ML20087C986

From kanterella
Revision as of 14:11, 14 April 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Brief Description of Epithermal Neutron Beam Using Fission Converter & Major Safety Features
ML20087C986
Person / Time
Site: MIT Nuclear Research Reactor
Issue date: 04/26/1995
From: Bernard J
NUCLEAR REACTOR LABORATORY
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9508100122
Download: ML20087C986 (9)


Text

7 y

'O

. . +y I

NUCLEAR REACTOR LABORATORY AN INTERDEPARTMENTAL CENTER OF

^

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY r

^>u; ' X O. K. HARLING 138 Albany Street. Camtridge, Mass. 0213S4296 J. A. BERNARD. JR.

Dr% tor Telefax No. (617) 253 7300 Drector of Reactor Operabons Telex No. 921473-Mir-CAM '

Tel No. (617) 253 4202 April 26,1995 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Attn: Document Control Desk

Subject:

Item of Information Concerning Use of a Fission Converter for the Generation of an Epithermal Neutron Beam Gentlemen:

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology is in the process of designing a fission converter for the purpose of generating an epithermal neutron beam. Enclosec. is a brief description of the design and an enumeration ofits major safety, features. 'Ihis is provided

~

to you as an item of information. Detailed technical information will be provided upon completion of the design studies later this year.

Sincerely, AN CL John A. Bernard, Ph.D.

Director of Reactor Opera 'ons MIT Research Reactor JAB /CRM cc: USNRC - Senior Project Manager, NRR/ONDD USNRC - Region I- Project Scientist, Effluents Radiation Protection Section (ERPS)

FRSSB/DRSS j oo.- r\

  • 8 9508100122 DR 950426 ADOCK 05000020 PDR -

Di g

=

1 l

Epithermal Neutron Beam Using A Fission Converter Prepared by Professor Otto K. Harling, Project Director July 27,1995 Introduction Recently the pace of R&D in neutron capture therapy (NCT) for y cancer has been accelerating [Ref.1]. Clinical trials have been initiated at 1 the MIT Reactor (MITR-II) and at the Brookhaven Medical Reactor. An European collaborative effort is poised to begin trials-in the near future, and q Japanese researchers are continuing their clinical trials using several reactors j

[Refs. 2,3,4,5]. The advantages of using epithermal rather than thermal neutron beams for deep seated tumors have been clearly demonstrated  !

1 [Refs. 6,7]. .

I An improved epithermal beam at the MITR-II would be very useful in i the current near term clinical trials and is essential for future Phase III l clinical trials and for routine application of NCT should this treatment become an accepted approach to cancer therapy. An improved epithermal neutron beam for NCT has been designed at the MIT Nuclear Reactor Laboratory. This beam uses a fission converter as a source of neutrons. The i converter, can be composed of any suitable fissionable fuel. We have based most of our studies upon the use of standard MITR-II fuel elements, both  !

fresh fuel and fuel which has been discharged from the MITR-II. In the  !

following sections an overview of the preliminary design for this facility is l presented and safety features are outlined. This overview of the current design is provided to the NRC as an item ofinformation. It is hoped that by doing this the formal and detailed request for the necessary approvals, which  ;

we expect to prepare in the future, will require a shorter review because the 1 request will have addressed all NRC concems. We would therefore appreciate any comments and/or guidance that NRC can provide on our preliminary design.

1 Overview of Design  !

The fission converter based epithermal neutron treatment facility is shown schematically in Fig.1. This figure is taken from Ref. 8, which provides the neutronic design of the facility. A copy of Ref. 8 is attached.

The neutron source for the converter-based beam is created by the MITR-II i

. 2 7

fuel, which is located in a water-filled tank . The fueled tank is located near ,

l the core side of the reactor's thermal column, where the unperturbed thermal heutron flux is 1-2x EXP 12. Monte Carlo calculations show that a converter, using 12 MITR-II fuel elements will generate 90-210 kW at a i reactor power of 5 MW. The power depends on whether spent or fresh fuel l is used and whether the water cooling is achieved with light or heavy water.  !

The converter operates with a k-effective which is much less than one.  !

Typically this important parameter is in the range of 0.4-0.6 with D 2 0/H2 O coolant for the configurations ofinterest. The fission neutrons from the converter are moderated and filtered to a beam of the desired energy with a low background of undesired thermal and fast neutrons and of gamma rays. I After collimation the epithermal beam is incident upon the target, which I might typically be a human head / brain for the treatment of virulent brain

tumors. We have carried out extensive neutronic calculations using the MCNP Monte Carlo program. These calculations show that our converter-based beam will have a high intensity of desired neutrons in the 1 eV-10 kev range and negligible components of fast neutrons and gammas in the treatment beam. l The converter fuel elements are located in a double-walled aluminum

, tank which will have a leak detector in the air space between the tank walls.

, Level and temperature measurements am also provided for the cooling water 1- in the tank. Figure 2 provides a schematic of the fuel tank and cooling i

system. The cooling circuit for the converter uses a separate heat exchanger

to transfer heat to the secondary system of the reactor. A circulating pump is used to force the coolant, either light or heavy water, through the heat
exchanger. The fuel in the fuel tank has its heat removed to the water by natural convection. This assures that a coolant pump failure will not cause d

rapid changes in fuel temperature since the entire heat capacity of the

, ~ 246 gallon fuel tank is available as a thermal buffer. The normal operating

temperature of the fuel clad is 70 C, i.e. well below the onset of nucleate boiling on the surfaces of the fuel plates. The time dependence of the fuel I temperature in the event of cooling pump failure has been calculated and is shown in Fig. 3. A considerable time, 2100 minuter, is available after pump or cooling pipe failure before any actions are needed to prevent potential fuel I damage. Lowering the cadmium curtain in front of the converter reduces the converter power by two orders of magnitude, requires only ~10 sec, and is independent of the continued operation of the reactor Reactor shutdown

, provides the ultimate backup to reducing converter power if the cadmium shutter failed to operate.

i

3 The converter fuel is loaded and unloaded in a manner which is very similar to the way these functions are handled for the MITR-II. A fuel iransfer cask is positioned above the fuel tank and irradiated fuelis transferred through the water into or out of the shielded transfer cask. The fuel in the fuel tank is positioned in a grid. A linear array of up to 12 fuel elements can be loaded.

Patient safety is assured by observing carefully developed written procedures and hardware systems to help assure precise dose control. These procedures will be comparable to those which have been developed for use with the existing medical beam at MITR-II. The hardware systems used for patient dose control will include a fast-acting shutter placed directly in front of the patient position and a cadmium shutter directly in front of the converter fuel. The possibility of rapid reactor shutdown provides the ultimate backup for tuming off the treatment beam. Beam monitors and n:adout systems currently used at the MITR-II medical irradiation facility will be adapted for use at the fission converter based epithermal treatment beam and will help assure that the patients receive the prescribed dose.

Reactor and medical staff will be protected against unnecessary radiation exposure by the shield walls of the medicalirradiation room. Only the patient will be in this room when the beam is allowed into the room.

This is exactly the same approach which is used with the current medical beam and is similar to that which is used at conventional radiotherapy facilities.

Summary of Safety Features Water cooled fuel in a double walled tank Convection cooling of fuel Long time periods before temperature can reach boiling if the heat removal system for the fuel tank fails MITR-II fuel elements capable of much higher power densities will be

used The k-effective will be much less than 1, typically less than 0.6 Fuel will be handled similarly to fuel at MITR-II The treatment beam is controlled by two shutters and is backed up by the reactor shutdown options Radiation dose will be monitored by a currently used and proven system Radiations will take place in a shielded room

- O, 4

References

1. D. E, Wazer, R. G. Zamenhof, O. K. Harling, and H. Madoc-Jones,

" Boron Neutron Capture Therapy," Chapter 7 in: Radiation Oncology Technology and Biology, P. M. Mauch & J. S. Loeffler, eds., W. B.

Saunders, Company, Philadelphia,1994, pp.167-192.

2. R. L. Moss, " On the Progress Towards Clinical Trials at Petten (Post-Sydney)" in: Advances in Neutron Capture Therapy, A. H. Soloway, R. F. Barth, and D. E. Carpenter, eds., Plenum Press, New York, 1993, pp. 739-743.
3. Y. Nakagawa, T. Kageji, H. Hatanaka, K. Mukai, K. Kitamura, F. Tsuji, K. Kanda, and T. Kobayashi, " Thermal Neutron Capture Therapy for Brain Steam and Skull Base Tumors: Heavy Water and Multiportal Neutron Delivery," in: Advances in Neutron Capture Therapy, A. H. Soloway, R. F. Barth, and D. E. Carpenter, eds.,

Plenum Press, New York,1993, pp. 671-675.

4. Y. Oda, M. Takagaki, Z. H. Zhang, H. Kikuchi, T. Kobayashi, and K. Kanda, " Clinical Experience with BNCF for Malignant Brain Tumors," in: Advances in Neutron Capture Therapy, A. H. Soloway, .

R. F. Barth, and D. E. Carpenter, eds., Plenum Press, New York,  !

1993, pp. 689-693.

i

5. H. Hatanaka, J. H. Goodman, and M. E. Miner, " Current Standard Boron Neutron Capture Therapy with Shionogi's Mercaptoundecahydrododecarborate for Malignant Glioma," in:

Advances in Neutron Capture Therapy, A. H. Soloway, R. F. Barth, and D. E. Carpenter, eds., Plenum Press, New York,1993, pp. 695-698. ,

6. S. D. Clement, J. R. Choi, R. G. Zamenhof, J. C. Yanch, and O. K. l Harling, " Monte Carlo Methods of Neutron Beam Design for Neutron 1 Capture Therapy at the MIT Research Reactor (MrrR-H)," in:

Neutron Beam Design, Development, and Performance for Neutron Capture Therapy, O. K. Harling, J. A. Bemard, and R. G. Zamenhof, . l eds., Basic Life Sciences, Vol. 54, Plenum Press, New York,1990,  ;

pp. 51-69. l

7. J. C. Yanch and O. K. Harling, "A Comparison of Epithermal Neutron Beams for NCT: Effect of Beam Collimation on Therapy

4

^

.5

, Parameters," in: Advances in Neutron Capture Therapy, A. H.

. Soloway, R. F. Barth, and D. E. Carpenter, eds., Plenum Press, New York,1993, pp. 67-70.

8. O. K. Harling and W. S. Kiger III, "High-Intensity Fission-Converter-Based Epithermal Neutron Beam for Neutron Capture Therapy,"

Proceedings of the 6th Intemational Symposium on Neutron Captum Therapy for Cancer (ISNCT), October-November 1994, Kobe, Japan, to be published in Cancer Neutron Capture Herapy.

I i

_ . . _ _ _ _ --___________-_____.-_______-__-__________-_.-_-____.____m_ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - .

~m

~

r > r>

~

, [ N s, .

Ca.drrliQrti - e w - '

. ~

e o, mm ~ , ,, .

~,

. - -C.ur-tain., .: ,

1 Deler-33

==

!! s..

"= "

i. .  ::

== Pis.sion Cotivert .

x Mir > .

it . .

Filfeb/Moder'at or

=  !!

. - Be.am B:au.tter~ 2

.~ ... ~

):C

- 4 . ..' 2 Ni.ekel. Ile? lector

. ~  : , -  !! .

P.p==.i.s 4!! ' . ' . Bistriu.th ..

k:.-.. .

=. ~.  %.,y ,ss'

=====. . === ==. . . ,  :

..=====

=====; .

,, ~

~ :wn iiia: ""e/

.e .I ~ .

imagg +

22555 4 %n \

m!"

. /

/* .g /

-k.

s'Ii 185551:

'e -

53EE55E .EEEEE I

-5EEE===EEEEEE k . s iE5555=- .

============= y i// -

3

._.===sr ===sia!!!!!!!

=======- ======== -

s s

~~,,;-

======= .=.=.==.======/,,-

.-===

~-

- :=====.

/' .--ageaa =eaaaaaa =======zea181=

======= , ,, #- '-

Reclining

'E!! 5!!!!!!!! !!!E" -

a

-iunisiynlillPWin!4 Or Sitting '.

- , . o

' 'o/' a it== .

.=gegege=

Bismuth

=

NNH , G, * . .

ieegaeagaa: , 82 4

=-= i  ; '

s i' .

- - . . .-  : Collimator n-  ! -

(

~.

l 0:5 - trim . Cd. . .

.a ,

a re, . , .

.~.

~

t s

+

~ <

s .

s.

_ ) -

Figure 1

i ISOMETRIC VIEW OF FISSION CONVERTER OUTLET PIPE p INLET PIPE

,- +

INLET PIPE r BAFFLES *

\ INNER TANK (11nch

'i thickneen except the front plate is 1/2 inch)

LOUTER TANK 14*-3 6/f (1/4 inch thicknese) i ALUMINUM BLOCK

.I

UPPER GRID TO HOLD THE FUIL l

MITR H FUEL LOYER GRID gamuf 88N TO HOID THE FUEL l.

k J

Figure 2 W

+ , - - ~ n--,. ,a,w --- - - - , - - . ,,+---,-w _ , , , . . . - + -

.__-.___.,-,_--.___-_,,----------n..,,,,.

,------e e- -, --r- - - - --

4 T

e Fuel Clad Transient Temperature During LOCA 120 -

i 3 Boiling Heat Transfer

. Critical Heat Flux 110 - '

S -

2 s

b

. i g

3

  • 0 ^

h i

u. l k

8 #

J m@

70 O 20 40 60 80 100 Time (min.)

Figure 3 i

.- - . , ,