ML040360557

E-mail from Rebeca Smith to Linda Smith Regarding Timeline

ML040360557
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	03/05/2003
From:	Nease R NRC Region 4
To:	Laura Smith NRC Region 4
Shared Package
Ml040360400	List: ML040360541 ML040360549 ML040360551 ML040360557
References
FOIA/PA-2003-0358
Download: ML040360557 (2)

Text

r1la-wacce. 114E;CEk - I imemi'le Page ii Pacie

- aarnew From:

To:

Rebecca Nease /,

Smith, Unda e m)

Date: 3/5/03 2:19PM

Subject:

Timeline attached remember it looks better when viewed thru WP S

(5'>4,¢

nurieccL" Nua= - UI IIrikre Po Page I .

Timeline ANO FP Finding Inspection: June 11 - 22, 2001 Exit: August 3, 2001 Report: August 20, 2001 Phase 2: August 2001 Phase 2 resulted in YELLOW TIA: September 10, 2001 Backfit Claim: September 28, 2001 Backfit Panels: October 26, 2001, and January 17, 2002 TIA response: Aug. 20, 2002 received Draft Phase 3_from NRR Phase III complete: revised by Troy and agreed upon by NRR,_date?j Backfit Response: April 15, 2002a(held upi lue t coordination with NRR's response to NEI)

SERP Dec. 10, 2002 requested we look into issuing a finding w/a o SERP January 24, 2003, agreed o 5 /

Reasons that this issue wasn't processed law timeliness goals:

SOP SDP for fire protection is inadequate for findings of this -type- manual actions outside CR. A Phase 3 was required.

Phase 3 NRR took 11 months to perform the Phase 3 Revised Phase 3 Phase 3 received from NRR was incorrectf _nd had to be revised by RIV SRA. The SERP agreed with Ii s f Backfit claim ANO claimed the violation was a backf it.

ReBackfit ________

backfit panel was convened. The violation waos-uphed and ANO's backtit claim I denied. l Coordination Results of the backfit panel were held to coordinate with NRR's response to very similar generic claim by NEI that required ASLB approval.

ReSEiRP In I1st SEF, _ ever7'-

though the backf it panel upheld the violation, and NR'sresponse to NEI supported RIV's position. The violation was approved by the ReSERP.