ML20099H754

Affidavit of CC Stokes Supporting Jl Mcdermott & Tj O'Neill 840731 Petition Re Failure of NRC to Honor Rules of Allegation Mgt Program & Matl False Statements by Util in Response to Previous Allegations

ML20099H754
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	01/18/1985
From:	Stokes C GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT
To:
Shared Package
ML20099H479	List: ML20099H476 ML20099H502 ML20099H527 ML20099H559 ML20099H574 ML20099H606 ML20099H626 ML20099H649 ML20099H663 ML20099H728 ML20099H754 ML20099H775
References
2.206, NUDOCS 8503190481
Download: ML20099H754 (2)

Text

. . , ..

Exhibit 11 -

,, u+ . . - m w a ..w. m a,.,aaa:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the matter of )

)

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC ) Docket Nos. 50-275 t COMPANY ) 50-323

)

(Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power )

Plant, Units 1 and 2) )

)

AFFIDAVIT OF CHARLES C. STOKES 0

Stote of ALA6AM A )

ss county of Mousrou )

City of doTHAV )

Tho above being duly sworn deposes and says: .

My name is Charles Stokes. I am submitting this statement frcely and voluntarily without any threats, inducements and coer-cien to Mr. Thomas Devine. This affidavit raises additional ccncerns about the NRC staff's failure to honor the rules of its own j Allegation Management Program, and about material false state-l Ccnts by Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PGandE) in response to l provious allegations I had submitted.  ;

1. PGandE f alsely stated that the American Institute of Steel

! Ccnstruction (AISC) has endorsed the analysis of Australian papers thot appear to support the use of structural steel " angles",

cince according to an AISC representative the Institute merely i presented the papers and the AISC Specifications Committee has l not met, discussed nor approved the use of the Australian papers.

hhg31 DO [5 l 0 t 1 ,

. - _ _ _ _ _ _ = - _ .

2. PGandE falsely stated that the analysis in the Australian pcpers on structural steel angles is applicable for conditions at Dicbio Canyon; since the Australian analysis is based on " pure ,,

bending", which significantly underestimated the loads on the ottel, compared to the compression.and tension combined with b:nding at Diablo Canyon.

3. I have never received any written confirmation of the ollegations I raiced to Region V, as required by their Allegation Menagement Program, although In October that region did provide written summaries of two a21egations I had made earlier to RCgion III and which were forwarded to Region V.

4. Contrary to the thorough practices at Region III, Region V did not note in its report the corrections I made to the staff cnolysis in a June followup interview for my allegations on welding docign at Diablo Canyon, nor did Region V even note my rebuttal in its published findings, which led me to believe that my cccments were not considered and my time had been wasted through ,

o ceaningless public relations gesture.

I have read the above two page affidavit and it is true, cccurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

b _lA Charles C. Stokes Sworn to and Subscribed before me is 18e day of Jan ary, 1985.

JAdAt Y tary Puglic~

My commission expires: 6/10/86 2