ML040360557
| ML040360557 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 03/05/2003 |
| From: | Nease R NRC Region 4 |
| To: | Laura Smith NRC Region 4 |
| Shared Package | |
| Ml040360400 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2003-0358 | |
| Download: ML040360557 (2) | |
Text
r1la-wacce. 114E;CEk - I imemi'le Page i
- aarnew
Pacie i From:
Rebecca Nease /, e m)
To:
Smith, Unda Date:
3/5/03 2:19PM
Subject:
Timeline attached remember it looks better when viewed thru WP 4,¢ S
(5'>
nurieccL" Nua= - U I IIrikre Po Page I.
Timeline ANO FP Finding Inspection:
Exit:
Report:
Phase 2:
TIA:
Backfit Claim:
Backfit Panels:
TIA response:
Phase III complete:
Backfit Response:
SERP SERP June 11 - 22, 2001 August 3, 2001 August 20, 2001 August 2001 Phase 2 resulted in YELLOW September 10, 2001 September 28, 2001 October 26, 2001, and January 17, 2002 Aug. 20, 2002 received Draft Phase 3_from NRR revised by Troy and agreed upon by NRR,_date?j April 15, 2002a(held upi lue t coordination with NRR's response to NEI)
Dec. 10, 2002 requested we look into issuing a finding w/a o
January 24, 2003, agreed o 5
/
Reasons that this issue wasn't processed law timeliness goals:
SOP SDP for fire protection is inadequate for findings of this -type - manual actions outside CR. A Phase 3 was required.
Phase 3 NRR took 11 months to perform the Phase 3 Revised Phase 3 Phase 3 received from NRR was incorrectf
_nd had to be revised by RIV SRA. The SERP agreed with Ii s
f Backfit claim ANO claimed the violation was a backf it.
ReBackfit backfit panel was convened. The violation waos-uphed and ANO's backtit claim I
denied.
l Results of the backfit panel were held to coordinate with NRR's response to very similar generic claim by NEI that required ASLB approval.
Coordination ReSEiRP In I1st SEF, ever7'-
though the backf it panel upheld the violation, and NR'sresponse to NEI supported RIV's position. The violation was approved by the ReSERP.