ML050540286

From kanterella
Revision as of 04:44, 24 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
E-Mail, R. Schin to E. Brown, P. Qualls and M. Salley Regarding Hatch Denial of NCV - Additional Information
ML050540286
Person / Time
Site: Hatch  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 10/23/2003
From: Schin R
NRC/RGN-II
To: Ellen Brown, Qualls P, Markhenry Salley
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
FOIA/PA-2004-0277
Download: ML050540286 (1)


Text

,_arles R. Ogle -Hatch Denial of -NCV-- A~dditional information C~age i7 \

N TharlesR.Ogle Hatch Denial of NOV-Additional information raoei .

From: Robert Schin; z To: Brown, Eva; Qualls, Phil; Salley, Mark Date: 10/23/03 11:09AM

Subject:

Hatch Denial of NCV - Additional information Based on additional verbal information received today, Hatch contends that the local manual operator action, to place the battery chargers in service after a fire and loss of offsite power, is allowed by NRC regulations and does not need an exemption.

They base this on words in III.G.1, which states 'One train of systems necessary to achieve and maintain hot shutdown conditions from either the control room or emergency control station(s) is free of fire damage." Hatch claims that the local manual actions are considered to be 'emergency control stations' as permitted by III.G.1.

Does the NRC have anything in writing stating that 'emergency control stations' are not applicable to III.G.2 fire areas?

CC: O'Donohue, Kathleen; Ogle, Charles R.; Payne, Charlie "A/