without shims. .
4 i
1
a .
1982.
l10k The Unit II[ Final Walkdown Inspection began i d toindelete June from To expedite the Walkdown process ESD 273 was rev i sseinstalled
- . pct h5N tho Walkdown process all bolted and welded connect o
.x - . . . . . . . . .
Action to after 1/24/79. ~ ~
79-RM-005, dated 1/24/79, which stated under Corrective developed and Prevent Recurence that " Pullman Power Products
^ '~ '
~~ design has implemented a program which' assureis adequatedeveloped control of Training and indoctrination programs have been inspection changes.
and implemented which assures adequate performance of
~ ' I
~
ffice.
parsonnel."As Internal Auditor, in a July 7, 1982 Pullman Intero nsideration Correspondence to the QA/QC Manager, I requested ltedaand reco .
of the deletion of Final QC Walkdown Inspection of Bo"There is docume te per-Welded Connections installed after 1/24/79: d cvidence available which raises questions about the "a equaS formance of inspection personnel". findings concerning discrepancies been approximately one hundred (100) ld QC Inspectors or noncompliances to procedures, committed by Fie cted by QC or committed by others but not identified and/or corre l These findings are documented on Pullman Interna Inspectors. Most of these Audit Reports and PG&E Minor Variation Reports.The areas of dis findings involve Unit #2 work. i Process compliances identified were Quality Control Inspectialons, Removed Sheet Discrepancies, Discrepancies with Installed l Storage Materand and To be Reinstalled, Discrepancies with Materia Requisition Traceability and Discrepancies with Field Warehouse and Material. d Unit But Pullman QA/QC Management would not reconsider an hYinalWalkdownswerenotperformedonpost1/24/79rup lt in g4e work.
The Unit II Final Walkdown Inspections would also resu Subsequently, Pullman Field major rework of rupture restraint. 1/24/79 work Engineers wrote several Discrepancy Reports on post yEtiewtby Also
\kh84whentheworkwasinad=3etslyreviewedbyEngineer 1
ifying Deficient Condition Notices would be written ident documentation. problems missed in pre-1979 work.
- b. -___ _ __ L_ _ _ _ __ _ .__ _ _ - ,
-,- o In 1982 serious problems were identified in the calibration li ,
process for torque wrenches used in the rupture restraint bo t ng program.
The problem extended beyond rupture restraints kto PG&Els.
enlibrated equipment used on ANSI B31.7 and ASME code wor i .
^ '
Ggneral Construction'Depa'rtment had been providing'calibrat on cOrvices to Pulbnan at the Diable Canyontorqui'
~ '
site wren'ches, since at least 1974.
PGGE calibrsted 'a vafi'ety,of" tool's' including: :
hydrogages, thermometers, heat temperature recoriers, hygrometers As a result of Pullman Vendor Audits gf cnd' trip-volt-ohhh meters.in PG&E's General Const i b3ing forwarded to PG&E's Nuclear Plant Operations for QA calibrat on.
PG&E's NPO calibration service had never been Pullman, subjected through to a myself, program audi.t by Pullman as required. 1982 performed a vendor audit of PG&E's NPO Department in October cnd identified the following deficiencies:
- 1. There were no documented instructions for the of Pullman torque wrenches and subsequent documentation.
- 2. The traceability of calibration operation for their be torque wrenches and subsequent certification could not assured because:
- a. The identification of the torque wrench on related documentation was not consistent.
- b. The certification documentation was confusing and in-adequate. d
- c. Documentation necessary for maintaining nerated.
traceability an
. certification proving traceability was not ge
- 3. The calibration documentation for NPO Standard .
deficiencies:
- a. There were no documented calibration frequencies for a standard used in a calibration process,
- b. Calibration information labels attached to NPO equipment did not provide positive identification of the devices for which the information was intended.
i d t{P As a result of the audits in PG&E's General d Vendor'sConstruc frrev Departments, Pullman removed PG&E frein its Approve res to until such a time as corrective action measures and mea preclude recurrence were completed and approved.
- c. . e s Subsequently PG&E'would write a Minor Variation Report #M-4406 cgainst Pullman. The discrepancy would identify that Pullman had procured calibration services from PG&E General Construction Depart-ment without written contract or. specification wh.ich delineated.
Quality and Technical requirements. This calibration service had been going on as far back as 1974 without Quality and Technical requirements. -
' " ~
' iAlso".in 198E, significant Program'deficiAncies were identified in the application of Weld Procedure Code 7/8 to Rupture Restraint Welding. In August, through Pullma'n Unscheduled Internal Audit #32 I identified"in both Units of the plant a large number of
'~
cquare groove welds made in one inch thick material using code 7/8.
These type welds were not a prequalified joint detail of the AWS Welding Code. Weld Code 7/8 did not have Procedure Qualification Records for the Type Weld as required by the AWS when joint details -
differed from those prescribed by the code. PG&E and Bechtel res-ponded on 1/24/83 to a Pullman letter concerning this problem by In stating that the square groove welds would not be allowed.
addition, the PG&E and Bechtel letter stated :" Weld procedure specification code 7/8 has been approved for the precess and joint configuration itemized on the WPS. There itemized parameters are considered prequalified by AWS or are supported by tests and pro-cedure qualitication records. If Pullman wishes to use WPS Code 7/8 for processes or joint configurations not itemized a new WPS and PQR's are required."
Based on this PG&E and Bechtel letter, my Pullman Unscheduled -
Internal Audit #35, dated 12/1/82 with a final prepared date of 3/23/83, identified in both units of the plant a number of single db S /evel groove welds in skewed T joints with special fit up require-ments and fillet welds with special fit up requirements which were not prequalified AWS welds. The welds were made with Code 7/8 without establishing Procedurc Qualification Records.
In addition, eight other types of joint configurations were identified as made with Code 7/8, but which were not itemized in the code 7/8 WPS. These welds did not conform to the intent kA
--..s-.
y l-
~.- -.~ -. - - - - - - - - -
of the PG&E and Bechtel letter and were nonconformances to the Weld Procedure Code. Other Weld Procedure Code 7/8 deficiencies were also identified. Pullman spent 1983 and 1984 implementing corrective action to these Weld Code 7/8 problems. But the
~
cor'ective r aEtion has not' addressed all the problems. Code 7/8 wa's revised and new weld procedure #AWS 1-10 generated which addressed joint configurations not listed in Code 7/8. But the ac-tual welds in'the field made in non'conformance to Code 7/8 have not been addressed. The Pullman Power Products construction program for Pipe Ruptures Restraint has a long and continued list-ing of discrepancies and nonconformances to PG&E specification QCkand10fFR50AppendixB.QualityAssuranceRequirements.Therecan be no assurance that all of the problems have been identified, reported and corrected. PG&Einf.S. #8833XR defines Quality Assurance as those planned and systematic actions necessary to establish confluence that material (equipment and systems) will perform satisfactory to services. PG&E defines Quality Control as those Quality Assurance actions which provide a means to con-trol the quality of material supplied (and work performed) to predeterminded requirements. ' Pipe rupture restraints have had a continuing history of failure to meet basic codes and quality assurance standards. Perhaps quality assurance is all irrelevant.
If QA matters, however, there is no basis for confidence that if an earthquake occurs, the piping will be sufficiently res-trained to avoid damaging surrounding equipment.
I have read the above Z page affidavit and it is true, accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
_m-
. Signed C O- M Date b d-b k h Harold Hudson -
D STATE OF CALIEPNIA
- 95 CXUIY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Oy
<t g-On June 5, 1984, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County, personally appeared HAROLD 0. H12 Soli, proved to me on the basis of satisfacto::-
~' n 3 evidence to be the person whose name appears in the above instru: rent, and acknowledged
\./ . o' to me that he executed same.
k HH/nw WIEESS my hand and official seal. Il m Il L'u LM Lisacienter, Motary Public Qg m' ..
____.______m._ . . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . __
5 5.CAUlT AFFIDAVIT
- 84 EN 21 no:43 My name is Larry (D ) Kinney. .I am submitting this J,..v affidavit- freely and voluntarily, without any thteats, inouce-ment, or coercion to Mr. Thomas Devine, who has identified him-self to me as the legal director of the Government Accountability Project. This statement evidences my concern for inadequate con-trols on early concrete pours at the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant and any lingering effects on the condition of the Plant, particularly if the plant shoold be subjected to the stresses from an earthquake. I am also concerned about the effects on consumers who have to pay for Diablo Canyon, if the waste that I observed continued during the ten years after I left.
I worked for Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) at Diablo Canyon from 1968-January 1973, initially as a surveyo:: but primarily as an inspector for early concrete pours and instal-lation of rebar at Unit I and Unit II. I also served as night shift inspector for the breakwater, and as an inspector for cad-welds. I resigned in 1973. Among the reasons for my resignation were the following:
- 1) Failure to review as-built drawings. Supposedly -
as-built drawings were checked after being signed off. I suspected that was not the case, however and decided to test my suspicions. In mid-late 1972 I signed drawings as "Roy Rogers,"
" Gene Autry," " Donald Duck" and " John Wayne." I then waited to !
be challenged. No one noticed.
- 2) Harassment of field inspectors. Field inspectors
. . ~ . . . - - - - . - - . . . - - . . - . . .
j< '
from Pittsburg Testing were nired to check reinforcement bar !
steel. They regularly complained to me of threats from PG&E 's steel contractor, Pacific States Steel, if they wrote up problem i reports for. conditions such as excessive n. umbers of voids in cadwelds. I recall the reports of harassm'nt e as follows: "We pay your check, so keep your mouth shut or you 'll be fired." I
- 3) Management veto of enforcement efforts. One of the :
l main reasons I resigned was that there were too many things. that I couldn ' t sign of f, but management wouldn ' t let me reject. ,
Man-agement consistently overrode my attempts to stop work. One ex- ,
ample involved reinforcement bar steel that had been bent back and forth. I wrote up the practice, because it establishes break ;
points and compromises the strength of the steel. This is a basic rule of concrete work. Even on this issue however, manage-ment overrode me. -
- 4) Too much payola on the job. Construction !
l supervisors offered me $100 per night to keep my eyes shut during ;
the breakwater work. I declined but was disillusioned both with the offer and myself fo'r briefly considering it.
- 5) Advance warning and gag orders for Atomic Energy Commission inspections. In my four years on-site, management always gave us at least one day advance warning before all Atomic Energy Commission (AECl inspections. Management told the inspectors not to ask questions or volunteer any information beyond what was specifically requested by the AEC.
- 6) Waste. I feel strongly that a significant amount of the construction costs were indefensible. One example
. = . - . . . - - - . w..- --- . .- - - . . . . - . -
. js involved $30,000 that was sp to build the guards shack and fence. I . told my. boss. that. it was unacceptable to spend ,so much ,
for so little. To the best of my recollection, the message that he communicated to me could be summarized as follows: "You might as well accept'it, because we can just go to the Public Utilities Commission and get it all back. The plant will be paid off six months after iti begins operating."
With Mr. Devine as my legal representative,,I will cooperate with any good faith NRC attempts to follow up on this disclosure and will help direct Commission personnel to specific examples of the conditions described above.
-I have read the above page statement and it is true, accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
y inney naw /
, Larry p
i State of Idaho, Kootenai County SS On this i day of bJr L ,1984, before me, Ukalun h a Notary Public in the for sd.id county and state, personally appeared 8 Larry Kinney , know to me to be the person who executed the foregoing '
instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal i the day and year in this certificate first above written. 1 i
0afnitir o n t it9 U >t b V i
Notary Public residihg at:
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho I
. . . . _ . . . . . . _ , . , . . . _ , . _ _ . , _ . . _ . . . , , . _ _ . , . . _ _ _ . ~ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . , _ . . . . _ . . . , _ . _ _ , _ . . _ . . . . . _ , . _ . , _ _