ML20099H574
| ML20099H574 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 01/23/1985 |
| From: | Hudson H GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20099H479 | List: |
| References | |
| 2.206, NUDOCS 8503190415 | |
| Download: ML20099H574 (39) | |
Text
'
0 4
Exhibit 4
~ ' ' - ~
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the matter of PACIFIC GAS AUD ELECTRIC COMPANY (Diablo canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2)
AFFIDAVIT OF HAROLD 0. HUDSON My name is Harold O. Hudson. I am submitting this affidavit freely and voluntarily without any threats, inducements or coercion, to Mr. Thomas Devine, who has identified himself to me as the legal director of the Government Accountability Project (GAP). This affidavit addresses deficiencies identified by the NRC and PG&E in the Quality Assurance Reogram of Cardinal Indust-rial Products and deficiencies in the Pullman Power Products Quality Assurance Program which complicates this issue.
Cardinal Industrial Prcducts of Las Vegas, Nevada, has been on the Pullman Power Products' Approved Vendors List for many years. Tullman classified Cardinal as a Material Manufacturer qualified to furnish Steel Bolting and Fasteners intended for use in ASME,Section III, Class 1,2 and 3 fabrication. Pullman has parchased and installed Cardinal bolto and fasteners at the Diable Canyon Nuclear Plant since sometime in the 1970's. Cardinal's past Quality Assurance Program has been identified by the NRC cnd P152 to have significant deficiencies making the quality of the ,
material indeterminate. PG&E has directed that corrective action be implemented but this action is limited in scope and does not.
address materials already installed in the plant by Pullman.
g$h Q
s -
l' This limited corrective action by PG&E is complicated by the fact that Pullman's Vendor Quality System Audits of Cardinal is of in-determinate quality based on a failure to implement ASME,Section III, NCA-3800 and 100FR50 Appendix 3 Criteria VII requirements for procurement of materials.
I. Pullman Power Products' Discrepancy Report # 9173 (12-21-84),
issued as a result of NRC I.E. Information Notice 84-52 and PG&E's Quality Assurance Implementation Audit 844085 of Card-inal Industrial Products, does not address / provide for a system of identification, documentation, segregation and dis-
- position of Cardinal materials previously purchased and in-stalled _by Pullman in both units of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear
_ Plants This is a nonconformance to 10CFR50 Appendix B Criteria XV - Honconforming Materials, Parts or Components and Criteria XVI - Corrective Action.
100FR50 Appendix 3 Criteria XV requires measurec shall be established to control materials 4hich do not conform to re-quirements in order to prevent their inadvertent use or in-sta11ation. These measures shall include, as appropriate,
, procedures for identification, documentation, segregation, disposition, and notification to affected organizations.
Criteria XVI requires that measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as deficiencies, deviations, defective material and nonconformances.are promptly identified and corrected. These requirements have not been implemented for Cardinal materials previously purchased and installed by Pullman in the plant.
Pullman's DR# 9173 only addresses /provides for a system of identification and documentation for material in Pullman's w'arehouse,or storage areas which were manufactured by jardi_nal.
Only Cardinal material in Pullman's warehouse or storage areas are identified and pinced on temporary Hold. This limited corrective action is at the direction of PG&E's General Const-ruction Division. PG&E General Construction Letter of 12-21-84 kkh
E .
t m ' 3_
? '.
l
[
by R. Lieber and R. Hobgood, states as a result of identified l deficiencies in Cardinal Bolts QA Program, "all fasteners in Class one storage supplied by Cardinal Bolt, including those supplied by a third party", must be immediately identified.
The Letter goes on to state that " Pullman is authorized to release these materials from the Class one storage for install-
~
ation, provided a system is established that will iden'tify each fastener by size, material type, purchase order, heat and/
or lot number, and installed. location". PG&E"a General Construction Division does not address / provide for a system of identification documentation and segregation of Cardinal materials previously purchased and installed by Pullman in the plant. ,This is a nonconformance to 10CFR 50. Appendix 3 Criterias XV and XVI.
PG&E General Construction Division has directed Pullman based on their instructions from PG&E's Quality Assurance Division.
PG&E Quality Assurance Letter of 12-20-84, by QA Manager S.M.
Skidmore, identifies that Cardinal has provided fastener mat-erial for Diablo Canyon Power Plant on seven purchase orders (4 NPO and 3 GC). The Letter states that as a result of identified deficiencies, "the quality of the fastener materials we have received from Cardinal on the purchase orders listed above is indeterminate at this time". The PG&E QA Manager then recommended "that the items supplied by Cardinal be located and tagged". PG&E Quality Assurance Division's recom-mendation deals only with material from the seven PG&E purchase orders. The Letter only request a research of records to determine if there have been other purchases from Cardinal.
l PG&E's' Quality Assurance Division instructions to General l C[onstruction_Divisiondoesnotspecificallyaddress/ provide for a system of identification, documentation and segregation I
of Cardinal materials previously purchaced and_i,nstalled by Pullman in the Plant. This is a nonconformance to 10CFR50'.
Appendix B Criterias XV and XVI.
l L
- o. e che failure by PG&E's Quality Assurance and General Construction Divisions and Pullman's DR# 9173 to address / identify, document and segregate Cardinal materials previously purchased and in-s'talled by Pullman in the plant is a significant condition '
adverse to quality. PG&E's QA Divison letter states'that the QA Audit of Cardinal " identified significant deficiencies in their past quality assurance program". The Cardinal Industrial Products Corporation " Report To Our Customers" by D.C. Fielder states that "with very limited exceptions, all the areas of concern raised by the IIRC related to prior QA Programs..."
With limited exceptions, it is the Cardinal QA program prior to its 1-9-84 ASME certification as a " material manufacturer" and " material supplier" that the NRC and PG&E QA Division is concerned with. Yet Cardinal materials purchased and installed by Pullman prior to 1-9-84 are not addressed by DR# 9173.
Pullman has purchased and installed Cardinal materials at the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant since sometime in the 1970's.
Pullman's Diablo Canyon Site QA/QC Manager D. Geske performed an ASIG,Section III, NCA-3800 Vendor Quality System Audit of Cardinal Industrial Products in 1980. A Pullman Interoffice Correspondence, 2-27-81, from A.A. Eck, Director of QA to W.L.
Cox, Senior QA Auditor of the Pullman Quality Engineering Group, stated "per request from the Diablo Canyon Project, please keep Cardinal Bolt, current on the AVL. Diablo will continue to use very heavily over the next few years".
Pullman has purchasedand installed large amounts of Cardinal materials that falls under the NRC and PG&E identified past QA Program deficiencies. Yet Pullman, at the direction of PGLE, has not included this installed material under the scope of DRA 9173 for identification, documentation, segregation and control. This is a nonconformance to 1007R50 Appendix B Criteria XV and XVI and is a condition adverse to quality.
II. The quality _of' Cardinal materials purchased and installed by Pullman prior to 1-9-84 is indeterminate for two reasons. First, because of significant deficiencies identified by the NRC and PG&E in Cardinal's past Quality Assurance Program. And second, because Pullman's own Vendor Quality System Audits of Cardinal performed during the early 1980's were inadequate and did not comply with Ay.M[5'eition III, NCA-1800. (M.e.tallic, M.a_t.erial Manufacturer's and Material Supplier's_ Quality System Program) requirements and_10CFR50 Appendix 3 Criteria VII (Controlg f Purchased Material _,., Equi 3 men,tnand,Se,rvices) requirements.
An examination,of a Pullman " Vendor Quality System Audit Checklist Applicable to Material Manufacturers and Material Suppliers - Checklist No. 1", dated 7-21-81, for Cardinal Industrial Products, reveals significant deficiencies in Pull-7 man's Corporate Vendor Aud1ng program and Pullman's ability to kON qualify Cardinal to ASMD SectionIII requirements as a " material manufacturer" or " material supplier". Several of these defic-iencies are generic in nature.
- A. PG:;2's QA Division audit of Cardinal identified as a sign-ificant deficiency that certifications for the heat treat-ing of materials did not contain the heat number of the subject material.
Eut a more significant finding is that Pullman's Vendor Quality System Audit of Cardinal did not address Heat Treating of materials. Checklist item # 18 - Verify if heat treating is performed in accordance with approved procedures - is marked not applicable and no audit was performed. Checklist item # 19 - Record the measure of control of furnace temperature by part or zone temperature -
is marked not applicable and no audit was performed. Check-list item # 20 - Record measures for temperature monitoring -
is marked not applicable and no audit was performed. Check-list item # 21 - Record and verify that the heating and cooling rates, maximum and minimum temperatures at specified AcA
, times in accordance with code and customer requirements.
Verify by heat treat charts or CMTR's - is marked not applicable and no audit was performed. Checklist item #
29c - Verify that vendors certified material test reports have provisions for heat treatment, hold temperature and cooling method and time - is marked not applicable and no audit was performed.
Pullman's Vendor Quality System Audit program for Cardinal is in nonconformance to ASME S_ection III, NCA-3820.a, b and c (1980 Edition) and 10CFR50 Appendix B Criteria VII, since Pullman did not audit the heat treatment of fasteners manufactured and/or suculled by Cardinal. This is a sign-ificant condition adverse to cuality.
As the 1981 Lead Auditor performing Pullman's Vendor Quality System Audit of Cardinal, I used the 1980 Vendor Quality System Audit as my format for areas to be audited. The 1980 Audit of Cardinal performed by Diablo Canyon Site QA/QC finnager D. Geske did not address Cardinal's heat treating program. Taking my lead from the 1980 Audit, I assumed that Heat Treating was not an applicable section of Cardinal's Quality System Program to be audited. it should be noted that Pullman's Corporate Senior QA Auditor, t'.L. Cox, who reviewed both the 1980 and 1981 Vendor Audits and then included Cardinal on the Approved Vendors List, \D did not identify this omission of a critical area or cardinal's Quality System Program and require corrective action to be implemented.
Bolts and Fasteners manufactured and/or supplied by Cardinal that required Heat Treating cannot be assured by Pullman Vendor Quality System Audits to have been performed in accordance with procedures, code and customer requirements.
~ - - -
- 3. Attachment #1 to Pullman's 1981 Vendor Quality System Audit Checklist is a list of Cardinal's Quality Assur-ance Manual Sections and Cardinal Standard Practices Procedures. Although the QA Manual has a section on Special Processes, there is no Standard PFactices Pro-cedure listed for the Heat Treating of Materials. Card-inal appears to have had no Quality System Progran cover-ing Heat Treating of Material during this time period.
The apparent absenco of a Cardinal Standard Practice fjrHeatTreatingofMaterialsisanonconformanceto ALME,Section III, NCA-3820.c. NCA-3862.a.1, NCA-3866.1 and NCA-3866.4 (1980 Edition) and 100FR50 Appendix 3 Criteria IX - Control of Special Processes.
Because of Pullman's failure in 1980, 1981 and possibility other years, to audit Cardinal's Heat Treating program and the apparent absence of a Cardinal Standard Practice Pro-cedure for Heat Treating of Materials, there is no assur-nnee that Heat Treating performed during this time period
. vaa controlled in accordance with material specifications end the rules of ASIE,Section III, NCA-3800 and 10nFR50 Appendix B Criterias IV (Procurement Document Control),
VII (Control of Purchased Material. Equipment, and Services),
and IX (Control of Special Processes).
C. A second deficiency in Pullman's Vendor Quality. System Audit of Cardinal performed in 1981 was that the Audit Checklist, item # 5, did not list and no audit was performed to determ-ine if the person or department responsible for defining'
~
and implementing the overall effectiveness of the quality program reported regularly on the effectiveness of the pro-
- p. Pullman's failure to audit this area is a noncon-formance to ASME,Section III, NCA-3820.a,b and c, NCA-3864.1.b.4 and 10CFR50 Appendix B Criteria VII.
t
s-This is a generic deficiency in Pullman's " Vendor Quality Audit checklist No. 1" used for Material Manufacturers and Material Suppliers. All vendors audited by Pullman using this checklist have a'QA Program of indeterminate quality based on this omission.
D. A third deficiency in P_allman's Vendor Quality System Audit _of Cardinal performed in 1981 was that the Audit Checklist # 9 only addressed Nondestructive Examination personnel to determine if they were qualified to perform their duties. These UDE personnel were not Cardinal employees, but employees of Eagle Intermountain Testing, a subcontractor. No Cardinal employee who performed functions within the scope of ASME Section III were audited to determine if they were oualified as specified by Section III. This included the Director of QA, the Internal Auditor,QA/QC Inspectors, Engineers, and Pro-duction personnel performing special processes. None of these Cardinal personnel were audited by Pullman to determine if they were qualified to perform their jobs.
This is a nonconformance to ASME,Section III, NCA-3820.a,b and c, NCA-3864.2.a (1980 Edition) and 10CFR50 Appendix B Criteria VII.
This is a te_neric deficiency in Pullman's " Vendor Quality Audit Checklist No. 1" used for Material Manufacturers and Material Suppliers. All Vendors audited by Pullman using Od this Checklist No. 1 have non NDE personnel of indetermin-ate qualifications performing ASME III functions.
E. A fourth deficiency in Pullman's Vendor Quality System Audit of Cardinal , performed in 1981 was that Audit Check-list item _#10 - Are examinations performed in accordance with procedures, approved by PPP as specified by Pullman's purchaoing specification - was marked not audited. The Checklist item #10 has a comment that "NDE is performed by Eagle Intermountain Testing" and " Procedures used are h
as specified on each customers purchase order". But this cannot be verified since no audit was performed on any NDE procedures (Eagle Intermountain or Cardinal) or on any other type of examination procedure, against any Pullman purchasing specification. Examination procedures used by Cardinal are of indeterminate quality. This is a noncon-formance to ASME,Section III, NCA-3820.a,b and c NCA-3866.3.a (1980 Edition) and 10CFR50 Appendix 3 Criteria VII.
A Pullman Power Products Letter, Log No.81-193, dated 8-6-81, to Cardinal Industrial Products, from vlilliam L. Cox, Senior QA Auditor, advises Cardinal that "by virtue of satisfactory completion" of a QA Program audit, they had been included on Pullman's list of approved vendors. Pullman informed Cardinal that they had been classified as a " Material Manufacturer qualified to furnish Steel Bolting and Fasterners intended for use in ASME,Section III, Class 1, 2 and 3 fabrication".
Yet the Pullman Vendor Quality System Audit of Cardinal performed in 1980 and 1981 had significant deficiencies. Major portions of Cardinal's Quality System Program were not audited by Pullman as' required by ASME,Section III, NCA-3820 and 10CFR50 Appendix B Criteria 777 The areas not audited by Pullman have significant impact on determining if Cardinal meet the requirements of ASME Section III, NCA-3800 The failure by Pullman to survey, qualify and audit Cardinal as required by ASME Section III, NCA-3800 and 10CFR50AppendixBCriteriaVII,meansPullmadrmethodofapprovingOdOk Venfors is of indeterminiate quality and that Cardinal's Quality System Program for this time period is of indeterminate quality.
The Cardinal " Report To Our Customers" states " Frankly, after having been approved by so many customers over the past years, we are surprised that the NRC was able to find any problems with our prior Quality Assurance Program". Perhaps the reason the NRC found problems was because customers such as Pullman Power Products did inadequate Vendor Quality System Audits when qualifying
. 0 Cardinal as a Material Manufacturer to furnish Steil Bolting and Fasteners intended for use in ASIE,Section III, Class 1, 2 and 3 fabrication.
40b I have read the above 10 page affidavit, and it is true, accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge.
L.\L o. \Lk Harold O. Hudson M el O b ,.4. %
Signed and sworn before me this ~.
~~~--~~~}
<r ,. i so.tc day of January, 1985. UNDA J. JONES NOTARY PU8 tlc = MINhE50fA
-[ j l
STEELE C0'JNTY
- ., e .. .. m. e. im
. : .2 . .a. .
,j,e o..:.. '
L.~-~~~~~..~-~~~~~~~~l Notary Publia'
e LIST OF ATTACHE!TS
- 1. Pullman Power Products Discrepancy Report # 9173, 12-21-84.
- 2. PG&E General Construction Division Letter of 12-21-84.
- 3. PG&E Quality Assurance Division Letter of 12-20-84.
- 4. Cardinal Industrial Products Corporation - REPORT TO OUR CUSTOMERS, no date.
- 5. Pullman Power Products - Vendor Quality System Audit Checklist l Applicable .to Material Manufacturers and Material Suppliers -
Checklist No. 1, for Cardinal Industrial Products, 7-21-81. -
- 6. Pullman Power Products Letter, Log No.81-193, 8-6-81.
- 7. Pullman Power Products Interoffice Correspondence, 2-27-81.
i l
j l
t
cc a rdin a l INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION
'? O u sagt. 800 334 essi 3 8 ') W4 5 ? OC.-t '.00 ** *== 0 % f ea.gvaOai7C3 739 tees i.As vtc,As NevAo A 89118 REPORT TO OUR CUSTOMERS This report has been prepared to update our customers as to the current status of our Guality Assurance Program as it relates to products supplied to nuclear customers. Over the past seven years, as interpretations of the ASME Doiler Pressure Code have evolsed. Cardinal's Quality Assurance Manual has been updated to reflect these changes Our Guality Assurance Manuel has under-gene three revisions and two editions We believe that, in its current form, sur Guality Assurance Manual is one of the most effective an tr e bolting industry. In recognition of our current
- Guality Atsuran:e Program, on January 9, 1984, ASME certified L a t d i r.a l ab a "r.aterial manufacturer" and a " material supplier" We have also been the subject of frequent rustomer surveys ano /c.
audits. During the pest five yeers, well over one hundred customers have reviewed our Guality As sat ant e Program, with an arprosal tete in enress of 98%
In the foueth quartet of 1963 c o n c ur r etit with the ASME r et t 1 # 1caticr precess, the Nuclear Peguletory Commission in-tuect&d selected porttous of our Guality Assurance System and r epare" detatlec reports The NRC's fineangs fell in three
. ategories i
Itets that have alreacy beer. t(selvec by Cardinal tahing
- crt et tive action, e g.,
the posting of additional statutory and e;s1.te y maternal and provacing customer, with n:tices of cer-tala scern ete cotential n on-c omp l i a rir e s .
liemt that weta retolvec Ly providlnc accationa: informa-
.in :: ter Nu T . enc 3 Itemt u*tc* will be the S u t. J e c t cf an internal review
.r: gree that will te discusset celow
's Frank 1 9 e t te* having b e e r, approvec by S t- many customers over
?*5 past y&at t we are sutprisec that the NRC was able to find s', ce etlees u ; ; f.
ci v e prior Gualaty Assurance Programs Please be 4:s15cc that, w t t r. vei y limited esceptions, all of ter areas of
- rceen restic :y the NGC related tc p r t ct Guality Assurance a re;*aas 4 c
- ;; an c? te car cvreent ASME approved Guality Assurance
l While we are confident thet Cardinal has provided quality products to the nuclear industry over the past years, in order to assure our customers of the quality of those products, we have d commenced an internal rev.ew program which will review all certifications issued by Cardine1 to the nuclear industry. Since well over 20,000 certifications must be reviewed to determine if any non-conformances exist, this process will take several months. The general areas of review will include the following-1.
The NRC found an isolated number of instances where our test records did not, confirm that non-destructive tests had been performed on a small number of pieces from certain groups of material. We will review our records to determine if any other instances existed and, if so, notify the customer.
- 2. The NRC has interpreted the stress relief requirements for cold drawn A193 and SA193 D7 and B16 materials differently than Cardinal. Cardinal has received an informal confirmation of its interpretation from ASTM committee members involved in writing the standard. Cardinal is currently seeking formal confirmation, and if received, it will clarify that no problem esists. Otherwise, appropriate notice will be given.
- 3. Four purchase orders were identifi d where SA193 B7 mate-rial was cross-certified to SA320 Crade L7, where the required Charpy impact tests, performed by the mill, used Charpy Irod rather than Charpy V-Notch type tests. Empirical test data and informal metalurgical opi'nions indicate that the values reported for " lateral espansion" may, in fact, be more conservative using the Izod rather that the V-Notch methoo. In any event, we have lasted on Attachment 1, those heat numoers which would be affected under subsection NX23OO You will note from Attachment 1 that we have already re-tested many of these heats with the V-Notch method, and in each case the material passed. We are i currently completing the re-testing of all of the listed heats, l and will re-certify them where they heve been used in nuclear i applications. Additionally, we are reviewing our records to i determine, as to Charpy tests performed by Cardinal, whether we may have cut coupons, too close to the end of the material. To the extent we find any such instances, we will either re-test and re-certify the material or notify the customer. So far, all re-tested material has conformed to specifications,
- 4. We found isolated instances under prior Cardinal customer I
approved quality programs, where stock materials were either in-l advertently used for code applications without proper upgrade, or j where goods were furnished from vendors who were not surveyed and/
or audited until after the material supplied had been produced.
Those instances which were discovered have been reviewed with the i appropriate custome s. If we di sc over any f ur thet- such cases, we
{ will advise the affected parties.
1 1
I
We believe that Cardinal's Quality Assurance Program as currently constituted is an excellent one. Our goal has been and will continue to be to provide the highest guality parts to the nuclear industry. Moreover we believe that the NRC's input into Cardinal's Quality Assu'rance Program has been of significant benefit. We are delighted that Cardinal is the first organi-ration to gear our program fully to current NRC interpretations.
We will continue to stay abreast of such interpretations to in-sure that all products certified by Cardinal will meet or exceed the standards of the NRC, ASME, our customers and Cardinal.
We welcome these inputs into the bolting industry as we have I
long believed that such oversight is necessary to bring the in-dustry into full code and statute compliance, for the ultimate benefit of you the nuclear bolting user. I l
If you have any guestions or need additional information, please call me or Norm Henderson. We trust that we can count on l your cooperation and support. l Additionally, $4 are attaching, for your review, copies of a i supplement to.our Quality Assurance Manual which will apply to procurement.which invokes.our Quality Assurance Program end
- l either 10 CFR 50 Appendia D or N45.2 but does not invoke Section' !
11I of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vesse'l Code.
Sincerely, a C.hk Dennis C. Fielder i
President -
i i
l l ,
l
~3-l l
t
JUNE 20, 1984 ATTACHMENT 1 MATERIALS WHICH WERE IZOD TESTED A193 & SA193 B7 ALL THREAD STUD 5 SIZE AFFECTED HEATS (4) (1) (5) 1 1/8-8; 4525D .6882D ,9121E ,X107E ,X605D & X606D (3) (4)(5) 1 1/4-8: 5450D, 5408D, 3454A, 7536D ,9723D, 1500E & B724B (4) 1 3/8-8: 3454A, 54080, 5450D, 6409D, 5785D, 7212E ,9723D 9423E & 9814D ,,
1 1/2-8; N589D, 9525D, 7157D, 9106D & 8724D (4) (5) 1 5/8-8; 9233E, 9423E .9106D
-(4) .
(5) - - * -
1 3/4-8: 9425E & 380E-
~
(5) (5) (4)(5) (5) 1 7/8-8; 9892D, 9D26D, 7238D .9526D ,7762E .8724D (4) 2-8: 9526D (4)(5) (2) 2 1/4-8; D552B & 7315A (2) ', (2) (2) 2 1/2-8; 7315A , N825D & N630D NOTES:
1 - Tested at O Deg F per NX23OO with Charpy V-notch. Heat passed.
2 - Tested at 10 Dcg F per NX23OO with Charpy V-notch. Heat passed.
3 - Tested at 20 Deg F per NX23OO with Charpy V-notch. Heat passed. -
4 - Tested at 68 Deg F per NX23OO with Charpy V-notch. Heat Passed.
5 - Material being tested et O Dog F per NX23OO with Charpy V-notch.
O .
. JUNE 20,1984 CARDINAL INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS CORP. <
GAM SUPPLEMENT Supplement to Cardinal's Quality Assurance Manual. This supplement will apply to procurement which invokes Cardinal's Quality Assurance Program and either 10 CFR 50 Appendia B or N45.2 ;
but does not invoke Section III, of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessle Code. i A. PURCHASING Parts and/or materials may be purchased from surveyed and approved vendors as prescribed in the Quality Assurance Manual. As an alternate, vendors may be i
qualified thru other means such as evaluation of Quality program or product verification as outlined in "D" below at time of receiving inspection.
B. INSPECTION Per Quality Assurance Manual.
i C. CERTIFICATIONS .
Vendor Certification: Vendor certifications will not require a Guality Statement. but mus.t consist of a. Mill. . .
Sheet, Certified Materia,1 Test Report (CMTR) or a
- Certificate of Compliance (C of C). In the case of a C of C, heat numbers need not be known if product verification as delineated be' low is followed.
Cardinal Certification: The Cardinal Certification for '
material provided under this supplement shall bear the '
statement that the certification is issued sub J ect to the provisions of this supplement as approved by the customer.
Other data required by the purchase order will be given in the certification except Cardinal will not provide its QSC number. 1 D. PRODUCT VERIFICATION Raw Material: For carbon steel raw material, Cardinal will determine that the material is ferro-magnetic and that the hardness range is as espected for the grade of carbon steel. For all other raw materials, Cardinal will ;
additionally verify the chemical content of one piece of material and required mechanical testing and record such verification in the vendor certification file.
Finished Product: If carbon steel finished products are procured, Cardinal will verify that the material is i ferro-magnetic and that the product meets the hardness and mechenical properties of the invoked material spec- '
ification. The number of pieces tested will be as re-i quired by the referenced finished product specifi-cation. In the case of procurement for all other types of finished materials, Cardinal will additionally per-
- form a verification of chemistry on one piece of material This data will be included in the vendor certification file Page ,1 of 2
GAM SUPPLEMENT Page 2 of 2 E. MARKING All finishedcustomer applicable productsand will be marked in accordance with -
cases where Cardinal procuresspecification requirements.
finished products whichIn are properly marked, applied. no additional marking will be If product will be applied requires additional marking this by Cardinal prtor to shipment.
t I
6
'y !
l
[
1
. PULLMAN POWER PRODUCTS VENDOR QUALITY AUDIT
, CHECKLIST - NO: 1 .
O vENoon cooc "o: "-39 o^'" 7-2 -8) e^c e - ' og 2 AUDIT CODE If supplemental observations or clarifications are necessary indicate with
- under audit code and record on supplement sheet.
S SATISFACTORY U: UNSATISFACTORY N:NOT AUDITED X:NOT APPLICABLE NO . EVALUATION CODE OBSERVATIONS {
- 1. Record the latest approved revisto r Rev. No. 2 i
i date and number of the Vendor QA .Rev. Date 10-17-d0 L Manual. S l
Certifi-Proc. #, CSP 7.002 Proc.
Title:
cation Rev. Date 9-o-00 A/R Spec. -
Appropriate Approvals Eliason-Director QA
- 2. Record a few quality related pro- Storace Stain-!
3 Proc. # CSP 8.001 Proc.
Title:
less Sted cedures illustrating Rev. Dates, Rev. Date 9-6-60 A/R Spec. -
Accept / Reject criteria and necess- Appropriate ApprovalsEliason-Director OA ary cognizant approvals.
P.O. for Nuclear Level I Proc. # CSP 5.003-1 Proc.
Title:
Recuire.
Rev. Date 9-6-80 A/R Spec. -
Appropriate Approvals Eliason-Director QA
- 3. Record how proposed quality related Revisons are forwarded to each customer changes to the vendors quality pro- after internal approval. Consents by the gram are reviewed and accepted by S customer are resolved by letter on an the party qualifying the vendor. individual basic.
- 4. Verify that the organization chart C W. Eliason 2 D$roctor QA depicts the current operating Heads QA Program Title structure and authority is c1carly established. S M.J. Donovan Prer.ident Quality Head Reports To Title
- 5. Check organization chart to deter- Record manual references f or A, B, 6 C mine if the person or department and explain.
respensible for defining and impic- Quality Assurance Manual, Section 3 - All menting the overall ef fectiveness of the program is:
S three items are innlemented.
A. 1.'esignated in writing.
S. B. Independent f rom production presourcs.
C. Di rcet acc.ce.s to tanagement.
1
_- .c__--.
I
PULLMAN POWER PRODUCTS VENDOR QUALITY AUDIT CHECKLIST - NO: I .
DATE 7-91-81 op 12 h VENDOR CODE NO: V- 39 PAGE 2 AUDIT CODE If supplemental observations or clarifications are necessary Indicate with
- under audit code and record on supplement sheet.
S= SATISFACTORY U: UNSATISFACTORY N:NOT AUDITED X:NOT APPLICABLE NO. EVALUATION CODE OBSERVATICNS If authority is by generating NCR's,
- 6. Record how persons performing QA/ record several to justify:
QC functions have authority and organizational freedom to: S Quality Assurance Manual, Sections 11 & 17 A. Identify quality problems. 82038 - Nuts not to specification-customer B. Verify implementation to these accepted as is.
problems. 82033 - Bolts failed magnetic particlo test cracks and linear indications. Bolts re-jected.
- 7. Explain how management reviews the Review internal audits and manual revision adequacy of the program. and record.
The President signs and approves the QA Mcn 8
ual. Director of QA signs and aonroves Standard T'ractices. Internal Audits are forwarded to the President for review, cp-proval and/or implementation of corr. act$o'
),. Manual Ack. Old Rev. Retrv.
- 8. Review manual distribution lists Dist. To No. Recpt. or Destroyed to ensure: Bennett 169-2 yes Retrieved A. Controlled distributions. 3 Mazza 238-2 yes Retrieved B. Retrieval of outdated revisions.
Date of Expir. Qualified
- 9. Verify all NDE examination per- Personnel Qual. Date To sonnel are qualified to SNT-TC-1A P. Chave:: 8-18-79 8-18-82 MT-3 PT-?
where applicable. S G. Harris 3-24-81 3-24-84 MT,PT-3_
A.Tartavlia 7-31-81 7-31-84 RT,PT,g{-
- 10. Arc examinations performec in Proc. Proc. Title PPP Apprv. Dat.e accordance with procedures, ,_
appreved by PPI' as specified by l Pullman's purcha?ing specifications? p __,
C
,s j! N.D.!;. is perfomed by Eagle Intemannt ,;'.
I,unt.im . Procedures used arc an speci W '
or, c:id. customr'n purch uto order. Dr:P Intasmuntain 3:, on the Cardinal AVI..
0..
i PULI. MAN POWER PRODUCTS
,' i VENDOR QUALITY AUDIT CHECKLIST - NO: 1 C VENDOR CODE NO: V-39 DATE 7-91 81 PAGE 3 OF12 AUDIT CODE If supplemental observations or clarifications are necessary indicate with
- under audit code and record on supplement sheet.
5 SATISFACTORY U: UNSATISFACTORY N:NOT AUDITED X:NOT APPLICABL@
NO. EVALUATION CODE OBSERVATIONS Production
- 11. Verify if applicable procedures are Work Location Manager Dist. List posted at work stations. Record Proc. # & Title. wheck latest Proc. # CSP 5.003-1 Latest Rev.
approved dist. list and compare U Proc. Title PO for NuclearDate -
e.g. heat treating, welding, etc. Rev. Date 9-6-80 Proc. #_CSPll.001 Latest Rev.
Proc. Title Inspection Date -
Rev. Date 10-14-80
- 12. Is there a system incorporating Trav. # Hold Pt. Hold Pt. Verificatio mandatory hold points established 1256806 yes yes by QA or customer requirements.
3 Review and record a few process sheets to ensure adherence to hold ~
points. ' -
- 13. Review & record a few completed A. Trav. # 21 31501 QA Apprv.yes Et.6-3-82 4
process sheets to determine:
A. QA release (approval) to pro- B. yes Insp. Req.yes duction.
B. Necessary inspection require- S C, yes QA Apprv. yes D t . 6-15-f cents are stipulated.
C. QA has reviewed final process D. _y_es All Opr.
sheets fer acceptance. Complete?yes D. All operations are signed 6 dated. E. yes Procedures E. Applicable procedures are used Refer? YOS referenced.
- 14. Obtain a few material heat numbers Floor Certifiest:
(or vendor unique identification) Hte 43279 Ht.01npys from prod. floor and verify: Mat. Grd/ Type L7PD Mat.Grd/Typel#PD Traceability of materials, parts S Appvd. Supplier PO 9321 -Crucible Inc.
1 or components to specific inspectici Ht# I2655 4 He# lp655 i
or test records as, required by Mat. Grd/ Type L7 Mat.Grd/ Type~Q I Code.
Appvd. Supplicr10_03?b-Crucible Inc. T
PULLMAN POWER PRODUCTS _
VENDOR QUALITY AUDIT CHECKLIST - NO: 1 VENDOR CODE NO: V-39 DATE 7-91-81 PAGE 4 OF12 AUDIT CODE If supplemental observations or clarifications are necessary Indicate with
- under audit code and record on supplement sheet.
S: SATISFACTORY U:UNSATISFACTOP,Y N:NOT AUDITED X:f40T APPLICABLE NO . EVALUATION CODE OBSERVAT1ONS i Welder Process Material
- 15. Verify welding procedures and welders are qualified to Section D
.X i l
Proc. # Proc. Title PPP Appro. Date
- 16. Verify if welding procedures are submitted to Pullman Power Product s I for approval.
X O Size Type Heat Certification Appd.
- 17. Check filler metal containers.
Verify and record marking and traceability to certification by x heat & lot.
Proc. # Proc. Title Appd. By
- 18. Verify if heat treating is per-formed in accordance with approved procedures.
X
- 19. Pe ord the meacure of control of mee temperature by part or
. .me teepera ture.
X
-- x -
t
, PULLMAN POWER PRODUCTS VENDOR QUALITY AUDIT CHECKLIST - NO: 1 DATE 7-21-81 5 og 12 h VENDOR CODE NO: V-39 PAGE _
AUDIT CODE If supplemental observations or clarifications are necessary indicate with
- under audit code and record on supplement sheet.
S: SATISFACTORY U: UNSATISFACTORY N:NOT AUDITED X:NOT APPLICABLE NO. EVALUATION CODE OBSERVATIONS l
- 20. Record measures for temperature monitoring. If by thermocouples, y reccrd and verify thermocouple calibration frequencies.
- 21. Record and verify that the heating Record material, hold times, and coolinn and cooling races, maximum and min- cveles.
imum temperatures at specified times in accordance with code and y customer requirements. Verify by heat treat charts or CITR's.
J 22. Verify and record provisions for A. QA Manual, Section 14.
handling, storage and shipping requirements. ~
A. Record manual or proc. ref. 3 B. Are special provisions for handling stainless materials specified, c.g., nylen slings, B. Standard co=nercial practice as shown etc.? on CSP 14.001
- 23. 'n'h a t is the method used to ensure Control code assigned by QA, metal conponent traceability throughout stanped by receiving and verified by QA.
the nanufacturing process? What is }!aterial $dentified with metal stamp with thc method of identification? 8 bundles of material tacced with PO number, heat nu=ber and name of supplier.
i
- I
t PULLMAN POWER PRODUCTS VENDOR QUALITY AUDIT CHECKLIST - NO: 1 V- 39 DATE '7-21-81 v9 VENDOR CODE NO: PAGE 6 OF 12 AUDIT CODE If supplemental observations or clarifications are necessary indicate with " under audit code and record on supplement sheet.
S= SATISFACTORY U: UNSATISFACTORY N=NOT AUDITED X=NOT APPLICABLE NO. EVALUATION CODE OBSERVATIONS
- 24. Documentation of examinations and QA assigned code entered on the CPR prior tests are traceable to the material. to release of material for manufacture.
Record evidence of examinations per 3 formed and verify if the status indicator reflects the satisfactory ,
conpletion of the examination.
- 25. Record and verify how P.O.'s are reviewed and approved by QA prior ta PO comes to Director of QA who reviews issuing P.O. to their supplier.
requirements and approves by signature or rejects.
S G
V
- 26. Verify through objective evidence No transfer of code numbers allowed.
of transferrance of marking to cut Material remnants are transfered to a pieces, or by ref. manual para- separato department and used for commercit graph if transferrance of material orders only.
identification is not documented. 8
- 27. Record evidence indicating that NCR #2033 - Material returned to manufac-nonconforming items are reviewed turer.
for rejection, repair, rework and 8
final verification of dispositions. NCR #2038 - Materinl acceptable per cust.cr er authorization and shipped.
- 28. Ensure and record the measures A. NCR //2065 - Dispositioned by product.ic used to identify. nonconforming representative, Engineering representatitr material and the subsequent seg- and QA representative with QA controlling rer" 'sn until dispositions are
. S power.
- v. :licd and approved. Record.
cvidence of NCR's through the B. Yes.
'.; fo) lowing: (Continued on next
- >a ge )
I w . .- - -
~
PULt. MAN _ POWER PRODUCTS VENDOR QUALITY AUDIT CHECKLIST - NO: I h VENDOR CODE NO: V- 39 DATE 7-21-81 PAGE 7 OF 12 AUDIT CODE If supplemental observations or clarifications are necessary indicate with
- under audit code and record on supplement sheet.
S= SATISFACTORY U: UNSATISFACTORY N:NOT AUDITED X:NOT APPLICABLl NO. -
EVALUATION CODE OBSERVATIONS
- 28. A. An NCR was generated and who C. Yes
- Cont) dispositioned? 3 B. The traveler indicated the NCR.
C. The NCR disposition was veri-fled by QA.
- D. The rejected material was g D. Rejected material did not have red tagged, codes or segregated hold tag due to temporary shortage.
until disposition verification. But material was segregated in a hol6 area with a tag identifying all infog mation.
- 29. Verify that the vendors certified A. Yes 3
material test reports have pro-visions for: (as applicable)
A. Chemical Analysis B. Yes 3
B. Tests C. Heat treatment, hold temp- y, C.
erature and cooling method and time.
D. b' eld repairs (if applicable). x D.
E. If applicable, certificate no, and expiration date.
3 E. Crucible Inc.
Alloy Division Midland, PA 15059
- 30. Review and record the manufacturer's CMTR for PO!5655, heat #89099 - Quantitath CMTR to ensure that all test Chemical Analysis for ASTM A194,Grado 7 -
results and operations performed by S compared to 1980 ASTM specification.
tha =anufacturer or his sub- *
- atractor are in compliance with ti.e requirements of the material s;'ecifi ca t ion. Verify applicable
>- CMTR's to ensure this requirement.
PULLMAN POWED PRODUCTS VENDOR QUALITY AUDIT CHECKLIST - NO: I
?
O yENDOR CODE NO: V- 39 DATE 7-21-01 PAGE 8 op 12 AUDIT CODE If supplemental observations or clarifications are necessary Indicate with
- under audit code and record on supplement sheet.
S: SATISFACTORY U:UlJS AT I S F AC TORY N:NOT AUDITED X:NOT APPLICABLE NO . EVALUATION CODE OBSERVATIONS
- 31. If the manufacturer purchases stock Verify and record which method indicated material not qualified to an NCA- is applicable. Record objective evidencc 3800 program, they must ensure the to substantiate:
following requirements:
A. The material manufacturer per- X A.
forms or subcontracts all other requirements of the material -
specification on each piece of stock material.
B. A product analysis is to be S B. Certification required on actual mill performed on each heat or lot test reports for each heat and lot.
to verify chemical composition.
C. Verify no welding has been per- X C.
, . formed on stock purchased mat-V erial. -
D. These functions are performed S p. Statement on Test Report that materia) in accordance icith the material manufactured in accordance with QA manufacturers quality system system' audit and approved by Cardinal program, on 2-29-80.
1
- 32. Record manufacturers procedure to ensure that tools, gages and instrt-ments are calibrated and adjusted S QA llanual, Section 13 to specified intervals.
J
- 33. Obtain serial numbers of a few Instrument: Instrument:
measuring instrumants on floor and verify calibration requirements. CIO65 CI005 A. What is the frequency of S A. 90 days from A. 90 days from ti::m calibration? time put into put into service.
service. ,
B. Date calibrated. S B. 4-27-81 B. 6-1-81
./ In service date In service d::t.
5-13-81 7-17-81
~' -- --
P U l_l. M A N POWER NODUCTS VENDOR QUAL 1TY AUDIT CHECKLIST - NO: 1
. VENDOR CODE NO: V- 39 DATE 7-21-81 PAGE 9 OF 12 CODE if supplemental observations or clarifications are necessary
.,' AUDIT indicate with
- under audit code and record on supplement sheet.
S: SATISFACTORY U: UNSATISFACTORY N:NOT AUDITED X:NOT APPLICABLE NO. EVALUATION CODE OBSERVATIONS l
- 33. C. Date to be calibrated. S C. 8-13-81 c. 10-1-81 *
- Cont )
D. Serial number of master stan- S D. D.
dard used to calibrate instru- Standards provided by Ponam Precision cent. Gauges, Glendale, Ca.
E. Ensure master standards are S E. E.
traceable through NBS.
Yes, records received frca Ponam certify to NBS F. Are the gauges tagged to sig- U F. No F. No
- c. nify calibratiun dates.
J
- 34. If master standards are forwarded Ponam Precision Gauges provides card stat-to a calibration facility, ensure ing traceable to NES per l'.IL-C 15662A 4
S
, certification correlates with the st;mdard.
standard, e.g., identification, required and correct frequencies, etc.
- 35. Inquire and record if any gauges have been found out of the requirec l.es. Used on a commercial product. Cus-rnierance at calibration. If so, S temer accepted material aftcr being in-
- 1. :ord what steps were taken to f ,acd of out of tolerance gauge.
re:.olve previously inspected mat-crial with this gauge.
- 36. R. cord the QA Manual and/or proce-dure referonce to signify internal
,} audit requirements. OA NuS SWor. R Citrdenr.1 Staridard Practico 19.003
P U I.t.f1 A N Pnt/E R PRonjlC15 VENDOR QUALITY AUDIT CHECV, LIST - NO: I r
VENDOR CODE NO: V- 39 DATE 7_p1 81 PAGE 10 OF 12
~ AUDIT CODE I f suppictnental observations cr clari f ications are necessary indicate with " under audit code and record on supplement sheet.
$=SATIGFACTORY U: UNSATISFACTORY N:NOT AUDITED X:NOT APPLICABLE NO .{, EVALUATION ' CODE l OBSERVATIONS l
- 37. Obtz.in and record internal audit reports to verify:
/. . Record the audit frequency. 8 A'. Annually .
~
.B. Does the audit cover the total S B. Yes, 18 areas of 10CFR50, Appendix B.
quality system procrr.n?
C. Are chechlists used to conduct S C. YS?
the audit? .
D. Arc audit results revict.ed and S D. By the President and persons involved.
approved by canage::.ent?
E. What .cre the steps taken to. S E. Summary Report to direct co:pliance resolve audit findings? With QA program.
I' . Were follcatup measuren taken U F. At the time of the audit, Cardinal did and responses sufficicnt to
- not provide this auditor with any follc preclude rccurrance? up measures in order to determine if responses sufficient to preclude recur-rence G. Arc audits perforr.ied by t.rainec 3 G. Yes, Jim Tyrrell-Northwest Regional personnel not havian direct Manager.
respon: ibility in the areas they audit?
- 38. 1. a synten of pl.nned ..nd docu- .
u;nt.t d c::t er n.il audit r perfomed ti ye r I f y c emp i 1:.a . wi*t b .9.11 n.9 ec: .
v t h.e unpri i..:ra and n:pplis r : of 3 QA ianual, Section 8.
l . ? c;::: w v.,: .ctsice.. .
!!; cord re al rei, h $
PULLMAN POWER PRODUCTS VENDOR QUALITY AUDIT CHECKLIST - NO: 1 h VENDOR CODE NO: V- 39 DATE 7-21-81 PAGE 11 OF 1
AUDIT CODE If supplemental observations or clarifications are necessary indicate with
- under audit code and record on supplement sheet.
S SATISFACTORY U: UNSATISFACTORY N:NOT AUDITED X:NOT APPLICABLE NO .
EVALUATION CODE OBSERVATIONS {
- 39. Obtain and record external audit CopperweldSteelCo.,ASMECodeCerti{
reports to verify: ficate, N Code - N-2211 A. Record the audit frequency. S A. Every three years, initial audit 4/24/81.
B. Does the audit cover the total S B. Yes, ASI-E III, NCA 3800, Sunsber 1980 quality system program, addenda.
C. Are checklists used to conduct S C. Yes the audit?
") D. Arc audit results reviewed and approved by canagement?
S D. Performed by C.W. Eliason, Director of QA with no additional review.
E. tinat governing document or S E. ASE III, NCA 3800.
what specification is used to qualify the manufacturers ven-dor?
F. tihat were the steps taken to S F. Program adequate, no audit findingc.
resolve audit findings.
G. 1,'ere followup measures taken X G.
and responses sufficient to preclude recurranec?
!! . Arc audits perforned by trained S H. Yes, Director of QA.
personnel?
Y
PULLMAN POWER PRODUCTS
, VENDOR QUALITY AUDIT CHECKLIST - NO: I h VENDOR CODE NO:Y~ DATE 1 - 2.l T l PAGE 12 OF12 AUDIT CODE If supplemental observations or clarifications are necessary Indicate with
- under audit code and record on supplement sheet.
S= SATISFACTORY U: UNSATISFACTORY N=NOT AUDITED X:NOT APPLICABLE NO . EVALUATION CODE OBSERVATIONS
- 40. Shop drawings are approved to ensure Record drawings and verify requirements.
that materials, dimensions, fabri-cation require =ents and quality levels have been included.
f 00 Armyn u)y &w q^NJQ &w. LU Lu mo A%g g.
- 41. Pending drawing change due to revised specifications, record the mechanics used to withdraw the drawing and verify:
A. Docu=ent or tag used to iden- A.
tify asse=bly on hold for h drawing change.
B. Who issues change notice? -
B.
C. Does drawing reflect reason C. -
- for change?
D. Revisions to drawings are D.
handled in same manner as original.
l E. Does QA approve all changes to E, fab sheets?
I
- PULLMAN POWER PRODUCTS
+
~ '
DdTE: 7-21-81 VENDOR QUALITY AUDIT SUPPLEMENT SHEET ~
~~
~ "~ ' ' '
OF .2.
VU9 ~ PAGE 1 VENDOR CODE NO:
ITEM NO. -ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION 9
Henderson's PT, !!T and UT, Level III cortification is based on exeerience, not on examination.
11 A. There is no Distribution list which states the latest revision dates for Cardinal Standard Practices. There is a Cardinal Standard Practice Assignment sheet which includes the following information: 1. Name of individual receiving orocedure.
Date procedure issued. 4. Date
- 2. Person's initial for receiving procedure. 3 This and signature of' person stating have read and understood their resp'onsibilities.
Assirre.ent sheet does not list the Cardinal Standard Practices or revision dates.
There is a list orCardinal Standard Practices (see attachr.ent 21) used in coniunction with the Assignment sheet for. indoctrination purposes but it does not list procedure revision dates either.
B. In addition, during the audit of the Production ihnager's nroce'dures it was notice 9 that revised, outdated pages of CPS 3.8 and CPS 13 001 had not been removed from his rrocotre bcok. A rod X had bnen lined throuch the old pares and the new revised eages inserted into_the. book next to the old.
See Cardinal OA Manual Section 7-5, ANSI M45.2, Section 7. ASifE III NCA 3866.2 and 10CFR50, Aependix B,Section VI.
33F Per the Dir~octor of QA, the gauges are not tagged to signify calibration dates, due tc the constant presence of grease on the gauges.
The grease inhibits the adhesiveness of the tags and the connany has been unable to find a brand of taFs which will stick review of record.)
to the gauces. A. tickler file has been set up based on a monthlv of ga'tife's" plat into service. The file is based on the 90 day period free which caures are put into service and the conth that recalibration becomes due.
See ANSI Section N45.2, Section 13 0
wO em ~ - em Oew a--.-.-. -
e v .
PULLMAN P O'./ E P. PP.ODUCTJ VENDOR QUALITY AUDIT ., DATE: 8 '4-81 SUPPLEMENT SHEET -
VCNDOR CODE NO: V-39 -
PAGE 2 OF 2 ITEM NO. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR C'ARIFICATION L 37F Du ri nt- the Vendor Audit. the Director of QA was unable to provide follow-un measures taken on their current internal audit. The Director stated he would mail them to me for review. Find attached letters received on 8-3-81 including a statement by Jim Tyrroll, Northwest Regional Manager, who perfomed their internal auditor. He stated "that corrective action has been taken on all violations that were listed in the January 8,1981 (internal audit) report". Cardinal did not state what th'e follow-up measures were o'r include the responses so it could be detemined if they were suffi-cient to preclude recurrance. Pullman Corporate QA should detemine if Mr. Tyrrell's
, response is adequate to meet the Checklist #37F requirements.
O P
ew 4
e
==
m 6.
.e e
.ee e-e mme . _ _
g
@ D G . 6.~
. .. -- . - ~ ~ - - - ~ ~
-~~~~~~~.'~,
g T T AC A th C h) T Ml t .,
e QU/LITY ASSUPJJ:CE liANUAL STM DARD PRACUC.ES STANDARD PRACTICES cont.
3.001 0TGANIZATION 15.002 1 PUFJOSE 10DIFICATION 10 CPR 16.001 5 001 REFERD!CED Non-CONIDEMANCE' 2 QUAllTY ASSURM!CE CORRECTIVE ACTION &
PIOGRM4 DOCUICJ7S AUTIORIZATION 70 RD0RK 3 OlGM!1ZATION 5.003 PbRCHASE ORDERS FOR "19 001 INTERNAL AUDI75 NUCLEAR, IIVEL 1 4 DESIGN CON 710L 22.001 RECUIRE!C17S NDE .
5 P10 CURD:DJT DOCUMENT 26.001 7*001 CI FILE CONTE 0L OF COUPONS CONTTOL 6 D S7RUCTION,PR]CEDURES 27 001 PROCEDURE FOR AND DRAWIfGS 7 002 CERTIFICATION SUBMISSION OF COUPONS FOR 7 DOCU:c T CONTROL PROCEDURE 'pynSICAL TESTUU -
8 CONTTOL OF FURCHASID 7' REQUEST FDR AN ,28.001 0RDERDG & PRODUCDU
!'A'@IAL M:D SERVICES A!TJDED CARDINAL CARDINAL S'IOCK ITS'S 9 IDI2!TIFICAT10N A!!D CErlTIFICATION -
CON'liDL OF MATETlAIS, 7 004 PAR'IS AMD C0!?0D'2!7S QUALITY ASSURANCE .
REVIFJ OF OTHER RFQUIRDSMS iO Si UJIAL PlOCI5S DOCUIE!TATION 3.I$iSPECTION 8.001 S70RAGL-STAINLESS 52 TEST CON'JCL STEEL 13 CO::TIDL OF 12ASURl!G 9 001 IDENTIFICAHON &
AND 'IT,ST EQUIPMS!T MARKEG MATERIAIS 14 1UJD LIl. 9.001AROD S D RM ATION
- SHIPPDu} S7DE!.3E A::D 15 li:SPECTION, MT AND 9 002ADOLT BLANK '
OPERATIl:3 STATUS STREATION 16 ,
NON CON 7DFJIII:3 MA'jIRIA:
9 003 *' FINISHED PRODUCT U (OTd1ECTIVE ACTION 10.001 PURCHASE ORDER SPECIAL PPDCESS QUAD 1T ASSUR/J:CE 11.001 INSPECTION P2CO:OS 12.001 RECEIVIIG D:SPECT 19 AUDIT 12.002 1:0TICE OF REJECTIOH T1JME:3 13 001 CALIERATION OF I! DOC Tii1 NATION VEASURU:3 & '17.ST EQUIP.
21 1* CAPI OF GAGE DIOCK JOFJ:3 13.M3 INSPECTION & 'IEST
~~
E0lGP!S:7 & MAREDG E 14 001 1UJUL.IIG S70R GE -
l
& S111PPI,ID __
P/.CEAGlf'3 "Q" 1l. . I G3 , . , , ,
. A WheetaDrator - Frye Company
,v Log No.81-193 P. O. Box 3308. Reacn Road Weihamsport. Pennsytvania 17701 Te4ephone (717) 323 9991
.,y Pullman Power Products s Ue*, % w.inamwo,,
h V-39 R. Nott August 6, 1981 Cardinal Industrial Products 3873 West Quendo Las Vegas, Nevada 81918 Attention: Mr. M. J. Donovan President
Subject:
0;ality Assurance Program Audit conducted July 21, 1981 to ASME Section III, NCA-3800 Gentlemen:
We are pleased to advise that by virtue of satisfactory completion of a Pullman Power Products Quality Assurance Program audit conducted July 26.1981 in your facility, the approved status of Cardinal Industrial Products Las Vegas, Nevada has been included on our list of approved vendors for one (1) calendar year. Your firm has been classified as a Material Manufacturer qualified to furnish Steel Bolting & Fasteners intended for use in ASME,Section III, Class 1, 2 & 3 fabrication.
Your status is effective immediately. We reserve the right to conduct audits of your quality program and its implementation to verify con-tinuing compliance.
This qualification includes auditing and qualification of sub-tier suppliers to ASME,Section III requirements.
Thank you for the cooperation extended to Mr. Hudson during his recent visit and we look forward to working with you in the future.
Very truly yours, William L. Cox Senior QA Aufditor Quality Engineering Group WLC:cio cc: AVL Dist. List B
l
) -
PJil.LMAN POWER PRODUCTS
- o. '
- VENDOR QUALITY SYSTEM vet 100R CODE NO: V39 AUDIT CHECXLIST APPLICABLE TO MATERIAL MANUFACTURERS AND MATERIAL SUPPLIERS "t.'AME OF FACILITY CARDINAL INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, CO. DA E 7-21-81 MAILING ADDRESS 3873 West Oquendo, Las Vecas, Nevada PHONE AREA CODE +
89118 702-739-1966 FACILITY ADDRESS Same as above PLANT AREA IN SQ. FT. 60,000 80 TOTAL PERSONNEL IN COMPANY TOTAL PERSONNEL IN ENG. 1 N0. OF PERSONNEL IN QA 8 N0. OF PERSONNEL IN MFG. 40 NO. OF PERSONNEL IN QC -
GOVERNIt!G DOCUMENT 10CFF.50 ADnendix B. ANSI-N45.2. ASME III ORGANIZATION LINES OF AUTHORITY _ Director of OA direct to President TYPE OF PRODUCTS (S)* Fasteners CURRENT ASME CERTIFICATES N/A PERSONNEL CONTACTED NAMES (S) POSITION M.J. Donovan l
President t --
C.W. Eliason Director of Quality Assurance k, TYPE OF SURVEILLANCE
() (CHECK WHICH PERFORMED)
INITIAL AUDIT ,
l RE-AUDIT l XX l AUDITFOLLOWUPI l PREPARED BY: _Fnrold O. HudFen li.0. LL AA A TITLE: Lead A6ditor/Tntmel Auditor AUDITED BY: _Earold O. Hudson LA.D. A. Ahv TITLE: _ Lead Auditor /Intarnal Auditor (PULLMAN POWER PRODUCTS USE ONLY)
! AUDITOR RECCMMENDS l l SECTION III NON-NUCLEAR i QUALIFICATION FOR: ADDITION TO AVL XXX OTHER (ATTACH SHEET) l VENDOR
SUMMARY
REPORT lQEGCOMMENTS: ,
TITLE: DATE:
{QEGAPPROVAL: ,,
. Indicate explicit definition of Approved Product:(s) e.g. - If pipc-indicate Seamless or k'elded.
hTcre welded pipe is furnished indicate whether Wclded with or withed filler mul.
.r
- p[. PU,LLMAN POWER PRODUCTS DIVISION OF PULLMAN INCORPORATED VENDOR QUALITY AUDIT SUMMkRY REPORT AUDIT DATE: 7-21-81 VENDOR CODE NO: V-39 CL # "-
FACILITY: Cardinal Industrial Products DISTRIBUTION ADDRESS: _ 3873 West Ocucndo j Las Voras, Nevada 89118 I j GENERAL
SUMMARY
& EVALUATIONS Cardinal Industrial Products Company is recommended for continuation of the AVL upon corrective action of audit findings. Find attached Vendor Audit Action Request #1, #2, and #3 for Pullman Corporate review and upon confirmation, for submission to C.'rdinal for corrective action. The audit revealed that there is no Distribution List which states the latest revision dates for Cardinal Standard Practices and that the Production.
Hans cr'c Standard Practice book had revised, outdated procedures still inserted in his book after the new procedure was distributed. The audit revealed that measuring gauges were not tacged to sienify calibration dates. No record was available of follow-up measures taken concerning findings on their current internal audit. Except for the abovd h findings the Cardinal Quality Assurance Program is adequate as implemented.
A UDITOR: O CAA O. Ad.hte DATE: 7/27/81 AUDITOR POST AUDIT CONFERENCE M it fiedinen vere diceussed vith tha Diractor of Quality AsnINance. Recommendations vere nede to incrove distributions of Standard Practices. The tagging of measuring gaunca was di cussed, with the Director of QA explaining the reasons for the deficiency (cee Supplement Sheet, Item #33F). The Director stated that follow-up measures taken to their internal audit findings would be mailed to me for review. He was infor.nca that thir informt$cn would be recorted to Pullman Corcorate QA for their evaluation.
AUDITOR: O cudL D - b1A A DATE: ~l - 1 \ -S \
~
QEG COMMENTS:
O . . -.
QCG APPROVAL: .
APPROVAL DATE: _
,c VENDOR AUDIT 1
^ VAAR 8 VEND 0k CODE NO. V- 39 COMPANY NAME: COMPANY LOCATION:
CADDTNAI. IPDit.9TRI AL PRODUCTS 3873 West Ocuendo. Las Ven s , NV 80118 SUDMITTED TO: DATE: BY:
C.W. Eliason 7-21-81 IIarold Hudson FINDING:. (REF. DOCUMENT WHICM WAS VIOLATED) '
Checklist //11, Finding A - There is no Distribution List which states the latest revi-sion dates for Cardinal Standard Practices. '
Findine B - Revised, outdated cares of Cardinal Standard Practices 3.8 and 13.001 of
! the Production Manacer's book had not been removed from his procedure book. .A red X had been lined through the old pages and the new revised pages inserted into the book next to the old. ,
PPP Vendor Ouality Audit Checklist. Item #11 - Cardinal OA Manual. Section 7-5.
ANSI Nk5.P, Section 7. AS!fE III NCA 3866.2 and 100FR50, Appendix B,Section VI -
, violates intent but no seccific reference. '
ENDOR CORRECTIVE ACTION PROPOSED DUE DATE:
(INCLUDE ACTION TO PREVENT RECURP.ENCE)
O
-. = : :.. - . -.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PREPARED BY: TITLE:
l QEG COMMENTS (FOLLOW-UP) l 1
FIN-)!NG CLOSED BY MEANS OF h EVALUATION AND VERIFICATION SY: DATE: l TITLE: l I
i
~ *
, #* - VENDOR AUDIT.
VENDOR CODE NO. V-19 ACTION REQUEST AAR g 2
, COMPANY NAME: !
COMPANY LOCATION: '
CUtDTh'AL IND1TSTRTAL PRO?UCTS SUBMITTED TO: 3879 West Ocuendo, Las Ver as. NV 89138 DATE: BY:
C.W. Eliason 7-23-81 Harold Hudson FINDING ::
Checkligt 337- (REF. DOCUMENT WHICH WAS VIOLATED) '
Measuring cauces are not tagged to signify calibration dates.
PPP Vendor Quality Audit Checklist. Iten #33F, ANSI U45.2, Section 13.
NOTE:
Cardinal QA l!anual states control of measuring and test equioment will be in accordance with !!IL-C-45662 (seo CA Manual, Section 13-1) and has no specific re to tagging equipacnt. -
VENDOR CORRECTIVE ACTION PROPOSED ,
DUE DATE:
(INCLUDE ACTION TO PREVENT RECURRENCE)
I .
CORRECTIVE ACTION PREPARED BY; TITLE: -
.s QEG COMMENTS (FOLLOW-UP)
=
FINDING CLOSED SY MEANS OF EVALUATION AND VERIFICATION SY; DATE:
TITLE: _ __
-_ _g- .-
/ ;- te.-i n, n,ms. vme. .. a g
- VENDOR AUDIT ACTION REQUEST VAAR ll 3 VEriDO.k CODE 110. V- 39 .
COMPANY NAME: COMPANY LOCATION:
O CARDINAL INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS 3873..Oquendo, Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
- . . . ~ _ - -
SUDMITTED TO: ,
DATE: BY: ,
C.W. Eliason 8 1-81 1
Harold.Iludson FINDING: (REF.DOCUMEt[TWHICHWAS. VIOLATED) '
, Checklist #37F - At the time of the audit, Cardinal was unable to orovide a record of
, .! follow-upmeasurestakenconcerningfindingsonthei'rcurrentinternalaudit. A letter
'was received by this auditor on 8-3-81 from Cardinal stating that corrective action had
~
,, been taken on all violati_ons _ that were 11sjed in their internal audit recort. But the i
)
letter did not include resconses to the audit' findings in 6ider to detemine if they were sufficient to preclude recurrance. ~
. ' Vendor _9pli tv Audi t Checklist Il37FJMI, NCA-%60.2. A'5I Mhs.2. Sa* inn lo l
l VENDOR CORRECTIVE ACTION PROPOSED DUE DAT5:
CINCLUDE ACTION TO PREVENT RECURRENCE)
O
\
\
' ^*
1 CORI.ECTIVE ACTION PREPARED BY: TITLE: .
..s .. _ . -
QEG COMMENTS ~(FOLLOW-UP)*
~
c
.-_ __ = ~_ - .. . - .... - - .. - - . . . . . . . . .
FlMDING CLOSED GY ANT OF *
) EV'LUATICN AND VL I CA T.I.0: L.D.Y. L.. ,_ . _ _ _ _ _ __,._ . , D A T E : , , . _ , , , . . _
' TITLE: . _ . _ . - . . . . . . _ . . . ......
a _
_- - - x __ _. - -_ = .- -== = - - --
-.v.~.. . . .
.i....-......----.---.-..-.-..--.-.._
/ copy . Z dy pd INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE t c.,y H. /Gara e
~
February 27,1951 ', / r / i. . -
SATE To W. L. Cox .
FROM A. A. Eck suanci Cardinal Bolt -
<=
Per request from the Diablo Canyon Project, please keep Cardinal.
Bolt current on the AVL. Dg will continue to use very heavily over the next few years.
As a reminder from the Site, they are due to expire on the AVL 6/27/81.
As a recomendation, it would be practical to use Harold
- Hudson of Diablo to conduct this Audit. The necessary procedures, checklist, etc., could be made available from your office.
$$ $c A. A. Eck AAE/ lam cc: H. W. Karner - Diablo
- File-
. B
- 9 e
\ .
'\
h NgN Ny
,SN . .
.